CAMPO: Here’s hoping for a great clash with two fantastic teams
By David Campese, 1 Aug 2012 David Campese is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Chiefs, Crusaders, Rugby Union, Sharks, Stormers, Super Rugby, Super Rugby 2012
Chiefs' Liam Messam is tackled by Durban Sharks' Keegan Daniels . AFP PHOTO
Related coverage
- Canterbury Crusaders news
- Chiefs news
- Cape Town Stormers news
- Sharks news
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
It was a great weekend of rugby, and especially good to again see the New Zealand sides play in an attacking and positive manner.
They really have been the benchmark all season.
The Crusaders let themselves down in their semi-final by not going away from their traditional style of rugby. Sometimes you’ve got to change a few things to get up in those close games.
This was relevant for the Chiefs in the way they defended. The input that Wayne Smith had on the Chiefs game plan assisted in upsetting the Crusaders’ attack.
He coached the Crusaders a few years back, so had great insight into how to upset their game plan.
Although they dominated the game with strong defense for the first 40-50 minutes and really got up in the face of the Crusaders’ players, they also dominated the attack.
The Crusaders are a good team, but they weren’t able to play their usual style. And with Sonny Bill Williams playing against his old team, they didn’t have the same explosive power they enjoyed when he was there.
Robbie Fruean, when placed under pressure, often struggles, which is why he isn’t in the All Blacks team. Sometimes he thinks he can do it all.
The others were solid, but not threatening enough with the ball. Carter needed runners to help with their attack.
But still, the style and the quickness of the game in general was unbelievable. It was very different from the way the Australian teams have been playing, but it was how I would love to see them play.
Back on South African soil, the Stormers came up short when their defence-dominated style failed to make an impact.
The Sharks, who love to attack, showed that the best form of defence is attack – the proof in the pudding that defensive rugby can only take a side so far.
It was good to see attack win again.
It’ll be interesting to see how the Sharks handle the Chiefs in the final. Both teams have very different styles, and the turnaround time is short, not giving the Sharks much time to get ready specifically for this match.
I remember the final last year when the Crusaders had to travel every second week.
The Sharks will also be hampered somewhat in their preparation by the travel involved as well as a few injuries.
Regardless, the Super Rugby final will be a fascinating game and one much anticipated by rugby followers everywhere.
As long as the Sharks remember that defence won’t win you everything, they’ll be competitive. And they will need to score some tries to get up against the aggressive Chiefs side.
I’ll be especially interested to see what impact the referee has on the match.
There have been lots of problems over the past few weeks or so with the TMOs and questionable on-the-ground decisions.
And, of course, refereeing is very much in the news right now in the wake of Graham Henry’s controversial claims about Wayne Barnes and his officiating in the 2007 RWC. It’s all quite unbelievable, even though it’s actually not that hard to believe.
Is it just coincidence that after that World Cup final between New Zealand and France, Barnes mysteriously went missing for about 6 months?
Back to the Super Rugby final, it’s going to be tough challenge for the Sharks, but on the day, anything is possible. Let’s hope like the Brumbies and Stormers, they don’t waste all their hard work by letting themselves down in the last game of the tournament.
Hopefully, we’ll see two teams with some great individuals playing attacking rugby. What a great way to watch the last game of Super 15.
Let’s sit back and enjoy what should be a sensational game.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
- Explore:
- Chiefs, Crusaders, Rugby Union, Sharks, Stormers, Super Rugby, Super Rugby 2012



August 1st 2012 @ 3:20am
Onor said | August 1st 2012 @ 3:20am | Report comment
I dont have much confidence in steve walsh. I saw him in the semi final between the sharks and the stormers. That last ruck where the sharks regained posession. J.P peterson looked to have come in from the side to clean out a stormers player and get men over the ball. Steve walsh was right there watching it happen. Maybe I am wrong and JP went through the gate from walshes perspective. I’m trying not to be too cynical about the game… and I try to remain positive even when I watch some atrocious games but to me its beginning to look like the winners are being arranged. A side note. Good to see the test match between between Argentina and the All blacks is sold out in Argentina!!! well.. thats what was in the media on this side of the ditch anyway!!!
