The Crusaders defeat themselves in 2012
By Phil Bird, 29 Jul 2012 Phil Bird is a Roar Guru & Live Blogger
- Tagged:
- Crusaders, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies
Related coverage
The Crusaders defeated the Crusaders in an epic semi final against the Chiefs in Hamilton last night.
It was a game that reflected the mood of the season for both sides. The Crusaders were running on ethanol, the Chiefs on jet fuel.
The men from Hamilton have developed a remarkably rounded team whose rise in 2012 has been driven by an outstanding forward pack and a backline pinned together by competition dazzlers Cruden, Williams and Robinson.
The more fancied Crusaders petered and fizzed in a stop-start campaign that lasted eighteen rounds and ended in appropriate fashion. A lack of fluency has dogged the Cantabrians since they last won a Super Rugby title in 2008.
From the outset the home team dominated their southern rivals with vicious rush defence and a steely rudder in five-eight Cruden, whose game was so electric it made Carter’s no-fuss calm appear almost…lethargic?
The Chiefs produced plenty of niggle, much of it directed at McCaw which is a theme presenting itself in all the big games these days; notably the rarities where McCaw ends up on the wrong side of winning. It had the effect of ruffling up the Crusaders who were guilty of dropped ball, passes that resembled up-and-unders, and a tackle count on their own players that might confuse the statisticians. A total lack of composure with the ball in hand.
Despite their form the Crusaders managed to be in the frame right up to the 82nd minute; their greatest strength is they know how to win when they’re playing badly. This time it proved a bridge too far, despite the Chiefs displaying some form of tourette syndrome, seemingly unable to control neurons firing like wayward garden hoses. Ill discipline was a key feature of their game, and most of it resulting in penalties. Luckily for them, Carter’s boot hasn’t been the same since his groin injury and running at under 70% for the season. Normally when his kick is misfiring he compensates with a harder running game, but not last night.
In the final minutes, the red team was three points down and with possession; this is the stuff the Crusaders are made of. And if the world’s greatest number 10 wasn’t having possibly the worst performance of his career he might have had the confidence to go for the killer drop goal and steal an unlikely win. Instead, they camped on their opponent’s 40m line for 20+ phases until they inevitably coughed up the oblong and with it their title chances.
Of course in a 15 man code you need more than one man to defeat a team, and Carter had the support of his teammates as they deconstructed their own game to a tawdry rabble.
The Wallabies would have been watching this with intent. If you manage to beat the Crusaders you’ve just developed your strategy for the Bledisloe Cup. This season the Crusaders were beaten by the Chiefs (twice) the Bulls, Hurricanes and Rebels. With the exception of the Bulls who rely on pressure – which is why they can’t win on the road – all these teams win by disrupting their opponents game plan.
This is why Robbie Deans is the best man for Australian rugby. Kiwi teams are the best at beating Kiwi teams and he’s got the inside word.
The Crowd Says (44) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- SPIRO: ‘Captain Magic’ Quade Cooper goes down with all flags flying (333)
- Deans confirms no spot for Quade Cooper (281)
- Want to beat the Lions? Pick Quade Cooper (229)
- SPIRO: All Blacks learning to live without Carter (218)
- Wallabies’ six worst-kept secrets confirmed (204)
- A lesson in Deans-speak (154)
- Inside the mind of Robbie Deans (150)
- If all the Wallabies leak this week is a team, then happy days (15)
- A rugby series twelve years in the making (2)
- Brian Smith says referees will be crucial
- Carter back at 10 in reshaped All Blacks (59)
- Mo’onia Gerrard swaps netball for rugby (2)
- Genia braced for All Black-type challenge (3)
- Brumbies crack Lions code for Wallabies
- A rugby series twelve years in the making (2)
- Brian Smith says referees will be crucial (1)
- British and Irish Lions teams post WW2 (part 3) (15)
- Fifteen reasons why the Lions will beat the Wallabies (27)
- Lions vs Wallabies: the teams I’d pick (17)
- My Waratahs vs Lions experience (2)
- Brumbies vs British and Irish Lions: Tour match live scores, blog (220)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Crusaders, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies

July 30th 2012 @ 5:45am
Thurl said | July 30th 2012 @ 5:45am | Report comment
“This is why Robbie Deans is the best man for Australian rugby. Kiwi teams are the best at beating Kiwi teams and he’s got the inside word.”
