Five more days of golden drought for Aussies in London
By David Lord, 3 Aug 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- London Olympics, Michael Phelps, Olympic Games, swimming
American Michael Phelps won the long-awaited 200 individual medley clash with compatriot Ryan Lochte to take his career Olympic medals to a new high of 20: 16 gold, two silver, and two bronze.
What an incredible competitor, the likes of which we may never see again.
Phelps stopped the clock at 1.54.27; Lochte 1.54.90.
In a surprise statement yesterday, London Games boss Seb Coe reckons Phelps is the most decorated Olympian but not necessarily the greatest.
Coe mentioned rower Sir Steve Redgrave and decathlete Daley Thompson, both Englishmen, along with Jesse Owens, as the greatest.
The boss is moving into dangerous waters even bringing up the subject.
One thing is for sure, Michael Phelps is one helluva swimmer.
There’s no argument he’s the greatest swimmer the world has ever seen, not only for his record medals, but also his versatility. And he’s not finished in London just yet: he was the fastest qualifier in the 100 fly this morning, looking for his 21st medal.
There was silver for 18-year-old Australian kayaker, Jessica Fox, just 0.61 seconds off gold. The world junior champion, Jessica went one better than her mother Myriam, who captured Olympic bronze in Atlanta 1996.
And double drama on the first night of cycling with red hot favourites Great Britain disqualified for an illegal change-over before the women’s team sprint medal round, and China had their world record setting gold relegated to silver with Germany promoted.
Aussies Anna Meares and Kaarle McCulloch won bronze.
The Australian men’s team sprint of Matthew Glaetzer, Shane Perkins, and Scott Sunderland missed out on bronze against Germany. The gold was won by Great Britain, giving Sir Chris Hoy his fifth in Olympic competition.
Celebrations began immediately when Nathan Cohen and Joseph Sullivan won New Zealand gold in the double sculls, the Kiwis’ first at these Games.
And South Africa won their first-ever rowing gold, crewed by James Thompson, Matthew Brittain, John Smith, and Sizwe Ndlove, in the lightweight man’s four.
Both the Australian men’s lightweight four of Todd Skipworth, Sam Poeltz, Ben Cureton, and Anthony Edwards, and the women’s eights, didn’t fire in their finals.
The men finished fourth, and they are a far better crew than that. The women, sixth.
In the pool, Melanie Schlanger finished fourth in the 100 free final, 3/100ths of a second off a bronze. Dutch girl Ranomi Kromowidjojo won gold in an Olympic record 53 seconds dead.
Sally Foster finished eighth with 2.26.00 in her 200 breaststroke final, won in world record time by American Rebecca Soni with 2.19.59.
Mitch Larkin also finished eighth in his 200 backstroke final, won in Olympic record time by American Tyler Clary with 1.53.41. Defending champion Ryan Lochte took the bronze in 1.53.94.
In the semis:
Meagen Nay was third fastest qualifier for the 200 backstroke with 2.07,42, but Belinda Hocking missed the cut with 2.09.36. Fastest qualifier the American Elizabeth Beisel with 2.06.18.
Eamon Sullivan qualified in equal seventh with 21.88 for the 50 free final. James Magnussen missed the cut with 22 seconds dead, finishing sixth in his semi.
Rowing, and Kim Crow (26) is an excitement machine. She literally paddled her way through her semi of the single sculls to be third fastest.
A hot prospect of a 400 hurdler when she was 18, Crow was Jana Pittman’s closest rival when she badly broke her foot, her hurdling career done and dusted.
She switched to rowing and in London will compete in the double sculls as well with Brooke Pratley.
Kim Crow is golden material despite a gruelling schedule.
Around the venues:
The Hockeyroos beat USA 1-0, an important win to stay in touch, with Anna Flanagan the scorer.
The Boomers scored their first win of the Games with an 81-61 success over China. Patrick Mills showed the way with 20 points.
Six-times Olympian Russell Mark finished 20th in the double trap, an event he won gold in Atlanta in 1996, and silver in Sydney 2000.
Natalie Cook, gold medallist in Sydney 2000, and Tamsin Barnett, were eliminated from the beach volleyball.
