Sharks make Super Rugby final
Related coverage
The Sharks held off a dramatic late comeback attempt by the Stormers to defeat their South African counterparts 26-19 and reach the final of rugby’s Super 15 on Saturday.
The Stormers looked dead and buried when JP Pietersen’s try put the Sharks ahead by 14 points with 20 minutes remaining, but Gio Aplon’s score seven minutes later set up a thrilling finish at Newlands.
The home side pushed for the try that would have levelled the scores even after the final hooter had sounded, but the Sharks held on to book a date with New Zealand’s Chiefs in next weekend’s final in Hamilton.
In the process, the Sharks became the first side in Super rugby history to win back-to-back playoff games away from home, having beaten Australia’s Reds in last week’s clash in Brisbane.
The Stormers had won 14 of their 16 regular-season matches with a defensive game plan that relied on making fewer errors than their opposition, and were ultimately left to reflect on a rusty performance in which they made too many mistakes.
A furious start to the match saw both sides reverting to type, with the Sharks’ running game dictated by the in-form Pietersen while the Stormers looked to hold firm and kick for territory.
After Peter Grant had opened the scoring in the seventh minute with a straightforward penalty for the Stormers, the Sharks began to dominate both possession and territory.
An infringement in the scrum allowed Frederic Michalak to level the scores, and by the midway point in the first half the visitors were in front thanks to the Frenchman’s drop goal.
The Stormers nearly hit back with a promising move down the left wing that ultimately saw captain Jean de Villiers held up on the line, but instead it was the Sharks who scored the first try of the game.
Winger Louis Ludik won a high ball on the home side’s 22-yard line, before stepping inside two defenders to cruise over the tryline.
Grant’s penalty on the stroke of halftime narrowed the deficit to 13-6, but some Sharks pressure early in the second half allowed the Durban side to restore their 10-point advantage.
Although Grant hit back with his third penalty of the evening in the 57th minute, Pietersen’s sublime sidestep two minutes later saw him ghost past Stormers lock Eben Etzebeth and put the Cape Town team in real strife.
The Stormers fought to the last, with Aplon’s try and another Grant penalty putting them within four points of the Sharks, but another Michalak drop and some solid defence saw the Sharks reach their fourth Super rugby final.
© AAP 2013![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Stormers, Super Rugby


July 29th 2012 @ 7:03am
Ziggy said | July 29th 2012 @ 7:03am | Report comment
Great victory but I doubt they can win again in NZ. Ironic as I believe the Stormers would have dispenesed with the Chiefs quite easily at Newlands. JP has really become a classy wing.
July 29th 2012 @ 7:27am
katzilla said | July 29th 2012 @ 7:27am | Report comment
Awesome win for the Sharks in a great game. Two enjoyable Semis that went down to the wire, can’t remember the last time that happened.
Glad to see JP Pieterson getting some great opportunities with ball in hand, before he pulls on a Green jersey and chases kicks all day.
July 29th 2012 @ 9:28am
ohtani's jacket said | July 29th 2012 @ 9:28am | Report comment
If the Sharks pull this off next weekend surely it will go down as the greatest feat in Supet Rugby history. And if they don’t, the Chiefs will be rewarded for a stellar season. It’s win-win.
July 29th 2012 @ 9:39am
Jutsy said | July 29th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Just watching the replay, phwoar the etzebeh/bismarck collision.
Not often u see bismark lose a battle of power.
July 29th 2012 @ 9:52am
nickoldschool said | July 29th 2012 @ 9:52am | Report comment
Michalak has become so influencial now. Lost his starting XV spot after a few rounds then made his way back at n10 and his now the marquee player he was always supposed to be.
Wonder if the Chiefs are going to stick with waikato stadium or potentially double the crowd/revenue and play at Eden park.
July 29th 2012 @ 11:48am
niik said | July 29th 2012 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Ridiculous travel schedule for the Sharks but I think they can overcome it to win. They will use it as extra motivation and the Chiefs still haven’t convinced me. Stupid things like back-chatting the ref should have cost the Chiefs on Friday but Carter & co were off their game. Sharks to take it and good on em if they do.
July 29th 2012 @ 12:08pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
-Need a 2 week gap between semi and grand final. curry cup do it. it is too unfair on the sharks travel schedule.
July 29th 2012 @ 4:46pm
Ryan said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:46pm | Report comment
Why was no one saying this last year when the Crusaders had to do a lot of travel?