Clearly Robbies developed hearing loos these past 4 years……..then again maybe its because he speaks a different language
July 30th 2012 @ 7:45am
sixo_clock said | July 30th 2012 @ 7:45am | Report comment
The ‘Saders won the second half and that should be a worrying factor for Rennie and co. He has the team and players so will he get them focused for eighty-two on the day? The Sharks do not quit, have a proven ability on the road to look very dangerous. Hopefully the extra days off will not soften the players because it is game-on come Friday night.
ps: What title did you send with the article? The one up there does not suit the content.
July 30th 2012 @ 1:02pm
Gravity Basher said | July 30th 2012 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Crusaders Defeat the Crusaders in 2012 (sic)
My position is this: if the Crusaders played footy like they should, they would have won the game. Just like the ABs losing to France, it’s never a function of ability, more self destruction.
The Saders have the best two players we’ll ever see, backed up by a competition leading scrum, and the best winger in the comp in my mind (Guidford). Everyone else is solid (except for Fruen, who’s fall from grace I’m positive is attributed to his being overlooked by the ABs, again. Not sure what else he can do to get into the squad, his form last year was electric)
The only player I’d like to see replaced is Quentin MacDonald starting ahead of Corey Flynn.
July 30th 2012 @ 3:23pm
ted said | July 30th 2012 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
This is why Robbie Deans is the best man for Australian rugby. Kiwi teams are the best at beating Kiwi teams and he’s got the inside word.
Still waiting Robbie……………..
July 30th 2012 @ 6:53pm
Wal The Hooker said | July 30th 2012 @ 6:53pm | Report comment
Damo I agree that game was so intense and brutal, the Saders got out muscled IMHO on this occasion and losing Romano and Read took away some fire power but I not so sure if it would have made a difference. The Chiefs were just so pumped mentally… The same goes for the Sharks in SA they came to play and were terrific. I’m rooting for Chiefs after 15 + years of pain and pleasure as a supporter, mostly pain and screaming at the bloody TV!
Check out what GG said on SMH site leave you all to decide and marinade on it
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/union-news/kiwis-and-boks-give-wallabies-a-wakeup-call-20120729-236f6.html
July 31st 2012 @ 11:39pm
Sylvester said | July 31st 2012 @ 11:39pm | Report comment
For those who haven’t heard, the Crusaders will have a flash, 35-seat covered stadium to play in, in a few years time.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/city-blueprint/7380204/Key-backs-covered-stadium
July 31st 2012 @ 11:44pm
Johnno said | July 31st 2012 @ 11:44pm | Report comment
i keep getting confused when i read this article does covered mean indoor.
July 31st 2012 @ 11:51pm
Sylvester said | July 31st 2012 @ 11:51pm | Report comment
Essentially, yes. I assume they say covered, rather indoor, because the stadium can’t strictly speaking be indoor of itself
July 31st 2012 @ 11:58pm
Johnno said | July 31st 2012 @ 11:58pm | Report comment
Yes well whatever the true nature of it’s covering levels, it is a magnificent design I hope it happens it wont cost billions either or masses of million eg $800 million. NZ when the world cup was on should of built more stadiums like this an indoor one in wellington defiantly , and also Auckland and christchurch either way looks good.
August 1st 2012 @ 12:03am
Sylvester said | August 1st 2012 @ 12:03am | Report comment
I really like the concept too. Price tag could be anything from $250m to $500m by the sound of it.
Having it completed in time for the Lions in 2017 will be fairly ambitious, given “acquiring” the land prob won’t be straightforward.
August 1st 2012 @ 11:40am
Dog said | August 1st 2012 @ 11:40am | Report comment
Richie McCaw is king of the niggle, no sympathy there. And he doesn’t know how to catch a ball anymore.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:39am
Tui said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Yeah he should learn a few things from that champion Cooper