August 1st 2012 @ 2:57pm
Kuruki said | August 1st 2012 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
Yeah mate i thought JP came in from the side also. There was noway he came thru the gate. But that is how the cookie crumbles.
August 1st 2012 @ 5:57pm
chris said | August 1st 2012 @ 5:57pm | Report comment
Straight through the gate, good play.
Sincerely
Stormer Supporter
August 1st 2012 @ 7:57am
mania said | August 1st 2012 @ 7:57am | Report comment
walsh should do fine provided his ego doesnt get in the way
sharx can win this because no one is expecting them to win. if they stick to their gameplan and prep like they have been doing and get enough sleep they can easily take this game. as its the last game they can empty the tank and give this game everything they’ve got.
they have already been written of by media and fans. the most dangerous adversary is the one that has nothing to lose
August 1st 2012 @ 10:11am
Pierce said | August 1st 2012 @ 10:11am | Report comment
First sentence says it all. As a Kiwi I would have been quite happy with – and would have preferred – Joubert.
August 1st 2012 @ 9:24am
Australopithecus Africanus said | August 1st 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Its just that one comes away with the feeling that all the travelling invoved in the competition somehow always seem to influence the outcome of the final when it involves travelling between Africa and Australasia – and a solution is hard to find – but it dilutes a great competition comes finals time – what about a home and away two game finals with bonus points deciding the winner ?
August 1st 2012 @ 9:43am
Sam Taulelei said | August 1st 2012 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Travel is an accepted consequence in a competition involving 3 different countries. The issue with finals is that the makeup of the playoffs and the permutations of the draw with 3 conference winners automatically hosting a semifinal can and will create the situation the Sharks find themselves in.
It’s of small comfort to the Sharks that if SBW had passed the ball to any of the unmarked players outside him in the final minute of their match against the Crusaders the Chiefs would have finished 1st overall and they would only have had to travel from Brisbane to Hamilton for their next match instead of Newlands and then either Christchurch or return to South Africa. A less arduous trip.
Scheduling a weeks bye before the grand final is a possibility, but that would have to eliminate one of the byes earlier in the competition because I see little point in teams continuing with byes after a 3 week break in June for the tests, then a weeks rest for the top two finishers and then a further weeks rest before the final.
That’s a lot of disruption for teams momentum leading into the playoffs.
SANZAR will need to think outside the box for a better solution for teams and one possibility could be to award the hosting of all playoff matches to the country who’s team finished top overall on the table.
Last year that would have meant Australia and this year South Africa. All finalists only have to travel internationally once, and it becomes like a mini World Cup featuring straight knockout games.
August 1st 2012 @ 10:02am
AussieKiwi said | August 1st 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Although I will be supporting the Chiefs, I have a lot of sympathy for the Sharks on this one.
Is this amount of travel a predictable part of the current competition structure? Yes. Has that structure thrown up an exceptionally difficult travel schedule this year for the Sharks? Yes. Should there be a week off between the semis and the final? Yes. Do I have a Rudd like propensity to answer my own questions? Most definitely.
I agree with the substance of the article, despite the travel issues it should be a great game between two attacking, exciting teams. Hell, even the defence of the Chiefs has been exciting this year. And this coming from a Crusaders fan.
August 1st 2012 @ 3:02pm
Kuruki said | August 1st 2012 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Had the Sharks finished top 2 qualifier they would not have had to travel. Surely we want to reward the teams who do well all year and not those who just scrape in. I have no sympathy for the Sharks as they had the same opportunity as everyone else to secure a beneficial finals draw.
August 1st 2012 @ 3:13pm
Colin said | August 1st 2012 @ 3:13pm | Report comment
Agree. I am a Sharks supporter but the reality is they have nobody but themselves to blame for the predicament and I think the travel factor is possibly overstated. They can win anyway if they are good enough on the night.
August 1st 2012 @ 5:05pm
Sam Taulelei said | August 1st 2012 @ 5:05pm | Report comment
Don’t believe the travel factor is overstated.
Only one team has ever won a final on foreign soil in the history of this competition and that trip was only as far from Christchurch to Canberra.
When the Bulls hosted their finals, everyone knew no team travelling from NZ or Australia had a chance against them and that was in the old format before conferences and extended playoffs.
