For equality’s sake O’Grady must carry the flag
Stuart O’Grady is the right person to carry the Australian flag in to London’s Olympic Park for this week’s opening ceremony and the appointment of anyone else would be a token gesture.
Much has been made these past few days of the need for a woman to carry the Australian flag during the opening ceremony. One specific woman has not been named – simply that a woman should do it.
It’s notions like this which confuse the idea of feminism. It’s supposed to be about equality, whereas it has a tendency these days to be simply construed as women deserve more to make up for past injustices.
Make no mistake, women have been treated as second class citizens – and based on the travel arrangements of the Opals (the Aussie women’s basketball team, who flew to London in premium economy) compared to the Boomers (the male team, who flew business), in many they situations continue to be.
Furthermore, it is a sad state of affairs that, going in to the games of the 30th Olympiad, only three women have ever carried the flag for Australia. And it’s certainly not fair.
But does it seem fair that a woman be given the honour for the next 24 Olympics straight so as to even things out?
Raelene Boyle, the first Australian woman to carry the flag at an opening ceremony, certainly doesn’t think so.
“I would hate to think when I was selected that they’d said ‘Jeepers, we’ve never had a woman before’. That would make me feel very sad … and it would certainly cast a shadow over my credibility.”
Former Olympian Ric Charlesworth stoked the fire, reported in Fairfax media as saying, “We have had quite a few males in succession and I would like to see them give a female athlete a chance.”
But without giving specific names, Ric is just saying a woman should be out in front because it’s about time, rather than because one is the most deserving of the honour.
Names which have been thrown up as one of Charlesworth’s deserving candidates include Natalie Cook (beach volleyball), Leisel Jones (swimming), Sally Pearson (athletics) and Anna Meares (cycling).
Whilst both Meares and Pearson are two of Australia’s best gold medal chances, you could dismiss their claims out of hand on the basis of their relative inexperience.
This may seem a ridiculous thing to say about Meares, who has won gold and silver in the last two Olympics respectively, but there are far too many athletes going to the Games who have competed at the top level for longer, for a three-time Olympian to be given the honour and pressure of being Australia’s flag bearer and therefore figurehead.
Jones and Cook would seem better options due to being more experienced – London will be Jones’s fourth Olympics and Cook’s fifth.
However Jones will always have trouble getting past the reputation she forged early on in her career – as a spoilt brat. It’s why Lleyton Hewitt isn’t even considered an outside chance of carrying the flag.
Thus we are left with Cook. Competing in her fifth Olympics at the age of 37, seniority is not an issue, nor is the pressure of being the Australian team’s figurehead. Furthermore, she has won two medals in her Olympic career.
However her comment, “If a male carries the flag I will sit in protest,” would seem to have done her cause irreparable harm.
Regardless, let’s compare these four to the outstanding male choice, Stuart O’Grady.
O’Grady has competed at every Olympics since Barcelona in 1992 – making this his sixth consecutive games – for a haul of four medals.
Furthermore, after years riding as a domestique for Tour de France winner Andy Schleck, O’Grady decided the dream of riding for an Australian pro cycling team was more important than winning another Tour with his previous team, so left team Schleck to ride for Orica-GreenEDGE.
Over 20 years at the top of his profession and a plain showing of patriotism to ride for an Australian team. This isn’t to suggest Cook, Jones, Meares or Pearson aren’t just as patriotic but, put side by side, O’Grady is the more deserving choice.
Just as quota systems are seen as an unfair means of ensuring a fair go, the idea that a woman should carry Australia’s flag simply because it’s about time is flawed.
Let a woman carry the flag because she is a fine role model, has been at the top of her game of many years and is the standout choice.
