Why Australia is failing in London
By Phil Bird, 5 Aug 2012 Phil Bird is a Roar Guru & Live Blogger
- Tagged:
- Australia, london 2012, Olympics, swimming
While China and the US fight their usual boring-as-bat-excrement two-horse race, the rest of the world are going about the business of competing in the real Olympics. Except for Australia of course.
We’ve all read the press; it’s been 30 years since we’ve done so badly in the swimming.
And the excuses roll in. The swimmers had synchronised stage fright, the coaching staff too lenient, there is too much pressure on the Australians to perform, there’s no talent this year.
The last came from under-fire head swimming coach, Leigh Nugent, as he offered his last line of defence for an abysmal campaign in the pool.
Yet in a curious twist which either heightens or desensitises his failures, it’s difficult to tell which, the rest of the Aussie contingent has been equally ineffective.
This comes as a fair shock to a country that in the past so desperately needed to do well in the Olympics and sport in general. There’s no better way for Australians to remind the world we actually exist, and that we’re useful. We’ve got about as much historical relevance as a banged up old LTD Ford from the 90’s, and we know it.
We’re bright, we’re fresh, but we’re immaterial and we resent it.
So why at time of writing are we getting beaten in 2012 by Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Netherlands, Cuba, Japan, NEW ZEALAND, Kazakhstan, North Korea, South Korea, and at a time in the campaign where it’s not uncommon for Australia to be leading?
As a nation we’re selling tonnes of dirt to the Chinese so there’s plenty of money going round to spend on state-of-the-art coaching, massages and tracksuits (most of which end up getting banned).
Plenty of coin for post-mortems, disciplinary committees and media consultants.
Plenty of coin to procure the athletes’ pretensions.
Money everywhere, yet all the money in the world can’t buy the one thing you need: good old fashioned desperation.
The Aussies don’t want it enough.
This doesn’t develop overnight; it’s been twelve years in the making.
China is champing at the bit to win everything, to the point their athletes are willing to blatantly cheat and look like international imbeciles in the interests of the national team.
While the Australians are busy crying to their parents in post-match interviews and bashing store fronts, the Chinese and South Korean badminton teams are putting jester hats on and dancing about like monkeys on hot coals, ending their careers in the national interest.
We put our mark on the world in Sydney 2000 and have been cruising in neutral ever since. It’s no surprise we’re now grinding to a halt.
Go Kazakhstan.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Olympics articles
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Roof problem shuts Rio Olympics stadium
- Tame swimming antics show Australia’s tired of ‘scandals’ (27)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Magnussen admits Olympic mistakes
- ASADA powers fall short, says Coates
- Schlanger’s unlikely saviour (2)
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Shane Heal, the USA and the Golden Generation of Australian Basketball (15)
- London 2012: 30 things from the 30th Olympiad (1)
- Fools gold: Australia’s First Footy Olympics (8)
- How Australian sport can change the world (7)
- Reminders from London (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australia, london 2012, Olympics, swimming

August 5th 2012 @ 1:41am
liam said | August 5th 2012 @ 1:41am | Report comment
and the brits are loving the aussies struggling.
the commentator at the swimiming said the aussie relay team was “the biggest capitulation since gallipolli”, and no end of commentators gloating over aussies not making performances.
but what did we expect. its the brits chance to shine. for once.
August 5th 2012 @ 3:32am
Steve said | August 5th 2012 @ 3:32am | Report comment
If the commentator said that, he needs sorting out: neither amusing nor appropriate, and trying it with almost any other nation would result in a media firestorm. (That’s the biggest bomb the….. have had dropped on them since……: The Brits haven’t massacred the……… like that since………etc)
August 5th 2012 @ 3:38am
Johnno said | August 5th 2012 @ 3:38am | Report comment
Funny they say the brits say the biggest capitulation since gallipolli as the aussy soldiers were under the military orders of the british military not our own aussy army. Watch the movie gallipolli and you will see what I mean. So funny to blame the aussies for the capitulation of Galipolli when it was not even the aussies running that military operation it was the brits. Too funny he should check his history.
