Johnson to really step up this summer
”He bowls to the left, he bowls to the right, that Mitchell Johnson, his bowling is …”. This chant has not only echoed in Johnson’s ears, but every English cricket ground since last the Ashes series.
Although harsh, it is somewhat true. Yet credibly, Johnson remains upbeat about his recent comeback from an eight month layoff due to a plaguing toe injury.
He laughs off the boisterous jibes to which he undoubtedly now knows all the words too, taking it as a compliment, “I think they wouldn’t put so much crap on me if they weren’t threatened,” he said.
Most would have supported Johnson’s admission that he thought about walking away from the game. Not me. Despite being the most frustrating cricketer on the planet, I believe Johnson will step up and spearhead our exciting, yet inexperienced pace attack for the next five years at least.
It is often those with the most potential who fall the hardest. Mitch learned this the hard way.
He announced himself on the South African tour of 2008, with few able to forget his unplayable performance of 8/61 in 2008 against the Proteas. Yet a year later in England, he went missing and one became aware of his often volatile mental strength.
Not only did his once potent swing and accuracy desert him, but more importantly, his confidence was shot. The new ball taken away from him, his shoulders slumped and the golden boy of Australian cricket seemed a distant memory.
Despite a hopeful resurgence after his 6/38 in Perth in 2011, he has never really fulfilled his undoubted natural talent with both bat and ball.
Who the hell knows? A question often asked by those watching him as he sprints into his delivery stride. Mitch included. The Australian press have rallied for Johnson to be dropped for the majority of his career, and deservedly so.
However, few argue that he belongs on the international cricket stage. The question is whether he will ever use his natural talent to productive effect. I think he can.
We are blessed with an enormously talented young crop of quicks including James Pattinson, Patrick Cummins, Ben Cutting and Mitchell Starc, who will all be on the international scene for the next decade at least. But someone needs to lead them.
Someone needs to step up and spearhead this talented, yet inexperienced attack in both forms of the game. That someone is Mitchell Johnson. Australia need a fast lefty, one can actually scare batsman with pace.
I am as big of fan of Mitchell Starc as the next bloke, however as much as I want to, I can’t go past Johnson. We can’t forget that he is still the number one ranked Australian one day bowler with an average of 25.22.
As much as I wanted Mitch to come back on the international scene following his injury, I can’t disagree more about the way in which it happened.
He returned in the second ODI in the recent one day series in England, finishing with figures of 0-43 off 7 overs. Players need to go back to their respective states and earn a recall.
Fair enough for players who have earned their stripes, but over the last couple of seasons Johnson hasn’t gone close to proving himself at the top level. “He needs to get back on the paddock – Mitch just has to start playing cricket again, he’s been off for about eight months now,” Mickey Arthur said on his return.
Pardon my ignorance Mr Arthur, but shouldn’t he be getting said match practice in English County cricket like fellow discards Usman Khawaja and Phil Hughes, and not on the international scene!?
Despite this, I do think that the appointment of Mickey Arthur of Head Coach will act as a saving grace for Johnson, previously working with one another in the Western Australian system. Last week Arthur gave Johnson a well-deserved wake up call, describing his recent comeback performances in England as “submissive, bullied and lacking character.”
Johnson himself said the description was correct. He knows he needs to reignite his once burning fire in his belly to bowl aggressively. Over the last couple of months, he has worked closely with Dennis Lillee who has advised him to work on his skill rather than pace.
“I’ve had him doing endurance running and sprinting and have technically remodelled a few things,” Lillee said. Since his comeback, Johnson has been noticeably more upright at the popping crease, intrinsically tightening his technique that has often been characterised by error.
With sheer weight of overs bowled, Johnson will kill the empty, overused term of ‘x-factor’ (what does that even mean?), and become the reliable spearhead Australia needs.
I don’t care if I’m the only one that backs Mitchell Johnson. Watching him switched on with both bat and ball is one of the most genuinely pleasing sights one sees on the cricket field. He will reignite his career with a return to top from and successfully lead a young Australian pace attack into next year’s Ashes.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (58)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (41)
- Rogers’ 214 gives Aussies Ashes boost (40)
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (19)
- Could Bird be the difference in the Ashes? (21)
- Warner targets media in Twitter rant (6)
- Strauss wants Pietersen fit for Ashes
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (45)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (8)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (68)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Cricket, Dennis Lillee, Mitchell Johnson

July 26th 2012 @ 1:49am
Mick H said | July 26th 2012 @ 1:49am | Report comment
Johnson has been talking this garbage talk for 2 – 3 years in the hope that a coach, the fans and selectors will believe in him again. The bowling team has gone strength to strength without him there.
He has an inaccurate and unpredictable bowling technique that the English (and therefore the rest of the world) have worked out….
Leave the ball outside off and whip the inswinger off the pads, ALL DAY. Then banter something about his family so he wipes his tears whilst running in for the next delivery.
