By population, Australia is on top of the medal tally
Australia leads the Olympic medal tally. That is, if you compare medals won to our population.
Currently we’ve one medal per 50 thousand in population. That compares to China who have 1/3.4million, USA 1/136thousand, Great Britain 1/87thousand and France 1/102thousand.
Australia has consistently done this in Olympic competition as far back as anyone can remember.
And again when we compare the amount of athletes to population, Australia again leads the count. With Australia sending 1/54 thousand population, USA 1/116thousand and Great Britain 1/650 thousand.
Despite our lower population, we’re mixing it with the world’s largest countries with the numbers of athletes we send to the Olympics. The numbers are Australia 410, USA 482 and Great Britain 541.
So where’s the problem? We’re leading the world in the size of our Olympic squad and the numbers of medals won per population. So why are we feeling let down just by the colour of the medals?
You’d have to say that in a sports mad nation we expect more. We are fed by an excessive menu of winter and summer domestic competitions, with champion performances weekly in AFL, rugby, cricket and others.
Yes, we do expect more.
When you consider these numbers, it is strange that many commentators consider the 2012 Olympics to be a failure.
So what’s gone wrong? Maybe we’ve overstretched. Sure a squad of 410 is admirable, but maybe we should narrow our goals, pick winning sports, develop more champion athletes and win more medals.
So do we instruct the AOC to cull the number of sports we compete in for 2016, and beef up the development in those sports that remain?
And in 2020 maybe we widen the range of sports?
Certainly we’re in for an inquiry into future Olympics and athletic development strategies. While there are a myriad of outcomes, my preference would be for us to pursue quality, not quantity in the future.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Olympics articles
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Roof problem shuts Rio Olympics stadium
- Tame swimming antics show Australia’s tired of ‘scandals’ (27)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Magnussen admits Olympic mistakes
- ASADA powers fall short, says Coates
- Schlanger’s unlikely saviour (2)
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Shane Heal, the USA and the Golden Generation of Australian Basketball (15)
- London 2012: 30 things from the 30th Olympiad (1)
- Fools gold: Australia’s First Footy Olympics (8)
- How Australian sport can change the world (7)
- Reminders from London (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Athletics, London 2012 Olympics, swimming

August 8th 2012 @ 7:25am
Jerry said | August 8th 2012 @ 7:25am | Report comment
According to your govt, the population of Aus is currently 22,693,601. You’ve won 25 medals.
That’s actually 1 medal per 907,744 people. By my count, you’d have to have won 451 medals to have one per 50,000 people.
Or are you talking all time?
August 8th 2012 @ 9:41am
Matt F said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Also if China really had won one medal per 3.4million people then they would currently have around 396 medals right now.
August 8th 2012 @ 10:00am
Jerry said | August 8th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
All time Australia has 441 medals which is pretty close to 1 for every 50,000 people. China has 436.
I suspect Noel was working off the all time statistics, which is a bit odd.
August 8th 2012 @ 10:31am
Matt F said | August 8th 2012 @ 10:31am | Report comment
All time would certainly explain his calculations a lot better though as you said it does seem a bit odd
August 8th 2012 @ 1:19pm
Cop Out said | August 8th 2012 @ 1:19pm | Report comment
This topic is a cop out and making excuses for how badly we performed.
We have got loads of room, loads of money, great weather and the results we have attained are completely pathetic.
Look at swimming for example. Every second house has a pool, we are surrounded by oceans yet we get a lousy gold.
Heads need to roll at the AOC. We need tougher coaches and athletes who work a lot, lot harder.
August 8th 2012 @ 7:25am
Eric George said | August 8th 2012 @ 7:25am | Report comment
How on earth did you reach that calculation? Even if you peg our population at 20 million to keep it simple, if we had a medal for every 50,000 people here we’d have 400 medals!
http://simon.forsyth.net/olympics.html
This excellent resource places us 7th in total medals per million, which is impressive but when you consider that Grenada has 10 times the amount of medals per million that we do, we’re a long way off first.