The men’s water polo team were soundly beaten 13-9 by Spain.
And Roger Federer is just one win away from the only trophy of note he hasn’t won: Olympic singles gold. He meets Juan Martin del Porto in the final.
London 2012 Olympics – Day 6 Gallery
See the complete London 2012 Olympics gallery
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- London Olympics, Michael Phelps, Olympic Games, swimming

August 3rd 2012 @ 6:45am
Colin N said | August 3rd 2012 @ 6:45am | Report comment
“And Roger Federer is just one win away from the only trophy of note he hasn’t won – Olympic singles gold. He meets Juan Martin del Porto in the final.”
Nope. There’s a certain Novak Djokovic on the other side of the draw. He also has a tough match against Andy Murray, who has a good record vesus the top guys over best of three sets.
Also, how impressive was that British men’s track cycling sprint team? Were probably fourth favourites going into the competition, but they seem to have peaked at the right time and beat the world record twice in the process. The pursuit team weren’t bad either.
The DQ’s were bizarre though. It’s very rare for someone to be relegated when the mistake they made actually disadvantages them. Both GB and China were down on their times in preliminary rounds. Felt really sorry for China after being the best throughout.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:33am
JAJI said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:33am | Report comment
He called Djokovic a Croat yesterday as well – now he has eliminated him from the tennis tournament altogether.
Its amazing but Australia could win more gold medals on the track than the pool at these Games the way we are going
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:42am
Matt F said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
He’ll pronounce Novak dead in the next article
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:54pm
WobbliesFan said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:54pm | Report comment
lol
August 3rd 2012 @ 9:24am
katzilla said | August 3rd 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Thats a good thing, the swimming program could probably do with losing some funding to other less funded sports that will provide the golds. Personally im sick of seeing or hearing about swimming like its the only sport on the planet.
There are Australians doing awesome across a whole host of different sports, some of who are an excellent shot at gold, yet all we hear is about someone coming 7th in a final for some obscure stroke that mimics an insects flying pattern.
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:17am
Punter said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:17am | Report comment
Katzilla,
You have to understand that Swimming has traditionally been Australia’s most successful sport in the Olympics.
It is not just Australia who does it, jingoism resides in all countries, my friend spent time in Indonesia during one Olympics & saw more Badminton to last him a lifetime yet did not know any Australian results & had to call home. While skiing in New Zealand in 1994, during the Commonwealth games, I saw the replay of the Road race in which I think Kiwis came 1st & 2nd (may have been 1st & 3rd), you did not even know any other sport existed.
August 3rd 2012 @ 5:48pm
JVGO said | August 3rd 2012 @ 5:48pm | Report comment
I disagree K. I believe swimming is fundamentally part of the Australian lifestyle, our coastal and rural topography and our climate. I think it is essential that every kid in Australia learns to swim in order to enjoy these aspects of life. I think our olympic swimmers have a important part to play in this iconography and promotion of health and general well being as well as water safety in our community.
Our community facilities for swimming far outweigh any other country in the world I’d suggest. Olympic pools are rare even in the USA yet every community council virtually in Australia has one. These facilities benefit the whole community.
Poeple narking at swimming in favour of other pursuits are really very short sighted. The fact that we rate swimming above many other sporting pursuits is part of our cukture and our fortunate and unique way of life.
August 3rd 2012 @ 7:03am
Milz said | August 3rd 2012 @ 7:03am | Report comment
Lord, whilst Phelps is a great athlete, you need to account for the opportunities to win medals he has in his sport. If Michael Jordan had a chance to win gold in a 10 min game; 20 min game; 30 min game; basket with twice the diameter; another for an allowance for pink shoes etc etc I’m sure he’d be looking at 14 golds as well. Redgrave got gold over five Olympics, Phelps only three. I longevity is a much better mark of an athlete than multiple medals based on slight changes to the core event – swimming in the pool.
August 3rd 2012 @ 7:23am
David Lord said | August 3rd 2012 @ 7:23am | Report comment
Milz, the quote is – There’s no argument he’s (Phelps) is the greatest swimmer the world has ever seen. Where does Jordan fit onto that statement?
