Wallabies take a step in the right direction
By Uncle Argyle, 11 Sep 2012 Uncle Argyle is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Kurtley Beale, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies
Wallabies coach Robbie Deans celebrates the win with his players (Image: AAP)
Related coverage
“That’s one small step for a man and one giant leap for mankind”. I am not sure if the late Neil Armstrong ever thought that, 43 years later, those words would be used to describe the present state of Australian rugby.
The victory over the Springboks in Perth on Saturday night was by no means a classic.
However it was potentially a launching pad for Australian rugby.
While some were over the moon with the victory, there was much to dislike about Australia’s performance.
While the game itself may reinforce Australia’s recent domination of South Africa, it also illustrated that the Wallabies are essentially about a 50 to 55 minute team and go missing for about 20 to 25 minutes per game.
It is usually this window that the All Blacks exploit and seal their victories. On Saturday night, that 20-odd minute window was the latter half of the first half.
With Tendai Mtawarira in the ‘sin bin’ for the last eight odd minutes or so of the first half, Australia failed to take serious advantage of the extra man.
Although Berrick Barnes added six points off his boot in that period Australia never really threatened with ball in hand.
South Africa upped the tempo and Australia looked threatened at times. This is an area where Australia must become more ruthless and mentally attuned to if we are to improve.
It was a gift period to which we did not fully exploit. Think what the All Blacks would have done with such a gift?
Australia looked lost in attack for much of that first half.
With the ever present chip-kick, I was seriously considering switching over to the Freemantle-Geelong clash as at least their kicks add value to the overall game.
I persisted and it appears so did Robbie Deans. I think his half time description of ‘silly dribbly kicks’ was an apt description.
It did leave me pondering what the All Blacks may have done to Australia given the same amount of unnecessary turn over ball?
Australia took too many poor options in attack, and against a higher quality opposition the game could have been taken away from us.
The positive was the victory itself, coupled with some magnificent defence. This was best illustrated by Adam Ashley-Coopers dual tackle on Mvovo and De Villiers in the second half.
Although it did appear high, it did show Ashley-Cooper’s commitment in stopping the raid and inspired his team on.
Prior to the game Wallaby legend Tim Horan spoke about how in 1992 at Newlands, Willie Offahenague’s hit on Uli Schmidt changed the nature of the game.
Horan believed Australia would be looking towards a similar inspirational moment and for me that tackle was it. It set a tone that Australia was willing to fight, to go the extra mile to get the job done.
In the second half the Australians took the ball to the line, cleaned out with commitment and reaped the reward.
Liam Gill and Scott Higginbotham were both effective as substitutes after impressive efforts by Sitaleki Timani and Radeke Samo.
Dennis, toiled in tight and did some very good work in the line-out taking six off Australia’s throw.
Nathan Sharpe was inspirational and was supported in patches by Polotau-Nau, Alexander and Slipper.
Benn Robinson to me is still a mystery. I am not sure what value he added to the performance and I am still waiting for Greg Holmes to be called up.
There have been many who thought Dom Shipperly was not up to Test match rugby.
I hope his solid debut on Saturday night dispelled that unwarranted criticism. While Digby Ioane is by far our most potent running back it was Shipperly who came off his wing looking for work while holding up his end of the bargain on the wing.
Australia must find a way to get Ioane more involved in the game. Quade Cooper was competent however his great mate Kurtley Beale again failed to fire.
I would like to see Luke Morahan be given an chance at fullback as Beale was awful in his efforts to take the high ball and offered little to nothing in attack. Morahan should be given more opportunity given his Super Rugby form over the past two seasons.
With Will Genia out for six months the mantle will fall heavy on the shoulders of Nick Phipps.
I think he will step up however with Nic White also unavailable perhaps a Josh Holmes or Brendan McKibbon may find themselves in Wallaby gold in the not too distant future.
A fantastic opportunity for young half backs in this country to have a crack.
While happy for the win that ensured the Wallabies remain ‘The Buzz Aldrins’ of world rugby for now, I think we have a long way to go before we can seriously threaten New Zealand.
However a small step was taken in the right direction in Perth and who knows where it will take Australian rugby?