August 5th 2012 @ 5:29am
Rory said | August 5th 2012 @ 5:29am | Report comment
Whilst youre right that it was a british run operation, If your take on history is based on Mel Gibson movies its fair to say that you’re misinformed.
For the record far more British troops died at Gallipoli than Aussie anyway.
That piece of commentary was not on the bbc. If it was it would arouse a lot of complaints in the uk.
Anyway, back to the medal table. How many holds have you Aussies won now?
August 5th 2012 @ 6:22am
Johnno said | August 5th 2012 @ 6:22am | Report comment
Yes more british soldiers died Rory but the point is it was a British operation not an aussy one.
August 5th 2012 @ 7:57am
Lolly said | August 5th 2012 @ 7:57am | Report comment
It sure as hell wasn’t on the BBC. None of the swimming presenters are into that sort of shock jock junk at all.
August 5th 2012 @ 11:14am
Tom Callaghan said | August 5th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
They have won one. How many Australians does it take to win one gold medal? It takes 22 million!
August 6th 2012 @ 6:22pm
liam said | August 6th 2012 @ 6:22pm | Report comment
it was on the BBC, radio five live at the swimming. that was a direct quote.
August 5th 2012 @ 11:13am
Tom Callaghan said | August 5th 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
The film Gallipolli represents a genuine historical source does it?
What about the Western front in 1914-1916. Tell us about calmness under fire there.
August 8th 2012 @ 4:04pm
Kharel said | August 8th 2012 @ 4:04pm | Report comment
Well Johnno, Ottoman army was under the command of Germans general in Galioplli if you want to compare.
August 5th 2012 @ 5:59am
Rugby Fan said | August 5th 2012 @ 5:59am | Report comment
Which commentator said that about Gallipoli? I didn’t hear it, and I can’t find any reference to anyone saying it.
If it did happen, I’d imagine there’d be a number of protests, and quite rightly. Since no-one seems to be up in arms, I’m calling this one out, along with the idea that commentators are goating over Australian performances.
August 5th 2012 @ 6:33am
King of the Gorgonites said | August 5th 2012 @ 6:33am | Report comment
Agreed. The thorpedo is anchoring the bbc coverage. Could you imagine mark foster doing that on channel 9?
August 5th 2012 @ 7:59am
Lolly said | August 5th 2012 @ 7:59am | Report comment
They have barely mentioned the Aussie performances on the broadcast, except when calling the races. One of the race callers has said that Magnussen had been talking himself up a lot before the Olympcs but they haven’t gone into detail about anything to do with that.
Very, very professional are the BBC crews. So pleased I don’t have to listen to the Aussies.
August 5th 2012 @ 12:03pm
Gravity Basher said | August 5th 2012 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
Rugby Fan, and others,
Regarding the comment relating Gallipoli The Guardian reported a paper said it was the “biggest defeat since Gallipoli”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/aug/01/london-2012-michael-jamieson-silver
August 5th 2012 @ 12:14pm
Rugby Fan said | August 5th 2012 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
So no-one in the British media made that comment, it was apparently local Australian media. Here’s the relevant paragraph:
“Another runner-up, Australia’s James Magnussen, will have an entirely different take on his Olympic experience. He too came second, in the 100m freestyle. But his press and public seems altogether less satisfied with it, seeing as the back pages back in his home country have been chock-a-block with columnists calling him “a choker” after he failed to lead their 4x100m relay team to gold last Sunday. “The biggest defeat since Gallipoli,” was one paper called it. “Un-Australian” added another, “A big belly flop in the pool.”"
