Andrew Strauss quits all forms of cricket
Alastair Cook is set to lead England in next year’s Ashes series after Andrew Strauss’s dramatic retirement in the wake of the Kevin Pietersen texting scandal.
Strauss, who led England to back-to-back Ashes victories for the first time in a generation, said it was form rather than the Pietersen controversy that made him decide to quit the game.
Pietersen was dropped after sending damaging text messages to his South African counterparts during the second match of the recently-completed three Test series, calling Strauss an offensive term and telling them how to bowl to the England captain.
Strauss led the national team for three years and a half years, with England enjoying a 12-month stay as the world No.1 Test side during his reign.
His departure breaks up one of England’s finest opening pairings with Cook and he becomes the third captain in a decade to quit following a series defeat to South Africa.
However his form has deserted him this year with his lean returns in South Africa’s 2-0 Test series win tipping him over the edge.
“As a captain, I think it is important that you are not a passenger in the team,” he said.
“I would have hated to outstay my welcome.”
Strauss, 35, had previously said he was keen to lead England in the back-to-back Ashes series next year.
However he revealed he had been thinking about exiting the game for “six to 12 months” and that Pietersen’s betrayal had not been a contributing factor.
“No, not in any way,” he said.
Despite his comments, it will be interesting to see in the coming months whether Strauss’s exit allows Pietersen to brought back in from the cold.
Strauss and England coach Andy Flower have prided themselves on building a strong team culture since coming together at the beginning of 2009.
One thing is certain, it would have been very difficult for a principled man such as Strauss to allow the attention-seeking Pietersen to return to his team.
Strauss made 7037 runs at 40.91 in 100 Tests with an impressive captaincy record of 24 wins, 11 losses and 15 draws in 50 matches.
Strauss believed Cook would re-energise the team while the latter paid tribute to his former batting partner.
“I have huge boots to fill,” said Cook, who is the middle of leading England in their one-day series against South Africa.
South Africa have shown cracks in England’s Test lineup in the past month with the home side being comprehensively outplayed by Graeme Smith’s men.
The pity for Australia is that England have so much time to regroup from their testing northern summer before the first Ashes Test starts on July 10 at Trent Bridge.
© AAP 2013- Explore:
- Andrew Strauss, Cricket, english cricket, Test cricket

August 30th 2012 @ 7:57am
Red Kev said | August 30th 2012 @ 7:57am | Report comment
I like the part of his statement where he said he hadn’t batted well enough for a while and so it was time to go. Compare that self awareness and team before self mentality with Ponting’s conduct. Hell compare what Strauss considers “not good enough” to Ponting’s two year century-less run prior to the India series. Those sort of standards are why England will retain the Ashes (twice) in the next 18 months.
August 30th 2012 @ 9:16am
Disco said | August 30th 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Far less of an ego and more of life outside cricket than Punter. Strauss didn’t stand behind the “I’m hitting the ball well in the nets. I’m as fit as I’ve ever been” line.
August 31st 2012 @ 6:37pm
Richard said | August 31st 2012 @ 6:37pm | Report comment
Far less ego!? That statement is just wrong. Everyone who has played with Ponting knows he is the ultimate team player and would never put himself ahead of the team. Regards his form, I seem to recall he played a crucial innings against SA in SA to save the series last summer not to mention India. We have been down this road before. As yet no one is good enough to replace Ponting.
September 1st 2012 @ 12:33am
Disco said | September 1st 2012 @ 12:33am | Report comment
There’s probably not an opener with better credentials than Strauss to open in England’s next Test match, but that doesn’t mean his retirement was ll-timed.
None of Ponting’s mates have made public any suggestion that he puts his career ahead of the team? There’s a surprise.
And I’m confused – is ‘all that counts’ that Ponting goes down ‘giving everything he’s got’ or whether Australia picks its best side?
Ponting was fantastic in his late 20s. However, his form leading into the India series didn’t warrant Test selection, and he subsequently cashed in against a very weak opponent; apparently, he was also hitting them well in the Caribbean nets, too.
Diminished returns when facing high-quality bowling (and New Zealand) in recent years suggests Punter will struggle against South Africa. But, hey, pick him on sentiment. After all, he’s proven to be great mentor to, say, Hughes and Khawaja.