August 8th 2012 @ 7:39am
crip said | August 8th 2012 @ 7:39am | Report comment
Wow we really kick butt. Maybe there’s something magical in our food and water or maybe we don’t have to worry about where we are going to get some food and water on a daily basis. And maybe if you calculate how much each medal cost each person in Australia we might suck. Let’s leave the per head of population garbage to New Zealand fans please.
August 8th 2012 @ 8:13am
Jerry said | August 8th 2012 @ 8:13am | Report comment
“Let’s leave the per head of population garbage to New Zealand fans please.”
Please. When has Aus ever topped the medal count? Never. Top 3? Once, at home in 1956.
You didn’t win in Sydney, you didn’t win in Athens, you didn’t win in Beijing. But you celebrated the overall performance. Why? Cause it’s very good for a nation of your size. Just cause you don’t say “per capita” doesn’t change the fact that you’re doing exactly the same thing.
August 8th 2012 @ 9:16am
crip said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Your reply to my comment makes absolutely no sense South Sea Pom.
August 8th 2012 @ 9:27am
Jerry said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
Sorry, shouldn’t your handle be ‘Crim” if you’re Australian?
My point was the ‘head of population garbage’ has been ok for Australia in past Olympics. It’s not exclusive to NZ, pretty much everyone other than the US and China are doing it.
August 8th 2012 @ 9:38am
crip said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:38am | Report comment
My point is that it is a stupid argument no matter who is doing it sheep goggles.
August 8th 2012 @ 9:46am
Jerry said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:46am | Report comment
So why bring up NZ? And what’s with the personal insults, shackle dragger?
August 10th 2012 @ 8:02am
Tom Callaghan said | August 10th 2012 @ 8:02am | Report comment
Nice one Jerry!
August 8th 2012 @ 7:44am
katzilla said | August 8th 2012 @ 7:44am | Report comment
There’s only one statistic that counts, and that’s medals per Million dollars spent.
Medals are bought with cold hard cash and that defines success. Whether your investment was worth it.
So with 25 medals, $120 million spent that’s 4.8 million per medal.
Worth it? I’m not sure, although if you compare it to USA or China your investment looks rewarding.
August 8th 2012 @ 7:48am
oogles said | August 8th 2012 @ 7:48am | Report comment
“Currently we’ve one medal per 50 thousand in population.”
So, that means Australia only has a population of one and a quarter million. What century is this?
August 8th 2012 @ 7:50am
BigAl said | August 8th 2012 @ 7:50am | Report comment
. . . and thats not to mention the number of Rubber Medals we’ve won !!!
August 8th 2012 @ 9:06am
Cicero said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:06am | Report comment
…and nobody can beat us at Aussie Rules!
August 8th 2012 @ 9:20am
crip said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:20am | Report comment
We also lead the world in Koala research.
August 8th 2012 @ 9:17am
AussieKiwi said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:17am | Report comment
If there was an olympic event in hubris…..Aussie Aussie Aussie, Oi Oi Oi.
August 10th 2012 @ 8:04am
Tom Callaghan said | August 10th 2012 @ 8:04am | Report comment
Spot on AussieKiwi.
Where does this ill founded Aussie bombast and hubris come from? Is it in fact an expression of a deep rooted sense of inferiority on the international stage?
August 8th 2012 @ 9:19am
Australian Rules said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
You sums are a bit confusing…
But the real test, as katzilla notes above, is the medals per million dollars spent.
After Montreal, Australia poured money into Olympic sports via the AIS and the state affiliates. Now Asian and European countries are outspending us and buying the best coaches…and it shows.
August 8th 2012 @ 9:44am
Nathan of Perth said | August 8th 2012 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Yep, we let that genie out of the bottle, didn’t we… and now our best coaches are busily teaching the people pushing us out – there’s irony for ya.
August 8th 2012 @ 10:47am
Grahame said | August 8th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
New Zealand, Jamaica and Grenada are at least three countries that prove your headline claim is crap. Or perhaps NoelO these and other countries are too small in your eyes to be worthy of counting?