Is Bolt the greatest sprinter of all time?
Churandy Martina of The Netherlands, US' Ryan Bailey, Jamaica's Usain Bolt, US' Justin Gatlin, Jamaica's Yohan Blake, US' Tyson Gay, Jamaica's Asafa Powell and Trinidad and Tobago's Richard Thompson take the start of the men's 100m final at the athletics event during the London 2012 Olympic Games on August 5, 2012 in London. AFP PHOTO / FRANCISCO LEONG
The most anticipated event of any Olympic games lived up to expectations, but does this make Usain Bolt the greatest male sprinter of all time?
Winning his second 100m title in an Olympic record 9.63s, Bolt became only the second man to defend the 100m title after Carl Lewis (although Lewis was famously beaten on the track by the infamous Ben Johnson).
Lewis is widely recognised as the greatest athlete of all time, but I think Bolt has a strong claim on the title of greatest sprinter.
If Bolt can back up in the 200m – and if he’s in 9.63 shape you’d be brave to bet against him – he will be the only man to claim the 100m/200m double in two Olympics.
Bolt is now the world record holder in the 100 and 200 metres, a four-time Olympic gold medallist, and five-time world champion. His world records have carved tenths of a second off the previous marks, in a sport where shaving 0.01 used to require years.
He is the only man to have set world records in three track events at one Olympics (the 100m, 200m and 4x100m in Beijing).
I was privileged to be in the stadium in Berlin when Bolt ran 9.58s, and again a few days later when he ran 19.19 in the 200m. Against some of the fastest men in history, who have lifted their games to compete with him, his dominance was total.
He has dragged his rivals with him – this Olympic final was the first to feature seven athletes running under 10 seconds, and if the unfortunate Asafa Powell hadn’t pulled up injured it was almost certain that the whole field would have cracked the mark.
This was the strongest 100m final ever run, and Bolt destroyed it.
How does his record compare to Carl Lewis?
Lewis, widely considered to be the greatest Olympian of all time, won nine Olympic gold medals spread across four Olympics, including the 100m/200m/4x100m sprint triple in 1984, and the long jump gold.
In 1988 he won a retrospective gold in ‘that’ 100m, silver in the 200m, and gold in the long jump. His gold medals in 1992 were in the relay and the long jump, and in the long jump alone in 1996.
So Lewis has a handy lead on Bolt in total medals won, but four of those gold medals were in the long jump – this arguably makes him a better all-around athlete, but it doesn’t necessarily add to his claim as the best sprinter. That gives him a career total of five sprint gold medals, and one silver.
Bolt has now won four Olympic gold medals in the sprints, compared to Lewis’ five. A 200m victory would see him draw level, and a relay win would see him pass Lewis on gold medals won.
The injury to Asafa Powell will certainly not help Jamaica’s chances in the relay, but with the two fastest men in the world (Bolt and Blake) and probably Nesta Carter and Michael Frater to join them, it’s going to be a magnificent battle with the American squad, with the Jamaicans probably a slight favourite.
If that scenario plays out, Bolt will have six gold medals and all three sprint world records from two Olympics. At the age of 25, Bolt probably has another Olympics in him.
Ultimately though, comparing the best times of these two master sprinters, it’s difficult to argue that Lewis can compare.
Lewis’ best times were 9.86 and 19.75. Bolt’s are 9.58 and 19.19. The differences are stark.
Tim Renowden has been following professional cycling closely since Indurain won his first Tour. A former A-grade club athlete, and now a keen recreational cyclist and roller racer, he once rode very slowly up Mont Ventoux. Tim tweets about sport at @timehhh_sp.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics

August 6th 2012 @ 11:35am
Dan said | August 6th 2012 @ 11:35am | Report comment
Hard to compare eras but when bolt wins the 200m then I think he will deservedly be regarded as the best sprinter or all-time, one thing for sure is that he is definitely the most entertaining!
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 6th 2012 @ 11:48am
Chris Lewis said | August 6th 2012 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Bolt will win more sprint championships, but comparisons are difficult and subjective.