September 1st 2012 @ 9:20pm
Richard said | September 1st 2012 @ 9:20pm | Report comment
Once again lots of negative Ponting statements. But no mention of who would replace him. You are getting a bit boring Disco
September 2nd 2012 @ 11:40am
Fisher Price said | September 2nd 2012 @ 11:40am | Report comment
Richard, you’ve not addressed any of the points I or others have made about Strauss or Ponting.
All that’s clear is you love Ponting, but there are wider issues to be considered and that’s what most if us are here to discuss.
September 2nd 2012 @ 12:11pm
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Apologies – for ‘Fisher Price’ read ‘Disco’.
By the way, I suspect Dave Hussey would’ve gone to the West Indies had Ponting had announced his retirement before that tour. Whether the former would have brought the mythical mateship and digger spirit of Punter I’m not sure, but I suspect Huss jr would be a capable Test batsman.
September 2nd 2012 @ 1:03pm
Richard said | September 2nd 2012 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
I have addressed your points actually. To me most of them are just mindless un balalaced negativity towards Ponting. I certainly respect him as player and I will defend him against your attacks
September 2nd 2012 @ 2:58pm
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 2:58pm | Report comment
Well, would you care to comment on his decline as a batsman then? Apart from citing the India series, I mean.
Ponting averaged around 29 in the two years leading up to that series, which is nothing to shout about, and it’s not as if Australia was winning regularly – will you comment on that or just brush such a suggestion aside as boring or negative or the thoughts of a non-sportsman/armchair critic?
I’ve tried to make a factually based argument as to why his time is up, whereas you’ve mostly cast assertions about my eligibility to have an opinion about Ponting.
You seem to think he’s irreplaceable.
September 5th 2012 @ 8:28pm
Richard said | September 5th 2012 @ 8:28pm | Report comment
Well obviously he has declined as a batsman. We have already covered this ground in another thread. The point is the selectors have tried to groom youth but there have been no stand out candidates. It is better to have Pontings experience in the team, especially one in transition and with no-one belting down the doors. You don’t through away his experience lightly. That is if you value his experience which I doubt you do. Better people than you and I have looked at this issue very closely and they have decided to keep him in the team, for now. I think its ridiculous to suggest the selectors are frightened of dropping him just because you think he should be dropped.
September 15th 2012 @ 10:36am
Disco said | September 15th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
I’m not alone in thinking Ponting’s Test returns these past couple of years haven’t warranted his continued selection.
The selectors/’better people’ are indeed too scared to drop him, and he’s too stubborn to retire, even foregoing an excellent opportunity to go out on the back of a good series last summer.
September 2nd 2012 @ 1:58am
Sluggy said | September 2nd 2012 @ 1:58am | Report comment
Except in that one dayer where he bowled the part timers to get through the overs so he didn’t get fined personally.
Should have bowled the quicks and stood at mid on and told them to hurry it up.
September 2nd 2012 @ 1:13pm
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 1:13pm | Report comment
Didn’t he do that in Test in India too? And against England at Cardiff? Possibly just cases of poor tactics, though…
September 2nd 2012 @ 2:53pm
Sluggy said | September 2nd 2012 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
That might be what I’m thinking of. It’s irrelevant to his holding his place as a batsman though.
September 2nd 2012 @ 3:05pm
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
I agree. Ponting will next be judged on his performances in the South Africa series. Struggle and the runs he scored against India will look even more like a blip.
August 30th 2012 @ 10:07am
amazonfan said | August 30th 2012 @ 10:07am | Report comment
To be fair to Ponting, the decision on whether or not to leave the game isn’t entirely his. I mean, he may desire to play until his death (which he probably does), however the selectors need to tap him on the shoulder and strongly indicate that it’s time to go.
August 30th 2012 @ 10:27am
josh said | August 30th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
Sensible players know when their time is up. To be fair Ponting deserves to be facing the axe. But at the same time for him to leave the game by not getting selected will be a poor end for a player with a record such as his.
August 30th 2012 @ 12:25pm
Disco said | August 30th 2012 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
What about a record as poor as his has been recently, the series against hapless overseas India aside?
