SARU boot Lions out of Super Rugby
Related coverage
The South African Rugby Union (SARU) has relegated the Johannesburg-based Lions from the Super Rugby competition to make way for new side the Southern Kings.
SARU officials voted 26-3 in Cape Town to promote the Eastern Cape-based Kings and relegate the Lions, who finished last in this year’s tournament.
The Sharks, who finished runners-up this season to the Chiefs of New Zealand, semi-finalists the Stormers, three-time champions the Bulls and the improving Cheetahs retain their status as South Africa’s other franchises in the 15-team competition.
“All rugby provinces have consistently supported the need for an Eastern Cape team in the competition. That decision was first taken in 2006 but their inclusion has twice been postponed,” SARU president Oregan Hoskins said.
“The Kings franchise represents more clubs than any other region — apart from the Stormers — and contains numerous leading rugby schools. It has been starved of top-class competition for a decade-and-a-half.
“Provinces asked for a rugby solution and we believe this was the fairest and most transparent method to respond to what is undoubtedly a less than ideal situation.”
The decision to axe the lowest South African team on the table followed months of speculation that included the Lions joining forces with another franchise and the Kings being paid to delay their elevation.
There has been ongoing political pressure to promote the Kings, who are likely to stage home fixtures at Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium in coastal city Port Elizabeth.
Eastern Cape boasts the largest number of black rugby players in the country and some officials from the ruling ANC party have expressed unhappiness at what they believed was the neglect of the sport in the region.
New Zealander Matt Sexton was named coach of the Kings last April but the Currie Cup second-tier leaders have not announced any major signings before the big step-up to Super Rugby.
Softening the blow a little for the Lions, who have denied constant reports of financial problems, is the decision to have a two-leg South African promotion-relegation match at the end of each Super Rugby season from next year.
South African officials want six franchises in the competition when the television deal is renegotiated after the 2015 tournament and there has also been speculation of Argentine, Japanese and Pacific Islands entrants.
© AFP 2013Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Lions, Rugby Union, SARU, South African Rugby Union, Southern Kings

August 17th 2012 @ 2:54am
chris said | August 17th 2012 @ 2:54am | Report comment
I don’t understand the South African club Rugby system as is the Currie Cup only 6 team’s and if that’s the case why don’t they rid the Currie Cup and just at the King’s to make it Super 16′s.
Second what types off crowd’s does the Currie Cup 1st and 2nd division get and who makes up the 2nd divison.
August 17th 2012 @ 3:09am
Knocked Back said | August 17th 2012 @ 3:09am | Report comment
“Provinces asked for a rugby solution and we believe this was the fairest and most transparent method to respond to what is undoubtedly a less than ideal situation.”
How about the fairest and most transparent method of a sudden death match between the Lions and the Kings?
August 17th 2012 @ 3:12am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 3:12am | Report comment
There are 14 Provincial teams.
Western Province
Blue Bulls
Golden Lions
Sharks
Freestate Cheetahs
Griquas
Pumas
Falcons
Northwest Province
Boland
Border
Eastern Province
South Western Districts
Griffons
There were different guises of the Currie Cup in the past, trying to find the best format that pits strength vs strength and affordcall teams exposure.
The best format has been splitting the Currie Cup into two divisions, Premier and first division, the biggest problem the first division teams gave is money.
Hence they can’t hold on to their talented players who get gobbled up by the wealthier Provinces.
These 14 Provincial teams feed the 5 and most likely by 2016 the six Super Rugby Franchises, therefor the Blue Bulls is not the Bulls Francise but the main Province that feeds the Bulls Super Rugby Franchise, so when the Super Rugby is on, the fourteen Provinces plus the Welwitchias (Namibia) and Los Pampas (Argentina) compete in the Vodacom cup.
Below this each Province has its amateur clubs.
Hopefully this will help you.
August 17th 2012 @ 3:25am
Johnno said | August 17th 2012 @ 3:25am | Report comment
I support the move to put the kings in. The Lions are a mess and need sorting out. Moving from ellis park would be a start, It is a big stadium and a long way out jo’burg from what i have been told a high crime area where ellis park is is that right biltong.