August 3rd 2012 @ 9:16am
Johno said | August 3rd 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Milz, you can’t really compare rowing and swimming though can you. They are 2 completely different sports, requiring different body types, training methods, aerobic / anaerobic capacity etc. Phelps is the only male to ever win the same swimming event in 3 consecutive Olympics and considering the number of truly great male swimmers over the decades who have failed to achieve this milestone I would suggest this says a lot about Phelps’ longevity as well.
August 3rd 2012 @ 9:53am
The Bush said | August 3rd 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
You also have to consider that swimming, whilst having so many opportunities for medals, is also less hotly contested than Track and Field. Hence why Australia has been able to dominate (comparitively) compared to our size and resources.
August 3rd 2012 @ 7:20am
Roger the Alien said | August 3rd 2012 @ 7:20am | Report comment
We sent more athletes over there than China did. They must think they’re there to party. I hope the English hospitality industry is well insured and ready for when our heroes really start letting their hair down.
August 3rd 2012 @ 7:41am
BigAl said | August 3rd 2012 @ 7:41am | Report comment
Punching above our weight again I guess !
August 3rd 2012 @ 1:20pm
Mango Jack said | August 3rd 2012 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Or just punching. Thankfully Nick D’Arcy will be going home before the swim team hit the pubs and clubs.
August 3rd 2012 @ 3:27pm
jameswm said | August 3rd 2012 @ 3:27pm | Report comment
You’d like to think that D’Arcy has learnt his lesson…but sadly I’m not convinced.
August 3rd 2012 @ 7:50am
lolly said | August 3rd 2012 @ 7:50am | Report comment
I hope Magnussen seriously considers going to the 200 with the 100. He’s got better second leg speed with the 100 so he might be a better match for the longer race. He must be mentally knackered by now after the kind of shocks he’s had at the Olympics.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:26am
Will Sinclair said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Has anyone else been watching the rowing?
It has been SENSATIONAL.
Last night alone there were three Finals and each was an absolute cracker.
The commentary has been great too – James Brayshaw and (I think) James Tomkins. The excitement in (I think) Tomkins’ voice as he describes the action is brilliant.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:31am
katzilla said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Yeah that 4s final last night was one for the highlight reels.
4 boats within 1 second of each other with less then 20 metres to go.
You couldn’t script it better, ws a shame the Aussie boys were falling away a little at that point but they put in an awesome race.
Their pressure through the middle stages is probably what forced the Danes to expend a bit more energy then they expected which left them lacking at the finish and allowed the Saffas to roll through in that favored lane 5.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:41am
lolly said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:41am | Report comment
I thought the men’s eights was pretty fantastic as well.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:45am
katzilla said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:45am | Report comment
Yeah and the mens Double Sculls final was epic also, but moreso for me being Kiwi lol.
Those two kiwi boys were last at the first check point, 5th at 1000, 4th 1500 and then the most blistering last 500 in the history of double sculls.
They put in some huge strides in the last 100 and watching their faces on the replay you could see how hard they were working. Loved the tall Italian guy, what a character.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:47am
Will Sinclair said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Katzilla – I was cheering for the Kiwis like they were our own!
What a race, what a performance!
I’ve actually had the opportunity to see some schools rowing over in New Zealand and it’s always brilliant. Good to see the Kiwis getting some success at this level.
August 4th 2012 @ 12:35am
Mitch (in Valencia) said | August 4th 2012 @ 12:35am | Report comment
Do you think Aussie media will try to claim kiwi gold as our own?? ha!
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:45pm
niik said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:45pm | Report comment
Mate it was a pretty good entree for today’s main event and that medal ceremony for the men’s single sculls was awesome. So glad for Mahe, he showed what a champion he is, but any of those guys would’ve been a worthy winner I reckon.
Gotta love whenever NZ leads Aus on the medal table too just quietly
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:48am
Will Sinclair said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Lolly,
The Mens VIII Final was probably one of THE all time great races. Just incredible.
And how good is the overhead camera? They showed the Germans from above and it was like poetry in motion – eight athletes working as one.
That’s why rowing is the ultimate team sport.
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:55am
lolly said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Yeah it was, I was at work and shouted at one point when the Germans and GB were neck and neck ‘Go GB’ and I was the only one in the office to do that! Must have sounded really strange with an Aussie accent. But they made it such a thrilling race.
