My medallists from London 2012: Bolt, Pearson, and our sailors
Jamaica's Usain Bolt celebrates after winning the men's 200m final. AFP PHOTO / GABRIEL BOUYS
The 30th Olympiad is over, but what is the future of Usain Bolt, the greatest track sprinter the world has ever seen, and arguably the greatest athlete?
He is to the track the Bradman of cricket, the Ali of boxing, the Nicklaus of golf, the Gretzky of ice-hockey, the Pele of football, the Jordan of basketball, the Laver of tennis.
But the giant 195cm (6ft 5) Jamaican poses more questions that answers.
We all know he holds the 100m world record at 9.58s, the 200m at 19.19s, and was the anchorman when Jamaica smashed the 4x100m relay world record with a stunning 36.84s in London.
What we don’t know is how good he really is?
We could count on less than one hand the number of times he has run through the finishing line at full pace. The world 200m record is one, and the recent relay world record is another. But that’s it.
All the other times he has shut down, or switched off, anything up to 20m from the tape.
That being the case, if Bolt ever really finished off all of his races as every coach tells every kid in the world to do, Usain Bolt would be even more awesome.
Would, not could. Somehow, I don’t think we will ever know. That’s Bolt’s free-flowing calypso nature, just do enough to win.
But there’s some unfinished Bolt business to discuss – the 400m flat.
Back in 2007, he ran 45.28 fooling around near home. Michael Johnson’s world record, set in 1999, is 43.18. With Bolt’s technique, stride, and immense power, he’d be an ideal candidate for the 400.
And that may well be the catalyst to keep him interested in chasing more achievements. He had no trouble making it a history-making golden double treble of Beijing and London.
He’ll be 29 by Rio de Janiero in four years time. But will he still be interested in the grind so necessary to stay at the top?
More questions.
There’s one saving grace here, and it’s his compatriot, close mate, and training partner Yohan Blake, the man Bolt named the “Beast”, who only reaches Bolt’s shoulders at 180cm, or 5ft 11.
Blake is now 22. And when Bolt broke at the start, Blake became the youngest world 100 champion at 21 and 245 days to beat Carl Lewis’ record of 22 and 35. Blake can sure motor.
He pushed Bolt leading into the London Games, and the results speak for themselves. Bolt’s future depends on that rivalry, but if Blake gets browned off with being a permanent bridesmaid and packs up his spikes, I reckon Bolt will lose his desire and call it a day as well.
And that would be a travesty, because we haven’t seen the best of Usain Bolt yet to break 9 seconds for the 100, and break 19 for the 200 – he can do if he sets his mind to it.
From the sheer brute power of Usain Bolt to the technical precision of Sally Pearson. Now there’s a contrast with the same nett result – gold.
Pearson is perfection, the most perfect hurdler I’ve ever seen.
So perfect if she ran in the same lane every race, her spikes would be in the same holes for 100 metres.
Having been a hurdler in my school days, I was taught two fundamentals – spend minimal time airborne, by snapping the lead leg under the hurdle once you cleared it which sets you up quickly for the three steps in between.
Watching Sally, you would swear the hurdles weren’t there so smoothly does she leave them behind her. Like a small blip on the radar.
The additional bonus is her height – 166cm, or just over 5ft 5 – which makes the three steps in between so much easier at full throttle than most of the girls she races against who are taller, with longer strides.
Sally’s true mettle surfaced in the Olympic final in pouring rain. It didn’t make a scrap of difference to the 25-year-old, perfection wins through in all conditions.
So Usain Bolt and Sally Pearson are my two gold and silver Olympians from London and it’s rather fitting they are the current male and female IAAF athletes of the year.
And don’t be surprised if the two of them retain their hard-earned and well-deserved titles. They are the best with more in store.
My bronze memory of these Games are the unheralded Australian sailors, who rightfully became the sung heroes. They collectively showed the rest of their green and gold Olympians how team spirit, good old fashioned Australian guts, and a genuine desire to win without any trumpet blowing, reaped rich rewards.
They produced three of the seven golds the entire team of 410 won. And it could so easily have been four golds had Mother Nature not been so cruel to the very talented match-racing crew of helm Olivia Price, who was catapulted out of the boat in heavy seas, forcing Nina Curtis, and Lucinda Whitty to stop and haul Olivia out of the chop, in winning silver.