-Kings on the eastern cape. I am so happy the cheetahs have been kept, a south african rugby heartland, who has produced so much good springbok talant the orange free state. And have a good sponsor in toyota.
August 17th 2012 @ 3:47am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 3:47am | Report comment
The Kings will be a joke next year.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:11am
Pogo said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:11am | Report comment
The lions have been a joke for years anyway. Maybe you guys should have four teams?
August 17th 2012 @ 7:12am
mania said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:12am | Report comment
saru is the joke. its a good ting they cant get done for out right lying. how often have saru protested vehemently and then gone and done what they protested against.
August 17th 2012 @ 6:11am
Pot Hale said | August 17th 2012 @ 6:11am | Report comment
Good move by SARU. Shades of Aironi and Zebre in the Pro 12.
The ARU might do worse than look at this development to give some of the bottom dwellers a hurry up.
August 17th 2012 @ 6:40am
tc said | August 17th 2012 @ 6:40am | Report comment
If this helps black rugby improve in South Africa in the long run and brings in new fans then God speed I say. It looks like the conferences will go up to six teams each after 2015 with the Lions/Kings in permanently and Taranaki who are probably not far from starting there bid for inclusion ,and new countries coming in as well ,it’s going to be very interesting indeed.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:03am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:03am | Report comment
The reality is the Kings have been aware of this since 2005 and have in 7 years not developed any black talent. They have been harping on being promised to join the Super XV, in that time they have achieved nothing, they won the first division only once in 2010 they have not managed to qualify for the Premier division since 2005 and they will not represent the black population of the Eastern Cape.
They have already today signed Dimitri Katrakilis from Western Province and there are already talks with a few others.
Cheeky Watson and those involved have not done this to promote development of the players in the Eastern cape, it is all about money and politics.
I am all for the Kings to exist in the Super Rugby competitions, but for the reasons it was created in the first place, development of black talent, not a tool for greedy power hungry individuals.
I will not support this Franchise unless they prove me wrong.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:24am
Johnno said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:24am | Report comment
Is port elizabeth a rugby heartland biltongbek in STH Africa. or is is soccer and cricket.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:31am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:31am | Report comment
The Eastern Cape is quite a large area, but not a very wealthy area, rugby union has a great history and tradition under the non white communities that stratches back more than 100 years.
That’s why I have always supported the idea of 4 Franchises and the Eastern Cape as a vehicle where black players could be developed and prove beyond doubt that they merit selection to the Springboks. In my view it would have helped transformation in rugby Union.
But as I say, watch as the Kings now buy players from all over because the haven’t done the grass roots development over the past 7 years.
August 17th 2012 @ 12:23pm
Colin said | August 17th 2012 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
I remember driving through the Transkei, East London area when I was a journalist on the Daily Dispatch, and there were always more rugby poles — made up of tree branches mostly — than soccer posts. One of the old timers told me their rugby balls were made from cow’s bladders a lot of the time, but he might have been having me on.
I played rugby while in East London for the Hamilton club 2nd and 1st XVs and we played a lot of black sides, even in the early 90s — clubs like Winter Rose — and these guys would run 10km to their game, and then run home afterwards. Simply amazing.
It’s a tragedy that the black population’s love for rugby in this area has not been nurtured. Nelson Mandela, who comes from the area, is a rugby man.
August 17th 2012 @ 12:24pm
Colin said | August 17th 2012 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
East London, for those who don’t know, is between Durban and Port Elizabeth and falls squarely in to the Kings region.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:19am
mania said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:19am | Report comment
i hope the SANZAR nations dont get a 6th team each. its boring and unimaginative. at least bring in new teams fro other countries instead of doing the same old thing. aus cant support a 6th team. SA will be hard pressed to make the kings a competitive team and will bring in another lions or lesser team. nz might be able to put forward another team but why? taranaki arent going to bring anything new.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:20pm
Student said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:20pm | Report comment
Instead of a 6th team each, it would make more sense to add three teams from Argentina….so the Pumas can grow their own talent against the top ranked rugby playing nations instead of outsourcing this development to Heineken cup and the likes up north.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:33pm
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:33pm | Report comment
It is bound to happen, so yes I agree with you that is the only other expansion I would like to see. Eventually hopefully Argentina can have 5 teams as well. Then let the conferences fight it out and the top two franchises from each country goes through.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:18am
nickoldschool said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:18am | Report comment
Good to see the SARU finally stepped in. The ” two-leg South African promotion-relegation match at the end of each Super Rugby season from next year” is imo the best/less unfair way to decide who is the 5th SA franchise in SR.
