Should Steffensen even be in the 4x400m relay team?
By Cam Baker, 10 Aug 2012 Cam Baker is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Athletics, John Steffensen, London 2012 Olympics
On Thursday, the ninth of August, the Australian Men’s 4x400m relay team will line-up in the heats. In recent times the this team has had much success, winning silver at the 2004 Olympics and more recently bronze at the 2009 World Championships.
They won gold at the 2010 Commonwealth Games.
In the last month, however, most of the publicity surrounding this team has been focused on the selection of World Junior silver medallist Steve Solomon in the individual 400m over the man who won the Olympic trials, John Steffensen.
Both men had posted “B” qualifying times and as such their selection was at the discretion of the selectors.
After threatening to withdraw from the games all together, Steffensen has since come out and stated that he will run in the 4x400m for Australia.
But, is he even one of our fastest four runners?
While Australia qualified 13th for the Olympics, this standard is based on the average of the best two performances from each country in the qualifying period. If you look at just a the single best performance over that period, Australia slips to 15th out of the 16 teams competing.
With the top three in each heat and the next two quickest times going through to the final, Australia can not afford to rest its best athletes during the heats. We need our best team to be running just to qualify for the final, and Steffensen, on current form, is not in our top four runners.
Since running in the 45s twice in the domestic season, Steffensen injured himself at the Stawell gift and has not been in the same form since, running 46.59 and 46.11 in his two races.
Meanwhile, Solomon, Offereins, Cole and Thomas went to Daegu to qualify the team. I am told they ran splits of 45.2, 45.2 45.5 and 45.5 respectively.
Since then Solomon has run a personal best over 400m and made the 400m final at the Olympics, Cole ran a personal best over 400 hurdles at the Olympics and Thomas ran a season’s best at the Olympics.
On those relay splits from May, Steffensen would struggle to make the team, and since then three of the four boys have shown they are in better form then they were in Japan.
If it wasn’t for those four boys we would not even have a 4x400m relay team at the Olympics. They have all made themselves available to run for Australia.
Thomas and Offereins were part of the medal winning team from 2009 and Cole and Offereins were part of our 2010 Commonwealth Games gold medal winning team, that Steffensen made himself unavailable for (note that Joel Milburn, the other member of the relay squad for London, was in both of these relays).
It will be interesting to see who the selectors pick for the 4x400m relay, and even more interesting to see what times they each run and if the selectors were correct.
For Australia to have the best chance to medal, the team should be Solomon, Offereins, Cole and Thomas.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Olympics articles
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Roof problem shuts Rio Olympics stadium
- Tame swimming antics show Australia’s tired of ‘scandals’ (27)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Magnussen admits Olympic mistakes
- ASADA powers fall short, says Coates
- Schlanger’s unlikely saviour (2)
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Shane Heal, the USA and the Golden Generation of Australian Basketball (15)
- London 2012: 30 things from the 30th Olympiad (1)
- Fools gold: Australia’s First Footy Olympics (8)
- How Australian sport can change the world (7)
- Reminders from London (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Athletics, John Steffensen, London 2012 Olympics

August 10th 2012 @ 8:18am
Tom Callaghan said | August 10th 2012 @ 8:18am | Report comment
Oh, and Cammy, Cammy!
Solomon did not display the wisdom of his biblical namesake did he? He should have learnt from Bobridges ability to ‘Talk the talk’ but not ‘walk the walk’
August 10th 2012 @ 9:32am
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 10th 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
steff ran the second fastest split of the four and ran his guts out down the back striaght trying to get Australia into a place…it was Offereins that let the team down.
August 10th 2012 @ 9:47am
jameswm said | August 10th 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
What did they split Jocelyn?
Don’t tell me about effort. All the boys put in a huge effort. But Steff looked to be struggling and even he admitted it.
Why was Milburn there if he wasn’t going to run at all:?
August 10th 2012 @ 10:46am
Tim Renowden said | August 10th 2012 @ 10:46am | Report comment
Gambled on saving him for the final?
He was extremely disappointed not to be running, as you would expect.
August 10th 2012 @ 12:43pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 10th 2012 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
Tim I think Eric knew they were up against it in that heat and had to throw in the best team straight and since BJ was in such good form…yes it would been heartbreaking for Joel…
August 11th 2012 @ 12:04pm
Seiran said | August 11th 2012 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Offereins let the team down? Sure, he was the slowest runner out there, but he was only a little over half a second off the pace of your beloved Stef, who as anchor should have run the quickest to bring the team home. Instead he ran the second slowest.
Oh, and then he had the tenacity to make out he was carrying other members of the team. The guy is not a team player. I’m glad he won’t be around for the next Olympics.
August 10th 2012 @ 10:06am
B.A Sports said | August 10th 2012 @ 10:06am | Report comment
If only Steffenson’s legs moved as fast as his mouth.
