Football should aim to close the gender gap
By Mike Tuckerman, 20 Jul 2012 Mike Tuckerman is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Basketball, football, Football Federation Australia, Matildas, Olympics, Olyroos
Sweden's Josefine Oqvist, left, challenges Australia's Kim Carroll during the quarterfinal match between Sweden and Australia at the Womens Soccer World Cup in Augsburg, Germany, Sunday, July 10, 2011.(AP Photo/Matthias Schrader)
Related coverage
It boggles the mind that in 2012 women can still be treated as second-class citizens. If Rosa Parks was still with us and travelling to the Olympics, presumably she would do so in premium economy – and not because of the colour of her skin.
This week SBS’ redoubtable troubadour Scott McIntyre penned a fascinating insight into Japan’s flourishing L-League, currently enjoying a surge of popularity on the back of the Women’s World Cup so successfully hosted by Germany last year.
None of Scott’s insight necessarily came as news to me – in fact my dentist in Japan has had two daughters in the JEF United Ladies squad for years.
And I wasn’t surprised to read that Japan’s senior women’s squad had flown to Europe in premium economy class, while their male counterparts –effectively Japan’s under-23 side – would fly business class.
What was somewhat eye-opening was the speed with which the story of the Japan Football Association’s sexism traversed the globe, all with the usual absence of any context regarding Japan’s specific sociopolitical climate.
I don’t understand why it should come as a shock that a nation with an abysmal human rights record, endemic political corruption and a lily-livered press also harbours sexist football officials.
Equally unsurprising was the prompt revelation that while we were all pointing and laughing at Japan’s archaic attitude towards gender relations, Basketball Australia was busily dividing up its two squads along the very same lines.
According to Fairfax’s Olympics reporter Samantha Lane, Australia’s men’s basketball team flew to London in business class, while the women’s team was ‘upgraded’ to premium economy.
“Different factors are taken into account when organising travel arrangements for our national teams – height and size being a primary consideration,” said a BA spokeswoman.
If you’ll excuse the gender-specific outburst – bollocks.
The only reason our women basketballers fly a different class to their male counterparts is the same reason any form of sexism exists – because as a society we turn a blind eye to it.
It’s the same reason women are paid less to do the same jobs as men, the same reason they traditionally take on more household duties than the men they cohabit with and the same reason the usual bunch of misogynists will crawl out from under their rocks to scoff and sneer at the very notion women deserve to be treated equally.
This has nothing to do with ticket sales or media interest or television revenue generated, especially as we’re talking about the Olympics.
The whole premise of the entire event –which of course flew out the window the second the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles turned a profit – is to see the world’s best athletes compete on a global scale with an equal chance of winning medals.
And that goes for both men and women.
If Basketball Australia couldn’t rustle up the funds to send both the men’s and women’s teams to London in business class, then it should have sent both teams in premium economy.
Judging by yesterday’s revelations this has been an on-going problem for the Opals, so Basketball Australia and any other sporting body guilty of such shenanighans deserve all the public backlash they get.
We’re a long way off gender equality in this country but I for one could never conscionably stay silent on an issue that may one day affect my own nieces.
One wonders what course Football Federation Australia might have taken had it been in the same situation, but the fact the Olyroos and Matildas both failed to qualify for London meant the issue never arose.
I’d like to think they’d have remembered that football is a game open to all and enjoyed by millions – irrespective of gender – and done the right thing by all concerned.
Mike Tuckerman is a Sydney-born journalist and lifelong football fan. After lengthy stints watching the beautiful game in Germany and Japan, he has settled in Brisbane and has been a Roar columnist since December 2008. Follow Mike on twitter @Mike_Tuckerman
- Explore:
- Basketball, football, Football Federation Australia, Matildas, Olympics, Olyroos

July 20th 2012 @ 7:44am
Bondy said | July 20th 2012 @ 7:44am | Report comment
I wonder how the male athlete feels in 2012 your sitting up the front of the plane in business class and female athletes with the cargo. It wont happen for the next Olympics even before this opening ceremony starts most sports and nations have been accused of sexism by their own countries media its a P.R. nightmare.
