Super Rugby viewership breakdown
By Rusty, 19 Jul 2012 Rusty is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Bulls, Canterbury Crusaders, Queensland Reds, Rugby Union, Stormers, Super Rugby
Related coverage
So here we are, at the end of pool stages of the Super Rugby season. There has been some scintillating play and some less-than scintillating performances on all three continents.
There has also been the usual upsets and egg for the faces of the pre-season predictors (like me).
This was the second season with fifteen teams in the competition. To look at the popularity of this season, I have been reviewing the viewership facts coming out of South Africa (RepUcomSA) for this season. Overall cumulative viewership across SuperSport (SA), Sky Sports (NZ) and Fox Sports (Aus) was a whopping 54, 972, 678.
Broken down regionally, you get a sense of demand and consumption of rugby in each country.
SuperSport 36 831 694 – 67% (175 389 per game)
Sky Sports 12 093 989 – 22% (57 590 per game)
Fox Sports 6 046 995 – 11% (28 795 per game)
The SuperSport number is colossal. At 36 million, it is over 1.5 times the population of Australia. However, given the population of New Zealand, the Sky Sports number is perhaps more impressive.
New Zealand (4 million) = 1 in 69 people
South Africa (50 million) = 1 in 285 people
Australia (22 million) = 1 in 764 people
This is an astonishing number for NZ. It would be pretty interesting to also have the subscriber numbers for each service, which I think would provide some economic levelling to the South Africa numbers. Either way it demonstrates the level of interest in each country, with Australia lagging considerably behind.
From a viewership point of view, it would also appear that the conference system is working. 18 of the 20 most watched games were hosted in SA and 13 of these were derby matches. The Bulls v Stormers match was the most watched game so far.
Of those 20 most watched games, New Zealand teams were involved in six and Australian teams only three.
Top five games by audience:
Game | Date | Supersport | Fox Sports | Sky Sports | Combined
Bulls v Stormers | 2/6/12 | 990,062 | 8,168 | 7,410 | 1,005,640
Sharks v Stormers | 26/5/12 | 919,914 | 24,044 | 6,860 | 950,818
Lions v Sharks | 2/6/12 | 888,840 | 10,607 | 5,080 | 904,527
Stormers v Bulls | 31/3/12 | 843,244 20,342 | 24,460 | 888,046
No real surprises given the SuperSport numbers that the South African games would be the most watched. Interesting, though, that the 12th most watched game was in New Zealand and was heavily watched across the Southern Hemisphere.
The teams most watched, sorted by cumulative audience, are ranked:
Stormers, Sharks, Lions, Waratahs, Bulls, Crusaders, Blues, Cheetahs, Chiefs, Hurricanes, Brumbies, Reds.
The numbers (which were submitted to the site but were not published in full detail) are skewed due to number of appearances, but I think that’s a fair indication of popularity. If you consider that 64% of the Bulls and Stormers games made it into the Top 20 viewed, that is incredible. Overall though the Stormers, with their broadcast popularity and crowd averages over the last few years, must be one of the best if not the best supported non-international rugby team in the world.
I think that what this shows in terms of the overall consumption is that South Africa will always be the biggest market due to population, but that New Zealand is dominant per capita.
However, due to the smaller population in NZ, significant growth appears limited. So unless South Africa can overcome a number of socio-economic hurdles to increase its subscriber base, it should be Australia with the greatest room for an increase. Australia comes with its own hurdles, the number one being the congestion of the Australian sports market.
Throw on top a poor performing conference with three teams in the bottom third and it becomes clear how much Australian rugby depends on its New Zealand and South African neighbours to bring home the broadcast bacon.
