Wallabies and Boks are their own worst enemies
By LeftArmSpinner, 10 Sep 2012 LeftArmSpinner is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, wallabies
111 Have your say
Related coverage
The Wallabies continue to be their own worst enemy. Clearly, they have learned nothing from the two rugby lessons provided by the All Blacks in the past three weeks.
The Springboks have also failed to heed the lessons of the Stormers’ flawed Super Rugby campaigns in 2011 and 2012.
After an error-riddled performance in Auckland, the Wallabies picked up where they had left off.
From the kick off and ensuing ruck on the Wallabies 22, just five metres from the right hand side line, the Wallabies threw two 15-metre passes deep in their own 22.
Samo drove straight and hard up the middle of the field. Quick ruck ball and a 12-metre Cooper pass to Barnes produced a three on one.
The inherent flaw in this first play of the game was that the play was now on the Wallabies’ 20-metre line and only five metres from the left touch line.
Seeing nothing on, and with his default still set to ‘kick’, Barnes fluffed the left-foot grubber. This gave possession to the Springboks, 27 metres from the Wallaby line. The closest forwards were Timani and Hooper, 15 and 20 metres away respectively.
This was low percentage rugby at best and brainless at worst.
Sadly, for the spectators, this was to be a portent of things to come. More frustratingly, it was a replay of many past individual performances and games.
Width for the sake of it and without forward metres is not attack. It’s the equivalent of the type of across-the-field running seen every week in the Under-9s across the country that sends coaches and parents crazy and allows the most timid defenders to halt their opponents.
Robbie Deans shares the same frustration.
In contrast, the Springboks replied with 10 phases of straight running up the middle of the field. They needed just one partially missed tackle from the Wallabies and they would have seven points. A ruck infringement would have netted them three points. The Wallaby defence stood strong and disciplined on this occasion.
From the 22 restart, Barnes again chose the highest-risk option, the ‘kick and regather’ drop-out. He surprised the Springboks. More crucially, he surprised his own team. Genia got to the ruck, passed it to Timani, but without the clean out, he was penalised for holding on. Steyn kicked the penalty.
In summary, two crucial and unnecessary errors by Barnes, and a 3-0 scoreline after just two minutes. Easy-peasy for the Springboks but generously dished up to them by the Wallabies.
Despite a new coach, The Springboks have not shown the diverse attacking game that is needed in international rugby, particularly when New Zealand is one of the opponents.
Where was Springbok coach Heyneke Meyer during the Super Rugby season and in particular the play-offs? Didn’t he see the Stormers campaign fall short for the second year in a row due to a lack of point-scoring capability?
The Springboks lack the modicum of flair that would complement their physical, confrontational game. Despite having just five Stormers in the 22, the Boks still play that attritional style.
These two teams have significant challenges ahead of them, if they truly aspire to be Number 1. The Wallabies need to remove the dumb plays from their repertoire and the Springboks need to boost their attack.
There is not much between these teams as they fight for second place in the world rankings. Last night, the statistics were very close. Both teams are under intense scrutiny from the fans and respective media.
I think that the Wallabies’ issues are more easily addressed. The Springboks’ issues are more fundamental.
There is a lot at stake. If they address these schoolboy errors and retain the good parts of their game, they can challenge the All Blacks for the position of Number 1 rugby team in the world. This sets them as a genuine chance to win the Rugby World Cup in 2015. Together, these things would bring a much-needed surge in revenue.
Follow LeftArmSpinner on Twitter @leftarmspinner, and become a friend of his on Facebook at www.facebook.com/leftarmspinner
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (319)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (184)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (16)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (5)
- Deans must forgive Quade: Slack (23)
- SPIRO: Super Rugby TMOs are making too many mistakes (20)
- Rebels’ O’Connor stays on sidelines
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one)
- SANZAR mulls sanctions against Henry (6)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (16)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (5)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (0)
- Super Rugby teams will skin the Lions (116)
- Super B to the rescue for rugby? (50)
- Picking your ‘First V’ for the Wallabies (66)
- Looking forward to the 2015 Wallabies (20)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, wallabies

September 10th 2012 @ 8:20am
ohtani's jacket said | September 10th 2012 @ 8:20am | Report comment
The quality of rugby in this Rugby Championship has been awful so far. I think the All Blacks, Wallabies and Springboks all all tracking poorly and it’s just another indictment of how disruptive the expanded Super Rugby competition is, particularly the break for the June test window. It’s going to be even worse next season with Super Rugby bending backwards to accomodate the Lions tour. I’m really not enjoying my rugby this year, in part because I think Hansen has got his tactics wrong similar to how Henry and Co. got it wrong with their flat backline approach in 2004, but our basic ability to control a test match means we’re not being challenged. If Nonu hadn’t lost control of the ball in contact, Argentina probably wouldn’t have scored in Wellington.