Which Australian commentator said it? No idea. Looks like the Guardian lifted the comment from an AFR report, which itself doesn’t give a source:
http://afr.com/p/opinion/strewth_now_we_re_really_in_the_oeVg96drd5TcP69eirZAHN
August 6th 2012 @ 6:25pm
liam said | August 6th 2012 @ 6:25pm | Report comment
thanks for pulling it out, but he most definitely said capitulation. which is a lot more offensive than “defeat”, as capitulation implies the effort was sub-standard and gutless. i didn’t notice him ascribing it to aussie press.
August 6th 2012 @ 6:23pm
liam said | August 6th 2012 @ 6:23pm | Report comment
as i’ve said above, it was at the swimming on radio five live, mid morning. it was either the day after or 2 days after the aussie relay team didnt medal. i emailed the BBC with a complaint, and havent heard back.
August 6th 2012 @ 7:47pm
Rugby Fan said | August 6th 2012 @ 7:47pm | Report comment
Sorry liam, your story doesn’t hold up.
BBC Five Live has an average weekly audience of six million and considerably more during the Olympics. If any BBC commentator had the poor taste to compare an Australian sporting loss to Gallipoli, it would have been noticed by more people than just you alone.
There were no tweets about any such comment on the BBC, and no mention anywhere else.
What we do have instead, is a UK paper picking up on a reaction by an Australian commentator who does seem to have made that comparison. A twitter search pins the blame on Alan Jones, as does this article:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/olympics/swimming/7379466/Aussies-lash-out-after-relay-favourites-bomb
“Veteran broadcaster Alan Jones reportedly described the Australian’s fourth placing as representing a worse defeat than Gallipoli”
August 6th 2012 @ 9:37pm
liam said | August 6th 2012 @ 9:37pm | Report comment
your logic that “someone else would have noticed”, just doesnt change the fact that what the british commentator said, was exactly what i quoted. he wasn’t asutralian. i’m a kiwi. i’ve been to gallipolli and know some history. i was seething, to be honest. i wrote the bbc complaints immediately.
that no-one else seemed to have noticed perhaps says it all. any and all media here (im in london) is swept up in a huge british patriotism fever.
if what the guy was repeating was simply reading out an australian headline, well. thats disappointing also, but the headline people are referring to isnt what i heard. he definitely said capitulation, and thats the word that offended me.
i wish it wasnt so but im afraid i’m not making anything up. how come no-one else heard this? i’m still bemused by the fact no-one has said anything in the press here.
August 6th 2012 @ 9:51pm
Rugby Fan said | August 6th 2012 @ 9:51pm | Report comment
There’s all the difference in the world between a British commentator drawing that comparison himself – which is what you originally implied – and a British commentator reporting an extreme reaction by an Australian broadcaster to his own country’s performance.
August 6th 2012 @ 10:47pm
Rory said | August 6th 2012 @ 10:47pm | Report comment
Liam
You’re either wrong or lying. There was no such comment on the BBC.
August 5th 2012 @ 11:11am
Tom Callaghan said | August 5th 2012 @ 11:11am | Report comment
Don’t you mean to shine again as at Beijing and all the past games that put GB third on all time olympic medal table and in successive Ashes campaigns, Rugby world cups, etc…..
If you want one person who encapsulates Australia’s sporting failure its Mitchell Johnson….
August 5th 2012 @ 6:07pm
Wiggo said | August 5th 2012 @ 6:07pm | Report comment
August 5th 2012 @ 6:10pm
Wiggo said | August 5th 2012 @ 6:10pm | Report comment
Tom, GB are 4th on the all time medal count but we were competing right back in 1896 when there were only 14 nations competing and amassed 146 in the 1908 London Games, gives us a bit of a head start on the others bit like starting halfway down the track on the 100 Metre race, still probably wouldn’t beat Usain Bolt thou.
