The Crusaders defeat themselves in 2012
By Phil Bird, 29 Jul 2012 Phil Bird is a Roar Guru & Live Blogger
- Tagged:
- Crusaders, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies
Related coverage
- Canterbury Crusaders news
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news
- Wallabies news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
The Crusaders defeated the Crusaders in an epic semi final against the Chiefs in Hamilton last night.
It was a game that reflected the mood of the season for both sides. The Crusaders were running on ethanol, the Chiefs on jet fuel.
The men from Hamilton have developed a remarkably rounded team whose rise in 2012 has been driven by an outstanding forward pack and a backline pinned together by competition dazzlers Cruden, Williams and Robinson.
The more fancied Crusaders petered and fizzed in a stop-start campaign that lasted eighteen rounds and ended in appropriate fashion. A lack of fluency has dogged the Cantabrians since they last won a Super Rugby title in 2008.
From the outset the home team dominated their southern rivals with vicious rush defence and a steely rudder in five-eight Cruden, whose game was so electric it made Carter’s no-fuss calm appear almost…lethargic?
The Chiefs produced plenty of niggle, much of it directed at McCaw which is a theme presenting itself in all the big games these days; notably the rarities where McCaw ends up on the wrong side of winning. It had the effect of ruffling up the Crusaders who were guilty of dropped ball, passes that resembled up-and-unders, and a tackle count on their own players that might confuse the statisticians. A total lack of composure with the ball in hand.
Despite their form the Crusaders managed to be in the frame right up to the 82nd minute; their greatest strength is they know how to win when they’re playing badly. This time it proved a bridge too far, despite the Chiefs displaying some form of tourette syndrome, seemingly unable to control neurons firing like wayward garden hoses. Ill discipline was a key feature of their game, and most of it resulting in penalties. Luckily for them, Carter’s boot hasn’t been the same since his groin injury and running at under 70% for the season. Normally when his kick is misfiring he compensates with a harder running game, but not last night.
In the final minutes, the red team was three points down and with possession; this is the stuff the Crusaders are made of. And if the world’s greatest number 10 wasn’t having possibly the worst performance of his career he might have had the confidence to go for the killer drop goal and steal an unlikely win. Instead, they camped on their opponent’s 40m line for 20+ phases until they inevitably coughed up the oblong and with it their title chances.
Of course in a 15 man code you need more than one man to defeat a team, and Carter had the support of his teammates as they deconstructed their own game to a tawdry rabble.
The Wallabies would have been watching this with intent. If you manage to beat the Crusaders you’ve just developed your strategy for the Bledisloe Cup. This season the Crusaders were beaten by the Chiefs (twice) the Bulls, Hurricanes and Rebels. With the exception of the Bulls who rely on pressure – which is why they can’t win on the road – all these teams win by disrupting their opponents game plan.
This is why Robbie Deans is the best man for Australian rugby. Kiwi teams are the best at beating Kiwi teams and he’s got the inside word.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (319)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (184)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Crusaders, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies

July 29th 2012 @ 5:23am
Kuruki said | July 29th 2012 @ 5:23am | Report comment
it was Kerr Barlow’s pressure on Ellis and Carter that impressed me. He is a very good niggler.
July 30th 2012 @ 5:29am
mania said | July 30th 2012 @ 5:29am | Report comment
kerr-barlow deserves a call up for the RC i reckon.
July 29th 2012 @ 7:46am
Sage said | July 29th 2012 @ 7:46am | Report comment
A good game and a great finish. Carter’s boot seemed to be working OK last week Basher and I think you’re angle that the Saders lost it rather than crediting the Chiefs with a deserved win is unwarranted. Go the Chiefs. Big effort from the Kings Country boys next week to take the flag. Good luck.
