Tour de France 2012 highs and lows
Related coverage
The Tour de France is done and dusted for another year, with a new champion, a string of new characters, and new episodes for some older stagers. Here are some of my personal highlights and lowlights from the race. Please, add your own in the comments.
The good
1. What Brad Wiggins’ win will do for cycling in the UK
Remember how good it felt in Australia last year when Cadel Evans became the first Australian to win the Tour de France? The validation of road cycling as a sport and the interest it generated from people who had previously been only peripherally aware of it?
The same will happen in the UK as a result of Wiggins’ historic win. Cycling has been experiencing something of a boom in popularity in the UK over the last few years, in various ways.
Achievements at an elite level (primarily through the British track squad, Mark Cavendish, Wiggins and the rest of Team Sky) have spurred interest in cycling as a sport, which legitimises professional cycling in the eyes of a sometimes sceptical, sometimes indifferent public.
The UK has seen enormous concurrent growth in cycling as a grassroots sport and participatory activity, including organised rides, sportives, hill climbs and track days.
Cycling as transport is also booming, which attracts people with no previous sporting interest, and there are a host of other interwoven subcultures and community organisations including fixed gear and courier culture, cycle to work schemes, bike hire schemes and many more which operate at the grassroots levels of cycling.
A British Tour de France winner should be an enormous positive influence on all of these factors, with the end result being more people involved at all levels of cycling in the UK, and more political influence for cycling organisations, to the benefit of cyclists in that country.
Fans of the sport and lovers of cycling all around the world should be pleased by this.
2. The sprint rivalry between Cav, Greipel, Sagan and Goss
The battle for supremacy between the big four sprinters of the Tour was easily the best contest of the race. Three stages each to Sagan, Cavendish and Greipel means it’s hard to split them. Each was excellent in their own way – I can’t pick the best rider out of the three.
Poor Matt Goss, perennially making up the podium without ever quite getting to salute, but he was clearly the best of the rest. He will be disappointed not to have claimed a win, but until his green jersey campaign was strangled by a much-debated disqualification, Goss was riding with confidence and aggression. He will be back.
Greipel used his powerful Lotto Belisol team to perfection in the first week of the Tour, but as the team’s focus shifted to the GC ambitions of Jurgen Van Den Broeck it became more challenging for Greipel. Still, three stage wins is pretty outstanding.
Sagan’s overall consistency and ability to win the difficult uphill sprints, and survive the mountains better than his rivals, means he was definitely a deserved green jersey winner. But for being outsmarted by Luis Leon Sanchez in stage 14, he would’ve almost certainly had a fourth win. He could be anything, given time.
What can you say about Cavendish? For a man who spent long days looking dejected and unloved by his focused team-mates, Cav’s devastating victory in Stage 18, followed by his textbook fourth consecutive win on the Champs Elysees provided serious redemption. His top speed is clearly better than anyone else in the pro ranks, and it’s scary to think what he might have achieved if his team had been focused on him. Rumours of a move to a team built around winning sprint stages are getting louder.
3. The new young guns
This year the race was lit up by a number of great performances from young riders. How exciting were Peter Sagan (22), Tejay Van Garderen (23), Pierre Rolland (25), Thibaut Pinot (23), and Edvald Boasson Hagen (25)?
With a few old favourites like Menchov, Vinokourov, Valverde, Petacchi and Basso fading, these young fellas really brought some excitement to the race. The future is looking bright for quite a few of the next generation.
4. An Australian team in the Tour de France
I know everyone really wanted them to win a stage, but the mere fact that Orica-GreenEDGE – an Australian pro team! – was in the Tour de France would have been considered a minor miracle just a couple of years ago. The team will have learned a lot from this campaign, which should stand them in good stead for the latter part of the season, and for next year.
And they actually went bloody close to getting a win.