Not only does Johnson go for lots of runs in test matches but he also cannot be relied upon to bowl to a plan in the bowling unit. It is important to bowl as a group or pack and with Johnson this is just impossible. He needs to show Australia through some seriously impressive bowling figures that he should return and boot out one of the current quicks.
Mitch Starc can do everything Johnson can, with more accuracy however he needs more of a presence at the crease which will come with age.
July 26th 2012 @ 8:05am
Jason said | July 26th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
Let him play the Perth Test and then let’s move on.
July 26th 2012 @ 11:45am
Mick H said | July 26th 2012 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Lol, can’t argue mate.
July 26th 2012 @ 8:25am
Brett McKay said | July 26th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
I would’ve liked to see what Craig McDermott could do with Johnson, but I guess we’ll never know now..
July 26th 2012 @ 8:49am
Disco said | July 26th 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
The dreadful term ‘X-factor’ is used to describe a player that is occasionally good but usually sub-standard. Johnson personifies this.
July 26th 2012 @ 9:09am
Happy Hooker said | July 26th 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Agree Disco … he’s like Goran Ivanisevic … but with half the talent. If Mitchell Johnson is leading Australia’s pace attack in next year’s Ashes series, then we are in even more dire straits than I thought.
July 26th 2012 @ 2:35pm
tonysalerno said | July 26th 2012 @ 2:35pm | Report comment
The ‘X’ stands for erratic in Johnson’s case.
July 26th 2012 @ 9:14am
Matt F said | July 26th 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
He shouldn’t be anywhere near the Test side unless he proves himself with good, consistent Sheld performances. It really should be as simple as that. Sadly the lure of the “x-factor” seems to trump actual results at the moment
July 26th 2012 @ 9:26am
Michael Fahey said | July 26th 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
As far as tests go he’s yesterday’s news….I still can’t forget Johnson’s woeful bowling at Lord’s in 2009….he, and by association Ponting for keeping him on, lost the Test in that first session…he’s a pie checker…first spell 0/77 off 11 and second 1/24 off 3…7 an over for morning of a Test.
My Pommie mates will chuckle..He laughs off the boisterous jibes to which he undoubtedly now knows all the words too, taking it as a compliment, “I think they wouldn’t put so much crap on me if they weren’t threatened,” he said.
Oh please…
He has only bowled well near the sea…Perth and Brissie…must be the tides!…Can bat but unfortunately the crop of fast bowlers have left him behind with the ball..Maybe the 20:20 dollars beckon..
July 26th 2012 @ 12:35pm
Disco said | July 26th 2012 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Ah, but his batting average is, from memory, about 18 which isn’t that flash for a Test No.8.
July 26th 2012 @ 9:35am
swannies05 said | July 26th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Get him away from my Test team, stuff his ‘potential’. He is 31, he has had his chance, time to show him the door was a few years ago bu now he should be pushed out of it and told to never come back. And as for someone leading the attack, how about Siddle? He led us superbly all Summer.
July 26th 2012 @ 1:36pm
Kev said | July 26th 2012 @ 1:36pm | Report comment
Enough about this guy’s potential and Lillee describing him as a “once in a generation bowler”. Potential is used to describe those who are young and still green, not someone who has been playing for as long as he has. The only thing Johnson has proven is that he is a once in a generation bowler at sending down rubbish deliveries and he can’t be trusted to bowl consistently. Anyone who goes for 7 an over in a test match is not good enough to play on the big stage. Time to to move on I say.
July 26th 2012 @ 10:50am
Poita said | July 26th 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
His terrible bowling cost phillip hughes his place in the side. In order to cover his ineptitude with the ball the selectors (led by Hilditch) dropped a batsman and replaced him with an all rounder ( who really isn’t an opener). If they had persisted with Hughes as they sdid with Johnson who knows where our batting would be now?
July 26th 2012 @ 12:21pm
Christo the Daddyo said | July 26th 2012 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
+1
July 26th 2012 @ 1:21pm
Cameron said | July 26th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
-1
July 26th 2012 @ 10:15pm
murph73 said | July 26th 2012 @ 10:15pm | Report comment
Is that you Khoder?
Philip Hughes cost Philip Hughes his place in the side.
July 26th 2012 @ 2:12pm
peeeko said | July 26th 2012 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
Harris, hillfy, sidle, pattinson, cummins and starc and cutting. No need for Mitchell Johnson in tests at least
July 26th 2012 @ 2:15pm
Bayman said | July 26th 2012 @ 2:15pm | Report comment
“I think they wouldn’t put so much crap on me if they weren’t threatened,” he said.
I’d imagine this is probably true. Anyone sitting at fine leg or third man would feel threatened when Johnno comes on to bowl. Those sitting behind the keeper are probably feeling pretty safe – and not just because the keeper’s there!
July 26th 2012 @ 2:27pm
Matt F said | July 26th 2012 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Yeah I had a good laugh at that statement too! Obviously he hasn’t been sledged by a batsman for quite a while either