Lessons learned by the Wallabies, perhaps?
By Brett McKay, 11 Sep 2012 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, wallabies
109 Have your say
Wallaby Kurtley Beale speaks with teammate James O'Connor and coach Robbie Deans.
Related coverage
When I was a boy, I can vividly recall my grandmother issuing me with the same “unless you’ve got something nice to say, say nothing at all” advice that I’m sure thousands, millions of grandmothers have given to their grandsons the world over.
To which I’ll just say that it’s a good thing the Wallabies discovered the error of their ways in the second half on Saturday night in Perth, otherwise my column today would’ve been pretty brief.
(As an aside, on current form, I’m sure a blank screen about the Wallabies would still produce debate!)
Plainly, the first half wasn’t good enough. It was worse than that; it was total crap. It got so bad at one stage that I genuinely thought I’d see ‘grubber kicks’ and ‘WTF!’ appearing in the national trending lists on Twitter.
Every person with a keyboard was using the same three-letter-acronym to question what the bloody hell the Wallabies were doing.
Wallabies coach Robbie Deans’ observations of the first half were interesting in that his message and demeanour broke new ground.
In that thirty second grab, I reckon we saw Deans the most frustrated and most brutally honest he’s ever been in a match situation:
“Yeah obviously [we were kicking poorly and giving away cheap ball], we had something like eight very average exits from our end… we were carrying it to the edge and then putting silly, dribbly kicks in behind giving up possession at the wrong end of the ground.
“So if we can take that out of our game, we’ll go a long way toward being able to get into the game, build some pressure, and get an outcome. Because when we built pressure, we did profit.”
Well said, coach. Finally. I’m still a bit worried that what obviously wasn’t a tactic was utilised numerous times in that opening forty by default.
The fact that Berrick Barnes, Kurtley Beale and Quade Cooper kept persisting with that “silly, dribbly kick” says that the actual tactics were either being ignored completely, or worse, had been forgotten.
The logical conclusion to that sort of evidence is that Deans’ message is not getting through. And if that is the case, there’s generally only one outcome.
Fortunately, the halftime message and the associated paint-stripping spray that you’d hope Deans delivered did get through to the players, and we saw a completely different side in the second half.
The question now becomes have the Wallabies finally learned the lesson that possession is the key to winning games of rugby?
The forwards were strong in the contest this time around, and Sitaleki Timani – who will miss the Argentina game now with a hamstring strain – once again led the way here along with Tatafu Polota-Nau.
Radike Samo was surprisingly effective at no. 8 and played a game well beyond his years and relative fitness levels.
Scott Higginbotham will once again come into calculations to regain the blindside flanker’s berth, and Michael Hooper just did brilliantly what he’s been doing all year.
Liam Gill, too, impressed in his short burst.
The backline makeup is still something of a lottery, though.
If Barnes is truly ignoring the gameplan and persists with kicking away ball like he did in the first half, then his position in the team is bordering on untenable.
But then when you factor in his six-from-six night from the kicking tee, and the fact that Cooper’s general kicking in play doesn’t have anywhere hear the length that Barnes does, the issue becomes somewhat clouded.
Ben Tapuai will see his name thrown up a lot this week, and there probably isn’t a better running inside centre in Australia.
However, he doesn’t have a kicking game at all, and as we saw in Sydney at the start of The Rugby Championship, it puts too much pressure on the individual going into a game as the sole kicker.
Pat McCabe came through his 30-minute ACTRU grand final cameo unscathed, and will undoubtedly be thrown back into the mix too, but he brings the same non-kicking issue to the selection table as does Tapuai.
Therefore, it might be a case that Mike Harris is the one to come into the side, unless – and this might ruffle some feathers – Barnes holds his place. That wouldn’t be a popular scenario, but it shouldn’t be discounted, either.
One change that will have to be made is at scrumhalf, where the decisions of the past to keep backups on the pine for all 480 minutes of the previous six Test matches is about to come home to roost.