August 5th 2012 @ 8:22pm
Tom Callaghan said | August 5th 2012 @ 8:22pm | Report comment
Wiggo,
By most calculations GB are third on all time table. GB is not the only nation that has been competing since 1896 and some countries have effectively sent two teams during certain periods .Germany would be an example of this. Its also the case that British Dominions competed as dominionsin early games and that there medals have been computed seperately from those of Britain. I don’t feel your analysis is particularly strong
August 5th 2012 @ 9:13pm
Wiggo said | August 5th 2012 @ 9:13pm | Report comment
Top 4 all time medal winners
US – 2296
USSR – 1010
Germany – 851 not including medals won by E.Germany
GB – 715
The only other nations that have competed in as many games as GB are Greece, France and Switzerland at 26 times, if you average them out we come in at 27.5 per games, which still puts us up at 7th.
I’m as patriotic as the next man but i like a level playing ground
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-time_Olympic_Games_medal_table
August 5th 2012 @ 11:39pm
Tom Callaghan said | August 5th 2012 @ 11:39pm | Report comment
You are basing your calculations on the idiosyncratic American method of computing medal table finishes rather than the gold yardstick used by the rest of the world.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:05am
Tom Callaghan said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:05am | Report comment
Not only do all countries other than the USA use golds as the criteria for computing medal table finishes but so does INFOSTRADA the sports forecasting agency as does the respected Italian sports forecaster who predicted that Britain would finish fourth in the table at Beijing. Your decision to use the American method, a method eschewed by the majority of the worlds population therefore seems rather perverse.
Your assumption that mere longevity in terms of olympic participation is key also seems rather dubious.Participating nations have not always invested intensively in sport. Great Britain has only really done so from about 2000 with the arrival of lottery funding. Australia, on the other hand,has always seen sport as a way to make a mark internationally and especially since 1976.
I remain, therefore, rather perplexed by your rather odd iperspective on this issue.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:37am
Tom Callaghan said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:37am | Report comment
Furthermore, the percentages for historic games participation that you quote do not seem to be decisive and they seem rather incomplete and not sufficient to hold up your argument
August 6th 2012 @ 1:49am
Wiggo said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:49am | Report comment
LOL if you have better sourses let me know
Based on Golds
US- 929
USSR – 395
Germany – 247 not including E.Germany
GB – 207
Average 7.96 Golds per games which still puts us in 7th
Go Murray awesome result
August 5th 2012 @ 1:16pm
Emric said | August 5th 2012 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
Thats a shocking thing to say.
August 6th 2012 @ 8:56am
Pommie b* said | August 6th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
For once??? We beat you at the last olympics too
August 5th 2012 @ 2:57am
Johnno said | August 5th 2012 @ 2:57am | Report comment
-Money Money Money Money in a rich man’s world like the song. We don’t have the money to compete we got the talent but we don’t have the money to compete with the big guns. We are a middle size nation pure and simple.
-And examples some of those examples you mention in your article gravity basher, ukraine,japan, south korea are all larger economies and have bigger populations than us. And Kazakhtahan is very oil rich only 16 million but huge oil reserves.
-And the excuse about football codes and cricket, also makes no sense, to that point.
-USA-baseball,basketball, gridiron,soccer,ice hockey
china,england,germany ,Italy,brazil, france, south korea,russia – all soccer and in some of those nations rugby too eating up talant, and market share
-Still are all these nations doing strong in olympic sports, despite soccer, the football codes, baseball, rugby,cricket eating up talant. Just they are big nations and have more money, bigger populations,.
-We got the talant just don’t have the money it’s as simple as that.
-You think academies, high performances centres, gyms, top elite coaches, travel coast, specialist nutrition, sports medicine costs, you think it is all magically for free hardly. it costs a lot of money.
-Remember all the fuss about taxpayers money being spent on ian thropes comeback, . well haven’t we sent as many as 400 athletes alone, not including coaches, and administrators, to the london 2012 olympics, and all this cost taxpayers money and still only 1 lousy gold.
-So if we want to compete with the bog boys, and nations to that are big like argentina and south africa spending big now too, we gotta be prepared to match all these nations above in spending. And we don’t seem to be.
