Primus the fall guy for a Powerless board
By Vince Rugari, 7 Aug 2012 Vince Rugari is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Matthew Primus, Port Adelaide Power
Port Adelaide coach Matthew Primus (Slattery Images)
Related coverage
No Port Adelaide fan will ever forget that famous splash of a bare-chested Jonathan Giles and Matthew Primus on the front page of The Advertiser in December 2005.
“Power’s mission to turn scrawn into brawn,” read the headline above an unflattering snap of a pale, rake-thin Giles next to a picture of a bronzed, hulking Primus at his physical peak.
Read more: Power outage for Matthew Primus
Read more: Win or lose, Primus was always screwed
Giles, all 17 years and 84kg of him, had just been drafted by the Power – but in 2009 he was delisted without playing a single senior game.
Who could have predicted that, nearly seven years on from that infamous front-page spread, these two men have effectively traded places.
A bulked-up Giles now has the opportunity to lead the ruck division for a Greater Western Sydney side that will almost certainly become a force to be reckoned with in a few years time.
He had 23 touches, 26 hit-outs and kicked two goals on Saturday – best on ground in the game that killed Matthew Primus’ coaching career.
Indeed, Giles and Primus now represent the consequences of a Port Adelaide that, since the 2004 flag, has made all the wrong decisions because they were too scared to make the hard ones.
The former is missed opportunity personified.
Endless recruiting gaffes, a dysfunctional administration and a toxic mentality that permeates the playing group have meant that whenever Port lucked themselves into drafting an excellent prospect, they never become what they could be because of injury or infrastructure.
On the other hand, Primus is a club legend that has been so gracelessly ‘shat on’, in the esteemed words of Warren Tredrea, because Port Adelaide has been blocking its ears and wishing its problems away.
It seems patently unfair that in the opposite coaching box at Skoda Stadium sat the very man who decided Giles was not good enough for the Power. Not only was he now reaping the rewards, the man who once oversaw the rot at Alberton was plotting his former club’s worst ever loss.
But let’s get one thing straight – the lionhearted, likable Primus was never the right man for this particular job. There are too many examples over the past two years that his message was not getting through.
Consider the Chad Cornes debacle, or the general lack of progress this team has made, both tactically and developmentally.
After they fell so shamefully to GWS, Primus simply had to go. As Giles learned the embarrassing way through getting his picture in the paper, perception is everything. This is modern sport.
But this is a mess of the club’s own making.
The same fans who are now militant in their demand for change were calling for someone from outside of Port Adelaide way back in mid-2010, when the club went through with a messy divorce with Mark Williams merely 12 months after re-signing him.
Outgoing chairman Brett Duncanson, who was reduced to a bawling mess when announcing his own overdue resignation from the club he grew up following on Monday, must wear the majority of the heat.
Williams should never have been re-appointed – and because he was, the board cost the debt-ridden club an amount per month that was said to be greater than Primus’ wages.
We’ll never know where Primus could have taken Port Adelaide, because he never had the right support network around him. Nor could he repair a shattered, clique-driven club culture. The board is culpable for both.
So broken are certain parts of Alberton that had Chris Scott been appointed to the post instead of Primus, there’s every chance it would have been him getting knifed yesterday.
As for the playing group itself, which has approached its football like Billy Brownless approaches the annual EJ Whitten Legends Game, there are only so many lines in the sand you can draw until your beach becomes a canyon.
Their hands are stained with the blood of two coaches.
Now the future of the club rests on the shoulders of a man who, exactly like Primus, comes from Norwood and Fitzroy stock – chief executive Keith Thomas, who assumed control of Monday’s press conference from an emotionally overwhelmed Duncanson, just like he has taken over the operation and direction of the club.
One of the callers to Adelaide radio station FiveAA after the Giants loss called for a ‘great big enema’ from board level right down to the gear stewards.
Little did we know that it had already been administered. Primus and Duncanson are gone, and more will follow thanks to Thomas’ secret review. The review began at the start of the year and he says it is steered by seven AFL luminaries who do not want to be named.
It is just so unfortunate that this has come so late and cost so much, in so many ways.
It is up to the ‘outsider’ Thomas now to silence the predictable howls that say this proud club should change its name or be replaced by another side from SA, as if some mythical market exists for a third team that isn’t the Crows and isn’t Port either.