Before going off on Saturday night, Will Genia’s only spell had been the ten minutes he spent in the sin bin in Auckland.
Now an anterior cruciate ligament rupture has been confirmed for Genia, and a rehabilitation period that will include a good chunk of next year’s Super Rugby tournament has been locked in.
In turn, Australia must now play out the Rugby Championship, including upcoming tours to South Africa and Argentina with the third best scrumhalf in the country (with ten minutes of rugby under his belt in the last two months) and a guy not seen in these colours since 2006.
Aside from the evident captain’s curse, spare a thought for Nic White.
My understanding of his situation is that after being ruled out of the first Bledisloe with a shoulder complaint, White was then asked to go back a prove his fitness with Queanbeyan.
He duly did, and indeed, kicked them into a semi-final on the back of 80 dominant minutes.
He was then overlooked for the South African Test again as a reward, and with no apparent objection or suggestion otherwise, he had a shoulder reconstruction last Thursday.
His Wallaby experiences in 2012 are boggling many a mind currently.
All in all, this presents an interesting week ahead in Wallabyland.
Combinations are going to be pushed out of their current ‘makeshift’ status by sheer necessity, a more forwards-laden method of making metres might be preferred out of a lack of trust that the backs know what they’re doing, and no-one will be volunteering to be named Captain.
Brett McKay is a former non-tackling scrumhalf and not-quite-1st Grade middle order stalwart. A rugby and cricket expert for The Roar since July 2009 (having joined in Sept 2008), Brett has written for Inside Rugby and Cricket Australia, and is also PLAY Canberra's rugby correspondent. He tweets from @BMcSport
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, wallabies


September 11th 2012 @ 7:12am
moaman said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:12am | Report comment
Excellent post as always Brett. The dire mood that has prevailed on the Roar in recent weeks has left me somewhat bemused and less interested than usual.So it is refreshing to read something more….reflective.I confess to have missed the final 20 minutes of the Aus-RSA game having nodded-off one time too many during the 1st 60 minutes I decided to skip the end.
I’m glad that you described (at least the 1st half) it as “total crap”—I wouldn’t have been so generous!
On the Genia thing….I expect people will jump on the bandwagon and heap more scorn on Deans but I have some sympathy with a coach who opted to keep one of his few so-called world-class players on the pitch during a series of games where he(Deans) had a metaphorical axe hovering over his head.I am fairly certain he would have been castigated for subbing Genia just as he will now reap criticism for not cultivating his deputy.
BTw…I personally don’t think Genia has been playing up to his reputation.
September 11th 2012 @ 8:39am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Moa, the use of Genia was a question that I put to Deans in my interview back before TRC began, which we ultimately (unfortunately, perhaps, in hindsight) left on the floor. By that stage, Genia had played all 320 minutes of Test Rugby, and I asked if it was a reflection on Genia’s importance to the team, or a lack of confidence in the backups (White and Phipps, at that stage).
Deans admitted that it wasn’t really a plan, that Genia would play every minute, but just the way the games panned out, which I suppose is a fair enough call, and I agree with your point. Interestingly though, Deans admitted that their management of Genia has to extend to the training track, too, where Genia really wants to dominate proceedings and run the show, like all good halfbacks do. The rest of his answer was essentially coach-speak (‘manage his workload’, ‘important player’, ‘opportunities for others’ etc), and that was why we didn’t use it.
Of course, it’s all bloody relevant and topical now, isn’t it!!
September 11th 2012 @ 9:24am
sheek said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Moaman,
I hope you had a good excuse to nod off other than the quality of rugby on display – like a good belly full of beer, wine & steak!
September 11th 2012 @ 7:33am
Mals said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:33am | Report comment
Since his concussion issues surfaced Barnes looks reluctant to run the ball & go into contact. Hence the dribble kicks.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:32am
M.O.C. said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
I wondered the same – why else go to such lengths to avoid collisions in a contact sport. If this is the case, I wonder if it is time to hang up the boots?