The Wallabies’ test was like watching the Welsh series again. The Boks bottled it to an extent, but the Wallabies scored when they needed to. I think they can do without the criticism this week.
September 10th 2012 @ 8:36am
Red Kev said | September 10th 2012 @ 8:36am | Report comment
Interesting that you mention the expanded Super Rugby competition – certainly it has hit the Wallabies and to a lesser extent the Boks hard with injuries – I think we may be entering the area of “too much” rugby. Which will be very interesting because that means the Super Rugby season would need to be pared back and people already complain about not having a full home and away season.
Overall I agree, the quality of the rugby has been poor overall – interestingly the game I have enjoyed the most so far was the Arg v SA game in Mendoza, but I wonder if that was just because I got up so early to watch it that the coffee affected my brain.
September 10th 2012 @ 9:31am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
It’s not too much rugby, red kevin, as much as not enough players in squads that can perform. It’s the economics of the deal. The Aust teams need to get more commercial and get some other revenue sources.
September 10th 2012 @ 9:27am
bennalong said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
Heeyyyy OJaaayyy !!!!!
Agree 100%………with each of your points.! A return to form mate.
Don’t know how the scheduling can work next year, and it’s critical for national teams to have time together before they start their seasons.
I have laid off the All Blacks generally because they’re winning and we’ve so poor against them, but their shape running off the forewards in broken play has not been as good as usual. Haven’t figured out what’s different yet.
September 10th 2012 @ 9:30am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:30am | Report comment
OJ, I think that you have once again nailed it. The rugby has been less than end to end, that’s for sure.
As to the reason, the teams are in transition, to an extent but have already had 6 games together and numerous training sessions together so that is not an excuse. The Argies were great, in an Argie type of way. Argie bargie! It is what it is and I dont begrudge them this style. It certainly got the ABS attention. At least someone has!
September 10th 2012 @ 1:53pm
MAJB said | September 10th 2012 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
LAS,
The ABs are nor playing to their potential. The ABs attack seems to run out of ideas near the try line. A few NZers are starting to say this as well, so it not my Stralian bias. Poor play is just not restricted to the Wallabies. However, something drastic has to be done to lift the standard and the spectacle of the Tests. Playing without a ref and having the team captains’ control a half might end up with interesting Rugby. I understand that there is a good chance that the 10 network make take on broadcasting Rugby. If the Test don’t improve in standard then 10 might not continue with the idea. We need live broadcast Rugby but at present it is hard to justify.
September 11th 2012 @ 2:06am
DuffyV said | September 11th 2012 @ 2:06am | Report comment
How could anyone miss why Ioane was crying after the second Bledisloe?????
He was wondering what might have been, if his parents had not dragged him to Melbourne when he was five years old.
Guess what, he possibly would have been in the other changing room cherishing his black jersey…………
September 11th 2012 @ 7:07am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:07am | Report comment
touché
September 10th 2012 @ 8:21am
patonga said | September 10th 2012 @ 8:21am | Report comment
. Wallabies were lucky to escape with a win….they do not seem to have a game plan…. and can someone tell Barnes to STOP KICKING THE BALL… if only he would look outside of his boot now and again.. or can he not pass on his right or left hand side…
Sorry but the wallabies are losing fans by playing like 12 years olds… force and back.. Kick., kick Back.. I have the Ball time to kick…
BORING… As for them improving were you watching the same Game ???? i actually think the wallabies are not improving at all…
I do not care to much for the springboks as i think they didn’t have the right team on the paddock…They can improve.. But what do the wallabies do now ????? Argentina will play 10 men rugby have the Wallabies got 10 men to contain them ????
September 10th 2012 @ 10:48am
redsnut said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:48am | Report comment
Feeling better now?