But if Bolt went on and won a 400m, there would be no doubt
August 6th 2012 @ 12:20pm
Millz said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
Chris, is Carl your brother?
August 6th 2012 @ 11:53am
tonysalerno said | August 6th 2012 @ 11:53am | Report comment
I agree with both Chris and Dan it is just too hard to compare Usain Bolt to other great sprinters in past Olympics. You have to take into account clothing and other forms of technology. With technology becoming more sophisticated coaches and athletes are using strategies which would reduce the time it takes Bolt to run the 100m.
There is no doubt Bolt will go doubt as the greatest sprinter of all time, based on his statistics but statistics sometimes do not tell the entire story.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:24pm
josh said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
In this case they do. I don’t believe that Bolt’s brilliance is due to training and technology. He is a bio-mechanical freak. He isn’t a huge bulky power sprinter. His long stride is unmatched in athletics; that is Usain’s greatest weapon. Until another 2m+ sprinter arrives his times will stand the test of time.
Here are some stats.
Considering all times under 9.99 seconds: A.Powell 80 timed runs, Bolt 31, Gay 31, Blake 20, Lewis 16
All times 9.90 and under seconds: A.Powell 43, Bolt 25, Gay 18, Blake 10, Lewis 1
All times 9.80 and under seconds: A.Powell 8 , Bolt 10, Gay 8, Blake 2, Lewis 0
All times 9.70 and under seconds: Bolt 3, Gay 1
All times 9.65 and under seconds: Bolt 2
All times 9.60 and under seconds: Bolt 1
August 6th 2012 @ 11:54am
gah said | August 6th 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
If Bolt wins the 200m sprint, there will be no room for arguent he is the gr8est sprinter ever imo. King Carl was a fine athlete but can’t boast Bolt’s stellar sprinting record.
August 6th 2012 @ 11:59am
josh said | August 6th 2012 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Yes.
There is no other sprinter in the world that can get near Bolt’s times. Sure Tyson Gay has gone sub 9.7 (with a significant tail wind) but for him its a stretch. Bolt not even fully fit can get sub 9.65.
I don’t expect we’ll see his world record being beaten by anyone else except himself.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:17pm
Justin Curran said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Bolt the best. Will be looking for that enlarging jaw though.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:25pm
Tim Renowden said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
I think that’s unfair. in 2004 Bolt ran 19.92 as a 17 year old – the fastest junior of all time by some margin. His progression is what you would expect from a 17 year old to a 25 year old.
August 6th 2012 @ 3:03pm
Justin Curran said | August 6th 2012 @ 3:03pm | Report comment
Ok fair enough, I didn’t know that. I think my cynicism about absurdly talented athletes stems from me being more of a cycling fan, rather than an athletics fan.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:32pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
Without question Bolt is the greatest sprinter and greatest athlete to this point..some one in the future may go faster but until then…Tim I too have watched his career since he grabbed my attention as that skinny ex-cricketer from Jamaica that ran that astonishing 19.92 as a 17 year old…he was so lean and thin then it was hard to see him developing into the 100 legend he is…I think there are a lot of batsmen around the world glad he is no longer bowling!…imagine him steaming in from the long run up at the speed he does to bowl a cork ball at your head….batsmen would be running in the opposite direction!
August 6th 2012 @ 1:36pm
Fussballs AFL tracking spreadsheet said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:36pm | Report comment
Not even remotely close to the best athlete, Bolt is barely fit to carry Michael Phelps’ wet towel bag. Bolt is very good at what he does, but lacks the all round athletic ability to complete in the large number of very closely related track and field events. He can’t even win at hurdles, which is exactly like sprinting except with a bit of jumping thrown in. They’re just minor variations on a common theme, unlike the different swimming strokes which require entirely different techniques and require superior all round athletic ability to master.
August 6th 2012 @ 1:42pm
jameswm said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
Thanking for proving your ignorance of both athletics and the comparison with swimming. Post of the day.
August 6th 2012 @ 1:50pm
Fussballs AFL tracking spreadsheet said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
Whereas for some reason people feel entitled to make ignorant statements about swimming and become quite defensive when this is pointed out. Go figure.