September 11th 2012 @ 12:36pm
Ralph said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
I did hear something months back to the effect that one good spinoff from Sonny Bill Williams boxing experience – it made him unafraid of contact.
September 11th 2012 @ 7:34am
wal said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
Your post is…same ol same ol!, you guys keep pulling out players names that have been ineffective to a way rugby should be played…boring!
September 11th 2012 @ 8:40am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
don’t let fear hold you back Wal, who’s your alternates for effective non-boring rugby??
September 11th 2012 @ 7:36am
Darwin Stubbie said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:36am | Report comment
‘the actual tactics were either being ignored completely, or worse, had been forgotten.’ …. Hmmm I’d actually say that it would be worse the other way around… forgetting you could almost put down to pressure and clicking into a dumb default mode … But if they’re not bothering to take in what Deans is trying to say and going out there thinking they know what’s best and doing their own thing – then it is basically rebellion …
September 11th 2012 @ 7:47am
moaman said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:47am | Report comment
DS–If it is ” rebellion …” I wonder if Deans has the mandate anymore to clear out the ‘ring-leaders’?
September 11th 2012 @ 8:46am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:46am | Report comment
Darwin, it might be a six-of-one/half-a-dozen-of-the-other case, in all honesty. Whether they’d forgotten the game plan in the opening exchanges, or ignored them is probably immaterial, the point is the plan wasn’t being followed, which we’re both suggesting is a major issue..
September 11th 2012 @ 12:01pm
El Gamba said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:01pm | Report comment
There’s certainly a bit of thought amongst some of the fringe players that Deans doesn’t know how to deliver a message to the Australian rugby mentality. I may not have put that well but you may work out what I mean!
September 11th 2012 @ 7:46am
Dasher said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:46am | Report comment
I thought Taps could kick and kick well…
September 11th 2012 @ 8:08am
Red Kev said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:08am | Report comment
Yes and No. Tapuai has a very slow kicking wind up which makes him a charge down waiting to happen when clearing – he has played at flyhalf (not at Super level) however and he is a left-foot kicker so is often used to kick by the Reds (especially this last season when so many flyhalves were injured), he just has to stand deeper to do it in general play.
I also take issue with this Brett “Cooper’s general kicking in play doesn’t have anywhere hear the length that Barnes does”. Barnes does not kick long, I would say they are close with Barnes a bit longer by maybe 5%. When Barnes kicks a penalty for touch he barely makes 20m, it’s a disgrace. The Wallabies would be better off without him.
September 11th 2012 @ 8:51am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Kev, I obviously haven’t been able to put the tape measure on the Cooper and Barnes kicks, but this is what I’m basing my assertion on:
Since Cooper has come back from his knee injury, he looks to me to be kicking with his weight going backwards slightly, which in turn means he’s kicking under the ball rather than through it, and thus his kicks look to be going higher, rather than longer.
Barnes kicks with a lower tragectory, and with his weight going forward, meaning he’s able to kick through the ball more.
When they’ve both kicked from similar positions on the field, Barnes to me, has been the one finding more territory. It’s not a scientific measure, granted, but I’ll stand by what I’ve seen and written today..
September 11th 2012 @ 9:20am
Markus said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:20am | Report comment
Barnes has also been managing to find the fullback or winger on the full with every single kick, making any extra territory gained on the kick itself fairly redundant.
September 11th 2012 @ 10:02am
Harry said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
I too have noticed that Cooper’s kicking game is one area where he has not got back to his best at. When he is at his best, IMO its superior to Barnes, who btw has kicked very poorly two tests running.
Time to axe Berrick. It wasn’t so hard with Rob Horne was it Dingo? Get Taps in at 12.
Another big problem – unfortunately Beale is still below acceptable fitness and condition, and as a result so is his general play. He was blowing hard after the first few minutes and showed nothing in attack – this is one of the resons why the backs lack penetration, as opposing teams know the risk of counter-attack is diminished when lardy Beale catches the ball (not a given), and won’t run.