Overall though, the numbers are very good and show an appetite for the sport that can only be a positive when the broadcast agreement is re-negotiated in 2015.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (407)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (268)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (249)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (246)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (232)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Where have the Australian franchises five-pointers gone? (55)
- Brumbies weather Blues storm in Auckland (7)
- Force pip Highlanders 19-18 in Perth (20)
- Dismissed Hartley in Lions doubt (17)
- Snarling Dogs rally for AFL win
- Stormers deny Reds 20-15 in Super Rugby (15)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (238)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (238)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (175)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (212)
- Has McKenzie cost Cooper the Lions Tour? (122)
- Does Quade Cooper really matter? (32)
- Rebels vs Waratahs: Super Rugby live scores, blog (415)
- Chiefs vs Crusaders: Super Rugby live scores (182)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Bulls, Canterbury Crusaders, Queensland Reds, Rugby Union, Stormers, Super Rugby


July 19th 2012 @ 1:53am
SamClench said | July 19th 2012 @ 1:53am | Report comment
The Tahs are the fourth most watched team in Super Rugby? My goodness. Viewers really need to think more when they plan their rugby viewing for the weekend.
July 19th 2012 @ 8:10am
Rusty said | July 19th 2012 @ 8:10am | Report comment
The editing is misleading. The featured within the Top 20 games by virtue of playing the Stormers in South Africa.
July 19th 2012 @ 10:34am
jeznez said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:34am | Report comment
I was going to say – because Lions third surprised as well.
July 19th 2012 @ 10:39am
jeznez said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:39am | Report comment
ps Berrick Barnes incessant kicking that day against the Stormers may have made a few people decide not to watch rugby again!
July 19th 2012 @ 2:49pm
SamClench said | July 19th 2012 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
Ahh I gotcha.
July 19th 2012 @ 4:18am
biltongbek said | July 19th 2012 @ 4:18am | Report comment
Rusty thanks for the figures , but the SA figures as you break it down is a bit misleading.
supersport is only accessable via pay channel, and roughly 75% of the population does not have access to it, then when you look at rugby union, a recent study by the Bulls Franchise have shown only 20% of the population follows and supports rugby, so your figure of 1 in 285 is not reflecting the viwership popularity amongst rugby fans.
You could base your popularity or viwership based on access and interest in the sport by looking at the actual market of around 10 million.
Not a criticism, but just closer to the reality.
Cheers.
July 19th 2012 @ 8:05am
Rusty said | July 19th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
No criticism taken. It was something I alluded to around the actual subscriber numbers providing the eco levelling
July 19th 2012 @ 9:50am
Red Kev said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
I don’t know about New Zealand (although I guess it is also the same) but rugby in Australia is also only accessible by pay channel.
Fox Sports is not free to air. There is usually 1 hour of rugby per week available to the public at large – a highlights package called Super Rugby Extra Time shown in the post 11pm timeslot on Mon/Tues on free to air. Australia also only shows Wallaby test matches on free-to-air, you have to pay to see NZvSA in the Tri-Nations.
July 19th 2012 @ 10:47am
Emric said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
Rugby in NZ is 99.9% on SkyNZ
Except Friday nights – the NZ game of the round is Delayed on Prime
and Tests all tests are shown on delay on Prime
July 19th 2012 @ 10:56am
Ryan said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
There is the Sunday afternoon highlights package on Prime
July 19th 2012 @ 4:55pm
Funk said | July 19th 2012 @ 4:55pm | Report comment
“You could base your popularity or viwership based on access and interest in the sport “…jees if you did that the Aus number would also drop dramatically. The only interested people in Victoria, are at the rebels games 20-25000, the same for WA with the force (part from few miners from QLD and NSW in northern WA). Bugger all in SA (that South Australia, for our african friends) and NT.
Then you can start dropping off the leaguies from QLD and NSW who wouldn’t watch union if their lives depended on it. Ahh statistics aren’t they great!
July 19th 2012 @ 8:08am
Rusty said | July 19th 2012 @ 8:08am | Report comment
A fair chunk of editing post publish . Will see if I can submit a proper table
July 19th 2012 @ 8:18am
Team taniwha said | July 19th 2012 @ 8:18am | Report comment
Interesting stats. All you ever hear is that the expanded super competition and indeed conference system is to help grow the Australian game. But I read some where else that viewer numbers were down on last year in Australia, while up significantly in NZ and SA (in line with your stats). So all this marketing talk about growing the Australian game seems to have not flowed inr eality yet..
