Winners and losers from a dramatic sports news day
By Michael DiFabrizio, 22 Aug 2012 Michael DiFabrizio is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Basketball, Basketball Australia, Ben Buckley, David Gallop, football, Rugby League
NRL CEO David Gallop speaks to waiting media. AAP Image/Joe Castro
Related coverage
A new $1.025 billion TV deal for the NRL. David Gallop replacing Ben Buckley as the FFA’s chief executive. It’s fair to say it was a pretty big news day in sport yesterday.
But who were the winners and losers?
Even those below the surface of these events, like the AFL, how did they fare?
Let’s take a look.
Rugby League: Winners
While rugby league fans are entitled to feel like losers – the new deal doesn’t drastically differ from the old one, and it lacks two fan-friendly components of the AFL deal in four free-to-air games and every game on Foxtel – ultimately, the game itself is a winner.
Several years ago South Sydney Rabbitohs co-owner Russell Crowe might as well have screamed “Show me the money!” when he led what would become a chorus of complaints about the size of the NRL’s TV deal in comparison to its main rival.
There were some practical reasons why this was happening, of course, including the fact rugby league games take up two hours of airtime compared to three for AFL games.
But there were reasons in support of the Crowe battle cry, too. The fact league is clearly number one in two of our three biggest states was chief among them.
On top of that, there’s also the fact your average State of Origin game – taking out dead rubbers – averages more than your average AFL grand final in terms of nationwide audience (not bad considering there’s more of them per year). The NRL grand final is also one of the country’s biggest sporting events from a TV ratings perspective.
Now, rugby league is much closer to their main rival. But obviously, it’s about more than that; it’s about what the money can do.
The larger return doesn’t just mean bragging rights, it means rugby league now has the ability to build a “war chest” of its own. Expansion into so-called foreign territory is now a more realistic possibility. You can also start investing more heavily in junior programs as well.
Whatever is considered strategically important, the Australian Rugby League Commission can go for it.
It’s a good position to be in.
Football: Winners
There will be fans unhappy someone from “outside the game” has the game’s top job once again. Screw them. David Gallop is a good appointment.
Six years is a good innings, so it’s fair to say Ben Buckley has had his time to leave his mark on the sport.
Unfortunately for him, the negatives were really starting to pile up. Two A-League clubs lost in the space of two seasons. The last three seasons being the worst three in the league’s history for average attendance. The long overdue Western Sydney Wanderers only made possible after a government grant. Only one home Socceroos game since the 2010 World Cup pulling above 30,000 — and even that (40,189 in Brisbane) was unimpressive for a World Cup qualifier against Japan.
He had his achievements too, and not all the dramas have been his fault – Clive Palmer’s shenanigans come to mind – but it’s a good time for a new face to arrive.
David Gallop comes in after running the second-biggest league in the country, and having done so throughout some noticeably tough circumstances, at that.
The NRL was hit by its fair share of scandals during his time in charge, but Gallop was still able to ensure the sport found growth, as evidenced by the size of yesterday’s TV deal.
He is a quality administrator. He knows how to run – as opposed to being second in charge – an organisation with a much larger Australian audience and profile than the FFA. He’s a solid choice.
AFL: Winners and Losers
The AFL are losers in the sense that their biggest rivals have finally caught up in terms of their TV deal. Okay, so $1.025 billion including conta isn’t the same as $1.253 billion including contra.
But the gap has shortened and the NRL have not yet signed away mobile/internet rights (an area that isn’t being fully exploited yet in Australia) and New Zealand rights, which will obviously fetch a bit more than the native game’s.
You constantly hear references to the AFL’s supposed “war chest” and how it’s set up the league’s two expansion clubs. Well, now rugby league can get to work on building one of their own, which would be somewhat frightening to the AFL commission.
On the other hand, Ben Buckley becoming available poses an intriguing scenario.
Is he the man to fill the vacant North Melbourne CEO gig? Could he be sent to fix Port Adelaide? Is an AFL gig, re-grooming him as Andrew Demetriou’s successor, a possibility?