His first moves have been perfect – but in his words, Port Adelaide cannot get anything wrong from here if they wish to become a footballing Power once again. Here’s hoping.
Vince Rugari is an Adelaide-born journalist who cut his teeth on the sporting graveyard that is the Gold Coast. He fancies the round ball and the Sherrin, and used to be a handy leg-spin bowler before injury curtailed a baggy green push. He is a Port Adelaide fan by birth, as painful as that has been recently. He's now sports editor of The Area News in Griffith, NSW.
The Crowd Says (33) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- AFL, Matthew Primus, Port Adelaide Power

August 7th 2012 @ 7:17am
rsingi said | August 7th 2012 @ 7:17am | Report comment
Spot on it starts at the top. Primus was set up to fail. The board should be sacked, They now need a hard leader who can get a team he wants around him, Mathouse and Roos are the obvious ones but as I doubt they would go near this mess Rocket Rodney Eade could be the man.
August 7th 2012 @ 8:40am
Ian Whitchurch said | August 7th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Hire Rocket. Get him to ask Choco if Brogan or Cornes are ready to be an assistant coach. If so, hire them.
Make a bid for Giles – he’s out of contract at the end of the year.
Oh, and dump the nickname ‘Power’. The team is called Port Adelaide, and their nickname is Port.
August 7th 2012 @ 9:08am
damo said | August 7th 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Agree with getting Cornes back. that man bled for jumper often and willingly, they need that kind of passion bacl if nothing else
August 7th 2012 @ 11:03am
Vince Rugari said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
Too late now. What’s gone is gone. Now is the time to fix up the club to make sure it doesn’t happen again.
August 7th 2012 @ 9:43pm
amazonfan said | August 7th 2012 @ 9:43pm | Report comment
What does getting rid of ‘power’ have to do with anything? It’s a better nickname than Port.
August 7th 2012 @ 7:41am
checkside said | August 7th 2012 @ 7:41am | Report comment
Port play West Coast at AAMI Saturday week. Time for all Power supporters to do that – be there and show support. These are the times that a footy club needs it and prove to others how proud they are of the Port Adelaide “Tradition”. I would also suggest the board call Mark Williams as a possible coach – if they havent burnt that bridge as well.
August 7th 2012 @ 9:49am
Nathan of Perth said | August 7th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
You cannot *seriously* be suggesting that what Port needs is to go back to Choco and mire itself even further in its unprofessional Old Boys network?
August 7th 2012 @ 11:02am
Vince Rugari said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
Apparently so. What a woeful suggestion! That kind of mentality is exactly what got Port into this mess. The time for a fresh set of eyes came years ago! It’s desperate now.
August 7th 2012 @ 8:56am
Christo the Daddyo said | August 7th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Why would any coach with any brains go anywhere near Port at the moment?
August 7th 2012 @ 11:02am
Vince Rugari said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
For the challenge, and because there are only so many senior coaching positions. This will probably be the only one available for the next year and a half.
The only way is up.
August 7th 2012 @ 9:34am
Macca said | August 7th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Port have made mistakes but they have suffered as much as anyone at the hands of the AFL’s desire to expand. Without the SUns and Giants Port could of now had the likes of Bennell and Cameron or Coniglio and Day but alas it is not to be and they will struggle for the next couple of years.
August 7th 2012 @ 9:51am
Nathan of Perth said | August 7th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
The rottenest corner of Denmark has not been the playing list, but the front-office and the rest of the football department. From what I’m seeing (and what I’m reading of Port Adelaide supporter boards) these departments have been dreadful.
August 7th 2012 @ 11:00am
Vince Rugari said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
That’s why, Macca, I believe it is incumbent upon the AFL to help Port find the best possible coach, the way they did with a struggling Brisbane, Fremantle and Sydney. It might not be Roos or Malthouse but AFL House needs to sweeten the deal.
August 7th 2012 @ 11:04am
Macca said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Unless they force Gary Ablett or Scott Pendlebury to be a playing coach i don’t think it will make much difference Vince.
And you would have to think this means Boak is definitely out the door so ti won’t get any better.,
August 7th 2012 @ 1:52pm
Ian Whitchurch said | August 7th 2012 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
In trade week last year, GWS were giving away players for a can of coke and a packet of cigarettes.
Ahmed Saad. Terry Milera and a #25 pick were traded for a #20 pick.
