Paris-Roubaix or Olympic gold?
Related coverage
Coming off the back of the world’s biggest bike race and with no WorldTour points on offer, just how relevant is the Olympic road race in today’s cycling calender? Does a gold medal compare with a victory at Paris-Roubaix?
I remember three things about the Olympic road race in Beijing. One, it seemed to go forever (245.5 kilometres – the longest in Olympic history although London will be longer), two, there was no one watching (Chinese security decided that it was unsafe to allow any spectators), and three, the obvious delight of Sammy Sanchez as he crossed the finish line, resplendent in the red, yellow and white jersey of the Spanish national team.
In a sport dominated by trade teams, indeed, dependant upon trade teams, it was refreshing to see the riders representing their respective countries. Yes, this happens at the world championships as well, but the Olympics are on a truly global stage, and the small matter of them only coming around every four years does make them special. Some riders have the opportunity to represent their countries at smaller events, such as the Commonwealth games, but they are against limited opposition. The Olympics are open to all.
That Sanchez reacted so jubilantly as he crossed the line should tell us something about the esteem a games medal is held in. The quality of the field chasing him tells us more. Fabian Cancellara was second, Alexandr Kolobnov was third and the chasing bunch contained Cadel Evans, Michael Rogers, Andy Schleck, Levi Leipheimer, Alejandro Valverde and Robert Gesink. All wanted glory, not for their employers – the ones who pay them to ride – but for national pride.
A quick check of the record books show recent Olympics have been dominated by some of the biggest names in the sport. In Athens Paolo Bettini sprinted to victory. In Sydney Jan Ullrich, Alexandre Vinokourov and Andreas Kloden made up the top three.
Take it seriously do they? You bet they do. It is a race that the biggest riders want to win. One of Lance Armstrong’s regrets was never having medalled at the games and Lance doesn’t usually do regrets.
Unlike the UCI’s calender of events, the Olympic road race has yet to fall prey to ‘non-traditional’ cycling nations. In fact Australia’s only ever medallist was Clyde Sefton, a boy from country Victoria, who claimed silver in Munich, 1972. He backed this up with Commonwealth gold two years later and was a two time national road champion (once as an amateur). Over the years he won multiple stages of the Herald Sun Tour (11) and claimed the general classification in 1981. He also rode with some success in Italy, counting among his team mates Francesco Moser and Felice Gimondi.
Hopefully Australia can add to that lean medal tally after this year’s event.
While Beijing was a mainly dull race lacking atmosphere, London should be the complete opposite. With the country riding on a cycling boom and with hometown heroes such as Mark Cavendish and Bradley Wiggins huge chances to medal, the racing will be furious and the atmosphere electric. Whoever stands atop the podium on Saturday evening (AEST), will know they have been in a contest and any thoughts of it being ‘just another race’ will have been well and truly buried. This is a medal that the riders want, especially Cavendish, but there are plenty who will try and spoil his party.
There will be breakaways, there will be a chase, there will be a sprint, there will be falls and there will be bravery. But there will only be one gold medal. It may not be Paris-Roubaix, but it is the Olympic games. Mess this race up and you might not get another opportunity.
Footnote: Here is an interesting exercise – If you had the choice of winning Paris-Roubaix or the Olympic road race, which would you choose? I have been swaying from one to the other and can’t decide. Initially I was thinking Paris-Roubaix because of the history and the difficulty of winning such an event. But then I started thinking about standing on the top step of the Olympic podium, listening to the national anthem and watching my country’s flag being raised, all with a gold medal hanging around my neck. That sounds pretty attractive as well. Which would you choose?
![]()
Passionate about your cycling? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily cycling email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Cycling, Olympics, Paris-Roubaix


July 26th 2012 @ 12:49pm
Bones506 said | July 26th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
Armstrong took Bronze at 2000 Olympics in the TT.
I think the question depends on which country you are from. For Boonen – PR is way bigger than gold. For Cavendish – I believe he wants Gold more than any other road cyclist in the world as he was denied on the track in 2008.
July 26th 2012 @ 7:22pm
Sean Lee said | July 26th 2012 @ 7:22pm | Report comment
Good point – For Cavendish especially, and riding in front of his home crowd as well, at this moment in time, nothing is more important for him.
July 26th 2012 @ 1:07pm
Tim Renowden said | July 26th 2012 @ 1:07pm | Report comment
Well, Sanchez has been covering his bike with gold for the last four years, so I reckon he’s enjoyed being Olympic champion.
Being open only once every four years, the Olympic Gold club is also a much more exclusive one than the Paris-Roubaix club.
July 26th 2012 @ 3:56pm
Bones506 said | July 26th 2012 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
As noted – the Spanish would not care about PR. A huge portion of riders, including the Spanish, do not have the power or size to actually compete in PR.
July 26th 2012 @ 7:11pm
Sean Lee said | July 26th 2012 @ 7:11pm | Report comment
It was the reaction of Sanchez that got me thinking about this topic. There was nothing contrived about his victory celebration, he was just overjoyed to win. It made up for what was a pretty tedious race.
July 26th 2012 @ 1:20pm
NickF said | July 26th 2012 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
As above, every 4 years makes it special, and for your country as well. But winning a gold olypiic medal does not only make you the best in your sport in the world, it puts you in a class with the best 100 metres, the best marathon, pole vaulter, 1500 swimmer and so on. It crosses all sporting boundaries.