August 30th 2012 @ 3:37pm
doozel said | August 30th 2012 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Really? Hope you aren’t referring to last summer? Have a look at his scores…
August 30th 2012 @ 3:43pm
doozel said | August 30th 2012 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
Let me save you the trouble:
RT Ponting 521 runs at 108.
If that is a bad series I hope we can find some more batsman who are so hapless….
August 30th 2012 @ 3:45pm
The Bush said | August 30th 2012 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
Read his comment – “the series against hapless overseas India aside”
He’s say OTHER than against India, who are the HAPLESS ones.
August 31st 2012 @ 10:53am
amazonfan said | August 31st 2012 @ 10:53am | Report comment
The problem is that, when it comes to retirement, he’s not particularly sensible. He should have retired when he scored that last century against India. That was the perfect time to leave as he would have left on top.
Ponting will go down as among Australia’s absolute greatest batsmen, and a contender for the title of best Aussie batsman since Bradman and as such It would IMO be extremely sad if the selecters don’t select him ever again. But, that said, they owe him anything and shouldn’t feel obligated to keep him on.
August 31st 2012 @ 6:41pm
Richard said | August 31st 2012 @ 6:41pm | Report comment
Selectors have no need to feel obliged, no one is good enough to replace him. End of story
September 1st 2012 @ 12:48am
Disco said | September 1st 2012 @ 12:48am | Report comment
Well, if they aren’t picked we won’t know. As it stands, Ponting hasn’t been setting the highest of standards for some time now.
But then may be you felt his performances in the last respective Test series against England, Sri Lanka, South Africa, New Zealand and the West Indies were good enough – in which case we’ll have to agree to disagree.
September 1st 2012 @ 9:32pm
Richard said | September 1st 2012 @ 9:32pm | Report comment
Come on.. Ponting retiring after a pathetic series against India!! You really hate the guy don’t you. There is no sense of honor in your argument or tradition in fact no sense at all.
It will be some time before we see his like again. Lets see him out this summer against SA, they appreciate him. And if he really performs then on to the ashes.
September 1st 2012 @ 9:59pm
amazonfan said | September 1st 2012 @ 9:59pm | Report comment
No, if it was end of story, nobody would be discussing it. Or should we cease discussion because you declare it to be end of story?
The point is that, the selectors aren’t obligated to ANYONE, regardless of their history.
September 1st 2012 @ 10:25pm
Richard said | September 1st 2012 @ 10:25pm | Report comment
People discuss all sorts of things on all sorts of forums. Its amusing that this particular one wants to take down Ponting and it bangs on and on with negative comments about him, but not one comment
or argument on who would be better to replace him. Thankfully the selectors aren’t so stupid.
September 2nd 2012 @ 11:27am
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 11:27am | Report comment
So basically, you’re arguing that Ponting deserves special treatment, the team subservient to fans like you seeing their hero in action?
Ponting’s retention for the India series, after the Hobart debacle, smacked of such special treatment and his form against a weak India only muddied the middle-order selection process, as seen by Ponting’s inability to keep up this form in the Caribbean. Now we approch a series against SA in which he will inevitably be playing in. Looking forward to it.
September 2nd 2012 @ 5:20pm
Richard said | September 2nd 2012 @ 5:20pm | Report comment
Geez you talk rubbish. I pointed out to you that he played the most important innings in SA in very trying circumstances. He totally dominated against India but you don’t seem to think that counts. If India were so bad then why didn’t the others apart from Clarke also dominate. You are so biased that if he scores runs then thats bad because it keeps him in the team. No batsman scores big runs in every series and can have extended slumps, the point is his value to the team as a competitor and his experience is priceless. But of course you wouldn’t value that.
He is also highly respected inside the team and around it, but you would never credit that. You just see it is bias because of your personal dislike of the man.
September 2nd 2012 @ 8:07pm
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 8:07pm | Report comment
In actual fact Usman Khawaja – remember him? – outscored Ponting in the second innings in Johannesburg.
Cowan and Warner and Hussey didn’t struggle against India. Marsh did but that’s because he’s not Test class.
In my view – based on his showing of the previous 18 months – Ponting should not have been picked to play India and his fantastic form against that listless and unmotivated attack helped his own career but didn’t solve Australia’s middle-order travails. This success meant he was a shoe-in for the West Indies tour where again, he returned to mediocrity.