I agree with your view on the Bledisloe strategy but it’s no secret. The WB’s just have to do what they know is needed but therein lays the problem
July 29th 2012 @ 7:57am
winston said | July 29th 2012 @ 7:57am | Report comment
The tittle of this article makes it sound a lot more imbalanced than it actually is. The Cheifs won because they played bloody well. Similar defensive style to a good SA team when they rush up and get cut down the space. Pushing the saders back 30m at the end of the game was massive and pretty much won the game for them. When the Bulls have beaten the crusaders they have bashed them in a similar fashion.
With such a poor aus effort this season I would think Robbie Deans would be paying far more attention to how the hell he is going to create a competitive test team. Eg are there any Aus forwards that have the mongrel and intent to play the way the chiefs did. Is Will Genia going to attack DC and the halfback like Ker Barlow did. Aus dont have a in form 10. For all the talk about injuries to Kahui and Conrad smith making the ABs weak at 13, Aus has no one really owning it at 12 or 13.
I feel SA is going to provide the real threat to the World Champs especially now that they have a real coach.
July 30th 2012 @ 5:32am
mania said | July 30th 2012 @ 5:32am | Report comment
winston – totally agree about the boks. SA has a lot fo cattle as evidenced by the stormers sharks game.
July 29th 2012 @ 8:21am
Red Block said | July 29th 2012 @ 8:21am | Report comment
Not one word about Blackadder’s tactics! The Chiefs were never the same team after McKenzie devised tactics that ripped the Chiefs apart at Suncorp. Prior to that the Chiefs had won 9 in a row.
The Reds attacked the Chiefs strength by picking and driving and having Ant Faingaa chip down SBW with grassing tackles and negating his off loads. Combine this with Genia running into Cruden’s channel and the Chiefs looked like lost Indians.
After this they won 3 from 6 and were ripe for the picking.
It was strange then the Crusaders tried an attack based on moving the ball around the field and never asked questions of the Chiefs in close.
Expect Plumtree to be much smarter than Blackadder and have the Sharks attack in places that will cause the Chiefs some major worries.
The travel weary Sharks are highly capable of causing an upset over a Chiefs side that is already clearing space in the trophy cabinet.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
July 29th 2012 @ 8:37am
winston said | July 29th 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Well I guess they’l take note of the Reds v Sharks game on how not to play.
BTW The chiefs pretty much defeated themselves at suncorp
July 29th 2012 @ 10:00am
Harry said | July 29th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Love it … you do realise we Reds supporters can now say if the Chiefs win next week that their SuperRugby title was a fluke and lacks legitimacy, the only reason you won is because we couldn’t put our best team on the field because of a rigged judiciary; and anyway the Reds absolutely spanked the Chiefs in their match.
Clearly it will be tainted win and the best team in 2013 were clearly the Queensland Reds, and all Chiefs supporters will have to immediately acknowledge this truism.
July 29th 2012 @ 10:03am
Harry said | July 29th 2012 @ 10:03am | Report comment
I am of course joking in the post above … if the Chiefs do get up, it will be a fully deserved and comprehensive triumph. The same as it is for every winner.
July 29th 2012 @ 10:15am
Gravity Basher said | July 29th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
I think ex-players should be banned from coaching for at least 20 years after retirement. Sentiment cloud’s people’s judgement. Look at Martin Johnson’s appointment. Ludicrous. Worse than Mal Maninga..
Sir John Kirwan’s appointment to Auckland has an air of desperation about it and won’t work.
Blackadder has managed the significant achievement of overseeing the best non-national team in the world and deconstructing their success.
The sign of good coaching is not necessarily about winning, it’s about getting the best out of the bunch of blokes you have.
which is why the award for best coach to Ewen McKenzie is dim-witted, almost dangerous. You wonder why Jake White would bother next year. Dragging that group to near the playoffs was a massive achievement. McKenzie’s recent statements that the Force’s Richard Graham is moving to the Reds to “fit into our current systems (sic)” was counterproductive and certainly not the way Deans approaches coaching. Of course Genia repeating the statement to the media which suggests it’s really, really important to the Reds that they don’t bring in outside influences. Makes you wonder why they bothered stripping the Force of their coach….