July 26th 2012 @ 7:27pm
Sean Lee said | July 26th 2012 @ 7:27pm | Report comment
Yes, it brings cycling to a wider audience, at least for a short time. To be a successful member of the Olympic family would be a pretty special thing.
July 26th 2012 @ 2:17pm
Moses said | July 26th 2012 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
If I had the choice I would prefer an Olympic gold medal because I couldn’t tolerate riding on those little pebbles.
But in all seriousness, there are only three races in the world in which pretty much all the top riders participate: the TdF, the Olympics and Worlds. I think prestige is to be judged accordingly. I’d therefore put Olympic road race gold second or third on the list headed by a TdF win.
July 26th 2012 @ 4:09pm
Bones506 said | July 26th 2012 @ 4:09pm | Report comment
Those Pebbles are actually huge cobbles that break wheels, bikes and prissy little Moutain climbers.
PR is for the hard men of cycling. Most riders cannot participate in PR as they are simply to soft.
July 26th 2012 @ 4:45pm
Guy said | July 26th 2012 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
I met Hennie Kuiper one day. He not only won the 1972 Munich Olympic Road Race as an amateur but also Paris Roubaix, Milam San Remo, tour of Lombardy, Tour of Flanders, World Professional Road Race, 2nd in Tour de France etc. i asked him what his most important/best win was. Olympic Road Race and he was surprised I had to ask.
July 26th 2012 @ 7:15pm
Sean Lee said | July 26th 2012 @ 7:15pm | Report comment
Kuiper was a great rider and my first draft of this article had his details included. I culled them out later to make the article more ‘streamlined’. I find it fascinating that he rates the Olympics so highly. Thanks for sharing that.
July 26th 2012 @ 6:20pm
Herbie said | July 26th 2012 @ 6:20pm | Report comment
What a great question – for me though the history and ardour of Paris-Roubaix outways the exclusivity of the 4-yearly Olympic RR Gold, and I’d also put the Olympics behind the World Championships. So for one day professional RRs I’d have Worlds, Paris-Roubaix, Tour of Flanders, then Olympics, with then other classics. The Olympics are important to the non-cycling world, and maybe if your thing is fame then the Olympics would mean more to you, but for a cyclist the Olympics don’t really cut it. I’ve spent the last few days explaining to parenets, friends and colleagues, repeatedly, why the Tour de France win eclipses any win in the Olympics! Some get it, some don’t.
July 26th 2012 @ 7:19pm
Sean Lee said | July 26th 2012 @ 7:19pm | Report comment
Thanks for your response Herbie. I was initially like you, thinking that the classics would outweigh and Olympic medal, but the more I thought about it, the more I began to waver. I think you are right – in cycling circles you would be remembered more for winning a monument or grand tour, with the Olympic medal as an interesting footnote on your palmares. But, as an individual, that chance to stand on the podium after winning gold for your country must rank up there as a life defining moment. The question is too hard for me.
July 26th 2012 @ 8:05pm
Bones506 said | July 26th 2012 @ 8:05pm | Report comment
Cadel noted in an interview that Winning the worlds is massive in cycling. Winning The TDF is big across the globe.
To the hard core cyclists I think Worlds and Roubaix is much the same. Herbie raises. Great poin about the history and ardour of Roubaix. I personally woul cherish a cobble and m name in the shower block over an olympic RR gold medal.
July 26th 2012 @ 9:52pm
Sean Lee said | July 26th 2012 @ 9:52pm | Report comment
No doubt about it, to win Roubaix is to become a cycling immortal. It is such a mongrel race and held in such regard by all associated with cycling. It is a real throw back to how tough cycling used to be (without the spare tubes looped around the riders’ shoulders). Doubt I’d have the strength to lift the trophy in the unlikely event that I should win the bloody thing! I’m swaying back towards Roubaix Bonesy!
July 27th 2012 @ 8:52am
Bones506 said | July 27th 2012 @ 8:52am | Report comment
The Olympic course changes every 4 years and offers something different which is great and allows different styles of riders to win it but PR is such an iconic race. Those people that don’t follow cycling would not even know of it. To those that do it is a revered race and breaks man and machine.
It is still, and always will be, the hard mans race.
July 26th 2012 @ 7:36pm
Cantab said | July 26th 2012 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
As a casual fan, I enjoy watching the Olympics much more than the tour, it might be a long race but at least its over in a day!
July 26th 2012 @ 9:54pm
Sean Lee said | July 26th 2012 @ 9:54pm | Report comment
One day races are usually more attacking as well because there is no tomorrow. Stage racing is an entirely different beast. It is test cricket as opposed to T20.
July 26th 2012 @ 9:27pm
Justin Curran said | July 26th 2012 @ 9:27pm | Report comment
I reckon the grand kids would be more impressed with a shiny gold medal than a big rock
July 26th 2012 @ 10:45pm
Alex said | July 26th 2012 @ 10:45pm | Report comment
Definately PR over the Olympics for me but the worlds as #1. A rainbow jersey would be amazing to wear.
However now that Cavendish has one I reckon he would rather win gold then win 3 more rainbow jerseys, especially at home.
And the thing I am most looking forward to is Sammy Sanchez not having good trimmings anymore. Bloody excessive prolonged celebration for winning one race