In my opinion, the best riders in the team were Albasini and Goss, but Weening animated a good few breaks as well. The loss of Brett Lancaster’s strength and experience certainly didn’t help, and they probably wanted more out of Simon Gerrans, but you can’t always control circumstances and the crashes in the first week took their toll.
I hope the team picks some of its young Aussie stars for the Vuelta, because this time next year it’d be great to see the like of Durbridge, Bobridge and Meyer in the Tour.
5. Thomas Voeckler’s polka dot jersey assault
For a man who suffered through the first week with a knee injury, losing buckets of time, Thomas Voeckler had a magnificent Tour de France. His dramatic style may have earned him the nickname ‘Hollywood’, but he’s a French national hero for a reason – he knows how to entertain. Liberated from the constraints of the general classification, Voeckler was allowed some latitude to attack, and attack he did.
He was first over three HC climbs, the Col du Grand Colombier, the Col d’Aubisque, and the Col du Tourmalet. One stage 16 he won all four categorised climbs, and then the stage. The next day he won the first three climbs, for good measure.
His net result was two stage wins, and the polkadot jersey. Not bad for a guy who looked spent after a week.
The bad
1. Drugs
The spectre of doping suspicion continues to cast a dark shadow over the performances of cyclists who probably don’t deserve it.
This Tour suffered guilt by association when news and rumours about Lance Armstrong, USADA, and secret confessions began to swirl. These sorts of headlines are a cancer, as casual observers see “Tour de France” and “doping investigation” and assume some new crisis, not the rehashing of (alleged) past sins.
Unfortunately the arrest of Remy di Gregorio, and the positive test of Frank Schleck, brought doping back to the present, and the drums started up again as sceptics questioned the dominance of Team Sky.
I understand why people ask these questions, but it saddens me that many people’s default response to a strong performance is now, “he must be doping”.
2. The race becoming a procession, far too early
You can’t blame Sky for being great at their jobs, but the combination of a time trial-heavy parcours, the strength of the British super team, the absence of Contador and Andy Schleck, Ryder Hesjedal’s crash, and Cadel Evans not being up to his 2011 level meant this Tour was effectively dead as a contest after stage 9.
That’s the last thing race organisers want.
3. Too much time trialling
Quick, what do Fabian Cancellara and Brad Wiggins have in common?
That’s right, these two specialist time triallists were the only two riders to wear the maillot jaune in 2012.
Having two long individual time trials and a prologue really unbalanced this Tour, creating time gaps that simply couldn’t be made up in the mountains, given the structure of the climbing stages.
Apart from that, time trials are hardly the most compelling viewing, especially when it’s after midnight and the best riders are still in the sheds on rollers.
4. Repetitive ads on SBS
SBS does a pretty amazing job televising the Tour de France, with every stage live, regular highlights packages, and wonderful supporting coverage on its website, through its Fantasy TDF competition, and its Tour Tracker app. Its strong audience figures this year are a fair reward for a job well done, and the fan-hostile Australian commercial free-to-air networks should take a good hard look at what SBS does.
But.
If I never see another ad for erectile dysfunction pills, European station wagons, insurance, or vitamins, it will be too soon. Please SBS, for our sanity, sell your ad space to a broader range of buyers next year. What you’re doing to your captive audience is not giving us Stockholm Syndrome, it’s just torture.
5. Thomas Voeckler’s sex face
The flipside of Thomas Voeckler’s constant exciting attacks is the hours spent seeing close-ups of his gurning sex face as he suffers in the mountains.
Voeckler climbs like he’s possessed by demons, hunched over his handlebars muttering to himself, lips contorting, tongue tasting the air, eyes rolling. He twitches and lurches around on his bike, out of the saddle, now seated, never still.
It’s a horrible sight.
Tim Renowden has been following professional cycling closely since Indurain won his first Tour. A former A-grade club athlete, and now a keen recreational cyclist and roller racer, he once rode very slowly up Mont Ventoux. Tim tweets about sport at @timehhh_sp.