July 29th 2012 @ 10:45am
Jerry said | July 29th 2012 @ 10:45am | Report comment
I’m curious as to why you think John Kirwan won’t work? It’s not remotely comparable to Johnson’s appointment, Kirwan has a decade of coaching experience.
July 29th 2012 @ 11:07am
Gravity Basher said | July 29th 2012 @ 11:07am | Report comment
Agreed, however Kirwan’s experience has been with the Japanese, and it’s a totally different gear in Super Rugby. Plus they havent really excelled under his coaching, didn’t get a win in the last world cup, which was their stated goal.
It’s a massive jump to the Blues with no real track record of success in NZ or other competitive country.
July 29th 2012 @ 12:40pm
Jerry said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
Mark Hammett had no experience as a head coach.
Jamie Joseph had coached NPC for only 3 seasons.
Colin Cooper had two seasons of NPC and one Colts campaign.
Kirwan has plenty of experience.
July 29th 2012 @ 2:13pm
Gravity Basher said | July 29th 2012 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
Fair comment
July 30th 2012 @ 5:40am
mania said | July 30th 2012 @ 5:40am | Report comment
kirwin coached italy and made them good enough to be admitted into the 6 nations. japan now win in the pacific cup finals where they never had before kirwins reign. japan behaved poorly in the WC but there is more to japanese rugby than one tournament. you should have maybe have done a google search on JK before slagging him off.
July 29th 2012 @ 12:17pm
Kuruki said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Kirwan may have been coaching for years but when you look at it in terms of how many games he has coached it’s not very impressive at all. Maybe what 30 odd games? That’s infancy.
July 29th 2012 @ 12:36pm
Jerry said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
He coached 32 tests with Italy and 43 matches with Italy. Plus a season as assistant coach with the Blues and a couple of seasons coaching a Japanese club.
July 29th 2012 @ 12:47pm
ohtani's jacket said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
He actually coached Japan for 55 matches.
July 29th 2012 @ 1:08pm
Jerry said | July 29th 2012 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
Oh yeah, that second “italy” should be “Japan” and apparently I was wrong (thanks OJ).
July 29th 2012 @ 12:48pm
Kuruki said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
Well then bring on JK !!! And let’s pretend i didn’t say anything shall we lol.
July 29th 2012 @ 9:34pm
Ben S said | July 29th 2012 @ 9:34pm | Report comment
Martin Johnson who took England to their best placed 6N in 2010 since 2003, an away win in Australia, a record home win over Australia and the 2011 6N, you mean?
John Kirwan WON’T work? Seems a bit too concrete to me.
July 30th 2012 @ 5:37am
mania said | July 30th 2012 @ 5:37am | Report comment
basher – “Worse than Mal Maninga..” you extracting the urine? how long a streak does Maninga have in state of O?
blackadder deconstructing their success? how many finals has blackadder made? he hasnt been sitting idle and saders every season around business end are touted as a force to be reckoned with. and then you say “The sign of good coaching is not necessarily about winning, it’s about getting the best out of the bunch of blokes you have.” how has he not gottent he best out of the saders?
July 29th 2012 @ 12:56pm
ohtani's jacket said | July 29th 2012 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
After the Reds loss, the Chiefs had a bye and won their next three matches. They lost their final two derbies after the June window. Don’t see how it had anything to do with the Reds nor do I see how it matters considering the Reds were on a six game winning streak and the Stormers a four game winning streak.
July 29th 2012 @ 9:31am
stillmissit said | July 29th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
It looked like the Crusaders tactic was to slow the game down and maintain some composure whereas the Chiefs started flat out and never stopped. The Crusaders were outplayed everywhere except the scoreboard and this game should be essential watching for every Australian Super rugby coach in how to stay in a game whilst getting your backside spanked.
