How will Graeme Smith fare in his 100th Test at The Oval?
By Kersi Meher-Homji, 20 Jul 2012 Kersi Meher-Homji is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Allan Border, Cricket, Graeme Smith, Ricky Ponting, South Africa cricket
Injured South African captain Graeme Smith in action during the second innings on day five of their Third Test against Australia at the SCG in Sydney, Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2009. Smith retired hurt from the first innings with a broken finger. AAP Image/Paul Miller
Related coverage
News on cricket has been hard to find in recent weeks, with NRL, AFL, tennis, Olympic previews and Tour de France highlights dominating the sports reports.
Australia’s recent poor performance in England has also not added sparkle to the cricket scene down under.
Will the Test tussle between two strong cricket teams, South Africa and England, keep Australian viewers glued to their TV sets?
A milestone was reached in The Oval Test which started yesterday. South Africa’s captain Graeme Smith became the 52nd cricketer and sixth South African to play 100 Tests.
How will he fare during these five days?
England’s classy batsman Colin Cowdrey was the first to make 100 Test appearances. It was against Australia at Birmingham in 1968 and he celebrated the occasion by scoring a century.
Others to hit centuries in their 100th Test are Javed Miandad and Inzamam-ul-Haq from Pakistan, West Indian Gordon Greenidge, England’s Alec Stewart and Australia’s Ricky Ponting.
Ponting is the only one to score centuries in both innings in his 100th Test, scoring 120 and 143 not out against South Africa in Sydney in 2006. Inzamam made the highest score when playing his hundredth Test, 184 against India at Bangalore in 2005.
Australia’s legendary Shane Warne became the first spinner in the ‘100 Test Club’. He had a sensational hundredth Test as he captured 2-70 and 6-161 and scored 63 and an unbeaten 15 against South Africa at Cape Town in 2002. “There are few fairy tales, this is as close as it gets”, he said after Australia won the thriller by four wickets.
Since then only two bowlers – both spinners – have taken five wickets in an innings in their 100th Test appearances. They are India’s Anil Kumble (2-87 and 5-89 v. Sri Lanka at Ahmedabad in 2005) and Sri Lanka’s Muttiah Muralitharan (3-87 and 6-54 v. Bangladesh in the 2006 Chittagong Test).
Among successful 100-Test players, India’s all-rounder Kapil Dev made 55 and took 4-69 and 3-82 in his 100th Test against Pakistan in Karachi in 1989-90. Sourav Ganguly’s 100th Test coincided with Melbourne’s 100th Test in 2007.
Fittingly for the Centurion Test between South Africa and New Zealand in April 2006, three cricketers played their 100th Tests simultaneously, a unique occurrence. They were Jaques Kallis and Shaun Pollock from South Africa and Stephen Fleming from New Zealand, the first Kiwi to play 100 Tests.
All three performed poorly in their landmark Tests.
But none performed as poorly as Australia’s Allan Border. The first Australian to play 100 Tests, against the West Indies on the MCG in December 1988, he was bowled by Curtly Ambrose for a duck.
Next day’s headlines make interesting reading: Border’s day is Curtly curtailed, Duck of the century and AB Duck is a bitter pill to swallow.
Rod Nicholson wrote in the next day’s Daily Telegraph, ‘Oh Allan! What a celebratory catastrophe at the MCG yesterday!’
By a coincidence, Border had also scored a duck in his Test debut.
India’s Sachin Tendulkar has played most number of Tests, 188, followed by two Australians, Steve Waugh 168 and Ponting 165. Of the 52 players who have played 100 or more Tests, Australia leads with 11, followed by England, the West Indies and India eight each, South Africa six, Sri Lanka five, Pakistan four and New Zealand two.
How will Graeme Smith go in his 100th Test at The Oval in the next four days? Will he do a Ponting or a Border?
The more pertinent question: Is playing 100 Tests a big deal today? The first time a cricketer achieved this milestone was Cowdrey in 1968, which was 91 years after the inaugural Test in 1877. In 44 years since then, 51 have made a hundred Test appearances because of the increase in Test cricket since 1970s.
But with ODIs and Twenty20 reducing the number of Test matches, will the landmark of playing 100 Tests regain its rarity?
Kersi is an author of 13 cricket books including The Waugh Twins, Cricket's Great All-rounders,Six Appeal and Nervous Nineties. He writes regularly for Inside Cricket and other publications. He has recently finished his new book on Cricket's Conflicts and Controversies, with a foreword by Greg Chappell.
- Explore:
- Allan Border, Cricket, Graeme Smith, Ricky Ponting, South Africa cricket

July 20th 2012 @ 4:41am
Viscount Crouchback said | July 20th 2012 @ 4:41am | Report comment
Smith is yet to bat but I was far from impressed by his captaincy in the field today. Neglecting to give Steyn the new ball was too clever by half.
The South Africans look decidedly podgy. I expect them to improve as the series progresses but they might have to do so from 1-0 behind if the Test continues on its current track.
Well played Cook too.