The Crowd Says (28) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Cycling, Tour de France

July 23rd 2012 @ 11:57pm
dsta8 said | July 23rd 2012 @ 11:57pm | Report comment
short periods in the mountains and about 100kms of TTs favoured wiggins from the moment the route was announced. so i was surprised that no one tried to attack wiggins and sky from the off. too bad hesjedal crashed out. and evans, who was the most aggresive of the gc contenders, suffered a bit and ran into some bad luck. i think basso and nibali couldve tested sky in the first set of alpine stages. it was all too late when nibali tried it in the pyrenese.
but how about that nibali-valverde hand-shake incident? i dont get it. it’s a race! why not let nibali try to push sky? the breakaway was a very strong group, seasoned climbers with a number of stage victors. it wouldve been entertaining to watch and see how far they’ll go. they couldve stayed in front, or at worst wouldve broken up sky. could’ve left the team ds with the difficult decision on either saving wiggo or have froome chase….fire up the sub plot that is froome v wiggins.
July 24th 2012 @ 9:51am
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Well, I spose Nibali knew that the break had no chance with him in it, but I agree it’s a shame that they let Sky off without having to chase. Maybe he just didn’t have the legs for an all-day break. Or maybe Valverde leant across and said,
“Hey mate, I’ll give you the prizemoney if you sit up”
Stranger things have happened.
July 24th 2012 @ 9:01pm
Sean Lee said | July 24th 2012 @ 9:01pm | Report comment
On the Nibali/Valverde incident, a similar thing happened to Cadel Evans a couple of years back. He had lost a bit of time in an earlier stage and needed to do something pretty drastic to get it back. He managed to get into a breakaway. The breakaway also contained Fabian Cancellara, who made it quite blatantly obvious that he did not want Cadel there. Spartacus rode up and down the pace line, almost inciting a riot, until Cadel eventually called it quits. Cancellara knew that the break had no chance of escape while Cadel was there and he bent over backward to get the Australian to sit up.
July 24th 2012 @ 6:33am
Moses said | July 24th 2012 @ 6:33am | Report comment
Yes when I saw the title of this article I clicked straight on it to post a comment about the erectile dysfunction ads. So glad that you already had it covered!
July 24th 2012 @ 8:21am
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 8:21am | Report comment
It’s enough to put a man off camping, and all.
And now we’ve got the Olympics and a whole new set of repetitive ads…
July 24th 2012 @ 8:32am
Justin Curran said | July 24th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
The good: The sprint contests; Peter Sagan in general; The breakaways – particularly the couple that only got pegged back in the last couple of hundred metres, and special mention to the break away victories of Voekler and Sanchez; Thomas Voeckler’s sex face; Sportsmanship generally being shown in the tack saga; Greenedge giving it everything on every stage.
The bad: Generally found the GC battle a snooze; Froome not being let off the leash; Wiggins abusive rant in the first week; Too much time trialling and lack of mountain top finishes; More Lance Armstrong allegations distractions; Some idiot risking lives by throwing tacks on the road.
July 24th 2012 @ 9:15am
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 9:15am | Report comment
I can’t argue with any of that! Thought Sanchez and Pinot wins were both excellent, and Valverde as well, actually.
I forgot to mention the crashes in the first week, which hurt the race (and the riders). Nobody wants to see crashes.
July 24th 2012 @ 9:30am
liquorbox_ said | July 24th 2012 @ 9:30am | Report comment
Voeklers sex face reminds me of “Eddie Murphy Raw” when he is talking about cool F#*K Faces, very funny stuff.
Europcar are my second favourite team and Voekler is my favourite cyclist so I was over the moon, A lot of highlights for me and so glad to see a team like Europcar being so aggressive. With GreenEDGE just starting out it would be nice for them to be as aggressive and try to get in all the breaks.If you cant win a stage, then at least get your sponsors on TV.
My only downside is being a Euskaltel fan I did not see much joy, but there is always next year!
