Rugby fails to fire this year on TV
Related coverage
Australian rugby may have been a big hit on TV screens last year but the same can’t be said for 2012.
The Waratahs anus horriblis, the Reds mid-season form slump and ordinary seasons from the Force and Rebels meant that rugby union has failed to rate with the same power in did in 2011.
The lack of the Rugby World Cup effect, as well as the introduction of several afternoon games and the unpredictable form of the Wallabies has combined to see rugby fail to capitalise on the gains of last year.
The Super Rugby season started with a solid result, 193,000 tuning in nationally to see the Reds’ dramatic last second opening round win over the Tahs.
That was the highest rating sports broadcast in week 8, beating AFL’s NAB Cup and the cricket.
The next weekend, with the return of the NRL, was not so good. No Super Rugby game was in the top 10 or rated higher than 112,000.
In week 10 (round 3 of the Super Rugby season) the Reds vs Rebels at Suncorp managed to sneak in at 10th place with 136,000 viewers.
The next weekend the derby match of the Tahs vs the Force pulled in 134,000, which placed 7th in the top ten.
The following weekend Super Rugby managed to snag 9th and 10th place with the Rebels vs Force receiving 130,000 and the Waratahs vs Sharks getting 99,000.
Round 6 of the Super Rugby season saw no match pick up more than 129,000 viewers, with the Force vs Reds failing to interest viewers, while round 7 was the same story – no Super Rugby game in the top ten, with the Reds vs Brumbies not receiving an audience higher than 145,000 viewers.
In Round 8 no game rated higher than 173,000 or was in the top 10, but in Round 9 the Waratahs vs Rebels game was the 9th highest sports program for the week and pulled in 149,000. Round 10 failed to fire ahead of NRL or AFL, with nothing over 194,000, and in Round 11 the Brumbies vs Tahs clash wasn’t watched by more than 162,000.
In Round 12 no games rated over 167,000, Round 13 also had nothing in the top 10 and nothing higher than 181,000, the same as Round 14 which had nothing higher than 200,000.
In Round 15 nothing was watched by more than 153,000 and then we had a four week international break. The Wallabies headed to Newcastle to play a mid-week Test against Scotland and then had a three-Test series against Wales.
Channel Nine bumped the Scotland game to a late-night timeslot and less than 165,000 metro free-to-air viewers tuned in. On Fox Sports live coverage of the game was much better received – 256,000 watched Australia lose in terrible conditions, which was the fourth highest rating sports broadcast of that week.
For the Wales-Wallabies clash at Suncorp, 258,000 watched on pay TV and 288,000 metro viewers watched on Nine.
The next Wales Test received audiences of 305,000 metro viewers on Nine and less than 227,000 national viewers on Fox, as the match failed to score in the top 10. The third and final Test, this time played in the afternoon in Sydney, had a poor result. While a record crowd attended at Allianz for the 3pm kick-off, only 142,000 watched on Fox Sports and just 212,000 on Nine.
We then returned to Super Rugby action for Round 16, with games such as the Force vs Brumbies, but nothing was watched by more than 121,000 viewers. In Round 17 again no Super Rugby game was in the top ten, with nothing rating higher than 148,000, and in the final Round (18) there was a little change. With finals places for the Brumbies and Reds on the line, the Reds vs Tahs match was watch by 176,000 and was the eighth most watched sports program of that week.
Plenty of necessary raw data – now for the analysis.
What do all those figures tell us? Well, a few obvious things, for starters.
The Waratahs have the largest fan base and attract the most TV viewers – which was not surprising considering they represent the largest player base and biggest state. And their poor season has not only hurt their pulling potential but the overall figures for Australian rugby as a whole. People have turned off the Tahs this year.
The Reds set 2011 alight with brilliant, attacking rugby. For a number of reasons, that has not happened this year. Injuries, new debutants and the improvement of other teams has meant the Queensland team has not been able to replicate its 2011 run.
They are still in the hunt to defend their title, but it appears unlikely they will win again. Their 2011 semi and final pulled in huge TV ratings but it’s a long shot for this to happen this year.
The Brumbies have a smaller fan base than the Tahs and Reds but have had an outstanding 2012 – apart from the last round. But their rugby hasn’t really been the most pleasant on the eye, grounding out teams and playing a tough but consistent kind of defensive rugby more common in South Africa.
