If you were NRL CEO, what would be on your to-do list?
Former NRL Chief Executive David Gallop. AAP Image/Paul Miller
Related coverage
Rugby League’s new CEO is about to be unveiled by the NRL Commission and there is plenty of talk the successful candidate will be recruited from outside the game.
This indicates the code’s ruling body is making a serious move towards improving its business practices striving for a more streamlined mode of operation and, ultimately, attracting extra exposure for the game and much more cash for the kitty.
David Gallop’s old job is reportedly carrying an annual salary of $750,000 and the successful candidate for the prestige position is certainly going to earn every cent of it.
From what I understand, the finalists have come down to the likes of former Labour powerbroker Mark Arbib, Racing NSW supremo Peter V’Landys, ex-TAB and current Penrith Panthers Supremo Warren Wilson, AFL’s chief operating officer Gillon McLachlan, and Shane Mattiske, the former NRL strategy manager who has, in recent months, been highly active as the interim ARLC chief.
From these, I’d hazard a guess and say it will be whittled down to either Wilson or Mattiske but beware – there is also a whisper that someone completely from left field could land the much sought-after gig. (Editor’s note: It is understood Warren Wilson has withdrawn from the race, with McLachlan emerging as the new number one target)
OK, let’s say the new guy is announced amid great fanfare this week and takes up the big chair at HQ from next Monday. What should he have on his to-do list from the outset?
This is largely a matter of opinion and personal choice but published below are some tasks/priorities that I’d like the new CEO to address from Day 1. Feel free to comment or add your own items for inclusion on the incoming CEO’s very first work pad.
GRASSROOTS: The league is pretty much flush with money thanks to the new Fox Sports-Nine TV deal and the clubs already have their hands out and mouths open, awaiting a generous handout.
Well, let’s say they get $6m each. That still leaves plenty of cash to invest in the development of the game. I’d like to see an army of extra recruitment personnel employed so that schools etc can be bombarded with RL visits, information and handouts.
Phil Gould recently suggested that it might be good for rugby league to ‘buy’ Oztag, an organisation which has tremendous appeal to all ages and both sexes. I’m all for his idea, it makes a lot of sense.
Also, dozens of country clubs in NSW and Queensland are struggling and if money is what they need to stay afloat, look after their needs provided the money is spent prudently.
REFEREES: The code’s referees system is simply not working. Sort out the problems from Day 1 or face another five to ten years of confusion and criticism from the league loving public.
If Bill Harrigan and Stuart Raper aren’t the right men for the job, look for others who can do what is needed to provide some clarification of the rules and eliminate the grey areas.
Heaven forbid if this year’s premiership is decided by a shepherd try.
Do we really need two referees? Can anyone say for sure that the system is better than the one man show that works well in Test footy?
RADIO RIGHTS: I do not think it is healthy that one network is granted exclusive commercial rights. If the FM stations want to broadcast live RL, let them, but they will have to pay as well. I say the more stations the merrier when league is concerned.
EXPANSION: If the code is considering expansion, make some decisions now about when and where and tell the public what will occur. And if the Central Coast Bears aren’t a hope for inclusion in any expanded competition tell them.
MID-SEASON TRANSFER WINDOW: The Beau Scott Affair earlier this year was alarming with the revelation (after just the second round) he was leaving the Dragons to play with the Newcastle Knights in 2013.
I think the league needs to urgently look to provide a four or five day transfer window in mid season. Let the club officials, players and managers do their business after say, Round 14, and that’s it. Huge fines or bans should apply to those who flout the system once it is brought in.
THE GAME’S THEME SONG: I am not a fan of the latest Bon Jovi song but I accept that some fans are cool with it. Fair enough, but I’d like to have a different song for each new season, and preferably using Australian talent.
CINEMA USE: It’s another personal thing but I believe the Commission should investigate the possibility of having more live league games screened in cinema complexes around the nation. It works well with State of Origin, why not some of the bigger NRL games and of course the title decider?