Without knowing what his future plans are, you suspect he’ll find his way back to the AFL industry. The North job is the one that got the most mentions yesterday.
At any rate, another quality administrator in the ranks can’t hurt.
Basketball: Losers
While this will be off the radar for many, I couldn’t let it slide.
Basketball Australia have recently replaced Kristina Keneally as chairperson and Scott Derwin as CEO by appointing … wait for it … Scott Derwin as chairperson and Kristina Keneally as CEO.
If that sentence wasn’t uninspiring enough already, they’ve now done it at a time when two of the most qualified sports administrators in the country went on the market (first Gallop, now Buckley).
In fairness, Keneally hasn’t been involved in the sport for that long so it’s not like you can write off that experiment just yet.
Whether basketball has the funds to pull off a big coup also has to be questioned.
But at a time when fresh blood is desperately needed – and on the back of yet another team going under in the Gold Coast Blaze – yesterday’s news, if nothing else, represents another opportunity lost.
Michael DiFabrizio is completing his journalism degree. As an AFL writer, he has been an expert columnist at The Roar since 2009, and appeared in The Age and on ABC television and radio. Follow Michael on twitter @mdifabrizio
The Crowd Says (34) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- AFL, Basketball, Basketball Australia, Ben Buckley, David Gallop, football, Rugby League

August 22nd 2012 @ 3:45am
Johnno said | August 22nd 2012 @ 3:45am | Report comment
-We have 6 codes in OZ that are i suppose the biggest , not netball as 7even because it doesn’t appeal to both men and woman. Where as basketball does.
-Basketball
-Cricket
-4 football codes
-If basketball could get an Asian champions league going that may make it some big money . Baksetball is truly global now which makes the AFL and NRL big tv deals even more encouraging for basketball. As china basketball is massive and they have 1 billion people, if we could get a chip intuit he asian basketball champions league there is hope for the NBL. And unlike the football codes basketball players can play 2-3 games a week easy so that is a lot of tv ratings, and slots to fill in on pay tv and you can play mid week and weekend.
August 22nd 2012 @ 9:08am
Danny said | August 22nd 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Rugby league is getting its money despite having one less game per week, without making rule changes to fit in commercials & its game being one hour shorter than AFL.
Rugby league has probably positioned itself ahead of the AFL in terms of money now available to spend. I see at least three reasons:
1. It isn’t having to direct & spend money on two expansion franchises in non traditional states. News Ltd pay for the Storm.
2. It doesn’t have & nor seemingly want a massive recruitment drive in non traditional states, so no money directed there.
3. League teams have less players & smaller squads. Less money needed to go on players & backroom staff & equipment.
AFL’s window of opportunity to make NSW & Queensland part of the AFL states & one true national code has now been closed & probably forever.
August 23rd 2012 @ 3:28pm
Fitzy said | August 23rd 2012 @ 3:28pm | Report comment
When NRL is the sport that kids play and adults tune into in the other states (latest census indicated melb population will increase more than Syd) and the code has teams in all states other than a token effort in Victoria. Then I think your claim might have some credability. The fact is that tv rights is one stream of revenue, sponsorship, membership, merchandising etc are also valuable sources. Which the NRL is still well behind. Maybe 20 yrs from now but not foreseeable time, wherese GWS and GC will grow with time. NRL is too busy considering its next expansion into Sydney and Brisbane which will effect its long term future.
August 22nd 2012 @ 9:45am
Anthony said | August 22nd 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Everyone is saying that the NRL got more value than AFL because they have 1 less game each week. But they have 2 extra rounds. And the rights include SOO – which is worth infinitely more than the NRL from a national perspective.
As for the NRL putting more money into the areas where the AFL has expanded……don’t know how they can increase their domination – it’s already top. The AFL is on a 20 year plan & will grow slowly but surely. The only way the NRL is going to counter this is by expanding into non-NRL areas: Adelaide, Perth, Hobart. Can’t see that happening any time soon.