September 10th 2012 @ 8:52am
Uncle Argyle said | September 10th 2012 @ 8:52am | Report comment
LAS,
I am happy for the win however I have the same sentiment as yourself. I thought our mental application was poor at times. There were chances to shred some Bok defence. Props standing in the line 3 on situations yet we kicked. I think we played about 45 to 50 minutes of rugby of which perhaps 10 may have bothered the All Blacks. But a win is a win.
September 10th 2012 @ 9:36am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Unc, I agree. I want to celebrate the win. A win is always a win, partic when it is against the boks. It has the double whammy effect of putting more pressure on the losers and the saffa media won’t hold back. As much pressure can be applied off field as on field. Just look at the reaction by will Genia to Kafes assessment in the post Match interview.
But, there are every obvious things that Are continually repeated. Deans knows them and commented on the aimless and ineffective grubbers. Yet, the players and in particular Barnes continues to take the wrong option.
September 10th 2012 @ 1:54pm
Wal The Hooker said | September 10th 2012 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
Gidday Uncle, Just got back from my wedding in the Cook Is and I survived the ordeal with the trusty help of a hip flask of rum to get me through! Geez I’d rather be at the bottom of a good old fashion ruck than go through that ceremony and speeches again! I’m just catching up on all the action on my hard drive.
Great to see the WBs bounce back on Sat, well done. Sad to see Genia get injured a case of way too much rugby IMO for the kid, the should have given him a rest me thinks and had him on the bench perhaps. Deans needs to manage his troops better, I know Genia was captain but IMO he needs to have a bit of faith in the other 9s and give them game time. Everybody’s a genius in hindsight I guess, however none of the other 9s have ever got a run on since Genia got the jumper from memory. I stand to be corrected there, but hey you gotta give the other guys a run.
Boy those Argies sure gave the ABs a workout, they were brutal and bloody terrific, I thought for a bit an upset could be on the cards and they certainly deserved it if they had pulled it off! I was super impressed with the Pumas and just for a little while had me a little nervous, wonder what would have happened if the lights hadn’t failed! They were on top of the ABs. They’re going to be very good side in the not too distant future me thinks.
By the way I had a local Cook Islands brew called MATUTU in Rarotonga whilst there, bloody delicious drop. If anybody on here wants a South Pacific holiday with a real laid back feel I can’t recommend it enough. Think Hawaii in the 60s or Bali 30 years ago. I’m a home island boy but been away long enough to offer an opinion and do they love their rugger! Rugby fields in amazing tropical locations is pure art!
September 11th 2012 @ 7:09am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:09am | Report comment
Wal, congrats on the nuptials. yep, the argies brought some bargie…………Now, with Genia out of the picture, we have real problems as who is going to lead them???? not as captain but as play caller?
September 10th 2012 @ 8:54am
sixo_clock said | September 10th 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
In attack we don’t yet have a definite, vocal, thinking, cunning skipper. Skills are low in many areas, decision-making is poor. The opposite applies in defence and that is what won the game. With only a handful of opportunities we were only able to capitalise on only a few of those. Our forwards are not yet active enough and still do not think as a single unit. Dingo has been climbing this mountain for years and not one of them has shown any inclination to heed his advice to play Rugby as a team with 44 legs, arms, hearts, and 22 brains.
Enjoyed the news about trialing to the original scrum (no ref’s call, no hit, Six Nations) in the ABC commentary, saturday! What is there to trial? Just get the scrums over quickly so we can play Rugby.
September 10th 2012 @ 9:39am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Six o’clock, completely agree and no that Genia is gone, we are in real trouble. Just who will call the shots?
One thing is for sure, it won’t be Barnes.
Jutsie, I I thought it worthwhile to describe the first few minutes in quite some detail. The devil is often in the detail and this is no exception. Rugby is about consequences, good and bad. Two bad options by Barnes and the boks are on the Board with three points, and without having to do anything.
September 10th 2012 @ 9:54am
Red Kev said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:54am | Report comment
You mean it shouldn’t be Barnes. 19 seconds it took for him to decide on a poor option kick and execute it terribly. Deans kept him on the field though (I’d've hooked him, 19s in or not – if as Deans claims the grubbers and chip kicks were not part of the plan and Barnes broke from it at his first touch, he should have been dragged and taught a lesson) and he’ll keep him in the run-on team next week as well.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:26am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
redfe kev, completely agree about Barnes, but what can you expect from a queenslander.