Problem is, who is going to commit to teams (Lions and Kings) who have 50% chance to miss the next comp’? How many top players could afford to miss the main comp in the southern hemisphere? We would have a two-level SA conference, the big 4 and the 2 others.
Great news anyway as something had to be done.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:23am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:23am | Report comment
Yes, something had to be done, but not this way.
Imagine the fallout for the Lions, their suite holders will sue them, their sponsors will walk away, their players will leave, they are taking a team with a 120 year history and crippling it, for what?
Politics and another Franchise who will fail as well.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:25am
Johnno said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:25am | Report comment
Ellis park i see as a problem too for the lions , it is so far out an in a crime ridden part of johanesburg so i have been told.
Now lets move the western force if things don’t pick up next year too i say and move to gold coast or Adeliade or west sydney or newcastle, much better geographic locations than perth if everyone in aussy rugby it seems the players are anti living in perth due too distance.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:35am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:35am | Report comment
The Lions were given the option to move to the Calabash in Soweto a few years back, but the problem is they own the stadium and if they move they have to pay for playing at the new stadium.
The area just needs a bit of urban renewal, it is close to the Ponti building which is a real drug infested and from what I understand under illegal immigrants and drug lords control.
As far as crime at the stadium, I haven’t heard of anyone being mugged, attacked or robbed near the stadium
August 17th 2012 @ 7:48am
Johnno said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:48am | Report comment
Yes that is it. It is not the stadium but the surrounding areas not good for a sports team. A bit of urban renewal and that is fine, the stadium moves always tough, Same with the stormers issues at newlines and moving to cape town stadium which i favour but there they have to pay rent.
-Either way good for lions not being in next year so they can get there house in order, and see fi they really want to play super rugby again.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:39am
nickoldschool said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:39am | Report comment
Yeah, you’re right biltong, i didnt see it this way. Do you reckon we should wait till 2016 and integrate them, the Kings, as SA’s 6th franchise? Thing is we are not 100% this will happen and they may not be willing to wait for another 3 years, or more. Not easy.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:58am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:58am | Report comment
Nick, my opinion is that the whole thing was approached incorrectly by SARU due to the pressure the Kings (in particular Watson with his influence in the politics) put on them
When the Kings were told they would join the Super XV it was firstly premature and secondly not even guaranteed there would be six Franchises.
SARU bargained they would get the Kings in and OZ wouldn’t get the Rebels in.
Based on that ignorance they made promises, unconditionally.
What they should have done was tell the Kings if SARU got the sixth franchise they would get a berth.
Upon realising they didn’t get the sixth franchise they should have said to the Kings that they would have to justify their demand for Super Rugby by getting into the Premier division first and end in the top 5, alternatively they should have demanded that the Kings use the period up to 2016 to develop home grown players (which is the reason for the Kings in the first place, to develop super rugby standard non white players) with an eye on a spot in 2016.
But alas, nobody had any common sense.
If super rugby does not expand, and in my opinion it should not add a sixth franchise per conference as it deletes the quality of the rugby.
Then SARU needs to restructure the feeder teams (14) into the 5 Franchises, base one in Durban (Sharks) one in Western Cape ( Stormers) one in Bloemfontein (Cheetahs) one in the Eastern Cape ( PE) and the other in Pretoria (Loftus) .
They must assist the Province Lions to relocate to the southern suburbs of JHB and build a stadium (35000) capacity in Alberton and restructure the Currie Cup to the other 9 Provincial teams only.
Let the 5 Super XV franchises play Super Rugby only, ensure financial equality amongst the remaining 9 Provinces and strengthen them as our second tier to feed the super franchises.