The camera work on some of the events is quite brilliant. Rowing and swimming are fantastic, love the water polo and the cycling in the velodrome. Hockey isn’t quite as good as it could be. I think it’s too fast for the cameras to keep up properly.
August 3rd 2012 @ 1:23pm
Mango Jack said | August 3rd 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Plus that blue surface. Does anyone else find it harder to see the ball than against the trad green?
August 3rd 2012 @ 8:03pm
lolly said | August 3rd 2012 @ 8:03pm | Report comment
Yes, at the venue the ball is brilliantly visible, a good choice for the players I think, but for some reason it’s not translating well to the screen.
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:20am
Punter said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:20am | Report comment
The 4s last night was awesome, highs & lows in such a short time, I thought we were winners & then missed out totally. The Kiwis come from behind win was awesome too. Great rowing so far.
August 3rd 2012 @ 9:31am
Harry said | August 3rd 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Yep, its been fantastic racing to watch and the commentary is good.
My favourites have been the mens 8′s and that 4′s final last night where the Saffa’s timed their run perfectly to win.
Various rugby union commentators – Marto, Kearns take note – could learn from the commentary of Tomkins. He’s partisan and clearly cheering for the Australian teams, but is very good at acknowledging the excellence of other countries and highlighting the different styles, techniques and tactics used by the racers.
I do feel a bit dirty in the fact I found myself cheering for the Poms in the men’s 8 and the Kiwi’s in the double sculls last night.
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:12am
Will Sinclair said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:12am | Report comment
Harry – you’re right about Tomkins.
He seems to just strike the right balance between cheering and analysing.
And he just gives you such a sense that he LOVES what he is watching.
August 3rd 2012 @ 11:36am
Bigbaz said | August 3rd 2012 @ 11:36am | Report comment
Yeh and I can’t believe I’m enjoying James Brayshaw as well.
August 3rd 2012 @ 9:38am
sheek said | August 3rd 2012 @ 9:38am | Report comment
David,
I agree with Sebastian Coe that Michael Phelps, while obviously the most decorated athlete in Olympics history, might not necessarily be the best athlete of the Modern Olympics.
Phelps, courtesy of his medley prowess, where he has mastered all 4 swimming strokes, is certainly the best swimmer in Olympics history, but to proclaim him as the greatest athlete as well requires deeper scrutiny. All of Phelps individual medals have been over just two distances – 200m & 400m – plus relays over 100m.
No swimmer has ever won individual gold over 1500m free, 400m free & 200m free. Whoever is the first to achieve this success over 3 huge varying distances will immediately challenge Phelps for top billing, irrespective of his medal haul. Or even someone who wins the individual 100m, 200m & 400m at the same meet.
Coe himself suggested rower Steve Redgrave, decathlete Daley Thompson & sprinter/jumper Jesse Owens as potential rivals to Phelps for the title of “greatest athlete in Olympics history.”
Has everyone forgotten the “Flying Finn”, Paavo Nurmi? At 3 successive Olympics in the 1920s, Nurmi won 9 gold & 3 silver in distances stretching from 1500m to 3000m steeple to 5000m to 10000m, plus the discontinued individual & team cross-country.
I would suggest that is a pretty awesome record. Or the mighty Czech Emil Zatopek, who won the 5000m, 10000m & Marathon at the 1952 Olympics.
At the risk of being mischievous, there appears to be an edict that whatever sport they’re involved in, the “greatest” must be an American…..!
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:09am
Punter said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
Sheek, just to correct you, Phelps has done the 100, 200 & 400 at the same Olympics twice already. 100 Butterfly, 200IM & 400IM at Athens & Beijing & looks like taking the 100 butterfly & 200IM & missing out in 400IM in London. Considering 400IM is one of the worst endurance swimming events & the 100 butterfly one of the most explosive, that is impressive. In Athens, Phelps won in 3 disciplines, Freestyle, Butterfly & IMs.
While the ‘Greatest Olympian’ debate will continue, I think Phelps’s names will always be there.
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:17am
Brendon said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:17am | Report comment
Dont forget that Phelps is a brilliant and consistent relay swimmer that swims in all 3 relays.