It was fitting the retiring Malcolm Page with back-to-back 470 class golds, carried the Australian flag at the closing ceremony which was a salute to his sailing comrades, as well.
So well done London, and well done Seb Coe.
Rio has been set a tough benchmark for 2016.
London 2012 Olympics – Day 17 Gallery
See the complete London 2012 Olympics gallery
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics

August 13th 2012 @ 8:14am
Eric George said | August 13th 2012 @ 8:14am | Report comment
“He is to the track the Bradman of cricket, the Ali of boxing, the Nicklaus of golf, the Gretsky of ice-hockey, the Pele of football, the Jordan of basketball, the Laver of tennis.”
Glad to see you’ve been swept up in London fever David, but I’m not sure this one will stand in the harsh light of re-examination once things settle down in a few weeks. Surely if there’s an Ali of track and field it’s Jesse Owens. Much of what Ali contributed to sport occurred outside the ring, after all.
Considering Carl Lewis grabbed 9 gold medals across 3 Olympic games, I think Bolt still has a bit of work to do before he ends the kind of gushing praise found here.
You mis-spelled Wayne Gretzky, by the way. Clearly being an iconic NHL star only gets you so far in Australia.
August 13th 2012 @ 8:51am
sheek said | August 13th 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Eric George,
I agree with you about Jesse Owens. We will never know how good (sorry, how much better) he might have been given the same opportunities afforded today’s athletes. Not only professionalism, but moving around in society unhindered by the racial prejudices of his day.
Carl Lewis won 4 successive long jumps (1984, 88, 92, 96) which is often neglected in these type of debates. However, Lewis is displaying a bitterness common with some ex-athletes of no longer being in the limelight. He hasn’t done himself any favours recently with his grudging remarks.
That said, Usain Bolt should leave it to us to tell him how good he is. We don’t need him telling us he’s a legend. And Jacques Rogge is probably right, he still has a way to go to quell all debate about his status.
Finally, you should have more respect for David Lord than make personal attacks on his spelling mistakes, or even his opinions. He is an iconic figure in Australian journalism, reporting, writing & was in fact one of the country’s earliest player-managers. He also competed in some sports to a competent level, so he can bring his personal experience to bear in his writing.
August 13th 2012 @ 2:30pm
Axelv said | August 13th 2012 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
Unlike 99.99999% of sports opinionists, Carl Lewis has ran in the 100 meters final in the Olympics, won gold and knows what it’s all about. His views on the 100m sprint and Bolt is much more valid than ours, he knows what it takes to win it, and it’s not just hard work, training and genetics. The majority of people are ignorant and believe that drug takers are in the minority. If you do some research and delve deeper, you will realise that the endurance and power sports are not that innocent.
August 13th 2012 @ 3:53pm
Matt F said | August 13th 2012 @ 3:53pm | Report comment
It would be nice for someone to have some evidence that Bolt was using drugs before making allegations for a change. Any evidence at all…..
August 15th 2012 @ 10:00am
amazonfan said | August 15th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Lewis’s ‘bitternes’ is irrelevant. You can’t measure an athlete based on how good a person they are. The only thing that matters is how great an athlete they were. Personally, I consider Lewis to be the second greatest sprinter, and the greatest athlete, of all time.
Furthermore, I don’t see anyone launching personal attacks upon David Lord, just criticising his opinions. Which people are entitled to do.
August 13th 2012 @ 4:29pm
Nick said | August 13th 2012 @ 4:29pm | Report comment
Carl also has something Bolt doesn’t have. At least THREE failed drug tests in the leas up to Seoul. The man is a disgrace and shouldn’t be involved in any discussions concerning great Olympians.
David, Bolt ran full tilt in the 100 THIS time in London. He gave it everything and broke his Olympic record.
August 13th 2012 @ 8:25am
JAJI said | August 13th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
Questionable that Mo Farah has been left off this list for the Australian sailors…..
August 13th 2012 @ 10:33am
Bakkies said | August 13th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
David Rudisha was excellent too. The Athletics will be excellent in Glasgow. Bolt is thinking about doing the long jump and he hasn’t medalled in the Comm Games yet.
Would like to see Pearson run the 100 metres flat in Glasgow as she will have competition from Jessica Ennis who is looking to do the 100 metres hurdles. Ennis was the quickest at the hurdles in the heptathlon and pulled out of the individual 100 metres hurdles heats. It wasn’t a particularly quick womens 100 metres final so Pearson could give it a nudge.