I say this as a Brumbies fan, and while winning is the ultimate, they don’t seem to have been able to pull in other Aussie fans to watch this ACT side like the great attacking Brumbies teams of 1999-2004 did.
The Force and Rebels are still developing, building their fan bases and their brands. But both sides haven’t had great seasons on the field this year, or won many games, which can’t have helped the ratings.
Injuries across all five franchises has also played a big part – we have missed the talents of the great entertainers like Quade Cooper, Kurtley Beale, James O’Connor and others. These players not only bring in more rugby fans they also attract the neutral sports fans.
Compounding all of this has been the play of the Wallabies. They lost to Scotland in one of the worst conditions and worst games in recent memory (I was there, and 30 minutes of one-out pick and drive puts most people to sleep).
They then beat Wales 3-0 in a series that had its exciting and dramatic moments but wasn’t edge-of-your-seat stuff. Tries were hard to come by and the Wallabies kicked a lot. This didn’t excite the fanbase and the ARU needs the Wallabies to play entertaining rugby. Poor coverage from Channel Nine hasn’t helped either.
Another fact has been the capture of the AFL rights by Foxtel and the huge investment the pay TV broadcaster is making in the sport. AFL has rated well on pay TV all year, has its own dedicated channel and Foxtel is doing all it can to promote the code to its existing subscriber base.
I believe there are some warning signs for the ARU. Super Rugby is regularly out-rated on pay TV by both NRL and AFL, often by between 50,000-150,000 viewers on average each week, despite these sports having free-to-air coverage as well.
The ARU needs to put an emphasis to its all its teams, including the Wallabies, to play attacking, entertaining rugby. Engaging and exciting fans is key.
The mess at the Tahs needs to be sorted out and the Force need a coach who will get his team playing an attractive brand of rugby. They also need a free-to-air TV partner who will support the game and not take the piss – it’s time to ditch Nine and go back to Network Ten.
Yes, Ten hasn’t been the best rugby partner in the past, but Ten are looking at all the sports content it can get and can be easier convinced to get behind rugby than Nine or Seven either would.
Tough decisions need to be made at the top of Australian rugby. Afternoon rugby is popular with attending fans but not those watching on the box. 2011 was a step ahead for the code, with playing participation levels growing. But I believe this year crowd attendances for Australian Super Rugby teams have declined, and TV figures obviously have been poor.
It’s been one step forward, one step back. Over to you, John O’Neill.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- SPIRO: Beale and Folau brilliant, Mogg subbed (278)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (242)
- I was dead-set wrong about Folau (237)
- What gives with Israel Folau? (184)
- Deans promises ball in hand rugby for Wallabies against Lions (183)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (180)
- My Lion tamers for 2013 (167)
- Cheetahs vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (12)
- Waratahs vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores, blog (512)
- Wallaby backline options (66)
- An exciting weekend in Australian rugby (0)
- Western Force vs Sharks: Super Rugby live scores, blog (114)
- Rebels vs Stormers – Super Rugby live scores, blog (359)
- Hurricanes vs Chiefs – Super Rugby live scores (47)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Super Rugby



July 18th 2012 @ 11:31am
Bigbaz said | July 18th 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
When the aru discover their in the entertainment business things may change.Having the no1 entertainer in Aussie rugby suspended for a home semi is not going to help the ratings either.
July 18th 2012 @ 2:56pm
Jeff said | July 18th 2012 @ 2:56pm | Report comment
Oh my God.Now we have to suspend the Judiciary Committee to help the TV numbers.
I have refrained on commenting on this issue up until now because as a Waratahs fan [tragic isn't it] I could be accused of bias but the facts are pretty simple.
If a player makes an illegal tackle [above the shoulder] which results in concussing his opposition which necessitates that player leaving the field one would expect him to br cited.
And I can’t see the judiciary in any country giving him less than one week suspension.Further to that if it wasn’t season over for the Waratahs they would be deprived of the player themselves this week because of his concussion.
In fact I think he was lucky to get only one week.
July 18th 2012 @ 11:47am
Tumble Hill said | July 18th 2012 @ 11:47am | Report comment
Prehaps they should play an episode of the G.C at halftime?