July 29th 2012 @ 4:48pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:48pm | Report comment
they were Ryan everyone was saying the crusaders were the inspirational story of 2012, and in many ways the real winners, and everyone saying they would of won the title had they had a better schedule coz of the earthquake. the saders probably would o frosted the final not the reds, and only just got beat too bosom tough ref calls, and match being played in bribane and exhaustion. Heck they had to go too london too to play a mach.
July 29th 2012 @ 4:52pm
Ryan said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:52pm | Report comment
Correction they did not have to go to London they choose to go there however I get your point.
Anytime travel was raised and the earthquake, playing all the top teams at home was mentioned it was meet with scorn from Reds fans, so lets not pick at old scabs.
July 29th 2012 @ 4:56pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:56pm | Report comment
true but the point is the saders had a massive travel schedule. This year they hat eebn the same team but SBW is not there, and a few other key players kieren reid and dan carter has been a bit off form this year. Mccaw though has been in good form.
July 29th 2012 @ 5:50pm
David said | July 29th 2012 @ 5:50pm | Report comment
Last year the Crusaders came 3rd so they had a ‘home’ playoff
Then they went to cape town and won. The flew back to Brisbane and lost.
Last year it was tough for them given the earthquake and maybe It was their bridge too far.
The Sharks had an additional trip in a play off phase. Durban Brisbane cape town Hamilton
I know the guys fly business class but even when I have done that on trips to the US etc. it has been tough.
Good luck boys
July 29th 2012 @ 12:40pm
Royce Strauss said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
The Sharks win fairly frequently in Hamilton. I hear Lambie and Jordaan should be back from injury too. It’s a shame about the ruling on Francois Steyn not being able to play – what a ridiculous law, the fans are the ones that get robbed.
Honestly think the difference between the Sharks now and at the beginning of the season is Beast, he was missing for about 6 weeks after breaking his ankle pre-season. The moment he came back the Sharks have been on fire. Along with that, the idea that I’ve been wanting for a while, playing Alberts at 4.
That Sharks pack is moor-some.
July 29th 2012 @ 12:57pm
steve.h said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
I say for this final start Sykes at lock ( He is fresh only returned to Rugby in the Reds game ) and at half time bring on Alberts in place of Bresler, who had a massive game on the weekend. I think Alberts has 40 mins left in him so best to utilise in the last 40.
July 29th 2012 @ 3:38pm
WQ said | July 29th 2012 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
Don’t get to far in front of yourselves Sharks fans!
Well done winning two in a row away from home, but hey let’s face it you have only beaten the mis-firing Reds and the attack-less Stormers whom have struggled to score tries for two years now.
I think the Chiefs will actually claim their first Super Rugby title next weekend, however they won the title when they beat the Crusaders on Friday night!
July 29th 2012 @ 4:06pm
Royce Strauss said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:06pm | Report comment
As much as I dislike the Reds, they thumped the Chiefs not so long ago, while the Stormers topped the table and were undefeated at home this season. I wanted the Stormers to win, but please don’t downplay what the Sharks have achieved so far. Mkay?
The pressure is on the Chiefs, not the Sharks. The Chiefs are expected to beat a side that finished “6th” (5th in reality, but they were positioned at 6th) and have traveled to the moon and back.
Just sad to see the final being played in such a small garden shed of a stadium.
July 29th 2012 @ 4:45pm
Ryan said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
The same Reds that were thumped by the Force?
I do agree all the pressure is on the Chiefs and that the Sharks efforts need not be down played they have been sensational in recent weeks on a very good roll.
As for the final being played in a “small garden shed” so what the Chiefs deserve the home final the wee tin pot gardeners are clearly the best team on standings left in the competition and deserve every right to have a wee tea party in the Waikato.
Or would you prefer Rugby went the same way as League and AFL and host the Grand Final at the same venue every year?
July 29th 2012 @ 4:50pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
no way i love super rugby hosting separate grand finals in different places. A-league soccer, super bowl, super rugby do it. I am of the firm belief the word tradition gets manipulated by the ALF and NRL to serve thee pockets by playing it in Sydney and Melbourne. Spread top class matches everywhere not just 2 cities have a monopoly.
July 29th 2012 @ 5:08pm
Royce Strauss said | July 29th 2012 @ 5:08pm | Report comment
Suppose the positive is if the Chiefs win they might be able to afford to demolish the shed and build a proper stadium.
July 29th 2012 @ 5:28pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 5:28pm | Report comment
I actually think the grand final should be moved too eden park a bigger gate would be on offer.
July 29th 2012 @ 8:40pm
WQ said | July 29th 2012 @ 8:40pm | Report comment
Have you been there Royce Strauss?