He wasn’t the slowest Aussie on the night, but the relay run, coupled with Solomon’s individual performances justified Athletics Australia’s decision for the 400 – individual.
August 10th 2012 @ 10:51am
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 10th 2012 @ 10:51am | Report comment
he was serioulsy baited with the questions in the mix zone and he handled them with dignity and professionalism…he should not have been so harsh on himself as he ran a great split..he is always his own harshest critic. Milburn was originally named in the team but with Cole running so well in the 400 hurdles he was brought in…the hurdling boys were always were named in the 6 member team..the spilts Solomon 45.66s, Offereins 46.3, Cole 45.48s and Steffensen 45.67……I agree it appeared on the screen the Offereins let the team down BUT his split is still pretty good…..it just shows the calibre of the opposition…they ran their best and did the country proud….the joke of the whole race is reinstatement of South Africa to final…so does anyone that ever falls over in a distance race get reinstated now…IAAF have opened a huge can of worms on this one…
August 10th 2012 @ 10:54am
jameswm said | August 10th 2012 @ 10:54am | Report comment
No it wasn’t a “great split”. Steffensen didn’t think he ran well, so don’t talk his performance up. A 400 hurdler with traffic ran faster.
The Saffa got impeded and tripped. I don’ think there’s anything wrong with their reinstatement and it’s consistent with other reinstatements this Olympics. Otherwise, you could send one team-mate to knock over your main rival and there’d be nothing they could do about it.
August 10th 2012 @ 11:00am
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 10th 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
I agree that the Kenyan runner cut infront and tripped the South African…no question…but it happens all the time…who is to say that SA were going to finish in a qualifying position in any case….that is the inconsistancy from the IAAF as there were 2 legs still to be run…if it was in the home straingh maybe a different story….
August 10th 2012 @ 12:30pm
Matt F said | August 10th 2012 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
“you could send one team-mate to knock over your main rival and there’d be nothing they could do about it.” Actually they could disqualify you, as they did the Kenyans. I hardly think that an athlete, or a relay team, is going to deliberately get disqualified just so that another competitor/team that they don’t like is taken out.
August 10th 2012 @ 2:03pm
jameswm said | August 10th 2012 @ 2:03pm | Report comment
Matt they could DQ the team-mate, but not the one he was doing it for. I’m taliing about individual races, not a relay of course.
Take an 800 or 1500 for example. Kenya might have two top runners, and send out a 3rd to impede a rival to stop them getting through.
Hopefully no one would do that, but it’s possible.
Jocelyn you haven’t been paying attention. Those reinstatements have happened all Olympics, including where runners were impeded a long way from home. No, no one can say they would have got through. But no one could say they wouldn’t have either.
August 10th 2012 @ 10:44am
Tim Renowden said | August 10th 2012 @ 10:44am | Report comment
It’s hard to read too much into splits in a 4×400 because there are so many variables (and this race was total mayhem for the Aussies), but the splits I’ve seen (from Runners Tribe) are:
Solomon 45.66
Offereins 46.3
Cole 45.48
Steffensen 45.67
Remember that starting out of blocks adds about 0.7s compared to starting from a running start in a relay, so Solomon would have had the quickest run. Remember also that Cole had to start in heavy traffic, dodge the slowing Jamaican who was injured, and was boxed in for about half the race, so he probably would have been faster in a clean race. Steffensen also had to battle in traffic and to me it looked like he eased up with 50m to go when he saw there was no chance of going into lane 3 to get around the pack in front of him, which is understandable.
Basically their chances were cooked once Offereins handed over the baton at the back of that big pack – they lost a lot of momentum in the argy bargy at the changeovers.
August 10th 2012 @ 10:56am
jameswm said | August 10th 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
Offereins was going backwards on that 2nd bend. How can he be in 47.0 shape (from a standing start)? I realise he went hard at the start, but that usually means you die on the home straight, not the 2nd bend.
August 10th 2012 @ 11:01am
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 10th 2012 @ 11:01am | Report comment
TIm I think the whole team effort was pretty gutsy and they did very well in the face of some awesome competition
August 10th 2012 @ 11:15am
Tim Renowden said | August 10th 2012 @ 11:15am | Report comment
Look, they all tried hard, and they were in a tough heat, but the 3:01.58 the team ran in Daegu in May would’ve comfortably qualified them for the final, so it’s disappointing that they couldn’t replicate that performance (that team was Solomon, Offereins, Cole and Tristan Thomas).
They ran 3:03.17 last night and I reckon most of the time difference was not from lack of speed per se, but more from the poor positioning of the team in heavy traffic which really does mess with your rhythm.