August 22nd 2012 @ 10:32am
AGO74 said | August 22nd 2012 @ 10:32am | Report comment
There might be more rounds but in about 7 of those rounds, there are only 4 , 5 or 6 5 NRL games. Probably better to look at total number of games rather than number of rounds. I don’t know what the resulting answer would be, but its a more logical conclusion. than based purely on number of rounds.
August 22nd 2012 @ 10:46am
Matt F said | August 22nd 2012 @ 10:46am | Report comment
This year it should be 201 NRL games vs 207 AFL games (including finals.) However the NRL figure doesn’t include SoO and the ANZAC Test etc. This year will be the first time in a very long time that the AFL has had more games than the NRL
August 22nd 2012 @ 11:41am
heavy said | August 22nd 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
At the end of the day, when the dust settles and people get off their soapboxes, the fact will remain that AFL will continue grow more than the NRL in Australia. While it will never be big in NSW and QLD, It has the models in place to hold a steady growth, albeit small, in both States. And this isn’t for the reasons that you might first think.
The simple fact is that the way the AFL go about introducing the sport at a junior level is far, far superior to anything the NRL can ever produce, simply because of the game itself. While the NRL is built on tackling and strong contact, quite often around the head, the AFL is about avoiding tackles, and has implemented measures to protect the head in a contest. While there has been an outcry that the AFL is becoming ‘soft’, it still remains the most athletic of all contact sports in the world and this is what makes it the greatest spectator sport in the country.
What the AFL have done very well, is keep an eye on the NFL’s recent investigation into concussions and the lasting damage it has on players. What is being uncovered is an underlying problem of metal health issues faced by a litany of players that have retired from the game. Depression, Anxiety, Cognitive impairment and even permanent brain damage have all been documented and will come out in the report. Comparisons to ex pro-boxers have even been made.
There will always be an argument that both codes have been going for over 100 years and there has been nothing documented or brought up in the past and is no need to worry, But in the last 20 years, due to the rise of ‘professional’ sports, Athletes are now stronger, faster, and are hitting harder than ever before. hence, the rate of injury has risen dramatically.
Soon, there will be a flood of law-suits, claiming negligence on behalf of the sports, for causing these brain injuries. People will begin to rethink sending their sons/daughters out to play such high-impact sports. This is already happening in the US with numbers declining across the country in NFL participation.
In Australia, NRL and Rugby will be the first to suffer. Maybe not now, but in 5-10 years. The AFL may face a slight decline, but will still be a better option for parents still wanting their kids to play an athletic sport and, out of all of this, Football (Soccer) and Basketball will be the real winners.
Those sports will see a resurgence in numbers and once again become strong. While they are likely to never outstrip the NRL or AFL in terms of popularity in this country, they will see strong gains in the future.
So unless the NRL (and the AFL to a degree) change their game substantially, might just have to keep some of that $1bn aside for some court room action down the track.
August 22nd 2012 @ 1:22pm
Danny said | August 22nd 2012 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
@ heavy. Failed to take account that most parents in NSW, QLD & USA have for the past decades already understood the risk to their kids & put them into soccer. Yet soccer hasn’t dominated over the rugby codes & NFL and even if what you suppose about concusssion & code choices by parents was true, it would be soccer that would win NSW & QLD not AFL.
August 22nd 2012 @ 2:16pm
heavy said | August 22nd 2012 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
@ Danny. Time will tell on the soccer front. As I said at the beginning of the post, the AFL are the most likely to continue growing ahead of the NRL no matter how much money gets thrown around in terms of broadcast deals. I never said that soccer would be more popular than either NRL or AFL in NSW or QLD. It simply won’t happen. But in the coming years, there will be a shift towards these less contact sports.
So far, there has been known risks, yes, and parents have been aware, but only to the point that their kids may get hurt in the short term. This is far longer-reaching research and It will only be in the next 10 to 15 years that we will start to see the effects on high profile ‘Professional’ sports people. Remembering that up until the late 70′s most Sportspeople were still amateurs and held other jobs. they didn’t play or train and collect injuries nearly as much as they would today.