July 20th 2012 @ 4:49am
biltongbek said | July 20th 2012 @ 4:49am | Report comment
I agree, they looked like they just went through the motions, not really looking like they had a plan, the pitch was dry and flat, so they decided to just bowl line and length and wait for the mistakes.
On Smith’s batting, he hasn’t been in scintilating form, but he is determined and will give it his all, but my biggest worry for him is this dry pitch and Graham Swann
July 20th 2012 @ 9:03am
Tony Tea said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:03am | Report comment
Graeme Smith has played 100 Tests at The Oval?!? How many at Lords, then?
July 20th 2012 @ 9:34am
Kersi Meher-Homji said | July 20th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Tony Tea,
Ah, the English language! Or should I say, chah?!
July 20th 2012 @ 6:39pm
tonysalerno said | July 20th 2012 @ 6:39pm | Report comment
Clever Tony, i think Smith will have a good match at the oval- hopefully a century comes his way- a champion batsmen.
July 20th 2012 @ 10:12am
sheek said | July 20th 2012 @ 10:12am | Report comment
Hi Kersi,
As you know, I’m fond of selecting all-time & periodical XIs. There’s no doubt Graeme Smith is one of the best two openers I’ve seen from South Africa, since first following cricket in the late 1960s.
He would open the SA batting with Barry Richards, who you know is in my humble opinion, the best opener I’ve seen from any country in the past 45 years. Even better than that Indian pair of Sunil Gavaskar & Virender Sehwag. I know Sunny is your preferred no.1.
Smith would also be captain of the best SA team from the past 45 years, but largely by default, since the better candidates – Mike Procter & Richards – never captained their country in their very few test appearances before sporting isolation hit.
On another note, it’s interesting to compare the contrasting fortunes of two of Australia’s finest batsmen at different stages of their careers – Greg Chappell & Allan Border. Chappell scored centuries in each of his first & last (87th) test matches, as well as twin centuries in his first test as captain.
Border on the other hand, scored ducks in each of his first & 100th tests. Border was neither particularly successful in his first test as captain (21 & 18) nor his last & 156th test (17 & 42no).
July 20th 2012 @ 10:27am
sheek said | July 20th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
Kersi,
Just out of interest, here are my best openers from each country in 45 years of watching the game.
AUSTRALIA – Bobby Simpson & Bill Lawry (who gets the nod ahead of Matt Hayden on a package deal).
ENGLAND – Geoff Boycott & Nigel Cook (that’s assuming Cook maintains his standard, otherwise Dennis Amiss).
SOUTH AFRICA – Barry Richards & Graeme Smith.
WEST INDIES – Gordon Greenidge & Roy Fredericks (there’s virtually nothing between Fredericks & Desmond Haynes stats-wise. Fans might not realise Greenidge had a briefer but more prolific partnership with Fredericks than Haynes. Also, Fredericks gives the partnership a right-left hand combo. Chris Gayle not in the race).
NEW ZEALAND – Glenn Turner & John Wright.
INDIA – Sunil Gavaskar & Virender Sehwag.
PAKISTAN – Saeed Anwar & Hanif Mohammed.
SRI LANKA – Sanath Jayasuriya & Marvan Atapattu.
July 20th 2012 @ 11:06am
Kersi Meher-Homji said | July 20th 2012 @ 11:06am | Report comment
Sheek,
You mean Alastair, not Nigel, Cook. Correct?
I agree with most of your choices. But Sehwag for India? Despite all his double and triple hundreds, he does not look an ideal Test opener to me. I would go for Vijay Merchant and Gavaskar as my best Indian openers. But Merchant was before your time frame, Sheek.
Atherton was an excellent opener for England.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:36pm
Disco said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
I’d consider Gooch.
July 20th 2012 @ 10:33am
quietcordial said | July 20th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
100 Test Matches is still an outstanding achievement for mine. The physical fitness and mental toughness to play at the elite level and contribute to the success of your team to maintain a place in the side is a testament to those that reach the milestone. Well done Graeme Craig Smith!
July 20th 2012 @ 10:41am
Johnno said | July 20th 2012 @ 10:41am | Report comment
-NZ what about Mark Richardson he was prolific for a while.
-Australia Micheal Slater . Slats was very powerful early on and david boon was reliable of course as was Mark Taylor
-South Africa Kepler Wessels has to be pushing Graham Smith hard surely and Gary kirsten as well
-Alastair cook is ready now he is the best i have just about ever seen better than Hayden even. And Micheal Vaughan’s record is superb vs Australia he made some massive runs in 2002/3 series, and made some big knocks in the 2005 ASHES too plus he had to do this in 2005 with the burden of the captaincy.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:04pm
sheek said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Hi Kersi,
Yes, I meant Alastair Cook. So many Englishmen seemed to be named Nigel, it just rolled off the tongue, I mean, the typing fingers…..!
Yes, I’m well aware of Vijay Merchant, although he WAS before my time. We have discussed this before. I’m glad you feel the same way about Sehwag, but definitely with Gavaskar for the past 45-50 years.
But if we’re selecting Indian openers over their 80 year history, then I would agree with you it should be Gavaskar & Merchant.