July 18th 2012 @ 1:38pm
Kuruki said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
or scan the crowd for the scantily clad “aunties”
July 18th 2012 @ 11:55am
D Maaga said | July 18th 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
not a bad research done by either a nrl or afl fan. rugby coming in third behind afl and nrl on tv ratings? what’s new pussycat.
July 18th 2012 @ 1:37pm
Titus said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Rugby comes a distant 4th after Football, even the resource starved a-league rates as well as Super Rugby, a good EPL clash at a reasonable time such as 11.00pm outrates Rugby, 1.5million get up at 4am to watch the Aussies in a World Cup and a pre-season SFC match with David Beckham gets 1mill on FTA.
The Wallabies play a top ten nation and struggle to get 200 000 on FTA.
July 18th 2012 @ 3:23pm
The Bush said | July 18th 2012 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
Yeah but the Wallabies at the World Cup last year got over a million. Let’s try and compare apples with apples mate…
I love football as much as the next person, but let’s get real about the A-League, it has never, ever, come close to the ratings that the Reds got last year (the largets Pay-TV rating ever for one event).
July 18th 2012 @ 5:01pm
Titus said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:01pm | Report comment
TB–Thats fine, the Rugby ratings are good and can be exceptional but anyone who thinks that Rugby is more popular than Football is kidding themselves……..and trying to prove that it is by comparing S15 to the A-L isn’t comparing apples with apples.
July 18th 2012 @ 5:11pm
The Bush said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:11pm | Report comment
Titus,
You are the one that compared the A-League and Super Rugby, not me;
“even the resource starved a-league rates as well as Super Rugby”
I’ve simply submitted that this point is fractually incorrect – Super Rugby, involving Australian teams, outrates the A-League any day of the week and that the big matches (finals) produce ratings that dwarf what the A-League ever get. To suggest that Rugby is a distant fourth in the football department to Football is a bit of a stretch (though for how long, who can say).
I agree, Football is a bigger sport, not just around the world but here in Australia too. All I want you to accept is that the Wallabies rate as well as the Socceroos do (often enough, when like for like can be compared) and that the content on Pay-TV (Super Rugby v A-League) is actually comparable (rugby rates better per match, but has less relevant games due to having fewer Australian teams).
July 18th 2012 @ 5:18pm
Munter said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:18pm | Report comment
Titus, yeah its amazing how many people will put up with such mediocre performances from the soccerlose, sorry how many games have they won at the world cup again.
July 18th 2012 @ 5:31pm
MV Dave said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:31pm | Report comment
Perhaps the Socceroos play in a tournament where there is some real competition unlike the Rugby version…easy to win when only a handful of countries take the game seriously.
July 19th 2012 @ 7:39am
Im Obsessed With SBW said | July 19th 2012 @ 7:39am | Report comment
And where does that leave rugby league MD?
July 19th 2012 @ 10:32am
Kasey said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:32am | Report comment
Depends on if you believe that a bunch of Lebs from Lakemba representing Lebanon in the RLWC adds or detracts from the credibility of international RL I guess.
July 18th 2012 @ 6:05pm
Kasey said | July 18th 2012 @ 6:05pm | Report comment
Rugby is sadly losing ground from its high-water mark in this country when Australia hosted RWC2003. There aren’t too many people unless they are being willfully ignorant who can argue with a straight face that football hasn’t been on the rise in Australia in the same time period. Logic tells us that at some stage they must have crossed over. Its not clear and obvious, but arguments could easily be made by proponents of each sport for #3 position. As someone with a casual interest in Rugby, it would be a lot more fun to watch if they’d kick for goal a lot less and try to score tries more often. too often its boring to watch Wilkinson types determine the out come of games instead of the flair players of the game.
July 18th 2012 @ 7:12pm
Emric said | July 18th 2012 @ 7:12pm | Report comment
Why? This is rugby not rugby league and the IRB is never going to change the rules to make a few aussies feel better
July 18th 2012 @ 9:48pm
p.Tah said | July 18th 2012 @ 9:48pm | Report comment
What’s it with Soccer fans in rugby forums lately? Have the AFL boys and girls given you too much grief and you’ve headed here. Do you guys go looking for fights?
July 18th 2012 @ 12:03pm
Steve said | July 18th 2012 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
The main things is that super rugby overall does well and this year has had over 55 million viewers, which is its highest ever in the 3 countries.
