Football must get youth development right
By Dr. Stew, 28 Aug 2012 Dr. Stew is a Roar Rookie
Following Australia’s performance at the Olympics, which some say was less than acceptable, the head of the Australian Olympic Committee John Coates has advocated for increased spending on grassroots sports.
This is in line with the 2009 Crawford Report, which also advocates for increasing the proportion of total monies allocated to grassroots sports.
This is not a controversial idea, and one that perhaps most Australians would also support. Indeed, sports participation has many physiological and psychosocial benefits for young people.
Recently, Craig Foster has suggested that football is in a better position than most other sports to drive an initiative that is aimed at increasing the number and experience of youth sport participants.
Football has 360,000 participants nationwide from the ages of 5-14, thus making it the number one participation sport in the country for boys and number six for girls.
Further, FIFA, unlike any other major sporting body, has systematically undertaken scientific research which demonstrates the significant health benefits that are derived from football participation. These include positive effects on fitness, strength, skeletal health, self-esteem, social skills and quality of life.
The FFA has worked hard over recent years to overhaul the “system” of youth football in Australia. Certainly the advances made by way of small-sided-games and the national curriculum have been substantial. However, these changes have served the sole purpose of generating players with a higher technical and tactical proficiency.
The ultimate aim, of course, is to have better players competing at a higher level, thereby lifting Australia to be one of the top footballing countries worldwide.
More importantly we have to ask how have these changes served to increase the positive experiences of our young footballers? How have they served to maintain and increase the participation base of football to ensure its competitive advantage in this space? And, how have they served the physiological and psychosocial development of young players?
The changes that have been made to the education of coaches in Australia epitomise the overhauls made by the FFA “system-wide”. The community coach education courses have been enhanced through the addition of a coherent framework of technical and tactical education.
Thus coaches are able to produce more highly skilled and tactically astute players (assuming, of course, that the coach can actually pass on this information to players).
However, coaching is never this simple. Indeed, by maintaining a focus on technical and tactical knowledge, our coach education courses leave coaches absolutely unprepared to facilitate any meaningful personal gains for young athletes.
Where is the information on how to build a meaningful positive relationship with a young player? Where is the information on athlete development and skill acquisition?
Where is the information on communication and leadership?
These glaring omissions reinforce the narrow focus of the FFA at the exclusion of all else.
No coach – young or old – could ever walk away from a community coaching course feeling prepared to handle a team of young players. How do they deal with misbehaviour? How do they deal with bullying? How do they deal with the parents?
These questions remain unanswered in the service of trying to develop “better” players.
But let’s face the truth, until coaches can be taught the necessary skills within the coach education system, Australia will reap no reward in terms of increasing its participant base, providing a better experience for young players, or (given that coaches will have no idea about how to teach the technical and tactical knowledge that they receive) even more skillful players.
The FFA must get this right. However, this will require a change of mindset. A change of philosophy. Great players, and great footballing nations, are not built solely and technically and tactical proficiency. They are built on a football culture.
The FFA needs to change the goal posts and realise that overhauling the “system” can only be an overwhelmingly positive thing when those changes serve the vast majority of footballers in this country – the young participants – who will go on to form the backbone of Australia’s footballing culture in the years to come.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (158)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (121)
- A-League expansion possibilities (102)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (95)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (93)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (91)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (80)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (60)
- AS Monaco’s taxing promotion to Ligue 1 (8)
- FFA misses opportunity with FTA coverage (8)
- Mariners bow out of ACL with 3-0 defeat (20)
- Grand final pain to power Wanderers
- Central Coast Mariners vs Guangzhou Evergrande: ACL live scores, blog (114)
- A-League 2013-2014 draw unveiled, with FTA considerations (51)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (60)
- AS Monaco’s taxing promotion to Ligue 1 (8)
- FFA misses opportunity with FTA coverage (8)
- Central Coast Mariners vs Guangzhou Evergrande: ACL live scores, blog (114)
- Fourth place should not be cause for jubilation for Arsenal (17)
- How does the A-League rate? (23)
- The mainstream media continues to ignore football (85)
Recommend this story.

August 28th 2012 @ 2:29am
Johnno said | August 28th 2012 @ 2:29am | Report comment
-If I was head of the FFA I would have a top down approach. All teams geared towards the soccer’s and being aware of the soccer’s, and the pinnacle. And establishing independence in the marketplace, not being embraced to like football like in the 1980′s or even 90′s people kept quite if they looked football, or listen to ethnic stereotypes eg wog ball. Has the Australian football landscape matured i would hope so.