Atherton’s test batting average was below 40. In my humble opinion, you aren’t a good test batsman unless you average above 40. As a rule of thumb, very good is above 45; great is above 50 & legend status is anything above 55!
July 20th 2012 @ 12:12pm
sheek said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
Johnno,
Yes, Richardson is an alternate option for NZ ahead of Wright.
Neither Slater nor Boon nor Taylor were good enough for long enough.
For SA, Wessels’ average is too low. Kirsten is my no.3 for the best SA team of the past 45 years. My SA batting lineup (top 5) – G.Smith, B.Richards, G.Kirsten, G.Pollock, J.Kallis.
As I said above, Cook needs to maintain his standard. Sehwag for example, has slipped after being hot for a long time.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:15pm
sheek said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
Johnno,
Yeah, Richardson is an alternative to Wright to partner turner at top of NZ team.
Neither Slater nor Boon nor Taylor were good enough for long enough to be considered ahead of Simpson, Lawry, Hayden & Langer.
Wessels’ batting average too low. Kirsten would be my no.3 for the best SA batting lineup of the past 45 years. Kallis drops to no.5 after g.pollock at no.4.
Cook is good, but not THAT good. Vaughan lacked high-level consistency.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:37pm
Disco said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
I wouldn’t consider Richardson in the same class as Wright.
Vaughan was good, yes, but I think Trescothick was even better.
July 20th 2012 @ 4:42pm
James said | July 20th 2012 @ 4:42pm | Report comment
one thing we have to take into consideration, something stats does not tell us is how reliant or important a player was to his team and how good the bowling he was up against. for instance there are a number of australian batsman from the last 20 odd years who are not as good as their stats are saying just as there are players from other countries who are not as bad as they seem. getting a century against a mcgrath or even more so a century against the wi bowlers of holden and co is a much more difficult thing than getting one against the australian bowlers of today. also the pressure on players, especially tendulkar and lara was huge, if they failed their team usually failed and they knew it. in the opposite way that some australian batsman, coming in after the likes of hayden and ponting in his prime with the score a couple of or a few hundred for 3 or 4 would find it much easier to score than someone coming in when the team was 3 for less than a hundred. i know that i should use a time machine, if i had one, to kill hitler etc but i would love to bring together the great west indian teams and australian ones and even the english when they were good or if they continue for another couple of years the english of today and just have some awesome matches of as near as can get, equals
July 20th 2012 @ 11:21am
Kersi Meher-Homji said | July 20th 2012 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Graeme Smith has played many brilliant innings among his 24 Test hundreds.
But I’ll remember him for a gutsy innings he played in the January 2009 Sydney Test.
Australia had to win in Sydney to retain their No.1 Test ranking. With Michael Clark hitting 138, Australia totalled 445. South Africa trailed by 118 runs. A fast delivery from Mitchell Johnson put the visiting captain Graeme Smith in hospital with a broken hand. Sensing victory, Ricky Ponting declared Australia’s second innings at 4 for 257, setting South Africa 376 to win on a deteriorating pitch.
Australia thought they had won the match when South Africa were 9 for 257 as skipper Smith was so badly injured that he could not tie his shoe lace let alone don the pads. But as only 36 minutes were remaining to draw the match, the captain courageous struggled to the crease, his left hand in plaster. The SCG crowd stood and roared in appreciation. He lasted 26 minutes scoring 3, adding 15 runs with Makhaya Ntini. Australia won by 103 runs but the cheers were for the gallant Graeme Smith.
July 20th 2012 @ 4:01pm
biltongbek said | July 20th 2012 @ 4:01pm | Report comment
There was an interview wih him just before he left for the current English tour, and he specifically mentioned that match as one of his best moments in Australia, the recognition the crowd gave him was very special to him.
However he said his most special innings for him was the 154* at Edgbaston when he and Boucher hit an unbeaten innings from 100/5 or somewhere about there, to win that test and the series for SA to reach the 267 target.
July 20th 2012 @ 11:23am
Sailosi said | July 20th 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
Graham Gooch, in my opinion test crickets most underrated batsman of the last 30 years would be my choice to open with Boycott ahead of Cook. From memory Nigel Cook was an uninspiring new ball bowler from Surrey.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
July 20th 2012 @ 11:51am
Jason said | July 20th 2012 @ 11:51am | Report comment
Agree. I don’t think Gooch and Edrich would suffer in comparison to Boycott and Cook.
July 20th 2012 @ 12:21pm
sheek said | July 20th 2012 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
Gee Sailosi,
So often I had picked Boycott & Gooch as my best English opening pair of the past 40-odd years. But this morning I had a complete mental block & entirely forgot about Gooch!
I would stick with Cook providing he doesn’t drop the standard he has currently attained. Otherwise, I would happily go back to Gooch opening with Boycott. They (Gooch & Boycott) certainly complemented each other.
Jason,
Edrich is certainly up there, probably on the next level, either as opener or first drop. And agreed, Gooch & Edrich don’t suffer much in comparison with boycott & cook.