And I don’t ‘suppose’ anything, Nor have i ‘failed to take into account’ anything. This is a whole new ball game. One which parent are yet to be aware of. There is dedicated research happening in this field right now, and the result are alarming.
There are currently approximately 113 lawsuits pending against the NFL, involving more than 3,000 players, which have been consolidated into a master complaint in federal district court in Philadelphia. This class action suit charges the NFL and official helmet maker Riddell with negligence and hiding information linking football-related head trauma to permanent brain injuries.
It is happening. And it wont be long before we see the effect of these actions in Australian sports.
August 22nd 2012 @ 4:51pm
Danny said | August 22nd 2012 @ 4:51pm | Report comment
@ heavy – trying to class AFL with soccer as low risk sport is a bit of a stretch. The concussion from a head clash caused by two players running to each other can be horrific in AFL as in any sport. Every time the sherrin is kicked where the ball comes down there is a strong chance of a contest between flying bodies & risk of head collision. You seem to have overlooked the example of Crows’ Kurt Tippet who had three serious concussions in five weeks this season!
August 23rd 2012 @ 1:47pm
Pot Stirrer said | August 23rd 2012 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
The Big problem you face in NSW and QLD is we dont like AFL, Your arragant thinking your game is better when all you are is a die hard fan who loves the game he grew up with. RL is now in a position to throw money at the junior development while the AFL will be cuaght up propping up your very boring expansion teams.
August 23rd 2012 @ 8:54pm
Brewski said | August 23rd 2012 @ 8:54pm | Report comment
And i guess you speak for the 49 players from NSW on AFL club lists, and the 48 from QLD.
And the thousands of men, women and children playing the game, not to mention parents, officials etc.
August 24th 2012 @ 10:49am
Pot Stirrer said | August 24th 2012 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Wow thats . 0000001% of the population.
August 24th 2012 @ 9:21pm
Harry said | August 24th 2012 @ 9:21pm | Report comment
Good on ya Bwoosk !! That’ll sort em out.
August 25th 2012 @ 1:42pm
Brewski said | August 25th 2012 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
Oh well, if you consider 100 players combined from NSW/QLD insignificant, thats your perogative.
I would imagine that there will be a few more, now that the northern AFL teams all have academies up and running with around 400 boys in each.
The northern clubs will have first dibs on these boys, which means quite a few will stay in their home states.
Your interest is, as always, appreciated in the great Australian game.
LOL.
And interestingly, there is more QLDers on the GC Suns list than QLDers on the Titans roster, i find that very interesting, and quite amusing really LOL.
August 25th 2012 @ 1:52pm
Brewski said | August 25th 2012 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
Sorry, i got that wrong, the Sydney Swans have around 720 boys at their academy.
http://www.sydneyswans.com.au/philosophy/tabid/16982/default.aspx
Probably the other clubs have more as well.
I guess you guys will be all over it now, with your enthusiasm for info regarding all things Australian Football !!.
August 23rd 2012 @ 9:49pm
Fitzy said | August 23rd 2012 @ 9:49pm | Report comment
I grew up in NSW and have played, watched and enjoyed AFL since I was 15. Know alot like me, you obviously live in a bubble, keep telling yourself these fairy tales and the AFL will just go away. Some people live in their own little worlds. PS SCG has been sold out for months for Swans v Hawks! I don’t think any NRL club can say same for one of their home and away games!
August 23rd 2012 @ 10:11pm
JVGO said | August 23rd 2012 @ 10:11pm | Report comment
Parra sold out Rd 26 for the Hindy farewell and it is being moved to Stadium Australia.
August 24th 2012 @ 10:52am
Pot Stirrer said | August 24th 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Its a big bubble, Mate your game sucks, Ive tried to take an interest but all i keep thinking is its just netball on a footy field.