If it was easy to do what Phelps has done then other swimmer would have done it. Only Mark Spitz came close in 72 with 7 (he believes he would have got 8 if the 50m free existed)
Matt Biondi got 5 in 1988 but 3 of those were relay and Lochte hasn’t lived up to expectations.
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:23am
sheek said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:23am | Report comment
Punter,
Thanks for correcting that.
Yes, Phelps name will always come into the discussion on “the greatest”. I’m just suggesting the matter deserves greater scrutiny before handing him that accolade, or indeed, handing it to anyone else.
Cross-comparing athletes is a dangerous business. How can you conclusively say a swimmer is better than a runner, or gymnast, or rower, or cyclist, or whatever? Or that a footballer is better than a baseballer, or cricketer, or basketballer, or golfer, or tennis player, or whatever?
Phelps is the greatest swimmer ever. Perhaps we should just leave it at that…..
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:29am
jameswm said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
Swimmers have so many medals available for similar things it’s ridiculous. And look how quickly you can recover when the water’s holding up your bodyweight.
Imagine having to run a 400m final on the track, and back up and run an 800 an hour later. You couldn’t do it at or near your peak.
August 3rd 2012 @ 2:01pm
Rabbitz said | August 3rd 2012 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
How about Ole Einar Bjørndalen of Norway?
6 Gold, 4 Silver and 1 bronze in Biathlon. Competed in the 1994, 1998, 2002, 2006 and 2010 Olympics.
Still in the mix in the World Cup Circuit.
Biathlon has a much more diverse skill set than most other sports, requiring in turn speed, stamina, heart rate and breathing control, accuracy and fine motor control all while under physical stress and competition pressure.
August 3rd 2012 @ 3:28pm
jameswm said | August 3rd 2012 @ 3:28pm | Report comment
Those biathletes are dead set freaks. I’d call myself anti-gun generally but as part of a sport it’s incredible.
August 3rd 2012 @ 7:27pm
Rabbitz said | August 3rd 2012 @ 7:27pm | Report comment
I shoot along side some up and coming Aussie Biathletes at our range. I am amazed by the effort and the apparent ease with which they can settle on the firing point after essentially running for a couple of k’s around the range grabbing their rifle on the way onto the mound and then they still hit what they are aiming at. I am flat out concentrating after sitting around waiting.
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:09am
Brendon said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
Interesting that Phelps lost the two longer events, 200 fly and 400 IM but won the shorter 200IM and only a choke of Aussie proportions will he lose the 100 fly. He already dropped the 200m free. I think going back to textile suits makes doing more and longer events tougher. I dont think it would be possible to do 8 gold without a suit like the Speedo LZR suit he wore in Beijing.
This will be the 2nd Olympics where no Aussie male, individual or relay, has won a gold. (we have no chance of beating the Americans in the medley relay unless they default and we might not even get silver).
Our last male gold was Grant Hackett in the 1500m in 2004 with Thorpe winning the 200 and 400 earlier in the meet. It will be 12 years since a male won gold in the pool when Rio 2014 rolls around.
We did go from 1972 when Brad Cooper won the 400m free until the ‘mean machine’ won the medley relay in 1980 without a gold and 12 years from Cooper to Sieben in 1984 for individual gold.
In terms of gold it will be our worse effort in the pool in 20 years – since Barcelona 1992, when drug cheating was still a big problem in women’s swimming. On paper the 2012 squad is far, far, far, far, far, far stronger than the 1992 team that only had Kieren Perkins in the 400m and 1500m free as realistic gold medal hopes.
The first thing Swimming Australian and the swimmers themselves need to do after the games is to admit THEY are the problem. Dont blame the media, traditional or social, dont blame pressure or no sleeping tablets. Dont blame controversies.
Admit that there has been underlying problems with Australian performances at the Olympics even in 2000, 2004 and 2008 but came to a head in 2012 due to the improvement in swimmers around the world and more depth in the USA team, especially in the women where they only won 2 gold in 2008. Of course there is the inevitable post 2000 decline which is no one’s fault. But from 6 to 1 gold in 4 years?