Heard Morahan was on fire at club rugby on the weekend for Qld Uni – stick him in at 15 for this weekend, drop Beale and tell him to get properly fit if he wants to play for Australia. Running at the Argies for 80 minutes will be key to opening them up and beating them this weekend.
September 11th 2012 @ 10:03am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:03am | Report comment
see team below Harry – Barnes has gone to 15, Beale to the bench…
September 11th 2012 @ 10:15am
Jutsie said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Beale was the only one of the three getting any accuracy or distance with his clearing kicks but neither he nor cooper have been reliable with place kicking in the past so I can live with barnes at 15 (at least he wont drop any bombs although tbf beale only dropped one this week).
Cooper’s always had an issue with clearing kicks coming of the side of the boot but at the moment he isnt getting distance either which i think is due to the injury. His has a pop-gun action at the moment.
September 11th 2012 @ 10:38am
Harry said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
OK, he needs to try to link with Digby and Shipperly to get a genuine counter-attack running threat happening – or maybe we’ll see Quade back there a bit and Barnes in the defensive line. One area where Genia will be sorely missed is catching the high ball – Genia is very good, of these backs only AAC stands out as safe under the pill, and none of the forwards.
September 11th 2012 @ 7:53am
ohtani's jacket said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:53am | Report comment
What’s an exit? Is that a Deans-ism?
As ugly or as unconvincing as the victory was, it’s plain as day that the Wallabies believe they can beat the Springboks just as they believe they can beat the Welsh. They’ve got the wood over both teams. Shakey wood, but wood nonetheless. I don’t think the issue is kicking. It’s the quality of the kicking. Lynagh used to kick all the time but they were great kicks. The real problem is that they can’t turn territory into possession the way they’d like to because they’re still not a dominant pack. But they’re getting better, on the season at least. The Pumas ought to be physical and there could be a few more injuries if the Wallabies aren’t lucky.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:01am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
it’s definitely a Deansism, OJ, I can’t say I’ve ever heard coming out of your own 22 decribed as an ‘exit’ before. Stick it in the rugby dictionary..
Your point about shaky wood is valid, this was certainly win borne out of belief and will, rather than on current form. And all that makes this coming match against Argentina all the more interesting, because they’re still something of an unknown..
September 12th 2012 @ 3:48pm
Larry said | September 12th 2012 @ 3:48pm | Report comment
Brett I think you’ll find most average club teams work on their ‘exits’ and ‘exit patterns,’ it’s pretty standard terminology. You need to get your press pass upgraded!
September 11th 2012 @ 8:01am
Nick_Brisbane said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:01am | Report comment
Tap’s Wikipedia page describes him as having a strong left boot.
Ben Lucas can also play scrumhalf.
September 11th 2012 @ 8:09am
Riccardo said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Morning Brett,
This really was a game of 2 halves – I know – yawn.
To say the Wallabies were easily dominated by a less than credible Springbok effort in the first half would be generous.
Barnes and Cooper have got to stop kicking away possession. Genia’s box kicking is simply dreadful. They were, in short, clueless.
Mtawarira’s brain fade and departure no doubt helped but the Wallabies that came out for the 2nd half had some fight. AAC was outstanding again and his “double tackle” an apt demonstration of the required commitment.
After hanging on through some gritty defence at 19 each Alexander’s winning try was perhaps fitting. Hooper was outstanding again. Though Timani was excellent; he is having a good tournament. TPN also impressed as did the ageless Samo.
However the concern remains that the Wallabies are not achieving the “sum of their parts”, let alone exceeding them and Los Pumas will have targeted this game as potential points. Their pack is potent and they are improving every game they have in this competition. I reckon this weekend’s result could be closer still.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:06am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:06am | Report comment
Riccardo, that’s a fair point, the Wallabies seem to be winning games on individual ability rather than a true XV working as one, but nevertheless, it wins games. Agree this weekend coming could be very close, I refuse to believe the Pumas won’t be coming into theis game thinking they can cause an upset.