August 6th 2012 @ 2:09pm
jameswm said | August 6th 2012 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Go and pick on them. I didn’t. Your disdain for Bolt, doing an event that every kid tries, is obvious, as is your lack of understanding of the comparison between the two sports. Why are we so good at swimming?
Sorry, you must be rright – every kid in the world wakes up wanting to be the best at 200 butterfly, or 400 individual medley. They’re the most popular sporting events in the world, and the 100 sprint and world cup of football play 2nd fiddle.
It’s why we dominated over 1500 free for so long – hardly ayone takes it seriously. Now they do, we don’t dominate any more.
August 6th 2012 @ 3:47pm
JJ said | August 6th 2012 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
Fussball is upset cause he is probably more suited to the bouyant-friendly sport of swimming.
Athletics is king, and Bolt is the king of it … so he’s the king.
August 6th 2012 @ 3:49pm
GCS said | August 6th 2012 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
Your last paragraph is ridiculous. Hackett’s winning times in 2000 and 2004 would still be good enough for a top four finish now. We don’t dominate now because we don’t have a champion 1500m swimmer.
August 7th 2012 @ 2:08pm
jameswm said | August 7th 2012 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
Hackett, Perkins, Housman – we did well in the 1500 because we took it seriously and few others did.
You made my point GCS – Hackett’s phenomenal time would only do a top 5.
And Perkins from Atlanta – his winning time would barely have made the final now.
August 6th 2012 @ 3:05pm
Tim Renowden said | August 6th 2012 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Phelps is undoubtedly a great swimmer and a great Olympian, but as a track sprinter he hasn’t achieved much.
I don’t think there’s much value in trying to compare athletes across such different sports.
August 6th 2012 @ 3:37pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 6th 2012 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Do humans live in water or on land?…we should you invent four different ways to getting the end of the pool faster?..if you are at the beach and being chased by a Great White shark are you going to breastroke? No. Yyou will swim the fastest stroke possible…freestyle…likewise a 100 metre hurdles champion would NOT consider themselves faster than a pure sprinter.
August 6th 2012 @ 5:30pm
Fussballs AFL tracking spreadsheet said | August 6th 2012 @ 5:30pm | Report comment
Jocelyn may be onto something here. There are plenty of Olympic events that could be enhanced with the introduction of large predators. Release a great white at the start of the 100m free, possibly a lion or tiger at the 100 metre track sprint. As they say to scuba divers, you don’t need to be faster than the shark, just faster than the slowest swimmer. Therefore perhaps we need to release 7 sharks / lions, meaning that only one competitor survives, truly deserving of the title ‘Olympic champion’.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:32pm
Tim Renowden said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
There is a footnote to Lewis’ story as well – he tested positive to banned stimulants in the lead-up to the 1988 Olympics, but was allowed to compete as the USOC accepted his defence that the substances were ingested inadvertently in a herbal supplement. Obviously that excuse doesn’t fly, now.
What we do know is that dope testing was much less rigorous (no out of competition testing, for example) in the 1980′s. Perhaps that makes Lewis’ achievements more valuable, if you think he was clean.
August 6th 2012 @ 7:01pm
Damien said | August 6th 2012 @ 7:01pm | Report comment
Thats true Tim,
He actually tested positive 3 times during the lead up to the 1988 Olympics.
His excuse was accepted also partly because a lot of the US track team was getting popped.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2003/apr/24/athletics.duncanmackay
August 6th 2012 @ 12:35pm
Cam Baker said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
You forgot that since the IAAF started keeping world records for the 200m in 1951 that he is the only man to hold the 100m and 200m World Record at the same time. (yes I realise that Jessie Owens has a pre war claim to this as well.
But can I throw another name into the mix. What about Michael Johnson? Three individual gold medals over 200m and 400m. Two relay golds (if you count the one where Young got the team got disqualified). World record holder in the 200, 400 and 4x400m. And only man to win the 200-400 double anywhere.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:39pm
Tim Renowden said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
That’s a fair claim, but I don’t think you can be the greatest sprinter without ever being the world’s fastest man – which means holding the 100m world record. Of course Bolt has now obliterated Johnson’s “unbeatable” 200m record, as well.