I was not alone in suggesting that Ponting doing well against a very average India was problematic for the team’s future, so if that’s ‘talking rubbish’ I’ll take that as a compliment.
Like it or not, against quality bowling, Ponting has been found wanting for some time now.
September 3rd 2012 @ 1:00am
Richard said | September 3rd 2012 @ 1:00am | Report comment
So we turn full circle. You can’t compare Khwaja’s innings to Pontings in SA. He out scored him by 3 runs and got out exposing his captain in the last over of the day. Ponting played on into day 5 taking the sting out of thier fresh attack. IMO it was, in the main, Pontings innings that saved Australia from a series defeat in SA. The last series of any real concequence.
September 3rd 2012 @ 9:11am
Disco said | September 3rd 2012 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Of course you think that. You think the sun shines out of Ponting’s proverbial. Ponting batted into day 5; his innings also commenced later, no?
But do I also detect the implication that subsequent Test series – including your man’s Indian summer – were less than consequential?
August 30th 2012 @ 12:26pm
Disco said | August 30th 2012 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
Which they’re too afraid to do.
August 31st 2012 @ 10:55am
amazonfan said | August 31st 2012 @ 10:55am | Report comment
Unfortunately, it appears that you’re right.
August 30th 2012 @ 3:34pm
doozel said | August 30th 2012 @ 3:34pm | Report comment
Hardly fair when you look at Ponting’s record as a batsman? It is like comparing a Ferrari and a Ford Falcon. Ponting is one of the greatest batsman of all time, hardly could say the same about Strauss. Avg of 40 in tests…
For all you Ponting haters lets see how the batting order goes without him. Have a look at the one day team if you need a preview.
August 30th 2012 @ 4:30pm
Red Kev said | August 30th 2012 @ 4:30pm | Report comment
When the guy is 36 and has been batting for Australia since he was 20 it is not relevant to compare his “record as a batsman”. It is far more relevant to look at his scores in the preceeding two years, or three years, and Ponting entered the India series with an average below 30 for his most recent 6 months and a century-less average below 40 for his previous 2 years (or something close to those figures, I don’t have the stats in front of me).
September 2nd 2012 @ 1:58am
Sluggy said | September 2nd 2012 @ 1:58am | Report comment
Mark Waugh?
September 2nd 2012 @ 11:24am
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
Quite.
September 3rd 2012 @ 1:01am
Richard said | September 3rd 2012 @ 1:01am | Report comment
Get serious!
September 3rd 2012 @ 9:10am
Disco said | September 3rd 2012 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Facts are facts.
August 30th 2012 @ 4:42pm
Disco said | August 30th 2012 @ 4:42pm | Report comment
Ponting’s decline over the past few years is very marked. He could’ve been set adrift after the Ashes hammering and should’ve been dropped after embarrassing himself in Hobart but – being a protected species – he cashed in against a disnterested and mediocre Indian attack before again strruggling in the West Indies – though not in the nets of course, where we’re constantly told he excels.
PS: One-day cricket has nothing to do with it, though, in fact, Punter was struggling there also which is why he was ditched.
August 31st 2012 @ 11:17am
jameswm said | August 31st 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Doozel it’s immature to use the word “haters”.
None of us know Ponting or have an opinion on whether we like him or not. However, how many runs he scored in his late 20s has zero to do with whether he should be picked now. People can have a bad run, but when it lasts for 2-3 years, it’s more than a bad run. The series against SA will show whether he is really back to his best (unlikely), or whether the Indian series was, excuse the pun, an Indian summer.
August 31st 2012 @ 1:27pm
Disco said | August 31st 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
Hear hear! ‘Haters’ is dreadful.
August 30th 2012 @ 7:57am
josh said | August 30th 2012 @ 7:57am | Report comment
Never rated Strauss. He had a average record against Australia. But he led a very good team and during the last two Ashes, showed more cricket awareness than RT Ponting.
Laxman gone, now Strauss; when will Ricky see the light.