This will alleviate some of the calendar and players either play in the Currie Cup 18 matches plus finals for a total of 20 matches, or Super XV and test rugby for those who qualify.
scrap the Vodacom tournament, and rather put more emphasis to create a semi pro super club competition in place of the vodacom cup.
This way, in my terribly opinionated way, we will have boks, 5 super franchises, 9 Currie cup Provinces, and anything from 28 to 40 super clubs playing in 4 or so conferences.
August 17th 2012 @ 4:41pm
nickoldschool said | August 17th 2012 @ 4:41pm | Report comment
All makes sense. Tx for the clarification biltong.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:31am
Darwin Stubbie said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:31am | Report comment
Taranaki won’t be in from 2016 ….unless the NZRFU decide to breakdown their franchise system – an individual province won’t be put into SR ….
I’d be surprised to see NZ agree to an extra team into their conference unless there is a complete scale back of cross conference games … Any expansion would need to be thought through totally – 16 just doesn’t work but 18 would mean almost closed off conferences given CC and NPC commitments … Also any idea of US involvement in the NZ conference would mean blowout scorelines and no contact with the SA sides as travel would be ridiculous …. Interesting times ahead in SA as its a big call to drop Jo’berg out – and I wouldn’t mind betting that relegation game gets canned if the kings are involved
August 17th 2012 @ 7:34am
Pogo said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
But perhaps a lower north island Hawk-a-naki might make it. Both Hawkes bay and the ‘naki have complained (with some justification) about their players being ignored by the Hurricanes. I think the tougher question would be where would you find a sixth team for the aussie conference?
August 17th 2012 @ 10:50am
Invictus said | August 17th 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Western Sydney is the next location based on the info that came out during the Rebels bidding process.
August 17th 2012 @ 12:11pm
Uncle Argyle said | August 17th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Mate Bogans don’t play rugby and the Tah’s can’t afford the split.
August 17th 2012 @ 1:15pm
GWS Rugby said | August 17th 2012 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
Bogans can play and the tah’s can go to hell. They are not our team. The split happened many years ago. A team in gws would be the best derby rugby could hope for. ARU DON’T HAVE THE GUTS.
August 17th 2012 @ 2:44pm
Invictus said | August 17th 2012 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
UA – Judging by the submissions in the 5th franchise bidding process, GWS is the soundest choice (economically). Unless you want it on the Gold Coast?
I think that a rival franchise in West Sydney might be the kick in the pants necessary to get the Tahs to pull their heads out of their collective arses.
August 17th 2012 @ 4:17pm
Uncle Argyle said | August 17th 2012 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
Can’t agree with either of you. Australia can’t service another Super team, especially in two uncertain markets like the Goldy and the greater west of Sydney. JON is pumping money into the 7′s program have you not heard.
August 17th 2012 @ 4:37pm
Invictus said | August 17th 2012 @ 4:37pm | Report comment
My reply does not advocate either. I was simply answering another posters question. Based on the info available to me WS is the front runner for the next SR team.
SR will expand, probably at the next broadcast deal. Whether it should or not is an entirely different question.
August 17th 2012 @ 12:38pm
Ryan said | August 17th 2012 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
I wouldn’t be too quick to dismiss Taranaki Darwin,
They are the only province in the country who had and has the backing to stump up for a 6th franchise not to mention a hell of a lot of talent to work with. Look how many of their players are running around for the big 5 at the moment and their ability to attract talent to the province in recent years is testiment to the hard work that has gone on behind the scenes across all levels of the game within their catchment.
Taranaki has everything required by SANZAR it was only the NZRUs decision to withhold their bid so to appease Australia and SA to evening out the competition to 5 teams each that stopped their bid in its tracks. Stephen Jennings is a a billionaire ex pat who is willing to financially back this team and I believe financially it will be run similar to Melbourne. However this is what scares the NZRU they would not have the control over the team that the weild over the other 5 franchises.
Only the other day Taranaki was awarded a contract by the chinese rugby union to help foster their national 7s team for Rio 2016 and Tietjens is also on board. Its not stopping their they are forging ahead in also offering coaching and inclusion to other developing nations. Taranaki are steaming ahead in the business department and are streaks ahead of most other unions in the country yet they are one of if not the smallest unions in the Championship and current Ranfurly Shield Holders.