Steven Morris and a #15 pick was a #14 pick.
Port took advantage of none of this.
August 7th 2012 @ 2:11pm
Macca said | August 7th 2012 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
You have to ask why GWS were able to trade Saad who played for the Northen Bullants and Milera who was in the SANFL in the first place.
August 7th 2012 @ 10:15am
checkside said | August 7th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
University, South Melbourne, Fitzroy, Brisbane Bears, Port Adelaide – only stirring, or am I???
August 7th 2012 @ 10:21am
Macca said | August 7th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
If it’s the case you have to ask why go to Western Sydney if it costs you Port Adelaide.
August 7th 2012 @ 1:53pm
Ian Whitchurch said | August 7th 2012 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
It doesnt. But if we’re lucky, it costs us the SANFL owning Port Adelaide.
August 7th 2012 @ 2:12pm
Vince Rugari said | August 7th 2012 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
Bullseye. Another element that makes this discussion far from straight forward.
August 7th 2012 @ 9:47pm
amazonfan said | August 7th 2012 @ 9:47pm | Report comment
I don’t think you can include the Brisbane Bears in that list. They’re the Brisbane Lions, before a name change.
August 13th 2012 @ 11:46am
Australian Rules said | August 13th 2012 @ 11:46am | Report comment
University are the only team on that list which no longer have a presence in the AFL (having departed after the 1914 season).
August 13th 2012 @ 11:14pm
amazonfan said | August 13th 2012 @ 11:14pm | Report comment
Neither does Fitzroy (having departed after the 1996 season).
August 7th 2012 @ 10:28am
checkside said | August 7th 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
I like the sound of Norwood.
August 7th 2012 @ 11:01am
Vince Rugari said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:01am | Report comment
Keep dreaming
August 7th 2012 @ 11:39am
checkside said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:39am | Report comment
C’mon Vince. Better than the present ”Redlegs”
August 7th 2012 @ 11:42am
Vince Rugari said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
My opinion? It should have been Port Adelaide first and then Norwood as the two SA clubs. Maybe Centrals, after their dynasty, might have put themselves in a position for a license in recent years as a third side. Even spread of power.
But this is our lot, and when you’ve got a side like the Crows, the only option for a second side is Port.
August 7th 2012 @ 1:29pm
Bayman said | August 7th 2012 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
Vince,
All in all a pretty fair summation of what has happened at Alberton to the once great Port Adelaide. I know that as a Port man you must be bleeding and, as the Crows man that I am, it is incredible that Port could allow themselves to have fallen so far. The only team to be beaten by both the Suns and the Giants in the last two years. Frankly, it is incomprehensible.
They say that those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. In Port Adelaide’s case this may not be such a bad thing. Sixty odd years ago they turned to Big Bob McLean to get their off-field activities right. Big Bob was a Norwood man so it seems almost divine intervention that Keith Thomas, another Norwood man, has been given the job in recent times. Let’s hope it’s a sign.
What McLean did was to bring in another outsider to lead the team. That man was Fos Williams from West Adelaide – the man who wrote the famous “creed”. As you have suggested it is time once again to go outside the club. The creed has long ago lost its power as this current lot continue to embarrass themselves and Port’s great tradition. It’s time to start again.
As you say, the appointment of Primus, following the incredulous re-appointment of Mark Williams, indicates a club still living in the past and surviving on past glories – or maybe, just broke! Unfortunately, those past glories mean absolutely zip to the likes of Collingwood, Carlton, Geelong etc. Indeed, to any Victorian.
In reality, Port’s great success was a very local thing. South Australians understood it, and were envious of it, but that was all. No-one else gave a damn. Once they joined the AFL that success was largely ignored – and at the very least seriously discounted. It seemed that only VFL/AFL premierships counted. So Essendon and Carlton have their sixteen flags but Port Adelaide have just one (though that is as many as St. Kilda and Footscray/Western Bulldogs).
Again, as you say, with the Crows in Adelaide the natural second team was Port Adelaide, particularly given the circumstances of how the Crows were created. As for your opinion (wish?) that Port should have been the first AFL team from Adelaide and Norwood second I’m afraid that was never going to happen – as we have previously discussed.
The Port fans may have liked the idea of mixing it with the VFL but unfortunately the VFL wanted the endorsement of the SANFL so Port was never going to fly, let alone Norwood. The SANFL was not about to make a decision to remove from its own competition the two most historically successful clubs – and the two with the strongest local rivalry – just because Port fans, and the club, suddenly felt ambitious.