-Also we should encourage more and lofty the AFC asian confederation to have NZ in the AFC. It is good for our game and good for grassroots as it’s promoted a strong rivalry with our trans tasman rivals. Some of the most famous soccer’s games ever in the 1980′s were vs NZ, .
-So closer ties with NZ football, we got the phoenix but lets push hard and pressure the AFC to get NZ into the AFC. And more money on grass roots, a national youth league rugby league style, and the FFA to develop closer links with state bodies, and state leagues likes NSWPL and the VPL in melbourne.
-We must move forwad in grass roots football for me the last good technical director we had was Rob Bahn former dutch senior coach. We could do a lot worse than rob Bahn, what technical director he was,. He laid the platforms in the last 5 years, coached the national team as a fill in for a few matches with success, also was always in close contact with Les and FOz, and they seemed to approve of him. Gave him more respect did FOz to Bahn than his other dutchman Pim. With Hiddink , Bahn has been the most esteemed and respected dutchman in the national set up in OZ.
-We need to get the A-league under 18 academies going too. Barcelona and Man U, have great junior academies as does the Ajax academy they all pump million into them. No surprises as to why they are amongst the best club sides in the World . A-league sides need to do the same, .
-When there were some personal changes at Victory last year they were ambitous on grass roots ready to spend big.We need to develop the next Kewells in OZ, not in leeds if we are to advance and grow up as a footballing nation.
August 28th 2012 @ 10:25am
Az said | August 28th 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
this is the most ridiculous statement I have read on this site.. I can’t even decipher half your points..?
August 28th 2012 @ 11:05am
Mango Jack said | August 28th 2012 @ 11:05am | Report comment
I might be a bit old school, Johnno, but can you please include a bit of punctuation so we have a fighting chance of understanding what you are trying to say? Less words, expressed more clearly? I know I’m probably sounding like your Year 9 English teacher, but it would help….
August 28th 2012 @ 12:10pm
Johnno said | August 28th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
The grammar is fine mango Jack and clear to understand, read it again it is fine.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:24pm
Football United said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:24pm | Report comment
no it just looks like an uncontrolled regurgitation of whatever nonsense is in your head. It is impossible to understand half the posts you make on this site.
August 28th 2012 @ 11:58am
Az said | August 28th 2012 @ 11:58am | Report comment
the more i read this, the stupider i get…. is stupider even a word?
August 28th 2012 @ 6:52am
Tom Callaghan said | August 28th 2012 @ 6:52am | Report comment
Look,
Whatever Australia does in football or any other sport it will never lead to Australian sporting success on the scale enjoyed by Yorkshire.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:20am
Futbanous said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:20am | Report comment
Eleventh in the overall Olympic medals table, 7 Gold, 2 Silver and 3 Bronze.
Ah what is GB without Yorkshire.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:25am
Brick Tamlin of the Pants Party said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
I guess having all of Yorkshires football teams playing in the championship and below is considered a success
August 28th 2012 @ 8:40am
Futbanous said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
True ,but like a good Yorkshire pudding,they will rise.
August 28th 2012 @ 10:27am
Az said | August 28th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
COME ON YOU MIGHTY LEEDS
wouldnt mind a promotion this yr
August 28th 2012 @ 2:33pm
wisey_9 said | August 28th 2012 @ 2:33pm | Report comment
+1
GO LEEDS!
August 28th 2012 @ 2:33pm
Brick Tamlin of the Pants Party said | August 28th 2012 @ 2:33pm | Report comment
Ha and i for one would not be against that one bit,some massive clubs in that area of the world and of course Sheffield had one of if not the first football clubs ever.
August 28th 2012 @ 2:49pm
Futbanous said | August 28th 2012 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
First
Even in Yorkshire,theres rivalry within rivalry. Sheffield loves to put one over Leeds & besides being the oldest Association Football club in the world(Sheffield FC) they also invented half the innovations & rules of the game.
Of Course the Southerners in the FA wont advertise that.
“Six years after the creation of the Sheffield Rules the Football Association rules were created. These were influenced by the Sheffield game but ongoing disputes meant that the Sheffield rules continued to be used. During this time many of the elements of the rules were incorporated in to the association game. Regular games were played between Sheffield and London using both sets of rules. This led to an agreement on a single set of laws administered by the Football Association in 1877.”
“The rules had a major influence on how the modern game of football developed. Among other things they introduced the concept of free kicks for fouls, corners and throw-ins into the laws of the game.[2] The abolition of the fair catch also led to their teams to be the first to head the ball. Games played under the rules are also accredited for the development of heading and the origins of the goalkeeper and forward positions.[3] The first inter-club football match and competitive tournament were both played using Sheffield Rules.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheffield_Rules
August 28th 2012 @ 6:53am
Bondy. said | August 28th 2012 @ 6:53am | Report comment
To me football is the most skillful of ballsports,whats easier running with a ball in your hand or at your feet ?. No brainer.