As for the coverage, I think I am finally sick of Shirwin and Liggett. I hae been spoilt by watching the Eurosport coverage of all the other races this season and have generally chosen them when there was a double up of any broadcasts earlier in the season. I am sick of the scenery and the history lesson that comes with it, I am sick of cooking segments and most of all I am sick of the trivial non cycling crap that is mentioned. Eurosport will discuss the gearing choices of the cyclist for each stage, the tyre choices for cobblestones, the frame weights of different cyclist and other information that refers to what you are watching. It is also entertaining.
SBS do a fantastic job, but it is getting tired for me. Take aim! I am sure I will get attacked for this view of the coverage.
July 24th 2012 @ 9:46am
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 9:46am | Report comment
I completely agree with you that Eurosport’s commentary is superior. Phil and Paul, bless ‘em, just aren’t as accurate as they used to be, and the need to talk constantly means they repeat themselves ad nauseam.
Harmon and Kelly (once you get used to Kelly’s mumbles and accent) don’t mind a bit of silence when there’s not much happening, and add a bit more insight.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:28am
liquorbox_ said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
the only eurosport coverage I did not like was the tour of Switzerland
July 24th 2012 @ 10:43am
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:43am | Report comment
Too much cowbell?
July 24th 2012 @ 11:02am
Mattwa said | July 24th 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
As a casual cycling viewer, I only listen to Sherwin and Ligget once or twice a year. I have to say I quite like the history lessons, and although they do repeat themselves, they get a bit excited and add a bit of colour.
Voeckler’s sex face is a highlight for me. I find it very entertaining.
+1 on adding some variety to the advertising. The erection medication one was painful. Pitching a tent? My god.
July 24th 2012 @ 11:51am
HardcorePrawn said | July 24th 2012 @ 11:51am | Report comment
Great article, and I’m so glad to see that I’m not alone in disliking the repetitive ads. The erectile dysfunctional ones were particularly annoying; their presence meant that I had to be on my toes whenever I watched a recorded stage with my kids the following day. SBS have a history of showing ads in a similar vein (‘Sniff and Stiff’ anyone?), are cycling fans (and fans of WW2 documentaries or European cinema for that matter) really the target audience for these products?
Also, listening to the commentary, which is usually exemplary, made me wonder if Phil Liggett was beginning to lose it this year. On numerous occasions he called out the wrong rider’s name, usually confusing riders in the breakaway with those in the peloton, and stumbled over French pronunciations. The occasional mishap is expected, but I thought that this year he really had more than a few. Hopefully he’ll be back on form in time for the Vuelta.
July 24th 2012 @ 4:49pm
Rhys said | July 24th 2012 @ 4:49pm | Report comment
Phil’s going the same way as Murray Walker did in his F1 commentary. Walker’s famous “unless I’m very much mistaken…..I am very much mistaken”. Still you’ve gotta love the passion in their calls.
I think next year’s Tour, the 100th, is going to be something special – I’d expect all the classic mountain top finishes to feature along the way. It’ll be one for the out and out climbers to win.
July 24th 2012 @ 11:57am
DanMan said | July 24th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Gotta say at least the most annoying add of all was not present. The 2011 Bills, bills, bills sgio one used to drive me nuts. A woman standing in front of her luxurious mansion and 2 new cars on the perfect front lawn complaining about the price of bills . . . Forever burned in my memory. Good advertising in hindsight?
July 24th 2012 @ 6:15pm
Cam B said | July 24th 2012 @ 6:15pm | Report comment
Tim, I agree with your list of good and bad and most of your comments except for the one talking about Caevdish.
I think he had an amazing tour. He crashed out of 2 sprint finishes and so he actually won 3 of the 4 that he contested. If it weren’t for those crashes with the form he showed he could have had 5 victories and then everyone would be saying what a great tour he had. Sagan won the green because of his ability to win stages and score points on stages that the other sprinters got dropped on. Based on that I don’t see how Cavendish could have gone any better even if he had the full support of his team.