August 13th 2012 @ 6:17pm
nickoldschool said | August 13th 2012 @ 6:17pm | Report comment
Agree Jaji. I think if you’re aussie and have a gold medal you already have a foot and a half in David’s medals.
Mo Farah, Tony Estanguet (3 golds in canoe at 3 different olympics), David Rudisha, Anna Meares or even Chris Hoy have done pretty well one would think.
August 13th 2012 @ 8:41am
sheek said | August 13th 2012 @ 8:41am | Report comment
David,
It’s an interesting dilemma for Bolt, perhaps even a pleasant one – stay within his comfort zone & go for a triple three-peat, or take a huge risk & add the 400m & long jump, but drop the 100m.
If Bolt goes to Rio & completes the triple hat-trick, then he’s still truly great. But if he goes to Rio & wins the 200m, 400m, long jump & either 4 x 100m relay or 4 x 400m relay, well, he probably will have a seat all to himself at the apex of the pantheon of sporting Gods.
A quick note on Sally Pearson & Dawn Harper. While Harper was gracious in defeat she couldn’t help offering the backhander that clipping a hurdle cost her more than the two-hundredths of a second that she eventually lost by.
I guess you could also look at this another way. Question – Why did she clip the hurdle in the first place? Answer – Because of the pressure exerted by Pearson in establishing a lead, meaning Harper had to play catch-up. Pressure forced the tiniest of mistakes. That’s how it goes.
While I wasn’t personally at London, you could certainly feel the vibe. The British are pretty well unmatched when it comes to presenting pageantry, of any kind. So I guess they have trumped Sydney.
While Sydney & London might be neck & neck in off-field handling, they have blitzed us for heroics, action, drama & quality on-field. This is the significant difference, the on-filed action in Sydney was too often predictable & dull.
In any case, the best 4 Olympics I’ve followed first-hand have been Mexico City 1968 (the first I ever followed), Barcelona 1992, Sydney 2000 & London 2012.
August 13th 2012 @ 10:33am
krash said | August 13th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Sheek,
I fully agree with you that London has put on a truly magnificent games. I’ve been nothing short of amazed at how incredibly well the Brits have supported these games. It’ll be be a tough act to follow for any of the locals of future host cities.
About Bolt though, if he does indeed decide to turn his attentions to the 400m for the next four years and for Rio in 2016, it will probably be the only thing he’ll focus on. I really can’t see him doing the long jump and the 200m to go with the strain of the 400m in Rio. As a former sprinter myself, I know how gruelling the 400m is; it’s certainly not the sort of thing one just excels in because one feels like it. Any pro sprinter will tell you that in order to well in it, let alone challenge world records, you have to fully commit to it. Yes, I know Bolt is absurdly gifted and supremely endowed, but even he is not immune to fatigue. In fact, earlier in his career, his coaches persuaded him to focus on the 400m because his body type is better suited to it. But Bolt himself remarked on just how intense it is to train specifically for the 400m, and it was part of the reason he decided to focus on the shorter sprints. I remember watching an interview some time ago when he said all of this…
August 13th 2012 @ 10:36am
Bakkies said | August 13th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
He doesn’t seem to be keen about doing to the 400 metres as he had leg injuries in the past. Plus he will be 29 in Rio if he makes it.
August 13th 2012 @ 10:36am
Worlds Biggest said | August 13th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
I think 15-20million a year in earnings should be enough to keep Usain motivated for another 4 years. In saying that I can see him having a break and maybe dabble in his other passion being Cricket and Football before a return for the next Olympics. He will still only be 29. Perhaps as you say Lordy the 400 m and Long jump may be his next goals.
Great honour for Mal Page carrying the flag, thank you Sailors for saving Australia’s bacon !! The 7 golds and 10th place finish equalled our perfiormance in Barcelona.
Congratulations to LOCOG headed by Seb Coe, these games were extraordinary and right up there with the very best IMO.Brilliant.
August 13th 2012 @ 11:04am
tonysalerno said | August 13th 2012 @ 11:04am | Report comment
The sailors did save what was looking like a disastrous campaign. All the time, effort and publicity goes into the swimming- but it is the lesser known heroes Australia prides themselves on.
August 13th 2012 @ 12:13pm
sheek said | August 13th 2012 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
TonySalerno,
I”m going to put out a post comparing Australia’s performance at this Olympics to a couple in the past. Actually, the overall results are quite satisfactory. I think Aussies got spoilt with our past 3 performances while London provided a reality check.