Great britian , and china have aussy coaches on there staff. global labor market now, all these coaches cost taxpayers a fortune if we were to keep them in OZ, even though we developed them we cant afford to keep them on the open market unless we fork out big at the expense of hospitals, education, infrastructure.
-So we have to say to ourselves as a nations how mich is olympic gold for 2 weeks every 4 years worth to the 22 million aussy people.
Becoz if it means a lot we better be willing to spend up even bigger and a lot bigger, and sacrifice hospital beds, schools, , universities, infrastructure eg airports,public transports, better roads, coz money is not unlimited and that is what it will take to win olympic gold. Sacrifices will have to be made, The old eastern bloc countries like east germany, soviet union used too, but many of there people were very poor is it worth i don’t think olympic gold is worth hospital beds, or education . or roads.
August 5th 2012 @ 4:59am
JVGO said | August 5th 2012 @ 4:59am | Report comment
What a load of crap johnno. Aussies don’t spend their money on hospital beds and schools, they spend it on flat screen TV’s, BMW’s, Iphones and other consumer paraphenalia. Education, health and everything else in this country is underfunded relative to our wealth because Aussies aren’t prepared to sacrifice their top shelf lifestyles.
The money spent on the olympics is a drop in the ocean. But it is a test of our character as a nation and it isn’t our athletes that have failed, in almost every case they have performed admirably, but as a nation we have reacted petulantly, pointing the finger, looking for excuses, pontificating and doing anything but examinig our own second rate self important attitudes.
In a lot of cases, particularly in the swimming I saw 19 and 20 year olds up agianst 24 and 25 year olds, young kids who in four years had potential to deliver far better performances, but why would they bother when they see the rewards for not delivering in all the acrimony and bile delivered on sites like the roar. God help them if they only get silver. This is the way that Australia will get what it deserves next time around as well.
The olympics is a test of our collective will. If we can’t do it for the joy of the Olympics how will we ever do it for the hard things like hopspital beds and schools.
August 5th 2012 @ 7:26am
Tom said | August 5th 2012 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Agree to a point it’s a lack of funding, but we’re supposed to be doing well economically, so where are the results?… sorry but don’t see it our schools, universities, hospitals, roads nor in our sport. Other countries with worse economies (apparently) are doing better in the medal tally. I think it’s probably a combination of many things and I am inclined to agree with the article, Aussies simply don’t want it enough and it seems there’s a general attitude amongst the Aussie athletes “I’m just here to have fun, enjoy the experience. I did my best and that’s all I can do.” Now that’s a good attitude to happiness in general, but not a great attitude to winning olympic gold. But then, why is winning gold so important anyway?
August 5th 2012 @ 8:19pm
Tom Callaghan said | August 5th 2012 @ 8:19pm | Report comment
Is Australia doing well economically? You have a two speed economy and the only part that is thriving is the semi colonial part that exports basic commodities to China. Australiais part of China’s informal economic empire.
August 5th 2012 @ 6:04am
Crashy said | August 5th 2012 @ 6:04am | Report comment
Read yesterday’s story in the sydney morning herald about rising rugby star Cadern Neville. Having never played rugby before 3 years ago, he quit the Australian rowing program due to substantial Olympic funding cuts meaning he would have to fund his own training. I’m sure these cuts were across the board.
August 5th 2012 @ 8:01am
Lolly said | August 5th 2012 @ 8:01am | Report comment
Compared to the Brits our funding has definitely reduced. But then this Olympics is at home so they were bound to pour money into it in the last few years.
August 5th 2012 @ 8:09am
RC97 said | August 5th 2012 @ 8:09am | Report comment
As Gary Lineker has just said lot of option for British sports personality great night for us,not so much for u lot silver in long jump though
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 5th 2012 @ 9:25am
B.A Sports said | August 5th 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Funding might cost us a few medals, but it isn’t unlikely we were spending that much more than other countries before either.