August 30th 2012 @ 7:30pm
JohnB said | August 30th 2012 @ 7:30pm | Report comment
Actually not so that his record against Australia was average. Overall his record was 100 matches, 178 innings, 21 hundreds, 27 fifties, average 40.91. For an opener, that’s a good career in any era. He pretty much maintained that level of performance against Australia – 20 matches, 36 innings, 4 hundreds, 7 fifties, average 39.47. My guess is that would rate well in the all-time figures counting only games against Australia.
Also worth noting that (even with a poor series recently) v SA his figures were up with his career performances (16, 30, 3, 3, av 38.37) and his stats against India were better (12, 22, 3, 3, av 44.23) – so his figures against the other sides who were number 1 in his time were well in the ball park of his career figures.
August 31st 2012 @ 12:17pm
josh said | August 31st 2012 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Strauss is down the list somewhat, in terms of averages.
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?batting_positionmax1=2;batting_positionval1=batting_position;class=1;filter=advanced;opposition=2;orderby=runs;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=batting
August 31st 2012 @ 1:27pm
Disco said | August 31st 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
He was certainly good when making three tons away in South Africa and two at home in the Ashes in 2005.
Captaincy, inevitably, took away from his batting, but he was a very decent player.
August 30th 2012 @ 8:38am
Christo the Daddyo said | August 30th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
“it will be interesting to see in the coming months whether Strauss’s exit allows Pietersen to brought back in from the cold.”
If the ECB has any brains whatsoever KP will never play for England again.
August 30th 2012 @ 8:48am
josh said | August 30th 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Only if they don’t want to win.
August 30th 2012 @ 9:51am
Happy Hooker said | August 30th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
So on that basis, KP will play for England again.
August 30th 2012 @ 8:57am
Viscount Crouchback said | August 30th 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
I very much doubt Pietersen will return. Cook, by all accounts, is one of those players who can’t stand the ghastly South African oik.
Sad news about Strauss. I would have liked to see him continue. Formidable competitor and a splendid man.
August 30th 2012 @ 10:07am
jameswm said | August 30th 2012 @ 10:07am | Report comment
Yep – certainly a well brought-up Englishman.
August 30th 2012 @ 10:37am
Pope Paul VII said | August 30th 2012 @ 10:37am | Report comment
I liked Strauss’ unprentious style. Australia were a very intimidating prospect in 2005. Two 100s against them was quite an acheivement. He mostly left it to the bowlers to get him out rather than help them.
His only real blemish was the insane 2006/7 Cap’n Freddy Fiasco tour.
Age has wearied him so he’s done the right thing.
August 30th 2012 @ 12:26pm
Disco said | August 30th 2012 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
I recall Strauss got three or four bad decisions on that tour, but, yes, he didn’t score many.
August 30th 2012 @ 6:58pm
Colin N said | August 30th 2012 @ 6:58pm | Report comment
He did, he got some absolute shockers on that tour. He might not have scored that much anyway (should DRS have been in use) and definitely wouldn’t have reversed that scoreline single-handedly, but it skewed his own averaga.
August 30th 2012 @ 9:14pm
ak said | August 30th 2012 @ 9:14pm | Report comment
What a way to retire !!!! Some other players aged 37, 38, 39 and saying they will play as long as they love the game should learn. Maybe some of them are much better players than Strauss, but they too should understand that they are becoming a burden for their side.
August 30th 2012 @ 9:18pm
Nev said | August 30th 2012 @ 9:18pm | Report comment
Geez some blokes are keen to continually wack Ponting aren’t they? These people probably mention Rick when someone retires from work at their office.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 31st 2012 @ 9:16am
Disco said | August 31st 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Yes, well, Ponting’s been an elephant in the room for 18 months, and he has plenty of supporters and sycophants talking up his net form elsewhere.
Unlike Strauss, Ponting couldn’t care less whether or not there’s a perception that he’s past it.
August 31st 2012 @ 8:02pm
Richard said | August 31st 2012 @ 8:02pm | Report comment
He has plenty of clueless arm chair critics as well! I can’t imagine that the one day team would have performed so badly in England if he had been in the team. No one has had what it takes to replace him as yet, however, Bailey looks like he might just have the temperament to knock him off.
September 1st 2012 @ 12:54am
Disco said | September 1st 2012 @ 12:54am | Report comment
I suspect many players have critics who don’t play international cricket, clueless or otherwise.
What did you make of Ponting’s form in his last one-day series? Or his struggles in the World Cup?