And in relation to repetitive adds… Can anyone out there tell me how Swiss vitamins gets away with having athletes star in their adds that are not sponsored by or even use Swiss vitamins? Their use of stock footage from Olympics has made it seem like Cathy Freeman, Steven Hooker and numerous other Australian gold medalists use Swiss vitamins when I know for a fact that at least one of those other athletes was sponsored by another vitamin company when they won their gold medal…
July 24th 2012 @ 8:01pm
liquorbox_ said | July 24th 2012 @ 8:01pm | Report comment
i guess if they are now sponsored by them then it is ok,
July 24th 2012 @ 10:31pm
Cam B said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:31pm | Report comment
Nope. They are not sponsored by Swiss. What Swiss is doing is using stock Olympic footage (because they are an official sponsor) and making it look like all those athletes are using Swiss vitamins when they are not.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:32pm
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:32pm | Report comment
That is dodgy.
July 25th 2012 @ 7:31am
liquorbox_ said | July 25th 2012 @ 7:31am | Report comment
I dont think it is dodgy at all, if a vitamin company decided to hire Dawn Fraser as a spokesperson, do you think they would show footage of her today or from when she was beating the world? Would you Show Steve Waugh now or when he was raising his bat after a century?
The person is still the same, the marketing idea is to show that someone who is a world beater thinks that taking vitamins is important, and to take the right branded ones is even more important.
July 25th 2012 @ 3:38pm
Tim Renowden said | July 25th 2012 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
Yeah but if a company is showing footage of athletes who have never used their products or been sponsored by that company, that’s pretty misleading.
July 24th 2012 @ 8:35pm
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 8:35pm | Report comment
Cav had a very good Tour by a normal rider’s standards, but compared to the last couple of years? Remember he won 6 stages in 2009, 5 in 2010, and 5 in 2011.
Maybe if he had better support he wouldn’t have missed out on contesting so many sprints.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:32pm
Cam B said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:32pm | Report comment
I fail to see how support of his team would have stopped him from crashing…
July 24th 2012 @ 10:40pm
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:40pm | Report comment
Better position won’t stop all crashes, but if you’re at the front in a train of team-mates you’re less likely to get tangled up.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:26pm
Roundy said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:26pm | Report comment
It will be very interesting to see the route for next year. The transfer period will be under way and if we don’t see many changes at Sky the organizers will have to think long and hard about how THEY will defeat Sky. Prudhome won’t want the 100th tour to be as boring as this one!
Saying that, I still loved it!
The Lance thing didn’t take too much gloss off it. It’s been happening for months. I was surprised to see Schleck get done… But don’t really mind- he’s a bit of a tw$t.
Sagan is bloody good. Love watching him smash it, deserved to win, even though Gossy is a favourite son.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:31pm
Tim Renowden said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:31pm | Report comment
There’s been a few hints about epic mountaintop finishes next year, so I can’t wait to see the route announcement!
I reckon there’s a pretty good chance Froome and Cav will both leave Sky.
July 25th 2012 @ 7:34am
liquorbox_ said | July 25th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
I must say I am interested in Skys’s performance in Spain, there are heaps of mountain top finishes
July 24th 2012 @ 11:11pm
HRLA said | July 24th 2012 @ 11:11pm | Report comment
Very nice article Tim. All your positives were what I found exciting about the race aswell. As soon as Andy Schlek and Contador weren’t going to be in the race I think it fell fully in Wiggins favour. Having 5 Strong riders to attack instead of just one or two potentially would have reduced Sky earlier on the climbs. I think Froome has to leave Sky because he wont get in front of Wiggins as team leader. He was ready to blow him away on three stages but clearly got told to come back to Wiggins (which I agree with as it is a team sport). Similar things might happen at BMC if Cadel tries to stay as number one and the young jersey winner wants to be promoted.