All sports preach fairness and equality for both men and women to contest their sports and then they shove women up the back of a plane to represent our nation ” unprofessional ” .
July 20th 2012 @ 8:31am
nearpost said | July 20th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Just look at Junior Football – FFA have a Skilleroo program for boys – girls have nothing.
Fair Go Australia….for boys!
July 20th 2012 @ 8:55am
Jerome said | July 20th 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Maybe they should start a Skillatilda program.
July 20th 2012 @ 1:26pm
tonysalerno said | July 20th 2012 @ 1:26pm | Report comment
I agree with near post, it starts at the grassroots level for the women. More younger female players will bridge the gap between the two sexes.
July 20th 2012 @ 9:00am
qwerty said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:00am | Report comment
“The ONLY reason our women basketballers fly a different class to their male counterparts is – because as a society we turn a blind eye to it.”Really Mike?Maybe you should do a little more research into this whole saga.
July 20th 2012 @ 9:18am
Tigranes said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:18am | Report comment
Mike thanks for the article.
But I guess at least in Japan and Australia, ladies can represent their country at the Olympics.
I wonder when their sisters in Saudi Arabia and several other countries will have the same privileges?
July 20th 2012 @ 12:17pm
Mike Tuckerman said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Interestingly, after concerted international pressure, Saudi Arabia has decided to send female athletes to London this year. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-07-13/saudi-female-athletes-to-compete-in-london/4128182?section=olympics
July 20th 2012 @ 9:27am
Ben of Phnom Penh said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
The entire Nadeshiko incident was a disgrace. An unsurprising, predictable disgrace, but a disgrace none-the-less.
At least it has finally caused some consternation, and that is a good sign.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:48pm
Mike Tuckerman said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
(Not surprisingly?) Ken Matsushima has a slightly different take on the matter. He says it’s a long-standing JFA policy borne as a result of the near-crippling pulmonary embolism suffered by then-Hamburg striker Naohiro Takahara during an economy flight. Perhaps Matsu will be kind enough to grace us with his presence and thoughts on the matter later in the day… but generally speaking, it takes these sorts of issues seeping into the public consciousness for anyone to even consider them, let alone for anything to change.
July 20th 2012 @ 3:55pm
Matsu said | July 20th 2012 @ 3:55pm | Report comment
Mike,
Regarding the issue of sexism in sports . . . . . seriously? That is one of those things that are so blinking obvious that it seems pointless to even go there. Sure, I think the women should have been upgraded. But apparently there wasnt enough money. There WAS however enough money for the JFA to step in and upgrade the women to premium economy. So is it “completely sex-unbiased”? No, obviously not. Nevertheless it is inaccurate to portray this as the JFA not caring about the women’s team.
However, lets back up and deal with the real issues here.
The Olympics is no longer an amateur competition. As soon as that became true, it was natural that professionals and amateurs would start to receive different standards of treatment. Have you forgotten all those stories about the different accomodations for the US men’s basketball team, relative to standards at Olympic village for most of the “true amaterus”?
My point is that this is by no means a “new” story. At the Athens Olympics there was a very long (albeit carefully nuanced and respectful) discussion in the Japanese press about the fact that Ryoko Tani – “Yawara-chan”, a huge media personality, star athlete and former gold medalist – had to fly coach, while her recent husband, Tomohiro, flew business class. The explanation – which is entirely accurate and understandable – is that a 159-cm 48-kg woman (Tani) is far less likely to get economy-class syndrome than a powerfully-built 197-cm man. Tani laughed off the questions and succeeded in keeping the incident on a respectful tone, by noting that her husband wanted to pay for her upgrade himself, but she refused because his snoring keeps her awake.
Faced with a very similar incident, Sawa responded to inquiries from the Japanese press with humour. That, plus the explanation from the JFA regarding the fact that professional athletes naturally have to receive different treatment from amateurs, was enough to put the story to rest. It was only when someone took Sawa’s comments out of context (you know who Im talking about), and completely left out the JFA’s side of the story in telling it to the international media, that this turned into a big row.