July 18th 2012 @ 1:33pm
Rusty said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:33pm | Report comment
that will mainly be because of the 18.2% increase in the SA viewership
July 18th 2012 @ 12:18pm
Emric said | July 18th 2012 @ 12:18pm | Report comment
interesting
July 18th 2012 @ 12:23pm
The Great G Nepia said | July 18th 2012 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
For a code that gets maligned every week by every tom, dick and harry, including its own supporters and legendary players, the ratings are not actually that bad!
July 19th 2012 @ 12:54am
Mick H said | July 19th 2012 @ 12:54am | Report comment
Ahaha, it’s all too true mate.
July 18th 2012 @ 12:56pm
Rusty said | July 18th 2012 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
Great article – I have published an article (currently sitting in moderation) on the overall broadcast numbers and the top end games. So its interesting to get a view into the australian market share in this manner. Top research and analysis
July 18th 2012 @ 1:22pm
Raymond said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
Actually most people I know prefer to watch Rugby with their mates at the Pub. This equals no viewing audience for the ratings.
July 18th 2012 @ 1:45pm
warren said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
But isnt this true for all sports? I feel having on Pay TV is in some ways a draw back. The AFL has their games on 7mate for interstate viewers and I believe the NRL is on GEM for the same reason. I do not have pay tv as I do not want my kids watching too much tv so I miss out on the Super Rugby altogether.
July 18th 2012 @ 1:29pm
Emric said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
I’ve recorded the numbers for every game played in NZ/Aus time zone – and managed to get some information from SA as well. I was going to be writing my article on the same thing tonight. not sure if i should bother now.
July 18th 2012 @ 1:45pm
Rusty said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
its odd how there always seems to be a common thoughtline around articles so you end up with 2-3 basically stating the same thing… either way; my article doesnt really dig into the NZ side (its SA centric) so if you have that it would be interesting to see how it stacks up against the Australian and SA side
July 18th 2012 @ 1:54pm
Emric said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
If I remember correctly I’m at work, SA was between 35-40 million
NZ was around 13 million
and Aus was about 6 million
SA of course has the biggest population, and a strong rugby culture but it benefits with all the games being played in viewable hours. All games played in SA end up being at 3AM in the morning.
Now I believe that Bulls V Stormers ended up with 1,005,000 across all 3 nations but most games rated very close to 600,000 mark.
July 18th 2012 @ 2:04pm
kovana said | July 18th 2012 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
This is why im hoping that Saffas get a 6 team Premier SR conference in 2015… and even that their 8 team 2nd Division CC tournament gets included as well… That why in one weekend Saffas could have up to 3 top level Pro Club matches in their own time zone… as well as 4 2nd division matches as well.. That would really boost the ratings..
Also imagine.. Aus with a 6 team Conference… AS Well as the NZ conference having their 6 team PREMIER conference….. together with their 2nd division 8 team conference (Using their NPC teams)… That way in Australasia they would have 6 top level Club matches as well as 4 2nd division matches….. All in all 10 Club matches in weekend…
I hope they go that route by 2015.
July 18th 2012 @ 5:04pm
Rusty said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
SA already do – its called the Vodacom cup and ran from March to May. Western Province beat Griquas in a tight match for the cup
July 18th 2012 @ 5:11pm
biltongbek said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:11pm | Report comment
Yes, Namibia and los Pampas from Argentina also have a team playing in it, Los Pampas actually won it last year, going through the whole competition unbeaten.
July 18th 2012 @ 5:01pm
Rusty said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:01pm | Report comment
Pretty much…
Top 18 viewed locally were all over 600K, top 12 over 700k, top 5 over 800k and 2 over 900k. Combined it was a little
July 18th 2012 @ 7:05pm
Emric said | July 18th 2012 @ 7:05pm | Report comment
Rusty
where do you get your SA TV ratings from? I’ve only found one site which gives us a small peek at the SA ratings but they tend to be a protected species
Anyway
SkyNZ 13,060,230
Fox 6,598,330
SS 34,074,497
Total 53,733,057
The SA figure is only up to round 16 so its likely to have increased with round 17 and 18 considering how critical some of those games were especially in SA.
July 18th 2012 @ 1:59pm
kovana said | July 18th 2012 @ 1:59pm | Report comment
To be honest.. The ratings are quite good. From the articles i read here you would think rugby has almost zero people watching it.. Let alone getting in the top 10.