August 25th 2012 @ 1:29pm
Brewski said | August 25th 2012 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
You appear to take a big interest pot stirrer, you post heaps about Australian football, LOL.
August 22nd 2012 @ 2:07pm
mick h said | August 22nd 2012 @ 2:07pm | Report comment
mate they just spent millions in western sydney with the gws giants and they were spruking that junior numbers were going to explode.the facts are their numbers have not increased.
August 22nd 2012 @ 4:59pm
heavy said | August 22nd 2012 @ 4:59pm | Report comment
@ mick h. Not sure if you undertand the whole expansion deal. ‘the facts’ are yet to be determined. As with the GC Suns, the AFL will continue to prop up their new markets for the foreseeable future, and hope they gain momentum and numbers with two semi-successful clubs. The GC are 2-3+ years away from finals and I would say the giants are a year behind that. Nobody was saying that junior numbers were going to ‘explode’ in either states. They are simply putting measures in place such as Auskick etc. to capitalise in a new market. We won’t see the results of this for a number of years yet.
Like Port Adelaide Power, (The other expansion club who find themselves in DIRE circumstances, and only now changing there tune, even after winning a premiership) both new clubs will have to have a solid management and a strategic plan involving a myriad of outreaches to keep fans and members.
Maybe the clubs will fail, maybe the AFL took a gamble and It won’t pay-off, but we wont know for at least 10 years and possibly many more. Which by that time, my above points referring to the possibility of the medical side of things getting in the way, will more than blur the lines between what it working, and what isn’t. Interesting times ahead.
So, mate, writing the GWS expansion off after a year is perhaps a little premature.
August 23rd 2012 @ 12:38pm
mick h said | August 23rd 2012 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
wrong mate as i have said before the afl made bold statements about the influence of gws in western sydney and that would reflect in playing numbers increasing the facts are it hasn’t happened. you know a franchise is desperate when they have to go to canberra for support. people in western sydney don’t care about gws. the medical issue doesn’t seem to stop the thousands of junior rugby league and union players from playing in rep games each year and that will continue. pdjrl is currently putting the final touches to its new rep program which will involve 80 players from u 12 ‘s to under 17′s (480 players) to trail and train in a rep environment. and that is one junior district alone and more than what the afl would have in nsw and qld
August 23rd 2012 @ 10:03pm
Jack Russell said | August 23rd 2012 @ 10:03pm | Report comment
In the end, playing numbers are rubbery. What isn’t though, is numbers on AFL lists – and there are 50 NSW players on AFL lists, including 18 from Sydney. This is a record high on both counts, and they’re numbers that continue to increase. Where are these players coming from if numbers at grass roots level are negligible? Is it just luck that NSW produces so many players despite having such a small base (assuming what you say is true)?
If you compare that to numbers playing NRL and Super Rugby from outside NSW and Queensland then it puts in perspective at least one of two things:
1. Australian football has a lot more participants than you’re making out, and
2. Rugby League and (to a lesser extent) Union outside it’s heartland is virtually non existent.
Certainly here in WA, league is never really heard but union has a presence. But I understand there’s just 1 WA player in Super rugby.
August 23rd 2012 @ 10:12pm
Fitzy said | August 23rd 2012 @ 10:12pm | Report comment
Sorry, what is your beef? Why is AFL so threatening to you, you don’t like it don’t watch it, but don’t come up with so many wildly inaccurate statements with no evidence backing up what you say. From what I remember the AFL never said the numbers would explode, they said that there were more than enough kids who PLAY NO SPORT that it would be viable for them LONG TERM to place a team and BUILD support! Typical scare mongering statements like yours just show how small minded you are. I think good luck to RL I know they have a future and respect the sport and players. I think you are just a pawn of those like Phil Gould who think there is a war.