July 19th 2012 @ 8:43am
Rusty said | July 19th 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
its getting more players in the game but as shown in Cutbacks article http://www.theroar.com.au/2012/07/18/rugby-fails-to-fire-this-year-on-tv/ is not really hitting the high notes locally for a number of a reasons
July 19th 2012 @ 10:37am
jeznez said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:37am | Report comment
Taniwha – the Waratahs having their worst season ever, after years of playing boring rugby will bring the Aussie numbers down enormously.
If the style of play and results come NSW’s way then there should be a corresponding leap in Aussie viewer numbers.
July 19th 2012 @ 8:34am
Rusty said | July 19th 2012 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Ok – very painful but here you go. Top teams watched on the basis on being in the Top 20 matches viewed across all three countries
Team Total Audience Games Avg
Stormers 7584902 9 842767
Sharks 4112618 5 822524
Lions 2444627 3 814876
Waratahs 799450 1 799450
Bulls 6988248 9 776472
Crusaders 2298579 3 766193
Blues 1486690 2 743345
Cheetahs 2957085 4 739271
Chiefs 736081 1 736081
Hurricanes 731730 1 731730
Brumbies 724373 1 724373
Reds 723075 1 723075
July 19th 2012 @ 8:51am
Steve said | July 19th 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
These are inredible numbers especially for a pay tv sport. Rugby is not my first sport of choice but it does have an amazing ability to continue its growth around the world. I have heard that the next broadcast deal has the potential to be mammoth.
July 19th 2012 @ 9:10am
John said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:10am | Report comment
For greater exposure and to capture all markets need to have some air play on free to air television, viewres look for stimulation through variety
July 19th 2012 @ 9:15am
Steve said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:15am | Report comment
It was interesting the other day i heard foxtel in Australia is really struggling. In 2010 it was in 32% of households, in 2012 that figure is down to 28% despite the AFL broadcast deal. Compared to other nations this is very very low. USA is 90%, UK 80%, NZ 75%, Japan has grown to 68%.
July 19th 2012 @ 9:51am
Red Kev said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Well maybe if they stopped charging so much.
July 19th 2012 @ 9:55am
Steve said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Yeah i think you are right. Foxtel set the price to high at its inception so its hard for them to go back on it.
July 19th 2012 @ 10:50am
Ryan said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Sky in NZ isn’t exactly cheap either and most of what you get is regurgitated week after week
July 19th 2012 @ 12:46pm
clipper said | July 19th 2012 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
The big difference is that Australia has one of the best, if not the best, FTA spreads in the world. Sure you get lousy channels like 9, but you also get ABC and SBS and heaps of digital channels. The only reason to get Pay TV would be to watch sports (especially Rugby as it’s not on FTA) but even then most of the major sporting events are on FTA.
July 19th 2012 @ 9:22am
Elisha Pearce said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:22am | Report comment
Interesting that the Lions continue to rate well. hopefully they can save the club.
July 19th 2012 @ 9:35am
Rusty said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
I think in its general gist and this is without seeing the bottom figures for the SA conference you will probably find more people watch the Lions in SA than the people watch the Tahs in Australia. Obviously it depends who they are playing, as playing Stormers/Bulls/Sharks will add significant numbers. For ref:
Lions vs:
Sharks 904k (888K in SA)
Stormers 815K (807K in SA)
Bulls 724k (716K in SA)
Since I only have slice of the top 20 matches from 210 round games I cant tell you how they rated vs the Lions/Tahs/Highlanders etc
July 19th 2012 @ 10:54am
Ryan said | July 19th 2012 @ 10:54am | Report comment
Population can not be discounted South Africa will always come out on top when it has twice the population of Australian and NZ combined.
Even if we take into account what Biltong says above re the true numbers in the SA public who actually follow rugby, using the same method in Australia and NZ you would still get a very similar outcome. It comes down to population.
Australia on the other hand have competition from within the AFL and NRL are huge in comparison.
New Zealand whilst rugby is still top dog their is a huge league following and growing by the day it will be interesting to see what happens when inevitably NZ gets a second team in the NRL.
Out of curiosity how much does payper view cost in South African Rands per month?