September 10th 2012 @ 11:40am
sittingbison said | September 10th 2012 @ 11:40am | Report comment
totally Red Kev, my only tweet for the night:
@sitting_bison
2 mins in Barnes kick it away and TPN concussed %((
Two weeks in a row that very senior players AAC and Moore have said “FFS we are meant to keep possession”, and now Deans has said exactly the same. So, if Barnes kicked it away against the game plan WHY didn’t Deans hook him? If not at 2min mark, then after say 3rd successive kick? He had Harris on the bench, so didnt lose anything in the place kicking department.
This to me is one of the many failings of Deans as coach of the wallabies. An inability to impose his will on the game. He does not make tactical changes, he does not discipline on field lapses. For instance, can you imagine Alex Ferguson not reacting to a playmaker going against instruction? A boot kicked in the head followed by the hair dryer. And shipped out completely if it was repeated ad nauseum.
September 10th 2012 @ 1:24pm
sixo_clock said | September 10th 2012 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
Got into trouble thinking aloud on another thread mentioning Sharpe, Dennis and even Hooper. That the captain has to come from the pigs is good Rugby, but he has to have an Eales like presence, the Gregan death stare, or the brains of Lynagh or NFJ. PeterK mentioned Moore (add Benn as well here) but they are a bit lazy for mine, we don’t have anyone as a standout till the likes of Caderyn or Power step up but for now would go with Sharpe as long as someone takes his parking spot, or seat on the bus before the game to get him angry. Would do the same to Phipps, b@stard is always smiling, whats that about.
September 10th 2012 @ 9:03am
jutsie said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:03am | Report comment
I share your bewilderment at the short kick option when taking a 22.
when ur line is under pressure and you get a relieving 22 why would u take 50:50 option that allows the opposition to apply pressure once again.
Just boot the bloody thing as far downfield as possible!
September 10th 2012 @ 10:27am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
it is high risk from: the location on the field, the chance that the opposition will get possession, that the kicker will knock it on or that they will lose the ensuing ruck, or that the rest of the kicking team wont be ready!!!!!!!
September 10th 2012 @ 9:44am
Brett McKay said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Leftie, it will be interetsing to see how Argentina come out this coming weekend, this game on the Gold Coast will undoubtedly be a game they’ve targetted as one they can take points from…
September 10th 2012 @ 9:49am
Johnno said | September 10th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
I disagree Brett I think Argentina will rest a few players and concede defeat in this match.
There main target is the 2 home matches vs the AB’S and wallabies. And the home match vs the wallabies they will really fancy there chances and aim for that. I think this , match on the gold coast they will throw and not care about.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:14am
Brett McKay said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Johnno, that makes no sense at all – if they were going to rest players and concede, then the games in Cape Town and Wellington would’ve been the time, not this Saturday. Why would you concede anything to the team running third??
September 10th 2012 @ 10:24am
Johnno said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:24am | Report comment
Squad rotation, I think the Argentina fans don’t care if they come last yet Brett.
Right now the priority in terms of meeting key performance team indicators is to beat both the boks and wallabies in Argentina, and put in a good effort and give the All blacks a fright and not lose by more than 10 or just 1 try.
-But they drew with the books which is a pass. But losing to the boks and wallabies in Argentina will be declared a failure and unacceptable. But road trip losses they are cool with.
September 10th 2012 @ 11:05am
Brett McKay said | September 10th 2012 @ 11:05am | Report comment
But Johnno, why would they “throw and not care about” (your words, not mine) a game that they might genuinely have a chance of winning?!? I bet the Pumas squad doesn’t share your method here…
September 10th 2012 @ 12:16pm
M.O.C. said | September 10th 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
Johnno, may I ask how you assume to know the desires of the Pumas?
Rugby teams speaking of “key performance indicators” and “priorities” which do not include playing rugby to the best of their abilities need to change sports. This sounds like the language of the Waratahs and Wallabies in post-defeat press conferences over the past few seasons – careful, I suspect that you have been brain-washed!
Such negative bureaucratic language and approach to a beautifully simple game.
September 10th 2012 @ 2:15pm
Johnno said | September 10th 2012 @ 2:15pm | Report comment
I don’t know the KPI’S of the pumas but just assume they would be there based on where there rugby program is at. KPI’S M.OC. keep it simple if you ask me , we have to have some measurements don’t we even in your beautiful world M.O.C . hardly brainwashed just having target’s .