August 24th 2012 @ 11:02am
mick h said | August 24th 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
FITZY no scare mongering what really pisses off people in western sydney is when councils(eg blacktown) are conned to provide facilities for the afl at blacktown( i see gws is moving training to homebush did the players get sick of travelling)and other sports have crap facilities and i include soccer rl and ru they are the most popular winter sports in western sydney. as a ratepayer, business and property owner i am entitled to input on how when and where my rates and taxes are going. blacktown workers have their own fields for rl and soccer i bet they would love assistance to upgrade facilities.
August 22nd 2012 @ 12:30pm
Vic said | August 22nd 2012 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
The losers will be soccer, basketball and rugby union. Why? Because there will be less tv money and airtime, headline space for them. This has been writing on the wall for a while now.
What can be done?
# soccer: just keep costs down and play to your core audience, whilst trying to build interest in the next generation
# basketball: the same, maybe they should go semi pro. Same as soccer
# rugby union: Is in the same situation as above case. Once you are in that pay tv vortex, it just sucks you further down. Could very well end up like NBL basketball. Not even appealing to pay tv in the end. Really needs to watch its step.
August 23rd 2012 @ 12:50pm
mick h said | August 23rd 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
vic rugby union is international their tv rights are sanzar south africa nz and australian rugby completely different factors their last deal was about 550 million for 5 years and don’t rely on the domestic market as much as afl and nrl. in nz and sa they have a strong 3rd tier.
August 22nd 2012 @ 12:51pm
emric said | August 22nd 2012 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
Vic Foxtel will provide coverage to Rugby Soccer and Basketball nothing is going to change in that regard.. its only FTA which has really changed and lets face it nothing much has changed there either..
August 22nd 2012 @ 8:54pm
Floyd Calhoun said | August 22nd 2012 @ 8:54pm | Report comment
Extra $$$ to establish expansion teams??!! Where might those teams be? Gosford? Dubbo? Players and their managers will cash in on this inevitable windfall, no doubt. Good luck with the rest of the empire building though. It’s no wonder Gallop jumped ship.
August 22nd 2012 @ 11:20pm
Anthony said | August 22nd 2012 @ 11:20pm | Report comment
Good points made above.
Have now read the fine details of the NRL deal. It may be a lot of money – but I think it is not the great achievement NRL people are trumpeting. Just one live game on FTA each week is a disaster. Everyone knows that FTA is the key to growth & promotion. Just ask the A-league.
SOO & rep games must be worth half the rights – so NRL is valued at 1/2 billion. IE: 1/2 the value of AFL, with 6 less games.
The only real positive is the extra cash – & that will be swallowed up by higher salary cap, grants to clubs & money put into where AFL is expanding, which is NRL heartland already!
August 23rd 2012 @ 11:40am
Australian Rules said | August 23rd 2012 @ 11:40am | Report comment
I think a legitimate question is:
Can rugby league be bigger than it currently is in NSW or Qld?
I think the answer is “probably not”.
It’s always been ingrained as the staple sport in those 2 states for 100+ years. Whilst the costly AFL forays into those states have been criticised (perhaps rightly so) Australian Footy will undoubtedly have a greater presence in those states in 20 years time as a result of that investment.
So will soccer, as a result of the 2nd Sydney team.
Given the ARLC seemed to say yesterday that:
1) The clubs and players will attract a massive chunk of the tv monies; and
2) Expansion is NOT an immediate priority…
You would hope that Grant et al reduce the grassroots/development deficit that have placed it squarely behind the AFL for the past 20 years.
August 23rd 2012 @ 12:44pm
mick h said | August 23rd 2012 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
1. soccer won’t if they keep fighting they will lock fans out
your bold statement about rl becoming bigger in nsw and qld is astounding. rl will continue to grow in both states lack
of proper facilities and money has been holding the game back and that will change now.
August 23rd 2012 @ 7:22pm
Australian Rules said | August 23rd 2012 @ 7:22pm | Report comment
RL is already the biggest sport in both states. Grassroots $ will reinforce that to a point, but it’s already top dog.
It’s like asking, could Australian Football grow much more in Vic or WA?
Same answer: I doubt it.