Address mental issues, address lack of PB’s in semis and finals regardless if the the swimmer gets a medal or not. Address the issue of holding trials our 4 months from the games. Team culture – Don Talbot brought in the whole “team” thing but while that was good at the time to improve team morale when you have such a single mentality and morale in the “team” when thigns go bad for one person it spreads throughout the team. The failure of the mens 4x100m free spread throughout the team. While poolside race interviews dont tell you anything from the words said by exhausted swimmers their body language does and the swimmers body language post that relay was very negative,
The problem is when winning is expected negatives have a much greater impact and vice versa. When Talbot brought in the whole “team culture” Australia wasnt expecting to win anything so it had benefit but not now.
August 3rd 2012 @ 11:38am
Punter said | August 3rd 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
There is alot more depth now than 1992, but going into Olympics Australia. But going into the Olympics, Australia was only Gold medal favourites for the 100 metres freestyle & the 4X100 free for men, so yes they failed, but we got a surprise gold. So while I agree they under perform to our expectations & to times in the trials for some, most knowledgeable swimming, we were only going to win 2 gold medals, so we are 1 short.
August 3rd 2012 @ 2:14pm
Harry said | August 3rd 2012 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
Brendon you need to write a separate post on this and it should be required reading for the Australian swimming head coach. So far from this bloke all I’ve seen is what looks like his own backside covering – when a coach starts talking about just doing his job, you know there’s trouble. We’ve noted the consistent trend of Australian swimmers underperformaing in finals (happened again last night in the womens 100M freestyle final) and surely this should be the starting point.
August 3rd 2012 @ 5:47pm
Axelv said | August 3rd 2012 @ 5:47pm | Report comment
Don’t forget that after Beijing 2008 Phelps had lost motivation and hunger on the sport, he didn’t want to train anymore.
This has a MASSIVE impact on his 2012 performances. He’s won 2 Gold and a silver, and potentially going to win another 2 Gold, quite a mediocre Olympics for him hey?
August 3rd 2012 @ 10:57am
gah said | August 3rd 2012 @ 10:57am | Report comment
It was a breath of fresh air to see how happy Jessica Fox was with her Silver Medal; it made a real contrast to the attitude of certain swimmers who it must be said did well despite not getting a gold, and then got upset about the Silver (perhaps I am being a bit hash on the Missile who was pretty gratious about his Silver yesterday and I really referring to the over the top reaction of Emily Seebohm).
It seems to me (and Jessica Fox) that coming second in the Olympics is very good work.
My fingers are crossed for Tom Slingsby in the Laser sailing class, but if he bags Silver he should not beat himself up about it.
August 3rd 2012 @ 11:24am
sheek said | August 3rd 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
Yes, perhaps at some point Emily Seebohm needed a slap across the face to bring her back into the real world.
But in Seebohm’s defence, she realises she bombed the opportunity of a lifetime, as did Magnussen. She really has no-one to blame but herself, & that is often a very difficult thing to confront.
Seebohm & Magnussen both might get a second chance, or they might not. They both might be in Rio in 2016, but no longer good enough for gold. No doubt we’ll find out over the next 4 years if either of them will have a shot at redemption.
It really does emphasize the message of grabbing your opportunity when you’re at the top of your game.
Cyclist sprinter Shane Kelly won a silver in 1992 & a bronze in 2000. But in 1996 when he was world champion & as sure a gold medallist as you can imagine, his foot slipped out of the pedal at the start & he was done. He had one shot at gold when he was at his absolute best, & blew it. Linford Christie won a silver medal in the 100m in 1988, & managed to turn it into gold 4 years later.
Only time will tell us if either Seebohm or Magnussen will follow either the Christie or Kelly route to redemption or damnation…..
August 3rd 2012 @ 11:31am
jameswm said | August 3rd 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
Don’t remind me of the Shane Kelly one Sheek – please…
August 3rd 2012 @ 11:43am
Bigbaz said | August 3rd 2012 @ 11:43am | Report comment
And how did Linford improve , by what means ?
August 3rd 2012 @ 12:06pm
sheek said | August 3rd 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
BigBaz – let’s not go there (not today anyway)…..