But selecting a woman to carry the flag simply because one hasn’t for a while is neither fair on the man who may have done it, nor the woman who is given the token role.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Olympics articles
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Roof problem shuts Rio Olympics stadium
- Tame swimming antics show Australia’s tired of ‘scandals’ (27)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Magnussen admits Olympic mistakes
- ASADA powers fall short, says Coates
- Schlanger’s unlikely saviour (2)
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Shane Heal, the USA and the Golden Generation of Australian Basketball (15)
- London 2012: 30 things from the 30th Olympiad (1)
- Fools gold: Australia’s First Footy Olympics (8)
- How Australian sport can change the world (7)
- Reminders from London (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics, stuart o'grady

July 24th 2012 @ 9:53am
B.A Sports said | July 24th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
O”Grady, while an acceptable choice, his Tour De France team choice and performance etc should have nothing to do with whether or not he carries the flag as it has nothing to do with the Olympics. If you want to bring non-olympic performance in to it then start counting in all of the achievments of Leisel Jones at World Championships, World Cup Short course meets, and other acolodaes she has achieved such as International Swimmer of the Year. She has 9 Olympics medals (happy to be corrected) and will become the first Aussie swimmer (male or female) to compete at four Olympics. Given she had to do all this while going through pubity, growing up infront of a nation and being expected to act like an adult when she was 15/16, I think she is a pretty worthy holder of the flag regardless of gender.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:19am
KN said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:19am | Report comment
I agree – I believe O’Grady is a great choice and as a woman, I’m more than happy to see the flag bearer be a man. Natalie Cook’s comments are disappointing and essentially belittle O’Grady and what he has achieved in his sport if he does get the honour.
I am interested however, in your thoughts on Lauren Jackson as a potential flag bearer? Few Australians have emulated her success in their chosen sports. Admittedly there aren’t any gold medals (yet!), but this will be her fourth Olympics and probable 4th medal.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:39am
sheek said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:39am | Report comment
KN,
Both Leisel Jones or Lauren Jackson would be fantastic choices. I’m inclined to think Cook has disqualified herself by her outbursts.
I should also clarify that being chosen as flag bearer depends on a whole combination of factors, & not just number of Olympics attended, or medals won.
I think the quality of character of the candidate especially, & their leadership, communication & mentoring skills, would all be factors in their selection.
July 24th 2012 @ 1:49pm
Big Steve said | July 24th 2012 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
Jackson probably has another one in her depending on injury, i think she is only 30. she was the first name I thought of and if she is in Brazil i would think she would be a lock.
July 24th 2012 @ 10:34am
sheek said | July 24th 2012 @ 10:34am | Report comment
Stuart O’Grady has done enough purely based on his Olympics service to carry the flag.
This is his 6th Olympics – 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012. He has won one gold medal & two bronze medals in an intensely competitive sport – cycling.
Natalie Cook is attending her 5th Olympics – 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012. She has won one gold medal & one bronze medal in beach volleyball.
Head to head O’Grady shades Cook by one more Olympics appearance & one bronze medal.
But Cook’s unfortunate outburst has muddied the whole process. I agree more women should carry the flag. Unfortunately, 2012 might not be the year if we look at the potential candidates dispassionately.
I’ve heard from a friend (before the team left) who is a member of the AOC team in London, that Aussie chief Nick Green (an outstanding former rower) is a bit of a deadhead. In other words, he might lack the wisdom to make the most considered decision here.
So politically, we might be “forced” to have a female flag bearer, simply because Cook has made such a meal of the issue.
July 24th 2012 @ 11:41am
DanMan said | July 24th 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
Sheek, I think you covered it when you say O’Grady is from an intensely competitive sport in cycling compared to Cook in beach volleyball. No disrespect to volleyballers but i mean seriously, its a bit of a joke sport compared to historic sports like track and field, cycling, swimming etc.
July 24th 2012 @ 2:50pm
Brian said | July 24th 2012 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
You kind of defeat your own arguments there. If your thinking of a pure Olympic sport than its Swimming or Athletics rather than Cycling (which the tour De France as its pinnacle). Based on that I would support giving it to Liesel Jones. I like many Australians have no recollection of O’Grady competing at the Olympics. I am sure he has with great distinction but pool and track memories outdo Cycling.
July 24th 2012 @ 5:52pm
DanMan said | July 24th 2012 @ 5:52pm | Report comment
Not really Brian – Yes TDF is the pinnacle of road cycling but for track cycling (which the lay person is more familiar with) olympics is everything.
July 24th 2012 @ 7:50pm
sheek said | July 24th 2012 @ 7:50pm | Report comment
Brian,
You need to clarify ‘pure’.