Give fans who cannot travel to certain games an opportunity to have a special rugby league ‘experience’ in ultra comfort and with like-minded fans around them.
READ THE ROAR EVERY DAY: Any CEO worth his salt should be checking this website daily to see what the fans are talking about: what they like about the game and what they loathe. Some talkback radio hosts use their listeners as playthings.
The real issues can be found right here and, within reason, the fans are allowed to have their say.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- David Gallop, NRL, Rugby League

August 28th 2012 @ 5:34am
Bee Bee said | August 28th 2012 @ 5:34am | Report comment
This is left field and never going to happen but still fun to consider in a hypothetical sense. If I were the CEO I would :-
Let all expansion teams in for the 2017 season. 2017 season has 22 teams and becomes the sort out season for two divisions. Top and Bottom. Top 11 teams in 2017 become( Division 1) Bottom 11 teams become (Division 2) for 2018 season.
11 teams in each division. 2 bottom teams in top div drop down each year. (Now we have two wooden spoons and they really hurt) EPL style. 20 round competition. (everyone plays each team in their division twice.)
Perth, CQLD, 2cnd NZ team, Port Moresby, Central Coast and 2cnd Brisbane team (but please don’t let them be Bombers.)
Let them all join in 2017. . Just in time for the new TV deal.
Rugby League rules forever.
The end.
August 28th 2012 @ 9:33am
turbodewd said | August 28th 2012 @ 9:33am | Report comment
Port Moresby?! Do you realise how impractical that idea is?
And 22 teams would destroy the financial advantage we just gained by spreading out the revenue pie over 6 extra teams.
August 28th 2012 @ 5:40am
Bee Bee said | August 28th 2012 @ 5:40am | Report comment
Oh and one more wish. Probably more realsitic. Next TV rights deal bans channel 9 from ever running another episode of the Footy Show. Ever….
August 28th 2012 @ 12:23pm
bonesaw said | August 28th 2012 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
Heck yes.
My major problem with NRL has been the way the product is presented – the persistence with the old personalities and old mindset. S*%t like “bring back the biff” makes me cringe. The current non-game rugby league content on free-to-air is embarassing, even One’s Game Plan follows the same stencil. The one chance a week we get to see some reasonable sports journalism on free to air “Offsiders”, brings in Roy Masters with has bitter one-eyed smugness.
In this regard the NRL are miles behind the AFL, who in turn are miles behind a sport like NFL.
Sadly not gonna change for at least 5 years. some serious business-related felatio goin on between nine n nrl
August 28th 2012 @ 3:41pm
turbodewd said | August 28th 2012 @ 3:41pm | Report comment
I agree. I only watch Offsiders. The Footy Show is utter crap. Its the Special Olympics without being special at all! Its Paul Vautin wobbling his head for 90 minutes!
August 28th 2012 @ 6:42am
steve b said | August 28th 2012 @ 6:42am | Report comment
Who ever gets the job Tim your idea.s above sound good to me ,i would like to the rural club’s get looked after because for to long they have been forgotten about ,and yes if their not going to spend any of this money on expansion come out and tell us ,,when how and who instead of feeding us B.S. ..And yes i think the new ceo should read the ROAR every day to get a good cross veiw of how the fans are feeling about things ..And fix the refs ,,, rules,,,,,and get rid of Harrigan these things are a must …
August 28th 2012 @ 7:53am
Tim Prentice said | August 28th 2012 @ 7:53am | Report comment
Thanks SteveB. Aah, the $6 figure published above should of course read $6m.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:55am
Pete said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
I agree that rural clubs/comps need more help, there is such a large fan base in rural areas as well that seems to be being slowly taken away by rival codes.
Boosting grassroots footy is THE best thing the new CEO could do, it ensures the game prospers for future generations, its a no brainer!
August 28th 2012 @ 6:54am
Punter said | August 28th 2012 @ 6:54am | Report comment
I think they should consider increasing funding to the int’l game, having all the Kiwis wanting to play origin is not good where the pinnacle of the game is between 2 local states in 1 country.