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (406)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (246)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (237)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (232)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (158)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (200)
- Well, that’s almost done it for the Tahs (169)
- Rebels upset Tahs 24-22: dash finals hopes (65)
- Chiefs grind down Crusaders to win 28-19 (24)
- Reds back to scene of Super triumph
- White’s Brumbies desperate for a win (5)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (158)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (200)
- Has McKenzie cost Cooper the Lions Tour? (120)
- Does Quade Cooper really matter? (28)
- Rebels vs Waratahs: Super Rugby live scores, blog (415)
- Chiefs vs Crusaders: Super Rugby live scores (182)
- Can the Wallabies bash the Lions tight five? (50)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Kurtley Beale, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies


September 11th 2012 @ 7:28am
Mals said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:28am | Report comment
Will Benn Robinson haters give it a rest?!? He’s the best set piece prop in Australia.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
September 11th 2012 @ 7:33am
formeropenside said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:33am | Report comment
This was last true a few seasons back.
September 12th 2012 @ 9:27am
jameswm said | September 12th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
Nah still true. He’s the best scrummaging loose head prop we have. He used to be a menace round the field too, I can only assume he isn’t fit yet.
September 11th 2012 @ 7:50am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:50am | Report comment
i’m usually a barnes fan but what the hell was he thinking? short grubber kicks when the opposition isnt rushing up means they just stop and gather up the ball. barnes needs his head examined. from deans comments this wasnt part of the game plan yet barnes persisted with the dumaz kix.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:51am
M.O.C. said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
I think that is the point Mania, he DOES need his head examined. (by a Neurologist) He has suffered from multiple, severe head injuries and is now rightly afraid contact and avoids it at all costs. Time to cease playing contact sport both for his and Wallaby fans’ benefit.
September 11th 2012 @ 10:01am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
MOC – unfortunately what you say maybe true
September 11th 2012 @ 12:29pm
Sage said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
I agree MOC
September 11th 2012 @ 7:54am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 7:54am | Report comment
not a quade fan but his presence made all the difference between the 2 teams. his standing flat on attack was a challenge to the boks to come stop me and they tried yet quade would cleverly move the point of attack just before getting hit. quade showed courage and discipline.
shipperly showed a hunger to get ball that impressed.
sharpe is as wily as he’s ever been
September 11th 2012 @ 11:08am
WQ said | September 11th 2012 @ 11:08am | Report comment
mania, I don’t think he had as big an influence on the game as Hooper/Timani/Samo giving them some go forward.
With Cooper’s skills he will always perform given the right platform. Same goes for Genia and his supposed increase in speed clearing the ruck, if the forwards create the momentum the quick rucks have a tendency of just happening.
September 11th 2012 @ 11:19am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 11:19am | Report comment
wq – qc was still more of a threat than barnes was. even without moving quade presented better options where he stood than barnes. qc was on the line enticing the boks defenders to chase him down. with barnes all they had to do was send one defender up and the rest could hang back and wait for the kick. in fact they were all hanging back but barnes still tried to grubber it in behind them. someone needs to tell barnes that putting the ball behind the line only works when the defence is rushing you.
yeah qc was no where near as influential as others that played that day but its refreshing seeing the aus 1st5 sit on the line the way he did, its a challenge to the defenders to ‘come get me’. when they did attack him he deftly offloaded the ball changing the point of attack. this gives much more options on attack…tho wb’s didnt make the most of it there is still hope for the future.
dont get me wrong i am so NOT a qc fan but i thought he brought something positive by where he stood.
September 11th 2012 @ 12:19pm
WQ said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
I don’t disagree with you mania and in fact support your comments about Cooper being on the line and forcing the Boks to have to make varying decisions about how they defended against him. I also support your point about the lack of questions that Barnes asked in the same position because he was so deep.
I suppose I was more coming from the direction that unless his Forwards created the positive momentum and genuine meters over the gain line, all of that would have meant nothing as he would have constantly been getting back foot ball.
