Team GB: how do they do it?
How come Team GB are so good on two wheels? (Image: LEON NEAL / AFP)
It’s the question everybody’s asking in the velodrome. Well, everyone but the British, we are just enjoying it.
Once the whole country almost basked in being rubbish at sport, but then the government threw huge amounts of money at it, some of it stuck, and now we are good, and we love it.
Money partly answers the question. Money underpins much of UK’s cycling’s success.
You will hear a lot of talk about marginal gains, but those margins only come from having the money to try them, because for every gain, there will be five things that didn’t work, and that’s what costs.
But even marginal gains hide something, the fact that Team GB’s cyclists and the staff who support them do everything right. They are a collective that’s bigger than the sum of their parts. And Olympic domination is what the collective aims FOR.
But money comes in again, not all federations have the luxury of being so single minded. The French sprint silver medallist, Gregory Bauge said as much. He dominated world sprinting between the Olympics, but was left gasping in Jason Kenny’s wake in London.
Domination hasn’t been easy. British Cycling’s chief coach Shane Sutton says; “About 18 months ago it hit us, London was getting closer and it was time to take a long hard look at where we were. Some people got told some home truths, everyone had to roll up their sleeves and start giving 100 percent.”
Everyone meant literally everyone involved with the team in London; the long-listed athletes, the physios, the carers, mechanics, coaches and nutritionist, were ALL asked to look at what they do, analyse it and come up with things they could do better.
And they did, they tried new stuff, and what didn’t work was thrown away but what did was kept and laid on top of the best practice the team had already evolved.
Some stuff was even held back, and that added to what has been one of Team GB’s masterstrokes; momentum.
The track team started well in the Melbourne world championships. They fielded what was the gb Olympic squad in what would be a dry run for the Games, and they dominated.
But then a second of British Cycling’s initiatives, arguably their most ambitious project yet, hit pay dirt.
Bradley Wiggins won the Tour de France, the first Brit to do it, and Team Sky dominated with Chris Froome in second, Mark Cavendish taking three stages and the collective effort was mighty.
The effect that had on cycling in the UK WAS huge, but the effect it had on the Olympic track team was even bigger. Sky is based on the principles all British international races live train and race by. Winning the Tour de France acted as a huge springboard for their effort.
Wiggins kept it going by winning gold in the time trial. ‘Secret’ marginal gains, like the world’s speediest helmets, what had been kept under wraps, were handed out. Momentum swung onto the track and the GB riders hit it pedalling like never before. Gold begat gold and the landslide began.
Anybody who wants to beat them has to play catch up now. But they know what it takes; focus, technology and a collective will to strive for excellence.
There are no secrets. In fact the ‘Secret Squirrel’ department that everybody talks about being in Manchester has a big element of smoke a mirrors about it, a ruse to get the competition believing that the GB track riders have special equipment with huge speed advantages.
The truth is rather more boring. It’s about everyone doing their best, and being treated as an equal part of the whole. For example, all Team GB riders work with one of the best sports psychiatrists in the world, Steve Peters, but all of the team staff work with him too. If a mechanic has a problem and Peters can help, then the mechanic gets his undivided attention until the problem is sorted.
If there is a secret, it’s that, everybody being equal but at the same time the team comes before any individual does. It’s quite a beautiful thing really, and it’s very strong.
So strong that Geraint Thomas put his road race goals, where he is going to be one of the world’s best soon, on hold for a year just to win the same gold medal he won in Beijing.
And if you want another example of how strong Team GB’s spirit is; Mark Cavendish is considering putting his road career on hold for a year to ride the track in Rio. He hasn’t got an Olympic gold, but all his friends have, so he wants one.
He also wants to experience being part of that winning track team again. Part of a unit that lives in each other’s pockets, that trains on a cold track on dark December mornings. That rides the rainy hills around Manchester. One that wins the Olympic Games.
The Crowd Says (16) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics

August 8th 2012 @ 11:32am
Colin N said | August 8th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Excellent article and should allay any ‘doubts.’ Interesting listening to Sir Chris Hoy yesterday evening talking about these alleged ‘magic’ wheels, a topic the French have brought up. Well…he said the wheels were made by a French company!!
August 8th 2012 @ 12:12pm
SE Informer said | August 8th 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
I really have to take my hat off to the British cycling team. I am an Aussie but Team GB are simply the best on the track and after the Tour, Team SKY the best on the road. Where to now for Cycling Australia? How are we going to beat the best of the best? In these games GB have consistently delivered and with world records to boot! The legacy will be a lasting one after the Games and with a gold medal eluding Cav on the road he has expressed interest in joining the team pursuit squad in Rio. It should be an interesting development period in the next four years. Also, with Victoria Pendelton’s retirement and with Meare’s thinking about Rio who will be her major rival on the track?
August 8th 2012 @ 3:27pm
Betty B said | August 8th 2012 @ 3:27pm | Report comment
Do you think they’re on drugs?