August 28th 2012 @ 9:42am
clipper said | August 28th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Punter – why would the international body (whoever they are) get any of the money that’s going to the NRL? It would be up to the NRL to send some money their way – the NRL clubs wouldn’t be too happy about that. This is the lopsided nature when the league between two states is far, far bigger than the international game.
August 28th 2012 @ 4:26pm
Crosscoder said | August 28th 2012 @ 4:26pm | Report comment
clipper.As the Four Nations tournament and NZ test are part of the deal,the nations involved get a slice of the monies.It has happened before.And of course a stand alone test..
The NRL clubs are concerend with one thing only ,securing a $5-6m salary cap.The clubs are more than happy with the Tv deal.
Considering the monies paid for league in 3states(last i heard Melbourne played an important part)is pretty decent compared to the monies outlaid for SANZAR,I don’t hear the clubs complaining.
Lopsided nature!!! Grassroots,club,state and test level tick .Not top heavy like another code Ii could name.
August 28th 2012 @ 4:32pm
NF said | August 28th 2012 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
Typical cheap shot clipper hey Crosscoder he always look for the negatives in our game.
August 28th 2012 @ 6:58am
eagleJack said | August 28th 2012 @ 6:58am | Report comment
On the referees I’d implement the centralised video ref room asap. The idea was first floated back in 2009 and Annessley and Gallop loved it and said it could be implemented within weeks. No doubt it got put in the “too hard basket” at the time but we are in desperate need of it now.
This is exactly why we got the ARLC, to tackle issues that the previous administrations may have liked but had too many things on their plate to implement.
The room, at NRL HQ, will have every conceivable piece of technology at the refs fingertips. Only the 4 best video refs will have access to the room, with 3 working at one time for every game over the w/end. This will give us instant consistency as we will no longer have 8 different interpretations of the rules. For games played simultaneously have all 4 in there.
I’d also like to see them get more power to overrule the refs on the run. For instance they could have pulled up the Corey Parker shepherd last w/end. Or the offside play from a kick in the Panthers/Sharks game from a month back. The video refs don’t only rule on matters they are called upon. They are active throughout the entire match.
August 28th 2012 @ 9:35am
Red Rooster said | August 28th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Sensible suggestion. No need for the video ref to be at the game anymore. Use the technology already available and as eagleJack says keep the decisions consistent using the same refs for all games.
August 28th 2012 @ 7:25am
oikee said | August 28th 2012 @ 7:25am | Report comment
I can help you with one problem, the Bears wont be back. Singo realises this and has dumped the Stadium signage rights.
I like the development officers in schools and buying oZtag.
I would also start up a nines comp and we could then use the rugby union’s sevens players to the faster and more competitive league nines, this would also make it easier for league to find the union talent and poach them.
Poaching, only do this at junior level, then it is not poaching, it is talent idenitity and opportunity for youth.
Or put plainly, poaching union talent, start with NZ, they have had it all their own way for way too long.
NZ should be thankful that AFL and NRL want their unwashed.
August 28th 2012 @ 7:56am
Tim Prentice said | August 28th 2012 @ 7:56am | Report comment
How about Oikee for CEO? Now THAT would surely liven up the game!
August 28th 2012 @ 1:03pm
Jimbo said | August 28th 2012 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Don’t really see the point of poaching union talent. It worked back in the 70s when union was an amateur game, but I doubt it would have much success now. They are different games, and most players are better at one or the other. The result of the ARU’s poaching during the early 00′s was that they spent a lot of money on players who by and large (with the possible exception of Tuqiri) were not particularly successful. I suspect most players will demand a premium to change codes, and it basically means the NRL will be paying more than they would for a league player of comparable standard.
August 28th 2012 @ 3:29pm
Haz said | August 28th 2012 @ 3:29pm | Report comment
Not true. Players like Jared Warea-Hargreaves and Konrad Hurrell have been poached from a rugby union background, and they both have a bright future in our game.