Funny game really, if the Crusaders had lifted the speed of their game they still might not have won but they would have been in a better position to win it, and we might have had the game of rugby I thought we would see between these teams.
July 30th 2012 @ 5:48am
mania said | July 30th 2012 @ 5:48am | Report comment
wow stillmissit – “saders outplayed everywhere except the score board.” huh? they were outplayed on the score board for the whole match and saders were still in the game upto and including the 82nd minute.
“would have been in a better position to win it,” saders were in a great position to win or draw it up to the last second and through out the entire game.
your a harsh critic if you didnt like that game. sure it wasnt a try fest but it still an awesome game
July 30th 2012 @ 8:11am
stillmissit said | July 30th 2012 @ 8:11am | Report comment
Sorry Mania but I was expecting the Crusaders to do what they do best and come out and attack wide and on the counter at speed. They strangely didn’t do that and that was due (in my not so humble Opinion) to the game tactics and Dan Carter having a rare off game. McCaw played himself to a standstill and Fruen did little, but there were too many errors for this to be stated as an ‘awesome’ game..
July 30th 2012 @ 8:31am
mania said | July 30th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
stillmissit – well i thought it was a good game. no where near the dynamic game previously where chiefs were ripped off by the TMO decision but still a game that both teams can take pride in.
tho agree with you carter was perhaps a bit off. mccaw cant have given any more than he did and no player (including read) could have contributed more, yet alas was still not enough. fruean as ever p’d me off as he musta gone on holiday for long periods of the game. how he got back into the starting line up i dont know.
definately agree that too many little errors, bad passes and drop balls from the saders. exactly the same thing that lost the stormers their game, too many little errors.
July 29th 2012 @ 10:42am
Nick Cross said | July 29th 2012 @ 10:42am | Report comment
I’m a bit confused – the thing that RD has been missing to enable the W’s to beat ABs is the knowledge of how to beat the Crusaders?
Unless something has changed there won’t be many Cheifs players in Wallabies this year, and the ABs are allowed to pick more than just Crusaders players so he still might have some problems.
July 29th 2012 @ 1:01pm
Tui said | July 29th 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
“The Wallabies would have been watching this with intent. If you manage to beat the Crusaders you’ve just developed your strategy for the Bledisloe Cup.” Believe it or not the Wallabies don’t play the Crusaders for the Bledisloe cup.
July 29th 2012 @ 7:45pm
tugboat said | July 29th 2012 @ 7:45pm | Report comment
All the 50 50s went to chiefs ,the sharks are playing better rugby and seem to have got better
The chiefs are the chokers of nz rugby so dont bet your house on it ,ref will play big part in this game
The only visit they have had to a final i think was a record loss to bulls ,im not sure id say waikato stadium is that daunting its more the travel , a nz team going to the bulls ground in a final is like game over
And with a team that never been winners the choke could be around the pressure the home crowd may produce
July 29th 2012 @ 8:02pm
Damo said | July 29th 2012 @ 8:02pm | Report comment
Of course Tui some wishful Aussie thinking in that comment.
If anything that game underlined just how powerful NZ rugby is.
Which is not really a boost to Wallaby chances?!?
I’d just like to say thank you to New Zealand for giving the rest of us such a great game. I thought from early in the first half that either of these teams would beat most if not all Test teams in the world.
Rugby was the winner.
July 29th 2012 @ 8:42pm
Damo said | July 29th 2012 @ 8:42pm | Report comment
And I also noted that the point of difference in each finals game was the energy of the number 10′s.
Cruden was everywhere. Carter was in comparison sleepier. Michalek bouncier than Grant, who looked off his game.
And the Reds did not have first or even second choice 10′s.
Steyn versus Carter -well it was as always – they are completely different players.
So if forwards match it in tight, the form of the 10′s may determine outcome.
I would place Cruden above a jet lagged Michalek.
So chiefs must be favorites.