September 1st 2012 @ 9:38pm
Richard said | September 1st 2012 @ 9:38pm | Report comment
Form Shmorm! What do YOU make of some of the form of players in their last series in England. Its pretty ugly reading.
September 2nd 2012 @ 11:20am
Disco said | September 2nd 2012 @ 11:20am | Report comment
Agreed. Both the current Test and one-day batting line-ups have serious issues, but a mid 30s Ponting is not the answer to these problems – unless of course he’s able to mentor younger batsmen alongside his buddy Justin Langer.
It’s about the team not Ricky Ponting, no?
Ponting’s golden period was the early noughties. Enjoy that for what it was – and his legacy is secured – but it’s not impossible to move on, is it? And just because Ponting hasn’t retired doesn’t mean anyone who does is a coward.
September 3rd 2012 @ 1:13am
Richard said | September 3rd 2012 @ 1:13am | Report comment
No of course not, only Strauss is the coward. Laxman and Dravid came here and lost 4-0 and then retired. They are men of integrity and honor. They realized the greatest challenge in their cricket life was to play Australia in Australia. Like it is says at Wimbledon, you need to be able to treat winning and losing equally. Strauss had no reason to retire, unless there is more to this than meets then eye.
September 3rd 2012 @ 9:08am
Disco said | September 3rd 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
To call him a coward is ridiculous and smacks of jingoism.
If Strauss had lost 4-0 last time he visited Australia, I suspect he might have been sacked and dropped. As it was he led his side to three innings defeats over Ponting’s rabble.
Strauss is now 35 years old. Aside from the fact that he recognised he was cutting it as a Test batsman anymore (and many English journalists were calling for him to retire or be replaced), could it not be that he sees other things he can do with his life? It’s called self-awareness, humility and putting the team’s interests first.
September 5th 2012 @ 8:42pm
Richard said | September 5th 2012 @ 8:42pm | Report comment
Jingoism! Pot kettle black. I think you have use the terms – “Ponting sycophants” for his supporters and “Pontings rabble” for the ashes losing teams. In any case Coward is a bit strong but IMO he still took the soft option. It would have been great to see him in the next Ashes. I think he his protecting his reputation its an ego thing
September 9th 2012 @ 3:38pm
Disco said | September 9th 2012 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
Had Strauss had stuck around and continued to struggle, with selectors too scared to axe him (ring any bells?), that would’ve been putting himself ahead of the team.
Of course you’d want him to stay on and therefore the English team to be weaker, but I think Strauss recognised his time was up.
Just as most England supporters would love your man Punter to tour there next year.
August 30th 2012 @ 9:21pm
Nev said | August 30th 2012 @ 9:21pm | Report comment
And Strauss was a class player. I think all Australians will be glad he won’t be opening the batting or captaining the team. The English batting line up is looking less formidable with every test
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 30th 2012 @ 10:35pm
Colin N said | August 30th 2012 @ 10:35pm | Report comment
It is at the moment! Both Bairstow and Taylor are talented lads though, as is Root, who people have mooted to take Strauss’ place. The former was superb against South Africa in the final Test and Taylor was unfortunate in the second innings after being run-out by Trott, and he’s looked comfortable at Test level.
August 31st 2012 @ 9:14am
Disco said | August 31st 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Compton’s also matured into a decent top-order player.
August 31st 2012 @ 8:43pm
Colin N said | August 31st 2012 @ 8:43pm | Report comment
Indeed, I just wonder whether they might as well develop these 21/22 year-olds early and build a stable batting line-up for years to come. It always seems to come to a point every couple of years where it seems like we have to rejig it.
Obviously, it doesn’t work that sometimes, but I’ve been hugely impressed with Root, Bairstow and Taylor.
September 1st 2012 @ 12:55am
Disco said | September 1st 2012 @ 12:55am | Report comment
And after all, Cook was blooded early and now, only few years later, he’s captain… without ever being referred to as ‘Pup’.
August 31st 2012 @ 2:41am
dasilva said | August 31st 2012 @ 2:41am | Report comment
It will be interesting when Captain Cook tours Australia
August 31st 2012 @ 9:09am
Pope Paul VII said | August 31st 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
I laughed, not quite out loud