August 30th 2012 @ 10:44pm
Beowulf said | August 30th 2012 @ 10:44pm | Report comment
Actually it doesn’t kill the Bears al all oikee,
Norths are cashed up and can buy the rights, returning the ground to the Bears. Makes a simple community model going forward as they have mega corporations signed in principle as sponsors upon license grant…money is no problem.
They may still expand if a bid can demonstrate they add value but not costs – the Bears are about the only franchise that can do that.
I agree with everyones sentiments however – if they don’t intend ever giving the CC a license, have the decency to tell the Bears…..15 years of lies, deception etc is enough. The payout for lost earnings at Bluetongue after being guaranteed survival if they relocated might swallow most of that $1b tv deal however….will be cheaper to just add the CC Bears!
August 28th 2012 @ 7:26am
Stevo4 said | August 28th 2012 @ 7:26am | Report comment
People are nibbling around the edges of the referees problem. The real problem as I see it is interpretation of the rules, and I think it’s daft to believe that all of a sudden every referee in the game is an idiot. I would be putting most of the focus on coaches, with a little on commentators (particularly those who were former coaches).
At the end of season coaches meeting every year in the past, sensible ideas are put forward and shot down because of self interest. The main reason they haven’t worked to get rid of wrestling for example is that every move to do so is shot down by high ranking coaches who know that their team does the wrestle well. I think the mechanism for this meeting has changed, but the effect is still similar.
Then you get loud mouth coaches and former coaches complaining vehemently about some rule they feel their team or former teams were slighted by over the years. Eventually, the rule is changed into one with very subjective interpretations, such as the obstruction rule. This just breeds confusion, and weird interpretations of the same rule. Of course all the criticism then falls on the referees, while ignoring the pressure by a number of individuals who brought that rule or interpretation into play in the first place.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:09am
steve b said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Load mouthed Coaches are not the problem ,fix the rules ,simplify so the man in the middle dosen’t have five different ways to interprete things !!
August 28th 2012 @ 10:46pm
Stevo4 said | August 28th 2012 @ 10:46pm | Report comment
Yes, but why are the rules are mess? The rules haven’t changed for no reason over time. Referees are no more or less (in)competent than they were in the past.
There’s always been referee interpretation, but in the past it erred on the side of caution: if it looked like a knock on it was, if the pass looked so much as flat it was forward, if you pushed as close to offside as you wanted you were pinged. Around the time of the NRL starting there was a huge push to get the interpretation on middle of the road calls to go the attacking team instead of the defensive (some coaches in particular). I think this is where some of the problems have arisen. I can’t speak for footy back yonder, but compared to 20 years ago the culture now is to give the attacking team the rub of the green, rather than the “looks like a duck, quacks like a duck” mentality of the past.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:13am
B.A Sports said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:13am | Report comment
I heard the front runner for new CEO is Gill McLachlan?
First up the CEO of the NRL should be on a lot more than $750,000. If that is all the ARLC are willing to pay, they won’t get a good quality adminsitrator. And I’m not sure that any of the names listed in the article, which had been reported in the past, are worthy of a million dollar plus salary.
But my first job would be to look into the TV rights contract, see if there is a cooling off period and if so, can it, and reopen negotiations. If not, it would be a meeting with Channel 9 about expectations on how the game will be covered. As the primary platform for exposure of the game, how Ch9 deliver rugby league is critical – though that obvious conclusion appears lost to John Grant.
Then I revisit the Strategic Plan (if the NRL has one) and re-assess goals and key objectives including expansion/relocation, grassroots etc… and what responsibilities I am going to give to clubs to drive grass roots growth.
August 28th 2012 @ 12:11pm
Von Neumann said | August 28th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
its a pity you are not as critical as you are informed….and that is to say, not at all.
August 28th 2012 @ 4:33pm
Crosscoder said | August 28th 2012 @ 4:33pm | Report comment
B.A Sports.
The money paid will be in excess of $750,000.It has been well publicised.