On box kicks, you compare Genia’s kick that Hougaard nearly took out of his hands, such was the degree of telegraph-ed-ness, and then look at Ruan Pienaar’s. I don’t know how he does it, but I don’t recall Pienaar ever having any trouble getting his away, so clean, so well-placed..
September 11th 2012 @ 9:36am
MAJB said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Brett,
Can’t agree that all of the Wallabies performance was one off and individual. Certainly this is situation with the inside backs. The team did put together a good defensive game, same as for the previous ABs test. Defence will win games. The forwards are starting to work better as a unit in the attacking phases. When Deans get the right inside back combination the Wallabies will be a potent side.
September 11th 2012 @ 10:02am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
no, not ‘all’ MAJB, just bits as you’ve identified yourself..
September 11th 2012 @ 8:38am
Sam said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
My clearest memory on Saturday night was the pace at which the ball cleared from the ruck. No dithering at base was noticeable and appreciated.
RE: kicking. Between the two of them there should be enough nous from Cooper and barnes to secure a good kicking game. The rules around that are kick to secure touch ( and that must be coupled with an offensive strategy to attack opposition lineout ball) in the vein of a dan Carter, Paul McLean style 5/8 or kick to where the opposition ain’t and that is done by sleight in the depth of kick or banana angle or however you mix it up so
that any opposition player must run a minimum Of 10 meters to reach it.
My final request of wallabies is in the final 30 minutes of game and especially in opposition 22 only use jumper #2 in lineout. We simply cannot afford to lose any of our throws into the lineout ever.
One other peeve of mine with wallabies is lineout
September 11th 2012 @ 9:08am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
“kick to where the opposition ain’t” that’d make a nice change, wouldn’t it Sam…
September 11th 2012 @ 12:01pm
Sam said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:01pm | Report comment
Indeed. It is scary and a real reversal that there are some rugby league kickers that find touch and kick more adroitly for territory than our union counterparts. And they don’t even get the benefit of contesting for the ball unless it has been a 40-20 kick. By their very naming and nature forwards lift when they are “going forward” on the back of hard won ball.
September 12th 2012 @ 12:34am
bennalong said | September 12th 2012 @ 12:34am | Report comment
Amen!
Another goodie for the forewards….”run at the gap not at the man”
Hooper does it, Alexander too
September 11th 2012 @ 8:48am
WQ said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Brett, I think you touch on the biggest issue with the Wallabies right now with your comment, “The fact that Berrick Barnes, Kurtley Beale and Quade Cooper kept persisting with that “silly, dribbly kick” says that the actual tactics were either being ignored completely, or worse, had been forgotten.”
They had not forgotten anything, they were blatantly taking the game into their own hands and ignoring the game plan and the wishes of the coach.
That has only happened as a result of two things:
1 – They have no faith in the Coach and there is a player revolt happening that will slowly unfold in front of us as Robbie Deans tenure comes to a painfully slow death destroying both him and the Wallabies along the way.
2 – These particular players believe they are bigger than the team and their actions are beyond reproach.
Moaman asks a pretty good question above and I believe it leads us to just where this will all end up. He asks “I wonder if Deans has the mandate anymore to clear out the ‘ring-leaders’?” Well I think the answer to this is clearly – no
If he had the support from the heavies it would already have been done. These players have done this repeatedly over a period of time now and they are still there. I suppose the other possibility is that Robbie Deans does not have the kahunas to rock the boat, either way it is not long now and the Wallabies will have a new Coach.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:11am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:11am | Report comment
WQ, I hate to bring up the ‘cattle’ argument again, but that would also be a major factor preventing any requirement for clean-outs. Especially this year, given the injury toll to midfield options.
As I mentioned in the piece, if it is the case that game plans are being ignored, then there really is only one likely outcome…
September 11th 2012 @ 9:53am
WQ said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
Brett you are right re the shortage of obvious replacements, however it seems to me that Robbie Deans is dying a slow death regardless.