September 10th 2012 @ 2:40pm
M.O.C. said | September 10th 2012 @ 2:40pm | Report comment
Targets in rugby are simple Johnno – try as hard as you can to win. Thats it. The whole KPI thing is what teams like the WBs talk about when they are trying to distract the fans from a loss.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:35am
Allanthus said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Johnno, what’s with the conspiracy theory? The Argies are only 3 games into a tournament that they’ve been pushing to enter for years, with a more than competitive team, and you have them throwing games already…??? I don’t think so.
Interesting some of the negative comments about the AB’s handling etc… Make no mistake the Argies are strong, tough and committed, no fun to be running into PLUS perhaps everyone criticising from their cosy armchairs has never played rugby in Wellington on a night like that? Be critical of the over ambitious tactics by all means, but i’d say cut some slack re the execution.
AB’s noticeably improved in the 2nd half as conditions got better. 2 well taken tries plus a certain 3rd lost to a deliberate slap down isn’t a bad return. Nice contribution from Weepu too, very composed and (for him) sharp.
And nice to see the Wallabies finish strongly as well. Now if they can only work this week on creating space for Ioane then we will have something more exciting to watch…
September 10th 2012 @ 10:46am
Johnno said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:46am | Report comment
I don’t mean by delibritley throwing matches but i think Argentina’s 1st priority is to win home matches, and if it means giving a player a rest a star like no 8 lobbe they will rest him if it means he will be fresh and firing at home.
-And fans in Argentina can take the away losses fo rnow , they are not the AB’s who have to win all matches, but winning at home vs the Boks and Wallabies or Drawing, is non negotiable no losses ot those 2 teams will be acceptable at home.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:26am
Tigranes said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
Johnno the Pumas didnt really concede in the game against NZ.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:36am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Johnno, they will think that they can beat the Wallabies, even before the horrible injury toll. ever met any south american people. tThey don’t lack self belief or do “backwards” on the footy field. also, they are on their best behaviour in their first year. they have jsdut been invited into the neighbours house for the first time. they are not about to have a dump on the cream carpet!!!!!, if you know what I mean. And Sanzar would be ropable if they tried it.
The Wallabies are very vulnerable. Injuries, tough opposition in the AB’s and some average performances have seen to that. they are there for the taking.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:48am
Johnno said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:48am | Report comment
True LAS South Americans fire up and have huge self belief and go hard. Wallabies are injured and vulnerable, argentina also had a tough match vs argues so will be tired. I agree SANZAR would be ropable. but they SANZAR can accept argentina losing away from home as the boks and wallabies are no better away from home on the road too.
-I think SAZNAR would be very ropable and worried if Argentina fail to be competitive at home and that means winning at least 1 win at home but 2 preferably.
But Argentina showed vs South Africa and past history they are a different animal at home very very tough to beat at home.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:31am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:31am | Report comment
aint that the truth……I was very impressed with how they took the game to the AB’s and questioned everything that the ABs tried to do. the yellow card was rubbish.
BTW, 300 reads and counting in first 2 hours.
September 10th 2012 @ 11:31am
patonga said | September 10th 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
If you look at the wallabies last test against the All Blacks and the yellow carding of Genia, it was at around the same time with
the Pumas .. it totally made the game open up for the All Blacks in attack. i wish neither would have happened so that it was 15 against 15,,,,
Can anyone tell me WHEN IS AN ALL BLACK GOING TO BE SENT OFF OR YELLOW CARDED???
September 10th 2012 @ 11:50am
John Doe said | September 10th 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
When they do something to warrant it is my guess. The Argentinian forward was off-side and the attempt “intercept” was definitely cynical. If it had been Ritchie M I bet you folk ’round here would be calling it the most disgraceful act ever conducted on a rugby field.
September 10th 2012 @ 5:34pm
Jack said | September 10th 2012 @ 5:34pm | Report comment
Richie was penalized twice in 10 minutes inside the 25 for failing to release the tackled player and laying on the wrong side. Deliberate and professional. Wasn’t evened warned. Its not Richie that drives people nuts its the ref’s deference to him.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:15pm
Jerry said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:15pm | Report comment
McCaw was penalised twice in the match (once in each half) 1 for not rolling away and 1 for breaking early on a scrum.