Should there be a discussion of sexism in sports, which includes instances like this one?
BY ALL MEANS!!!!!!!!
But anyone who has an ounce of common sense can see that NOBODY benefits from having it play out in the press, a week before the Olympics kick off, and in a context where all the “reports” are at second-hand, out of context, unattributed, and with no chance for the JFA the JOC, or Sawa and the other women to have their comments and positions clarified.
July 20th 2012 @ 4:28pm
Matsu said | July 20th 2012 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
Incidentally, youve managed a slight misquote yourself, above.
The policy of flying men’s Olympian football players business class has been in place since Atlanta – the first Olympics at which (nearly) all of the men were professionals rather than amateurs. At every Olympics since 1996, Japan has flown every fully-professional athlete by business class (that went for the men’s baseball team as well, though baseball wasnt included at London this time so it doesnt apply this year).
The broader policy, which REQUIRES Japanese players to fly business class when on NT duty, was introduced after Takahara suffered his collapse in 2005. From what I was just told a few minutes ago by a Japanese reporter (working for Weekly Sakka Digesto), the players will actually get a LIFETIME BAN from NT selection if they ignore the policy and fly economy-class, because the JFA is legally responsible for their health while on NT duty. Havent yet managed to verify this with the JFA but if it is accurate, it adds an even stronger basis to their position that this was just a legal issue, not one of sexism.
July 21st 2012 @ 10:33am
Matsu said | July 21st 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
The silence is deafening . . . . .
July 20th 2012 @ 9:32am
micka said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
I think it is deplorable when sexes are treated different in regards to a common situation but I also think if “the laydeeeeeeeez” want change they should do something about it. Rosa Parks took a stand… or a seat… for what she believed. Maybe the Opals should say business class or we aren’t going.
No gain comes without sacrifice. The Boomers are sacrificing medal contention for nice seats. The Opals I suppose are sacrificing kickass seats for better training and development which has made them winners.
The Boomers are truly awful.
July 20th 2012 @ 9:54am
BigAl said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:54am | Report comment
Given that Basketball Australia have been clearly maligned in this article Mr Tuckerman should consider doing all or some of the following…
1) Retract the whole article;
2) Apologise to Basketball Australia;
3) Remove the word ‘EXPERT’ from his title
ps BA is now headed by a woman !
July 20th 2012 @ 12:39pm
Mike Tuckerman said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
BigAl – Not for the first time on The Roar, someone (in this case, you) has chosen to focus on a specific point of contention in order to ignore a broader issue.
This piece is about sexism in sport. It references the Japan Football Association, the Olympic Games themselves and Football Federation Australia – as well as Basketball Australia. I have no intention of retracting the “whole article” because you take personal umbrage with one specific point I have made.
If I have maligned Basketball Australia in any way, then I apologise. I certainly don’t want to have misrepresented them, although if they have decided to “rewrite an inequitable travel policy” (as per statements made by Kristina Keneally in today’s SMH) then I don’t think I have.
July 20th 2012 @ 5:09pm
BigAl said | July 20th 2012 @ 5:09pm | Report comment
Now how do you know I have ‘. . .chosen to ignore a broader issue.’ ?
July 20th 2012 @ 10:45am
Johnno said | July 20th 2012 @ 10:45am | Report comment
W-league has potential and girls like Elysee perry are great for promoting the sport.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:40pm
tj said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
out of interest do the eggballers have national comp for women? do they even have local comps? semi-professional players?
July 20th 2012 @ 4:45pm
micka said | July 20th 2012 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
I think both have state reps and local comps etc. AFL certainly do. Dunno about professional level.
July 20th 2012 @ 1:03pm
MyLeftFoot said | July 20th 2012 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
oh dear –
for those who didn’t hear Andrew Gaze on radio SEN this morning – the Opals actually have a larger budget than the Boomers – and the travel arrangements of each was part of the overall balance of camps and programs. The blokes opted for channelling funding to travel business class and the women didn’t.