July 29th 2012 @ 8:37pm
WQ said | July 29th 2012 @ 8:37pm | Report comment
It will feel like Eden Park for the Chiefs and feel like hell for the Sharks!
July 29th 2012 @ 5:38pm
David said | July 29th 2012 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
It’s the finals. The chiefs earned their home advantage.
The Stormers earned theirs semi advantage.
The Sharks have earned their shot at the final.
You devalue the win against the Reds who had been playing very well.
You devalue the win against the table topping Stormers despite no one else beat them there.
I was at the game yesterday and the Sharks did really well.
They can’t be discounted.
Having said that the odds have to be against them.
I do believe that the Chiefs would have struggled to fly to Cape Town and win.
However saying that the Chiefs Saders game was the final is as arrogant as some of my countrymen get from time to time.
This last leg of the travel may be a bridge too far for the Sharks. Even if they get well beaten it devalues nothing what the Sharks and Stormers did.
Either way am the best side win and I hope It’s the Sharks
July 29th 2012 @ 8:49pm
WQ said | July 29th 2012 @ 8:49pm | Report comment
The best side will win and celebrate their first Super Rugby final.
July 29th 2012 @ 9:27pm
WQ said | July 29th 2012 @ 9:27pm | Report comment
I did not devalue any win by the Sharks, just pointed out the deficiencies of both the Reds and the Stormers. I also congratulated the Sharks on back to back wins away from home.
As for my comment about the win over the Crusaders, that was made as a result of the enormity of the win over the Crusaders and the mental attitude that the Chiefs needed to bring to that game.
Whilst you might believe that the Chiefs would have struggled to beat the Stormers in South Africa, I am here to tell you that neither the Stormers or the Sharks would have beaten the Crusaders in New Zealand!
July 29th 2012 @ 10:01pm
Carnivean said | July 29th 2012 @ 10:01pm | Report comment
Your insistence that the ruling on Frans Steyn is ridiculous shows a distinct lack of ability to think in a critical manner.
What if the Chiefs signed Richie Mccaw on a loan? They could sign him today and play him on the weekend. Who cares that he wasn’t part of the team for the majority of the season? Rules on the mid-season signings are ridiculous, just ask Royce.
July 29th 2012 @ 12:49pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
A fresh frans stein would be a massive massive lift him, Lamvie, and freddy michalek running the team wow what talant.
Michalek should of been iced by lievermont in the world cup last year, but that is the logic of the french coach very or ex french coach very silly. what a player.
July 29th 2012 @ 3:52pm
Jutsie said | July 29th 2012 @ 3:52pm | Report comment
Lol you’ve been told the whole way through the finals series thats steyn isnt allowed to play because he was brought into the squad after the april deadline yet you still think his out due to injury!
July 29th 2012 @ 4:49pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:49pm | Report comment
lol silly me.
July 29th 2012 @ 5:09pm
Jutsie said | July 29th 2012 @ 5:09pm | Report comment
haha no worries. Hopefully lambie is back though.
July 29th 2012 @ 3:57pm
West said | July 29th 2012 @ 3:57pm | Report comment
I’m a huge chiefs fan, have been since they began but history with the chiefs has been a frustrating and disappointing journey they have let me down time and time again…..he’ll lets face it most years they where written off before the season even begins. But change is in the air, new coaching staff better discipline and the help of a few key players has turned the franchise around. Forgetting the past and previous humiliations of chiefs final attempts this is the best chance and opportunity to fail here would be a complete disaster and have no one to blame but themselves. Really they should destroy the sharks and run away with it before half time.
July 29th 2012 @ 4:50pm
Ryan said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
Yes they certainly have turned things around I am interested who will pick up SBWs spot in 2013.
As for past humiliation do note there is no s as the Chiefs have only ever contested one final and yes they were soundly thumped by the Bulls.
If they lose this coming weekend then add the s as then it will be plural
I’m not so sure they will destroy the Sharks at all, the Sharks have been playing solid kiwiesque style rugby this year and their confidence will be high they have just beaten two of the conference winners away, whats to say they can’t take a third. I personally am hoping they don’t but all power to them if they do.
July 29th 2012 @ 4:58pm
Johnno said | July 29th 2012 @ 4:58pm | Report comment
For me i think they will trial Richard Kahui as an I/C. They could do a lot worse ryan than Kahui. He is 6’3 like SBW.
Kahui is vastly experienced reads the game well, for me i think he is the man unless they get an overseas import.