The Argentinians gave away 3 penalties in their own 22 in the space of about a minute prior to the yellow card with the 3rd being a blatant slap down of a pass with a clear overlap. It’s pretty much a textbook professional foul and it’s absurd that anyone could argue with it.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:18am
Lucky Escape said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
They should get rid of Barnes and put in Mike Harris who can also kick goals with pinpoint accuracy but can run with ball in hand better than Barnes. Or move Adam-Ashley Cooper in one spot and bring in Nick Cummins at centre.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:41am
Sailosi said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Barnes provides zero. He has no ability to provide time and space to himself or those around him so he has to kick. He lacks size which means under pressure and when isolated he has to kick or pass because he never wins a contact situation. His kicking and passing under pressure is poor. He can’t pass to his right hand side with any confidence. He lacks pace which means once again under pressure or with no other option he has to kick. He’s a terrible ball distributor and lacks clear decision making with limited time.
Can Ben Tapuai please be selected
September 11th 2012 @ 5:51am
mick-e said | September 11th 2012 @ 5:51am | Report comment
Your assessment of Barnes is drivel.
Cant make breaks, no pace, never wins a contact situation. Drivel, drivel drivel. O’Connor lacks size, but he and Barnes dont lack guts.
And Tapuai for the Wallabies? No Tapuai is a provincial player only-ditto Harris, ditto the Honey Badger. Oh but Harris and Tapuai are Queenslanders-of course.
Barnes is a defector so must be blamed for every weakness in the Wallabies- mental and physical. Remember how Sharpie was the target of vitriol when he “defected.” Lets wait and see what happens to Higgers. Its garbage. Dont see much criticism of Genia coming from Queenslanders but he was hopeless against the ABs and improved but was no worldbeater against the Boks.
Barnes has proved himself at the highest level. He makes quite a few good breaks if you watch him closely but the support play of the Wallabies is frequently poor. A grubber of his didnt come off when nothing was on but how many stupid little grubbers and attempted re-gathers which are fluffed has Beale tried.
The fact the author of this piece blames Barnes for a kick and retrieve kick off shows how absurd some of the criticism of him is. Dan Carter does the kick and retrieve re-start frequently and frequently the ABs win the ball. The fact the Wallabies dont even know whats on shows how dumb they can be, not that Barnes chose the wrong option.
September 11th 2012 @ 7:12am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:12am | Report comment
I am critical or Barnes and Im a waratahs fan……He had some good games again the taffies but either side of that, either for the tahs or the Wallabies, he has been mindlessly kicking way too much
September 10th 2012 @ 11:42am
sittingbison said | September 10th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
AAC doesn’t pass the ball. Cannot play 12
September 10th 2012 @ 10:37am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:37am | Report comment
cummins is a winger first and starting at 13 is a tough one for a first test. But, Inman has also been on fire for the students. Big and quick.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:41am
tubby said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:41am | Report comment
I cannot see how deans can share the frustration with the poor kicking choices. There’s no way he could be picking the same player over and over who refuses to follow the plan with such poor results. what coach would put up with that?
would still love to know what sharp was thinknig when he decided he’d rather be part of the springbok lineout. trying to block for the planned maul? he thought he’d set off early for when barnes would inevitably kick it away?
boks have a serious issue though, the forwards simply weren’ that effective in barging ahead, and the backs never looked like threatening the line. Even when mvovo had 20 metres and a support player with only AAC ahead they managed to blow it. Goosen has hopefully done enough to get a start with lambie at 15. between them they can create opportunity that steyne and kirschner never will.
September 10th 2012 @ 10:47am
Justin2 said | September 10th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
But Barnes is reliable…
September 10th 2012 @ 11:38am
Sailosi said | September 10th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Yes, you can rely on him to kick possession away and ignore a 3 on 1 overlap.
September 10th 2012 @ 11:52am
Justin2 said | September 10th 2012 @ 11:52am | Report comment
Sail – that was a sarcastic post. Its what all Barnes fans use as an argument to justify his selection.
Someone on here last week suggested he was an “absolute necessity” to start in the 15 at Test level!
September 10th 2012 @ 12:46pm
Sailosi said | September 10th 2012 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
Justin2, I realised that. I mentioned on another post, what is it with Aussie rugby supporters that when somebody dull, conservative, unimaginative and kicks a lot comes along people always say he’s suited to test rugby he must play.