Crossing the Indian Ocean four times in three consecutive weeks and beating all 3 conference winners in the process to win a title will be an even more amazing accomplishment than if the Crusaders won the final last year after playing no home games.
August 1st 2012 @ 5:36pm
Kuruki said | August 1st 2012 @ 5:36pm | Report comment
The Crusaders traveled more distance in that season then any team in the history of the Super 15 ever has and ever will. I don’t see how the Sharks wining could have been more amazing then if the Crusaders would have done so.
August 1st 2012 @ 5:43pm
AussieKiwi said | August 1st 2012 @ 5:43pm | Report comment
Yes the higher placed team should have some advantage, fair enough, but in my opinion the advantage is too great here. Nobody benefits, least of all the game, if the challenger is so knackered from the travel that there is no real contest.
August 2nd 2012 @ 6:12am
Sam Taulelei said | August 2nd 2012 @ 6:12am | Report comment
Fair point, as fans we want the final to be a good contest. All coaches know the value and importance of finishing in the top two positions because of home ground advantage and the disadvantages of travel.
August 1st 2012 @ 10:41am
mania said | August 1st 2012 @ 10:41am | Report comment
or like NFL have rugby on a neutral field. tho this would mean finishing top gives you nothing
August 2nd 2012 @ 4:55pm
cm said | August 2nd 2012 @ 4:55pm | Report comment
What if Perth were the permanent fixture for ALL Super Finals? A bit like the MCG, always host to the last game of each season, with home and away semis up to then.
Perth is reasonably distance-neutral and it might also give the locals maximum motivation to qualify for a final under those rules.
August 3rd 2012 @ 5:08am
mania said | August 3rd 2012 @ 5:08am | Report comment
cm – why should perth get all the revenue?
August 4th 2012 @ 11:53am
atlas said | August 4th 2012 @ 11:53am | Report comment
Perth? disregard for the fans who’ve supported their team all season.
That one would never work.
August 1st 2012 @ 10:26am
Emric said | August 1st 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
If the Sharks win they will be one of the most deserved champions of any sport at any time.
Go the Chiefs
August 1st 2012 @ 10:40am
mania said | August 1st 2012 @ 10:40am | Report comment
and sharks can win. hopefull the chiefs realise this and prepare appropriately.
dont dismiss the minds ability of forcing the body to do what its told. sharks can win this and make it the biggest success story against the odds in the history of super rugby
August 1st 2012 @ 10:50am
WQ said | August 1st 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Looking forward to what should be an excellent game of Rugby.
I think the Chiefs have to many guns and will win the game comfortably in the end as long as they come with the attitude that they displayed against the Crusaders last weekend.
Hopefully they do not lose Craig Clarke to injury, if anybody at the Chiefs deserves a game this weekend it is him.
The Chiefs by 15
August 1st 2012 @ 11:08am
Rugby guy from Fiji said | August 1st 2012 @ 11:08am | Report comment
can’t wait to watch the first scrum pack down……i think these are 2 of the best front rows in the comp.
we have the all south african front row (beast and du plesis’) packing down against two tongans (tameifuna and taumalolo) and a samoan (schwalger).
August 1st 2012 @ 1:23pm
Redback said | August 1st 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Sharks too strong upfront. The sharks will not take a backward step or hesitate if the chiefs try to dish up any crap this week.
August 1st 2012 @ 3:05pm
Kuruki said | August 1st 2012 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Chiefs already beat them in South Africa there is no reason we can’t do it in Hamilton.
August 1st 2012 @ 2:09pm
RebelRanger said | August 1st 2012 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Eager to see how Messam goes with the pressure. Done well against Crusaders but I think the Sharks forward pack will be a bigger test.
With all the niggling the Chiefs were offering McCaw and co, I expect fireworks early.
Interesting to see if the Sharks defence can punish Crudens tendency to not kick out of his own half. And whether they will be able to shut down SBW who has expanded his game to creating tries from kicks, back of rucks etc.
Definitely the most entertaining final possible with 2 of the most complete teams this year going at it.
I’m tipping the Chiefs by 12 with them pulling away in the last 20 minutes.
August 1st 2012 @ 3:07pm
Kuruki said | August 1st 2012 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
It is absolutely crucial that Craig Clarke play this weekend. If he drops out then the Sharks go automatic favorites in my book. He is absolutely crucial.