No sexism in the basketball.
July 20th 2012 @ 8:59am
Bondy said | July 20th 2012 @ 8:59am | Report comment
Its something you’ll never need to worry about, international flights between mens and womens teams.
July 20th 2012 @ 9:01am
Fussball ist unser leben said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Wow – The Cattery is back under one of his original names!
1. There is no sporting event at the Summer Olympics called “soccer”, so I’m not sure what you’re talking about?
2. Neither the Australian men’s, nor the Australian women’s, football team qualified for the London 2012 Olympics, so again, I’m not sure what you’re talking about.
July 20th 2012 @ 9:30am
Ian said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:30am | Report comment
i’d be questioning why a team would channel the funds to go to a business class airfare over other resources. having only flown economy to europe i’d love premium economy and it can’t be that bad.
July 20th 2012 @ 10:11am
MyLeftFoot said | July 20th 2012 @ 10:11am | Report comment
Congratulations on reading the article and my reply.
The above two posters (Bondy, and Fussb…..etc ) clearly have something else on their minds??? Did Fussb….etc even read the article??
Correct in my mind – that the Boomers opted to spend the money on a better quality of seat compared to what other better uses that might have greater positive impact on their performance? If the Opals compete better than the Boomers at the Olympics then there might be questions raised.
This whole ‘sexism’ discussion was a beat up but sadly so typical of tabloid coverage – the real story is missed.
Anyway – agree with BigAl below – Tuckerman has made a blue here. And given the 2nd last paragraph “One wonders what course Football Federation Australia might have taken had it been in the same situation, but the fact the Olyroos and Matildas both failed to qualify for London meant the issue never arose.”
One really wonders why Tuckerman bothered at all??
July 20th 2012 @ 12:14pm
Mike Tuckerman said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
MyLeftFoot – I must admit I didn’t hear a Melbourne ex-basketballer speaking exclusively on a Melbourne sports radio network several hours after I had written this piece.
I didn’t write the Basketball Australia angle – which I clearly pointed out came from Fairfax’s Olympics reporter Samantha Lane – I responded to it. And I note she’s filed a couple more stories on the issue this morning, including this one: http://www.smh.com.au/olympics/news-london-2012/travel-policy-rewrite-after-secondclass-flights-fury-20120720-22dv7.html
“One really wonders why Tuckerman bothered at all??”
Because I think gender equality is an important social issue worthy of discussion on a sports discussion website.
July 20th 2012 @ 2:05pm
MyLeftFoot said | July 20th 2012 @ 2:05pm | Report comment
MT -
no worries.
the ‘why…bothered at all’ bit was more in relation to the linking the FFA into it given that this time around they have niether side there.
As Fuss….etc so eloquently pointed out. Although, as I’d read the article I was quite aware of that!
The overall article could perhaps have been better served as general sports or Olympics rather than soccer given the breadth of reference you made.
July 20th 2012 @ 2:52pm
Punter said | July 20th 2012 @ 2:52pm | Report comment
Mister Football, why do you bother, this caters for 2 subjects you care for little, International sport & women in sport!!!!
July 20th 2012 @ 5:09pm
MyLeftFoot said | July 20th 2012 @ 5:09pm | Report comment
actually I’m the original mlf,
not this recalcitrant usurper to whom you refer.
July 20th 2012 @ 5:17pm
Tristan Rayner said | July 20th 2012 @ 5:17pm | Report comment
Alright, back in your box.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:50pm
The (not so) Special One said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Have you seen how tall the mens Basketball team is? That’s why they channel their funds that way. I’m 175cm tall and hate how little leg room there is in economy – imagine being 200cm plus as most of the mens team is.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:54pm
Mike Tuckerman said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
I think Liz Cambage and Lauren Jackson suffer the exact same problem though.
July 20th 2012 @ 3:49pm
Axelv said | July 20th 2012 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
It’s just a media beat up Mike, it normally is. They use every chance to jump on board half truths and enrage people about it. People need to stop being so damn over sensitive about petty things.