Taranaki may not be included as an individual province but do not bet against a combined team with Hawkes Bay getting a nod as it will also increase the fan base. New Zealand certainly has the talent for a 6th team who knows they may even lure NZ born fringe players like Jarrad Butler away from the Reds who has strong links to Taranaki through his father.
August 17th 2012 @ 8:04pm
Darwin Stubbie said | August 17th 2012 @ 8:04pm | Report comment
But don’t you provide the stumbling blocks … As a single entity Taranaki won’t get a gig and just as importantly the NZRFU won’t give away full control …. So under those circumstances will the private equity still be forthcoming ….
Also realistically what’s the connection with the Bay – there isn’t one … They are either side of the island – with a province or 2 in between … And really what’s in it for HB anyway – a junior partner again but in a new franchise
Honestly I really can’t see any point in expansion … It just dilutes the rugby on offer … At present NZ and to a lesser degree SA aren’t suffering but Aust certainly is …. So far all expansion has been is a ham fisted ‘soultion’ from SANZAR at each contract renewal to get basically the same level of money … SR isn’t the cash cow in all this the international comp is and at some stage there has to be a tipping point where expansion equals losing $ … What I’d want to see at the next contact deal is some positive and innovative thinking into making the current 15 team comp a better product – they need to improve the current situation rather than to just expand with zero thought behind it
August 17th 2012 @ 7:32am
Leo said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:32am | Report comment
I have seeing many SA posters saying they haven’t won this and don’t deserve to be in super rugby but if this was NZ or Australia its like not having Queenslands or Canterbury in super rugby while South Australia and Northland-North Harbours franchises gets in.
The fact is the Kings will have the same salary cap as the other four SA super rugby franchise so therefore they will finally have money to get some decent players to make a good go at it.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:38am
biltongbek said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:38am | Report comment
Yes Leo, they’ll get money now, but the point of the Kings motivation was that they are the heartland of black rugby.
Not just another team that is going to buy players.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:49am
Leo said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:49am | Report comment
The Kings franchises region was never going to prospers under apartheid but that’s another story. Like the Rebels and Force in Australia they had to buy players who can step up to super rugby level you were never going to have players from Eastern Cape make it in super rugby alone without outside help but the Kings have something the Rebels and Force don’t and that is playing numbers and large amounts of clubs and top rugby schools in the region. They won’t win next season but they have a chance of doing better than some who have been there before in a few years.
August 17th 2012 @ 7:48am
Shungmao said | August 17th 2012 @ 7:48am | Report comment
Politics is in every sport especially rugby but when it’s as blatant as this and the race cards are pulled watchout! This is the start of the slow demise of Boks rugby, the minute the administrators are picking the teams you’re in trouble. I look forward to the bulls or sharks finishing 5th in their conference and losing the play off. This will truly test the system.
August 17th 2012 @ 8:09am
chris said | August 17th 2012 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Since none of you lot answered my bit then I had to search for it myself and got to say South African Rugby be it S15/CC1/CC2 and that includes Soccer and Cricket is a complete joke for a country of 48,810,427… Christ even Ireland with it’s GAA and Rugby beat it with crowd’s.
Maybe apartheid did cause the problem of Rugby and crowd’s in South Africa but I remember sayibg a picture of a black youth team from 1909 on TV and thought if South Africa were not a bunch of racist at the time Iam sure Rugby Union in the country would of been a kin to NFL where 75% of team’s were black.
August 17th 2012 @ 10:18am
Rusty said | August 17th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Find me a country that consumes rugby more from a supporter and broadcast view….
August 17th 2012 @ 4:49pm
Sircoolalot said | August 17th 2012 @ 4:49pm | Report comment
Chris remember that the White population of SA is around 4.5 million. They are the main consumers of rugby.
August 18th 2012 @ 10:56am
Tigranes said | August 18th 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
Chris,
I have heard it before that south Africa is populated by blokes with the physiques of NFL players and that they would dominate domestic rugby ~ biggest myth out there, Been to both US and SA southern African blacks are far smaller than their African American counterparts, not to mention Afrikaaners are generally big units