July 19th 2012 @ 11:03am
Rusty said | July 19th 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
about R590 for Premium e.g HD and all Sports .. so about 70 AUD
July 19th 2012 @ 11:07am
Ryan said | July 19th 2012 @ 11:07am | Report comment
So about 90 NZD a little cheaper but not by much
July 19th 2012 @ 1:29pm
allblackfan said | July 19th 2012 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
Ryan, I’m curious.
Where did you get that league has a huge following in NZ and growing by the day?
July 19th 2012 @ 3:05pm
clipper said | July 19th 2012 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
maybe he believes what the league people post on here – even though most don’t know the sporting landscape of NZ – Soccer and Netball have bigger followings accross the country.
July 19th 2012 @ 4:41pm
Ryan said | July 19th 2012 @ 4:41pm | Report comment
I’d like to know where exactly I said league was bigger than any of the sports that you have mentioned?
I follow many sports so I don’t tend to get into spatty little code wars like that which you are trying to create.
July 19th 2012 @ 3:12pm
Ryan said | July 19th 2012 @ 3:12pm | Report comment
Hot off the press allblackfan.
I am a fan of both codes and live in Auckland and to deny that league is huge here is to turn a blind eye, league is also growing rapidly around the country look at competitions such as the Western Alliance for example.
Whilst the warriors owners are paying for the implementation of these programmes NZRL have been consulted due to the growing popularity of League in Auckland and the country as a whole.
Sure it has got a long way to go to rival rugby by the way I never said it did rival rugby. What I said is league is hugely popular which it is with fans and is growing by the day. This article alone only proves that.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/league/7309904/Warriors-owners-aim-to-be-best-in-Australasia
July 19th 2012 @ 7:15pm
p.Tah said | July 19th 2012 @ 7:15pm | Report comment
Impressive stuff. The Blues better get their act together!
However I hate it when they say things such as “We want this club to become the best single sporting franchise in Australasia, taking it to levels never seen before in this part of the world,”
I recall Cliver Palmer @ GCU, Kevin Sheedy @ GWS and the Western Pirates all saying something similar. Why do they say these statements?
July 20th 2012 @ 1:19am
alblackfan said | July 20th 2012 @ 1:19am | Report comment
Ryan, I said I was curious. I wasn’t taking a pot shot although I accept that it sounded like I was. Unfortunately, I don’t have access to emoticons so as to soften the nature of my inquiry.
That news about what the Warriors owners will be doing isn’t exactly news to me. I have been expecting it for some time.
But I know enough about NZ to realise that what’s big in Auckland is not necessarily shared by the rest of the country. That article also mentions the club’s growing popularity — largely in Australia.
I don’t think the forced inclusion of RL players in Auckland RU’s schhol competition is helpful to either code. About time they were seperated.
I’m just wondering if Auckland will be big enough to sustain it especially if the NZRU gets its act together and does more to develop Auckland (ie another northern NZ Super franchise?)
July 20th 2012 @ 1:32am
Johnno said | July 20th 2012 @ 1:32am | Report comment
The beauty why this is in the warriors favour expanding is this. The warriors have historically relied a lot on aussie talant, playing wise, coaching, and player leadership.
-Think Kevin campion, steve price, robert mears, jason bell, nathen fine, nathan friend now, and also wade mckinnon. Plus aussie coaches like Ivan cleary..
-So they can always top up the player and coaching market with foreigners, where as the auckland blues have import restrictions. So depth is less of an issue for the warriors.
July 19th 2012 @ 1:36pm
Tigranes said | July 19th 2012 @ 1:36pm | Report comment
Elisha
Lions leverage off supporters of other SA teams.
Look at their big games – whenever they play Stormers or Sharks or Bulls, the majority of the crowd are not dressed in Lions gear.
There is hope for the Lions, but they are hardly the King of Beasts in super rugby…a bit like to Mighty Elephants in Currie Cup.
July 19th 2012 @ 2:58pm
biltongbek said | July 19th 2012 @ 2:58pm | Report comment
Well if most rugby supporters are like me in SA, they watch just about every Super Rugby match, for me there is no distinction who plays, but then I don’t support one specific SA team.
July 19th 2012 @ 9:58am
Steve said | July 19th 2012 @ 9:58am | Report comment
Imagine if there was the same amount of super rugby games as the NRL or AFL. There would be close to 100 million viewers.