So we can talk all we like about how much better off Port would be if Adelaide’s two AFL teams were Port Adelaide and Norwood, both with a proper club background and an established supporter base, but it’s irrelevant. Yes, both clubs could have then tried to woo the supporters of the other SANFL clubs to follow them in the AFL but it’s still a big ask to expect Glenelg or Sturt supporters, for example, to follow Port And Norwood.
Over time, no doubt, it would have happened. By then, of course, the SANFL would have been greatly reduced in tradition and history with the demise of Port and Norwood. We can argue now, of course, that the arrival of the AFL has indeed diminished the SANFL, and the WAFL, and those competitions can never reagain the standing they once had. Sad but true.
It doesn’t alter the fact, as you alluded to in your final sentence, that we have what we have and we can’t change it. The Crows and the Power – and a second rate SANFL compared to what it was.
As frustrating as it may be, wishing Port had been the first SA team in the AFL is a pointless exercise. It didn’t happen and it was never going to happen. That’s the sad truth. It’s time to make the best of what they have got and move on – and hopefully forward.
August 7th 2012 @ 11:58am
josh said | August 7th 2012 @ 11:58am | Report comment
When are the players going to held responsible?
August 7th 2012 @ 2:03pm
Ben Carter said | August 7th 2012 @ 2:03pm | Report comment
Hi Vince – all I will say is it’s interesting that in cricket (as a comparative nationally-played professional pastime) it seems to usually start at the bottom before uprising to the top, as it were. Cue memories of the mid-90s Ashes thrashings Australia handed out in England.
The Poms would lose a Test, maybe switch two or three players. Lose another, switch another two or three. By the third defeat the captain has been changed, too. Come defeat four it’s the coach on the block and by the fifth Test loss the chairman of the board has probably resigned in a fit of result-related pique.
I do not usually agree with Mike Rucci in The Advertiser, but he made a worthwhile point in relation to this particular issue – while Primus (who seems like a perfectly decent bloke) is ousted, the players apparently all get seven more days and another game in which to play – and presumably lose – without any sanction against them.
Yes, the coach marks some of the tactical direction, but the players have to execute it properly as well.
August 7th 2012 @ 2:48pm
Bayman said | August 7th 2012 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
Ben,
Unfortunately, some things never change. It’s always easier for a club to sack one coach than to sack twenty-five players.
As for sacking a committee, well, good luck waiting for that. On that score we have to wait until someone falls on their sword, like Duncanson, before the blazer wearers feel any heat. I feel sorry for Primus, less sorry for Duncanson.
August 7th 2012 @ 8:17pm
Kev said | August 7th 2012 @ 8:17pm | Report comment
If AFL clubs are good at doing anything it’s making knee jerk reactions without bothering to look at the root causes of their problems. Port Adelaide’s problems are with their assistant coaches, list managers, board and players not Primus. You watch, they’ll fuss over who to replace him with and nothing will change.
August 8th 2012 @ 1:08am
Walt said | August 8th 2012 @ 1:08am | Report comment
My once proud club is a disaster and while the SANFL needs to cop its share of the blame, most of it is Port Adelaides own doing. The terrible recruiting, made worse by the concessions to GC and GWS, a game plan that is just as confusing for the supporters as it is for the players, not one player recruited since 2000 has become an All-Australian, lack of onfield leadership, injuries and the ongoing choking. Matty had to go though, he hasnt had the resources that other coaches have but he cant coach on match day – plain and simple. I love the guy and I am the first to admit I was happy when he was recruited. I didnt rate his abilities but he won 4 of the 6 games he was caretaker, narrowly going down in one of the losses. Hey, he must have something going for him and the players were finally responding.
I could understand last years train-wreck due to list management woes, off-field silliness and injuries. But I did realise that Matty didnt know what he was doing on game day. His game plan was not playing to Ports strengths, the players lacked intensity and games in winnable positions were becoming the all too familiar fadeouts. This year, players skills have gone down, half of them barely breakout of second gear and Mattys own coaching abilities have never looked worse.
Love you Matty and you will always be at home at Alberton. But go away and find somewhere you can learn your trade from those who have the resources to make it work.
I could go on and on. But today is your lucky day – I wont.
PAFC forever.