August 3rd 2012 @ 4:56pm
Matty_Ed said | August 3rd 2012 @ 4:56pm | Report comment
An alternative way of looking at this is that London for Magnussen and Seebohm is the equivalent of Kelly’s Barcelona or Christie’s Seoul. Right there within striking distance but just not quite good enough. But a big learning experience and fuel in the fire for next time.
They are both still relatively young in swimming terms and will be 24/25 come Rio. Lochte is as good as he ever was at age 27 and guys like Alain Bernard and Pieter Van den Hoogenband won sprint Olympic gold in their mid-twenties.
August 3rd 2012 @ 5:50pm
Axelv said | August 3rd 2012 @ 5:50pm | Report comment
Jessica Fox swam her best, and the only person that beat her was the one that broke the World Record. It is easy to be happy with Silver, I know I was for her.
Magnussen and Seebohm did not swim their best, they were much slower than they have been all year, including the semi finals, that is what you call losing gold. Being an underdog and coming from behind to grab a medal of any colour is a very different story from being the best, in front and finding a way to choke and lose Gold. Swimming your whole life, being in front and losing by one hundredth of a second is shattering, you wouldn’t understand.
August 3rd 2012 @ 11:33am
sheek said | August 3rd 2012 @ 11:33am | Report comment
Brendon,
A technicality please. The 1980 4 x 100m medley relay team that won the gold medal was NOT the ‘mean machine’.
The ‘mean machine’ began its life at the 1982 Commonwealth Games as the 4 x 100m freestyle relay team, & continued through to the 1984 Olympics & 1986 Commonwealth Games.
Because Neil Brooks was the one common swimmer in each of the 1980, 82, 84 & 86 relays, this is where the confuion arises.
I went to a sports trivia nite many years ago run by ex-test cricketers Steve Rixon &Greg Matthews, & they incorrectly stated that the 1980 team was the mean machine. I went up to the judges table & politiely told them that while I will accept the judges verdict, they should be aware of the facts, & then told them the same as I said above.
August 3rd 2012 @ 12:54pm
sheek said | August 3rd 2012 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
David,
Legend has it you’ve been around since the Ancient Olympics ended!
What do you make of Leigh Nugent’s claim they will have a postmortem into the Australian swimming team’s below par performance at London?
Firstly, I’m amazed at the army of managers, coaches, psychologists, psychoanalysts, doctors, life doctors, pysios, masseurs, dietitians, trainers, etc, etc, accompanying most of the sports. There is now probably more support staff than athletes.
And secondly, how can so many of these support staff be so ineffectual?
Most of the swimmers in London have swum slower times than they’re capable of. Why is this? What went wrong with the taper? What went wrong with the preparation?
Tapering is not a sports science discovered last year, or last decade. It’s been around for as long as swimming, & sports in general, has been around.
How can so many support staff get it so wrong? Having a postmortem is too late, things should have been fixed pre-competition.
Susie O’Neill suggests the Aussie swimmers don’t train hard enough anymore. And even if the taper was skewiff, there’s always a thing called desperation. James Magnussen says he couldn’t have done anymore to win the 100m freestyle gold.
But Nathan Adrian disproved this claim. Adrian charged into the wall like a crazed rhino, not breathing the last 15m. Magnussen rather glided into the wall, breathing at least once the last 15m.
Adrian wanted it more. He was more desperate & he prevailed.
David, with your thousand years(!!!) experience in sports journalism, what do you make of this?
August 3rd 2012 @ 1:34pm
Mango Jack said | August 3rd 2012 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
And while you’re at it, do you reckon they should bring back chariot racing?
August 3rd 2012 @ 1:54pm
sheek said | August 3rd 2012 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
Mango Jack – Work, Heath & Safety wouldn’t be prepared to pay the compo premiums. They’re gradually taking the fun out of everything…..
August 3rd 2012 @ 5:25pm
lolly said | August 3rd 2012 @ 5:25pm | Report comment
Well, I think Magnussen did do all he could. They guy has been through an emotional shock – maybe it was self-induced but it still happened – and has had to keep trying to perform at peak level. He, more than anyone else, knows what chances have been blown in London.
I think an enquiry should be run into the coaches. How can an entire team not perform to their best at the one time in four years when it is vital?