If you mean ‘drug-free’ forget it, aquatics & athletics are as tainted as cycling. However, if you mean “deserving of Olympic status” as sports, then heck, you’re asking for a whole new argument. Cycling’s been in the Olympics for a very long-time, and is a ‘blueblood’ sport of the Olympics.
July 24th 2012 @ 5:39pm
Bondy said | July 24th 2012 @ 5:39pm | Report comment
Thats pretty impressive Sheek.
One thing for future reference if O’Grady carries the flag “good choice” for 2012 surely the most simplist thing to do would be for the A.O.C. to simply state that we’re going boy girl from here on in so 2016 its female regardless and boy again for 2020 and so on. It stops the sexist claims immediately.
July 24th 2012 @ 12:52pm
Mango Jack said | July 24th 2012 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
Longevity and the number of times an athlete has been selected, though significant, should not equate to entitlement to carry the flag. It should be someone who represents Aus well and adheres to the ideals of the Olympic movement. I like Liesel Jones’ story. From petulant teenager, she has matured into a great ambassador. Throw in her considerable acheivements, and I think she has a strong claim. After recovering from a horrific accident to be a top level cyclist again, Anna Meares should also be strongly considered. Agree that Cook’s poor handling of the debate disqualifies her. But maybe she is smart enough to know that anyway, and is acting the fall-girl to ensure Nick Green is backed into selecting another female. It’s a shame the choice has become so much about gender, as there are many excellent candidates, men and women.
July 24th 2012 @ 1:20pm
Steve said | July 24th 2012 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Natalie Cook and her self serving comments should rule her out completely. Australian’s hate nothing more in their sportspeople, than a big headed, I deserve, I deserve attitude. Natalie Cook doesnt want Anna Meares to be the flag bearer, she doesnt want Leisel Jones to be the flag bearer, this is all because she wants it, and thinks she deserves the honour. This is all about Natalie Cook’s own self serving, self interested nature. Being a woman, or a gay athlete, are just background noise to her own selfish wants. I would hate to be the female athlete selected for this role now, if thats turns out to be the case, Natalie Cook has just tarnished this role for all women now. She has put Nick Green into an unenviable position, and I for one would hate to be choosing this role now. For my money it should be Stuart O’ Grady.
July 24th 2012 @ 2:51pm
jameswm said | July 24th 2012 @ 2:51pm | Report comment
Totally agree that flag bearer should be chosen on merit not gender.
However, I do think Leisel would be an excellent choice. Far from ruling her out, I think her journey from an unpopular teenager to one of our most loved Olympians is a great story. She deserves all the credit and has worked hard.
Having said that, SOG is a true champ.
I’d be perfectly happy with either and would put them as the top 2.
July 24th 2012 @ 2:58pm
Australian Rules said | July 24th 2012 @ 2:58pm | Report comment
Well expressed Joe.
July 24th 2012 @ 3:09pm
Punter said | July 24th 2012 @ 3:09pm | Report comment
I too would be perfectly happy to have either Leisel Jones or Stuart O’Grady carrying the flag at the opening ceremony.
If i had to pick one it would be Leisel as she has a higher Olympic profile than Stuart, plus if gender does come into it, the fact we have had only 3 women flag bearers, well this is wrong, the men are way behind the women when it comes to Olympic success.
Maybe this is longevity thing, as women tend to quit & have babies.
July 24th 2012 @ 5:31pm
Antonio said | July 24th 2012 @ 5:31pm | Report comment
If feminist want equality why don’t we just desegregate the sexes in the Olympic games and make female athletes compete against their male counterparts. This would stop the view that female events at the Olympics are B standard when compared against the male events.
July 24th 2012 @ 6:49pm
John said | July 24th 2012 @ 6:49pm | Report comment
Agree with most on here in that it shouldn’t be based on gender. If the best candidate is male for the next century then so be it. Likewise if it is a female for the next century.
I would like it to be an athlete who is humble, who tries in everything they do to make Australia a better place. Someone makes sacrifices for the good of others. I don’t know enough about our Olympians to pick a candidate but someone in the AOC would be able to make a good decision (surely). Someone who has been to a stack of Olympics, won x amount of medals or had an amazing comeback story should not be picked for those reasons. It should be based on what they have done for their sport and the Australian community.