What children need in this country is extensive ballwork and play in recreation time (before/after school) instead these kids are prodominantly playing alot of these wrestling handball sports rugby’s and aussie rules that mask skill and technique, I believe not enough kids are playing the sport in their recreaion time and alot of kids would be generally only kicking a football round at training or actual game day,remember people keep telling us its not a physical game football ,but what is it then it has to be skillsbased and physical games are easy to play and learn football isnt.
Football in Australia cant be compared to AFL/NRL for instance where they are predominantly wrestling sports where the aim of these sports is to throw your opponent to the ground, you cant touch people in football .Playing these wrestling sports takes strength but with football its skill and a different mindset you dont build your body up to play this sport,you walk off the pitch pretty much in the same condition as you went on you dont walk off concussed beaten to a pulp .
Ronaldihno Gaucho lived with the football ,perhaps our kids should too.
Good read Champ.
August 28th 2012 @ 11:37am
Mango Jack said | August 28th 2012 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Arrogant nonsense, Bondy. You clearly have no understanding of the skills required to play rugby or Aussie rules. Yes, they require physical strength, along with speed, balance, vision, hand-eye co-ordination, etc.
August 28th 2012 @ 11:54am
Bondy. said | August 28th 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
Mango.
I’ve looked but I just cant find the skill you see with those sports .Good luck.
August 28th 2012 @ 12:06pm
Mango Jack said | August 28th 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
Bondy, I’m not going to get into a silly code war, but I have played and enjoy both football (soccer) and rugby. I can tell you, there is incredible skill required to throw an accurate 20m pass onto the chest of a flying winger, whilst a 120kg back-rower is bearing down on you. Or to side-step 3 defenders at full pace. Or to slot a conversion kick from the sideline. Or to offload in a tackle.
August 28th 2012 @ 4:56pm
BigAl said | August 28th 2012 @ 4:56pm | Report comment
where does ballet fit into your scheme of things Bondy ?
August 28th 2012 @ 8:34am
RC97 said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:34am | Report comment
So what your saying bondy is that footballs for technical whimps?
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:37am
Bondy. said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
What i’m suggesting is that you wont find those sports i’ve mentioned above played anywhere else in the world pretty much, . unique or weird ?.
Did you have any technical issues to post about the article or just physical comments..
August 28th 2012 @ 8:56am
Brick Tamlin of the Pants Party said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Zlatan Imbrahimavic the Swedish striker is a very technical player,hes also a black belt in taekwondo so call you could call him a wimp if you like.In fact there’s plenty of footballers world wide who grew up in places you’d probably be scared to set foot in.
August 28th 2012 @ 9:12am
RC97 said | August 28th 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
All im saying is the world could do without more ronaldos
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 28th 2012 @ 2:49pm
Brick Tamlin of the Pants Party said | August 28th 2012 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
Yeah well Ronaldo is a prima donna that is for sure,but hes a unit and physically he’d be able to play League or AFL thats for sure.Picture him as a Five Eight in League,he changes direction in flash and thats with a ball at his feet,in his hands jesus who wouldnt get near him.Mentally on the other hand….
August 28th 2012 @ 9:13am
RC97 said | August 28th 2012 @ 9:13am | Report comment
And why hasn’t rugby taken ibrahimovic yet
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 28th 2012 @ 9:55am
Midfielder said | August 28th 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Doc
Good article … my tho’s… I read an article about where the MLS wants to go with youth development… and they explained very clearly their plans and I was gob-smacked at how simple [simple to say maybe not to carry out] .
What they explained was they have three tears of football in the US and to become a top MLS team you must come from the second tear, and to be in the second tear you must come from the third tear… Unlike most leagues where P & R decides the movement between divisions… the change in tears occurs as the MLS expands and is decided on how the team functions as a whole … i.e. marketing, stadiums, crowd behaviour etc…
What made me stand up and cheer was an awakening to how the MLS have used the European P & R in their own way … BUT what they said was each team in the MLS and each second and third tear team needed to have an academy to develop players … the idea being if they expand the number of second & third tear teams and open up a fourth tear you could finish up with over 100 well round youth academies…This copies the European system where say the top 4 to 5 divisions have their youth academies…
Only the Mariners as I understand it have an academy … and we also have a team playing in the State League three wishing to go into state league two .. Central coast Lightening…
If each A-League club had a youth academy, each state league team had a youth academy … and the carrot was held out like the MLS do that the next team will come from the state teams… using FFA issues as the reason for joining the A-League…