The strategic plan is being finalised before end of this year,also well publicised.
The Tv stations 9 and Fox Sports are already looking at various way to improve coverage partuiclar with new technology available.As Grant has a multi million dollar tech co,I suggest he would have some idea.Gee all this has been in print media,since the announcemnet.
August 29th 2012 @ 4:02pm
B.A Sports said | August 29th 2012 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
Crosscoder
The author didn’t reference Gill MacLahclan, even though his name is in the media and he is the only one who can command the $1m plus salary – IMO
The Strategic plan doesn’t exist yet – the question was what would you do, – I said revist it. the CEO is the one charged with implementing it, it should be his first job and he (or she) should be on board with it. IMO the ARLC aren’t close to idenitfying what their strategy is long term, because, IMO, the TV rights deal has been very narrow sited – but thanks for kind words….
August 30th 2012 @ 8:05am
Crosscoder said | August 30th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
I know B.A.,my point was simply to emphasise the fact,the ARLC will have to pay a lot more than $750,000.
It has been acknowledged in rl circles for some time,since Gallop’s removal,the figue will be much higher.So there is no need to push that as CEO.Cause it will happen.
The strategic plan is currently being worked on,Grant has indicted such.One suggest as CEO it will be a case of implementng it.
How do you know the ARLC aren’t close to identifying the long term startegy,when Garnt is talking about having it ready before year’s end.
With the monies forthcoming from the Tv deal,and tNarrow sited,it would be $300m less.BTW there is more money to follow,the new CEO will be far better placed to instiute initiatives,than if it were a deal $300m less.
I am only repeating what the ARLC and committees are doing and waht has been advised,it’s not as if they are sitting back contemplating their navels.
August 28th 2012 @ 8:57am
josh said | August 28th 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Schedule all rounds well in advance of the coming season.
Decide what games will be shown on FTA. Including a Saturday afternoon game. NRl might be doing well due to foxtel, but on the FTA market, saturday is all AFL on FTA. while Channel 9 show rubbish.
Review the referees section.
Clean up the rulebook for the NRL and representative teams.
For now.
August 28th 2012 @ 9:36am
Alby said | August 28th 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Tim,
Great Article,
Grass roots should be looked after straight away, employ 16 NRL Development Officers to work with all NRL Clubs.
Every school has a visit every Kid gets a ball etc regardless of school it will cost but it will be worth it.
Some form of the game to be encouraged at School Level re engage with those great schools that are apart of the School Boys Comp.
Every NRL player to be made an Ambassador of a Junior Club in their district where time permits he is to attend training of these clubs and games/preso night/bbq where possible there would be no greater thril for any junior player I am personally coached by Sam Burgess etc.
Referees: Agree time for a change the rules were simpler previously fix them and remove the pocket referee bring in two extra touch judges they can police the 10 metres. and watch behind the play then move into in goal when required.
Only 1 referee to have a voice.
Agree the more coverage the better if 4 stations want to call the game they pay the more demographics the better. Bring in women callers as well.
Really promote the 2nd Tier Comp- Henson Park had 3K people on Saturday and a great atmosphere the more of this the better.
The players lifted and produced a thriller.
Junior League NRL to be more active in the controlling of junior leagues we must become more professional in the administration of the game at this level. If the junior leagues don’t like it bad luck.
Agree all comments to be filtered down surveys done the fans require a say even at Board level.
Expansion must happen my thoughts are it will in 2015 WA will have a team it makes commercial and TV sense the NRL will bow to the pressure I feel sorry for CC Bears but I doubt they will get in.
Country Areas Every NRL Club to engage with a specified area they can nuture the talent and a transfer system introduced between the clubs.
Canterbury pumps money into Wagga/Riverina they spot a talent put him into their system but player signs with St George STGI pays Dogs a fee that money goes back into development.
Mid Season Transfer Window would be great and would make a good TV programm as well.
Not everyone wants to watch the game in pubs/clubs so cinema would be great especially for the kids.