Given the amount of support on the Roar, which I believe represents the thoughts of your average Wallaby fan, he at least would have gained quite a bit of public support for taking a stand. Not sure that would have produced a win against the Springboks though, so I do understand it is a double edged sword.
As moaman has pointed out, does he have the backing to make a stand?
September 11th 2012 @ 10:01am
Brett McKay said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
it’s just one of many $64 questions within Australian rugby currently, WQ..
September 11th 2012 @ 10:13am
borri said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Most average wallaby fans support deans, your wallaby die hard supporters want to sack any coach after their first loss
September 11th 2012 @ 10:47am
formeropenside said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
IN which case, they have been pretty patient then – how many losses to the AB’s now? Scotland, Samoa, RWC, Grand Sham…
September 11th 2012 @ 11:59am
borri said | September 11th 2012 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Its footy, you don’t win every game. Both those losses against Samoa and Scotland where b teams that we put out to play against their best. That is a fact. The all blacks are better than us. That is a fact. But many wallaby die hards don’t care. SACK THE COACH, SACK THE COACH, SACK THE COACH, SACK THE COACH. Madness. the funniest part is they want Ewan to take over after one super 15 win compared to how many of Robbies. That’s the part I find the funniest.
September 11th 2012 @ 1:58pm
Markus said | September 11th 2012 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
borri, the Wallabies A team lost to Scotland too.
And to England’s touring B team. And got the biggest pasting in Wallabies history (v Boks in 2009).
Don’t win every game? I’d be happy if they could manage every 2nd game.
September 11th 2012 @ 5:05pm
borri said | September 11th 2012 @ 5:05pm | Report comment
Markus, games we lost in 2009 are pretty much ancient history (Scotland, England and Boks) I fail to see their relevance in 2012. Sorry mate build a bridge and get over it.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:37am
M.O.C. said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Could you imagine what would happen if an AB ignored the game plan of Graham Henry (tough old school headmaster)? Would the dressing-room TV cameras reveal a player pants down getting the cane? Either way, I am sure no-one would be game to ignore his game plans. Toughen up Dingo – threaten to take away their hair gel or Twitter access perhaps.
September 11th 2012 @ 11:14am
Jutsie said | September 11th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
I think its more to do with all three are low on confidence to chance their arm and take the ball to the line, QC and barnes due to recent knee and head injuries respectively and beale because he has had a few shockers in succession and has lost belief in his own ability. When the pressure is on they are taking the easy option instead of the correct one.
But I must add cooper wasnt the main culprit and apart from a few poor clearing kicks had an ok game for his 2nd game back from injury. The few grubbers he put in actually threatened the springbok line unlike the ones beale and barnes put through.
September 11th 2012 @ 12:24pm
jeznez said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
Beale has had busted ribs – I’d almost guarantee they are still not healed and hence his reluctance to take contact and tentativeness under the highball. Couple that with poor fitness so that a skilful player makes basic handling mistakes. Let him go and try and get himself right for the November tests.
September 11th 2012 @ 2:01pm
WQ said | September 11th 2012 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
If that is the case jeznez, then how bloody stupid is that!
He should not be playing any Rugby let alone Test Rugby, I suspect they are the reasons that led to the drop in form, however it is the mental residue of those things that are still holding him back.
Either way it would be hard to deal with whilst playing Test Rugby.
September 12th 2012 @ 12:51am
bennalong said | September 12th 2012 @ 12:51am | Report comment
You’re absolutely right Jutsie
The games against the AB’s killed their confidence, as anyone with a brain could see. In both games the AB’s were offside or near it and denied the backline any time or space.
Barnes has been the play caller and principle kicker which has not been done before. The theory that its due to his knee is highly possible
Also, it’s not like there’s a set backline that could be in collusion like at the Brums with Nucifora. Quite the opposite
The team is a patch up and even McCabes return could well be shakey, too
The injury rate is the main cause of the team’s failure