I was thinking Jesse Owens had a fair claim for his impact on sport and attitudes to race. His legacy was stronger than Lewis and Bolt, probably. But his achievements were confined to one Olympics, so I think on career stats alone he is behind.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:55pm
danisrob said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
Johnson was the worlds fastest man as his 200m record of 19.32 at 10.35m-a-second was faster than Donovan Bailey’s 9.84m in the 100.
Never understood why the 100m winner is always considered World’s Fastest.
August 6th 2012 @ 1:22pm
Tim Renowden said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
What were their top speeds?
August 6th 2012 @ 1:43pm
jameswm said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:43pm | Report comment
The start makes up a bigger proportion of the 100 than the 200. That;’s why the average speed over 200 is sometimes quicker.
August 6th 2012 @ 1:46pm
mushi said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
They’ve done some analysis to show the top speed of the 100m runner is typically higher than a world class 200m runner.
the m/s difference is the result of the acceleration period making up more of the 100m than the 200m
August 6th 2012 @ 1:49pm
The (not so) Special One said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
Not correct on any level. In a 100m race, the slowest part is the first 40 or so, due to reaction time and the time needed to achieve max speed. That means comparing the metres per second of the times is not a valid comparison, as someone like Johnson or Bolt can hold top speed for up to 100 metres or so. The following is from Wikipedia:
“the second 100 m is run with a “flying start”, without the slow acceleration phase of the first 100 m and without the greater than 0.10 s reaction time of the start. In fact, each 200 m gold medalist from 1968, when fully electronic timing was introduced, to 1996 had a “faster” average speed at the Olympics, save one, yet there had been no controversy over the title of “world’s fastest man” previously.”
August 6th 2012 @ 1:50pm
The (not so) Special One said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
I would add that the controversy was only in the USA, because Bailey was Canadian.
August 6th 2012 @ 6:58pm
Colin N said | August 6th 2012 @ 6:58pm | Report comment
Yep, apparently Bolt’s final 100m in Berlin was run in 8.95 seconds or something like that.
August 6th 2012 @ 7:21pm
Colin N said | August 6th 2012 @ 7:21pm | Report comment
I should probably clarify – Bolt’s final 100m in the 200!
August 6th 2012 @ 8:00pm
Tim Renowden said | August 6th 2012 @ 8:00pm | Report comment
According to this http://speedendurance.com/2009/08/21/usain-bolt-200-meter-splits-speed-reserve-and-speed-endurance/ Bolt’s second 100m in the 19.19 world record was:
19.19 – 9.92 = 9.27.
However, his split from 50-150m was 8.84 (14.44 – 5.60).
That gives you a fair idea of a) how much slower the first 50m is b) how much he slowed down in the final 50m and c) how fast Bolt can go at his top speed!
That’s an average speed of 11.312m/s or 40.7km/h for that middle 100m.
August 6th 2012 @ 9:53pm
Cam Baker said | August 6th 2012 @ 9:53pm | Report comment
It is not really Jessie Owens’ fault that his achievements were confined to a single Olympics. There was this thing called World War 2 that got in the way and he was accused of running for money and so was banned from amateur competition.
August 6th 2012 @ 12:47pm
Chris Lewis said | August 6th 2012 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
You cant merely go on times. The tracks today are faster than in the past.
August 6th 2012 @ 1:46pm
mushi said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
so how do you judge sprinters? By coconuts consumed in May?
August 6th 2012 @ 1:51pm
Rabbitz said | August 6th 2012 @ 1:51pm | Report comment
Depends if they are European or African Athletes…
(And before anyone gets upset it is a Monty Python reference)
August 6th 2012 @ 7:03pm
Damien said | August 6th 2012 @ 7:03pm | Report comment
LOL..
August 6th 2012 @ 7:03pm
Australian Rules said | August 6th 2012 @ 7:03pm | Report comment
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen Bolt?