Compared to other countries we did exceptionally well. Of the consistent top 12 medal winning nations over the past 20 years for example, we have the smallest population, so we have no cause to complain. In fact, we ought to be as proud as punch.
Also, at every Olympics, there is going to be one key sport that underperforms. It’s almost unavoidable. This time around it was our swimmers. Yet 4 years ago, with our best-ever haul in the pool, they over-inflated our final tally. In 2008, it was the cyclists who let us down, & in 2004, it was our sailors. While in 2000, it was possibly our rowers who underperformed.
It’s extremely difficult to have every sport firing on all cylinders at every Olympics. Even the Brits, despite their outstanding performance at the games, would be disappointed with their return in the pool for example.
When all is said & done, the Aussies did extremely well at London 2012.
August 13th 2012 @ 12:42pm
Albo said | August 13th 2012 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
“Also, at every Olympics, there is going to be one key sport that underperforms.”
And which one key sport would you like to nominate where we underperformed this time?
Swimming ?
Track & Field?
Cycling?
Rowing?
Boxing?
Every sport with a ball ?
Equestrian ?
Gymnastics?
Diving ?
Shooting?
Lets face it, if we didn’t have boats in the Olympics, we would hardly have found a winning performance with the 4th largest team at the Games !
It was a terrible games for our athletes underperforming across all the sports. Very few athletes acheived PB’s or winning performances to match their already proven capabilities ! Failures of athletes to peak at the right time and whole team management need serious analysis !
August 13th 2012 @ 5:00pm
sheek said | August 13th 2012 @ 5:00pm | Report comment
Albo,
Feel like strangling a few Aussie Olympians, do you…..?
This is how we fared at London compared to our 6 year average 1992-2012. Note, some of the individual medals averages need to be adjusted up or down with the overall medals average being the key.
I think we were reasonably close to our 6 games historical average.
Swimming – 1.6.3- (10) vs 4.5.5-(14).
Track & field – 1.2.0 – (3) vs 1.1.1 – (3).
Cycling – 1.2.3 – (6) vs 2.2.2 – (6).
Rowing – 0.3.2 (5) vs 1.1.2 – (4).
Sailing – 3.1.0 – (4) vs 1.1.0 – (2).
Shooting – nothing vs 1.0.1 – (2).
Equestrian is usually only worth two medals max to us anyway – individual & team eventing. In any case, over 6 Olympics, we’ve won 4 gold & 2 silver, although nothing in 2012.
Either our men or women have won a medal in hockey at every Olympics since 1992 – 7 in all, including 3 gold. Our women basketballers have medalled at every Olympics they’ve competed in – 1996 to present.
In 4 Olympics, our Water Polo women have won one gold & two bronze.
To compare our performance in London with 2000, 04, 08 is unrealistic because these were our best 3 Olympics EVER, & 2004 & 2008 carried some momentum over from 2000.
A more realistic guide is to compare our performance in London over a 6 Olympics average since 1992, which I have done above.
At Rio & into the future, it will require an enormous effort from Australia to reach a double of 40 overall medals & 12-15 gold medals. We may not see the heady days of Sydney, Athens & Beijing again for some time. Our future is 35 to 40 overall medals, with 10 to 15 of them gold medals.
That I believe, is the reality going forward.
August 13th 2012 @ 1:17pm
liquorbox_ said | August 13th 2012 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
Bolt is no comparison to bradman, Bradman was close to 40% better than his nearest rival, bolt is only a couple of percent at most.
As for the other comparison athletes you chose, they all tried as hard as possible through their events, Bolt switches off, luckily he is good enough, but it also is an indication he does not try his best- this is what the Olympics are meant to be about, so in essence he does not fit the Olympic motto.
I also find him to be a tool, a very talented one at that, but in the same up himself way that Pearson and the Missile had no respect for their rivals. Why is it so hard to be humble?
He is great, but not the greatest athlete, for these games my award goes to Mears, unless someone else came back from a broken neck and beat a rival that they should have lost to. Most of the “best Olympic moments” were competitors beating rivals they should have beat, or that they had beaten 29 out of the last 30 times they had met.
August 13th 2012 @ 2:44pm
jameswm said | August 13th 2012 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
You should call yourself soap-box instead. Pearson up herself? Bolt a tool?
Bolt has arguably done more for the sport of athletics than anyone – ever.