I mean, we queried the Chinese didn’t we, and Britain’s improvement is far away greater than anyone else’s at these games.
August 8th 2012 @ 3:44pm
Osacar said | August 8th 2012 @ 3:44pm | Report comment
Britain’s improvement? 7. Same number of Golds as four years ago, less silvers. Slightly worse performance but still dominant.
August 22nd 2012 @ 12:12am
Tony Hill said | August 22nd 2012 @ 12:12am | Report comment
Osacar we were allowed two riders in most events in Bejing. This time round they only allowed one per country and took away two events. Thats why Britian never won more medals.
August 9th 2012 @ 7:11pm
Sean Lee said | August 9th 2012 @ 7:11pm | Report comment
They are beyond doubt. Hard work, talented athletes, superb coaches. It has all come together over the past five or six years so it hasn’t come out of the blue at all. Enjoy watching these athletes and don’t sully them further with talk of drugs, instead acknowledge what hard work and dedication can do.
August 13th 2012 @ 10:07pm
Billy Reid said | August 13th 2012 @ 10:07pm | Report comment
Sean
Coulndt put that better myself. Dedication hard work and strong team ethics produces winning results well done GB
August 22nd 2012 @ 12:15am
Tony Hill said | August 22nd 2012 @ 12:15am | Report comment
Betty B. With one of the best anti drug agencies in the world,USADA now probably better than ours,British cyclists would be caught if they were on anything other than adrenalin!
August 8th 2012 @ 4:48pm
Axelv said | August 8th 2012 @ 4:48pm | Report comment
They do it through training, diet, preparation, hard work and drugs.
August 8th 2012 @ 4:54pm
Dale Bickham said | August 8th 2012 @ 4:54pm | Report comment
Lots and lots of money, and aus coaches/staff.
August 8th 2012 @ 6:19pm
nickoldschool said | August 8th 2012 @ 6:19pm | Report comment
Bauge said he was speechless when he visited GB facilities a few years ago. They are in a league of their own when it comes to velodromes and bike technology. Frustrating for the others.
August 8th 2012 @ 7:18pm
katzilla said | August 8th 2012 @ 7:18pm | Report comment
You asked a question then answered it in your second paragraph.
Money. That’s the difference between Gold and a placing.
Its the difference between 5 or so golds in Athens for GB to 19 in Beijing and 22 already in London with days to go.
264million quid! Is it worth it? They need to win 4 more Golds to have each gold cost 10 million pounds.
Is that worth it? Not on your life.
August 8th 2012 @ 10:53pm
Rugby Fan said | August 8th 2012 @ 10:53pm | Report comment
Money has clearly made the difference across the whole of Britain’s Olympic effort but it doesn’t guarantee anything on its own. Athletics and swimming receive some of the largest funding. We came up short in the pool, whether you measure performance against Beijing or our pre-Games forecast this year. We had one exceptional day in athletics but the overall effort looks it won’t reach the target 8 medals.
The cyclists have peaked for the competition and Dave Brailsford is wiinning plaudits for putting the right people and structures in place. It will be fascinating to see whether Britain can keep an edge in the event. We looked like losing it after Beijing but managed to refocus in the way Chris describes in his piece above. A home games will have acted as a big incentive but there’s also a sense that the cycling team wanted to keep their sport in the spotlight in Britain.
August 9th 2012 @ 3:30am
Colin N said | August 9th 2012 @ 3:30am | Report comment
“We had one exceptional day in athletics but the overall effort looks it won’t reach the target 8 medals.”
Not sure about that. Five medals already with chances in the long jump, 5K and the 4×400 relays. Osagie was impressive in the 800 as well and could sneak a medal (although the gold is virtually guaranteed to go to Rudisha). Steve Lewis in the pole vault is an outside bet but is in good form and there’s always the men’s 4×100, but realistically we are fighting for bronze behind Jamaica and the USA. We also have an exceptional ability of dropping the baton, but Chambers, Gemili (who’s a hugely impressive talent) and Dasaolu all seem in good form.
There’s been a few disappointments with Greene and Idowu, but the former couldn’t really account for the exceptional form from some of his competitors.
August 9th 2012 @ 3:51am
Rugby Fan said | August 9th 2012 @ 3:51am | Report comment
Eight isn’t impossible but the forecast before the Games included, as you say, high hopes for the medal chances of Idowu and Radcliffe. Both got injured at the wrong time – the curse of many Olympic athletes – and Dai Greene was just too rusty after his injury lay-off to challenge what turned out to be a fast field.
I mistakenly thought that the modern pentathlon came under the athletics banner but it appears, like the triathlon, the multi-discipline event stands apart.
Still, fingers crossed. It’s a new feeling to be lamenting where we might be losing medals after so many years of settling for small crumbs of comfort.
August 9th 2012 @ 11:04am
Colin N said | August 9th 2012 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Hmmmm, judging by the way Shara Proctor did in the long jump, that’s the last time I’m going to predict anything!!