We get plenty of athletes into Finals and they fall short. Some perform below their best, some are recording best efforts, but why aren’t any of these “best efforts” as good as those from athletes from other countries? Then we have those who “cruise” into the finals but because they just cruised they miss out on the optimal lane which can be the difference betwen silver and gold. Bad tactics. As suggested, it lacks the desperation. There are Australian coaches winning gold medals with other countries. With athletes with whom they do not even share a language. We have coaches from other countries, so we can attract the best coaches, but in many cases obviously we don’t.
I can’t help but feel what ever greater being is up there is issing a hole heap of karma on the Australian public saying “you morons were stupid enough to elect Julia Gillard as your PM, I am going to embaress you on the biggest international stage there is”….
August 5th 2012 @ 9:52am
Lux said | August 5th 2012 @ 9:52am | Report comment
Spare a thought for Russia, in 10th spot below Nth Korea and Kazakhstan. My sympathies lie more with them.
August 5th 2012 @ 10:02am
B.A Sports said | August 5th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Don’t forget the African nations and the Carribean nations (you know, those super wealthy countries) still have all of their events to come. Australia may not be finished falling yet…
August 5th 2012 @ 10:18am
Wiggo said | August 5th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Lottery funding has a lot to do with the British success in the London olympics and not just because it’s a home games the British were 4th at Beijing.
It’s not enough just to be the hardest working and naturally talented anymore, countries like China & the US are desperate for success, their governments consider it a priority to win the overal Gold medal count and consequently are ploughing big bucks into their sports programmes. The US have targeted swimming medals (it currently accounts for more than half their medals at London 2012) & with their massive resources Australia are going to suffer.
Can’t believe anyone on he BBC made any reference to Galopoli and capitulation, they wouldn’t dare their feet wouldn’t touch the ground on the way to the dole queue.
They have talked about the Aussie lack of swimming golds with Thorpe but its all been very BBC (politically correct).
August 5th 2012 @ 3:21pm
James said | August 5th 2012 @ 3:21pm | Report comment
the reason most in england are only giving the lack of australian gold a cursory mention is that the gap is so big now, 14-1. if it was closer then maybe it would be a competition but at this point it just wouldnt be cricket.
August 5th 2012 @ 11:55am
axe said | August 5th 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
The opinion that football codes and cricket take the cream of Australia’s male athletes does have some merit. However, even though most of Australia’s Olympic greats have been women, and they continue to win more medals than the men in London, they aren’t winning much gold either. There are other factors that contribute to performance, and the cuts in funding since the highs of Sydney 2000 don’t help.
August 5th 2012 @ 12:10pm
millane said | August 5th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
i thought it was all the AFL’s fault…
August 5th 2012 @ 1:59pm
JVGO said | August 5th 2012 @ 1:59pm | Report comment
AFL is spending $200 million on two new teams. That’s probably more than our entire Olympic program.
August 5th 2012 @ 3:04pm
Lux said | August 5th 2012 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
Perhaps those Olympic sports should work out a way to become self-sufficient – if you’re using your own money, it becomes nobody’s’ business how poorly your travelling.
August 5th 2012 @ 3:55pm
JVGO said | August 5th 2012 @ 3:55pm | Report comment
Masses of NSW and ACT taxpayers money has been used in the GWS venture at blacktown, homebush, Wagga, and Canberra Lux. I’d definitely be interested to know how it compares to the expenditure on supporting our own NSW Olympic athletes in particular. But hopefully we can leave this discussion to a more appropriate time.
August 5th 2012 @ 4:03pm
millane said | August 5th 2012 @ 4:03pm | Report comment
find it somewhat amusing that australia’s self-declared ONLY world city and centre of all things free-market struggles with the competition and choices presented by what many anti-afl types on this website view as such an international insignificant sporting code…
August 5th 2012 @ 3:02pm
Lux said | August 5th 2012 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Now we’re getting to the nub of it.
Thank you for being bold enough to put forward the real reason, we can now all stop walking around on tenterhooks.