August 10th 2012 @ 2:00pm
jameswm said | August 10th 2012 @ 2:00pm | Report comment
Steff had a clean run. Cole was the one who did better – a faster split with a lot more traffic. Steff sat at the back of the pack but never challenged them. I was watching thinking right John, here’s your chance for redemption in the eyes of the public. But it never came.
He’s obviously not in the shape he was in February, and I don’t know how much the Stawell gift injury has to do with that.
August 11th 2012 @ 1:04pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 11th 2012 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
james you must have been watching a difference race to me as Steff did not have a clean run…no-one does in a 4×4 if you get back in the field as the change over zone is a dog fight for all….you obviously did not see the push and shove from the Dominican Republic….and if you were a student of relays you would know that you do not always put your fastest last in fact quite often they run first to set up being in the front bunch to avoid the traffic in the change zone…hence why Solomen ran first……it appears nothing short of Steff breaking the worl record would appease all the vitriole and haters….even after Steve Hooker has come out and verified that the racial abuse DID happen in Beijing everyone still wants to berate him…..and dont forget there were 3 other runner in that relay team…but no, the headline still has to read the Steffensen didn’t perform….I still think they all did the best they could…
August 11th 2012 @ 1:05pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 11th 2012 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
Exactly Tim….you are on a hiding to nothing when you get mid pack in a 4×4 and have to endure that traffic in the change zone
August 10th 2012 @ 11:06am
Hoy said | August 10th 2012 @ 11:06am | Report comment
Watching it, Offereins lap was the one that hurt us position wise. I am surprised his time was so good. The other countries number two runners must have been pretty good. I will say he held up well for the first two hundred, but seemed to struggle after that.
The line of questioning shown by Channel 9, on the “Team” focussed soley on Steffenson, and was petty and stupid I thought. I don’t agree with Steffenson’s line of thought about why he wasn’t allowed to try out in the individual race, but to hound him over it, after the 400 relay, and not ask any of the other runners any questions, or not show those questions was stupid. Thanks again Channel 9.
August 10th 2012 @ 11:18am
Tim Renowden said | August 10th 2012 @ 11:18am | Report comment
The Ch.9 interview was actually just an edited version of what was shown on Foxtel, where they interviewed all four runners.
Shameless tabloid journalism? Digging for controversy? Channel 9? Say it ain’t so!
August 10th 2012 @ 11:31am
Hoy said | August 10th 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
I assumed there must be more… He handled the questions well. Was disappointed the free to air channel didn’t see fit to show the whole team being questioned about their run.
August 10th 2012 @ 12:15pm
B.A Sports said | August 10th 2012 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
I Agree. I am not his biggest fan, but I thought he handled the post race interview pretty well. To aks him one question about if he was prepareed for cricitism was ok, but to go on about it wasn’t really appropriate for a post race interview.
Didn’t see Hackett or Rooney asking those sorts of questions beside the pool?
August 10th 2012 @ 12:16pm
jameswm said | August 10th 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
I watched it on Fox. They interviewed the runners in order.
The questions to Steff were a disgrace.
August 12th 2012 @ 2:34pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 12th 2012 @ 2:34pm | Report comment
and you wonder why John reacts the way he does….that was shameless disgracefull baiting…he handled it with dignity…
August 10th 2012 @ 1:06pm
matt h said | August 10th 2012 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
+1
August 10th 2012 @ 12:10pm
Australian Rules said | August 10th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
If Steffenson never ran for Australia again, the nation would hardly go into mourning.
The guy will be remembered not for his ability, but for his trash-talking, his lack of grace and his look-at-me look-at-me obsessiveness.
August 10th 2012 @ 12:33pm
Chris Lewis said | August 10th 2012 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Poor interview by Channel Nine, probably trying to provoke controversy, and a poor 4 x 400m relay run.
August 12th 2012 @ 1:58pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 12th 2012 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
Chris I am glad someone else saw that and John was very gracious in not accepting the bait….
August 12th 2012 @ 2:04pm
JVGO said | August 12th 2012 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
The post run interview was a disgrace, as just about everything channel numb has done for the broadcasts. They have a lot to answer for particularly for the over emphasis and estimation on gold, gold, gold.
August 10th 2012 @ 6:11pm
Cam Baker said | August 10th 2012 @ 6:11pm | Report comment
Well, time for me to eat humble pie and say that Steffensen ran a faster split than I expected him to and he totally justified his place in the team.
August 12th 2012 @ 2:03pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | August 12th 2012 @ 2:03pm | Report comment
You are a class act Cam for having the bravery to admit that…Class people are always the first to admit that may be wrong or have misjudged something….it is pity so many others have not retracted such vitrolic statements towards Steff especially after Steve Hooker verified the racist treatment….so many people had bagged John for “playing the race card’ when he made the statements ..so later when the truth comes out none of those bloggers on this site retracted those comments….shame….classy or you Cam to make that statement…John was very hard on himself