August 14th 2012 @ 7:27am
liquorbox_ said | August 14th 2012 @ 7:27am | Report comment
so you dont think that Pearson’s confidence is not a sign of being up herself? I would not expect US athletes to act the way Magnussen and Pearson acted.
As for your Bolt comment, How exactly has he done more for the sport? If anything he has shown that the sprint events if competed without drugs is a lottery of genetics.
100m sprint is a joke of an event anyway, sure the training and weights sessions require an athlete to break the pain barrier to continue to train, but every elite athlete does this to get near the top. Over 9.5 seconds there is not time for an athlete to experience the pain that a longer distance (400m and above) has to overcome. It is a straight out race of who is built the best for the race genetically.
Same goes for the 50m swimming.
Sprints are a joke of an event, they just show off freaks of the sport and require no tactics.
August 14th 2012 @ 12:53pm
jameswm said | August 14th 2012 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
So only tactical events are valid? Seriously, you’re digging yourself a deeper hole with every post.
Finding the fastest person in the world – that’s the ultimate test of sport.
Did you see the interview with Sally with Michael Johnson and Linford Christie? She talked about making sure the positive voice inside won over the negative one.
How exactly do you expect a sprint athlete to win a gold medal without a pretty solid degree of confidence? Shows how much you understand it.
You obviously haven’t watched many Olymic Games if you think the US athletes (esp the sprinters) are a paragon of humble behaviour.
August 14th 2012 @ 1:41pm
liquorbox_ said | August 14th 2012 @ 1:41pm | Report comment
not tactical, but events where you have to overcome pain during the event. I am sure that Badminton players train equally as hard and are equally as focused, but they too dont have to overcome the pain a body suffers during a 400m sprint.
I think you misunderstood my comment on US athletes, they are the embodiment of poor sports, they have no respect for other athletes performances, just their own and this has spread to involve almost all sprinters from all countries. It is a disgrace to other athletes who show some grace to the athletes they have just beaten
August 13th 2012 @ 1:24pm
Bones506 said | August 13th 2012 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
Meares – she beat a competitior of equal capability in Pendleton – and the manner in which she won it was first class tactical precision.
She knew that she could not let Pendleton draft and come over her so Mearea and co devised a plan to trap her.
A true champion finds a way to win when the odds are stacked against them. This was Cycling’s version of the ‘rope a dope’
August 15th 2012 @ 10:15am
amazonfan said | August 15th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Completely agree!
She was brilliant, and IMO she was one of the absolute most impressive performers of the Olympics!
August 13th 2012 @ 2:43pm
jameswm said | August 13th 2012 @ 2:43pm | Report comment
Bolt running under 9 seconds for the 100? Geez, you are kidding yourself.
When he ran the WR of 9.58 he ran right through the tape. And 8.99 is a good 6m faster. Sorry, unless you do whatever FloJo did, you don’t improve that much after the age of 25. Nowhere close. Getting into the 9.40s should be his goal.
I also hope he chases the 400, but at the next Olympics comes back to the 100/200 to try to do the triple triple. Bugger Phelps, that would make him the greatest Olympian of all time and arguably the greatest spotsman. He’d surpass Bradman because only a smaller proportion of the world play cricket but everyone runs and everyone at some point tries the 100m.
August 13th 2012 @ 3:51pm
Matt F said | August 13th 2012 @ 3:51pm | Report comment
I agree, breaking 9.5 might be achievable if everything goes right for him. Breaking 9 seconds is a ludicrous proposition
August 15th 2012 @ 10:09am
amazonfan said | August 15th 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
I don’t think he’ll automatically be better than Bradman, however I agree he will become the greatest Olympian ever. As for Phelps, I don’t think he’s the greatest regardless. Phelps is brilliant, however in no way do I consider him the grestest ever Olympian.
August 13th 2012 @ 2:55pm
Roman said | August 13th 2012 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
Usain Bolt has a new challenge, That American that won silver had a bad back and still did good. This might make Usain even better, with a new challenge, wish I could run that fast.
August 13th 2012 @ 2:55pm
Roman said | August 13th 2012 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
Usain Bolt has a new challenge, That American that won silver had a bad back and still did good. This might make Usain even better, with a new challenge, wish I could run that fast.
August 13th 2012 @ 4:26pm
jameswm said | August 13th 2012 @ 4:26pm | Report comment
Um, Blake the beast won the silver in the 100 and 200.