September 11th 2012 @ 12:26pm
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
tru WQ- i however wasnt going that fundamental. of course its always about the forwards in rugby starting with the front row but i thought they were that much better served with qc as pivot as opposed to bb.
do agree tho that Hooper/Timani/Samo and even higgers provided more.
hooper i’m impressed with his attitude that no matter whats happening around him he still plays his game. imo the prefect team player.
samo i’m not a fan of usually, as he’s old and tends to dispear for large chunks. however he was all business in this game and had a high workload with good accuracy
timani – i’ll reserve judgement. saw a couple times he was caught out of position and put the wb’s under pressure. he did do some good things tho but needs to work on his accuracy
September 11th 2012 @ 2:16pm
WQ said | September 11th 2012 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
Hooper looks like the real deal to me and I don’t say this often but I would have preferred he had been born in Aotearoa.
He is not only hard on the ball, but can carry the ball and has an excellent shoulder in defence, He is certainly not a one trick pony.
I live in QLD so have a soft spot for Samo, thought he was outstanding against the Boks, but do agree he has a tendancy to go missing every now and then.
I quite like Timani and I think once he gets himself Test fit will be an excellent replacement for Vickerman. Needs work in a few areas, but he is big, tough and has a bit of mongrel, just whats needed in the powerhouse of the scrum!
September 11th 2012 @ 8:53pm
sph45 said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:53pm | Report comment
I’m glad Sharpe is in the team, he is in good form, he works hard, and should do a good job of captain. However, he was ill disciplined on Saturday night and gave away cheap penalties which became cheap points. Would be best if he could remove this unnecessary silliness – almost petulance – from his game.
September 11th 2012 @ 8:25am
Wayne said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
Giteau at 1st, Quade at 2nd (or vise versa). Easy. Time for Dingo to eat humble pie and get this team back in attack mode.
September 11th 2012 @ 8:26am
Riccardo said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:26am | Report comment
What is impressive Uncle is that the Wallabies appear to continue to have an advantage over the Boks, who I thought were average.
The Team that took the field in the 2nd half was a different unit, granted, and the Wallabies deserved their win.
The fact remains that the Wallabies were dominated in the 1st half. They continued to kick away possession and looked bereft of ideas. As you have also alluded to there were points there in the latter stages of the 1st half that weren’t taken.
With the injury toll mounting, this weekend against Los Pumas should be interesting. They were impressive last week and will present a different challenge for the depleted Wallabies this weekend. The Wallabies will need to be at their best from minute 1 to counter the immediate threat of the Pumas’ pack.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:02am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:02am | Report comment
riccardo – i wonder about this. vs the AB’s the boks turn up big time and take it to the blax. but vs aus they seem bored and unmotivated. WTF is up with that?
September 11th 2012 @ 9:14am
Riccardo said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
I know Mania.
I don’t get it either.
I cannot recall a fixture against the Boks where we haven’t had an arm-wrestle and yet we beat the Wallabies regularly, who, in turn, beat the Boks regularly.
OJ commented on another thread about the fact the Wallabies believe they can win against the Boks.
Surely it’s not as simple as that?
September 11th 2012 @ 9:42am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
yeah riccardo – every test vs the boks and the AB’s know they’ve played a hard side. yet when they play aus they seem to go easy on them. i know everyone lifts their game when they play the best but this is ridiculous.
back in 2009 when the boks totally dominated the AB’s they played averagely vs everyone else. dont have th stats for 2009 but i remember them losing a few EOYT games yet totally owned the AB’s that year. bizarre.
maybe it is just a simple case of self belief
September 11th 2012 @ 10:25am
ohtani's jacket said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
The Boks beat the Lions and almost swept the Tri-Nations that year. The end of year tour was their usual disappearing act.
I don’t know if it’s that uncommon to be able to dominate one side but not beat another. The All Blacks had 8 straight victories over the Springboks from 2001 to 2004 at a time where we had a losing record against the Wallabies.
September 11th 2012 @ 10:29am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
OJ – but that doesnt explain why the boks (seemingly) go easy of the wb’s. commentators, kearns i think, was going on about how boks like to bully sides. i didnt see any of that in the weekend but i can almost guarantee that boks will vs the AB’s
September 11th 2012 @ 10:33am
ohtani's jacket said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Aside from the extra motivation in taking on the old enemy and all their boyhood dreams about growing up and playing the All Blacks and all that, I think it’s the defensive system they employ against the All Blacks that frustrates us. The Pumas employed it to a certain degree in Wellington, putting pressure on the halves. You don’t see that kind of defence from the Wallabies generally and the Boks don’t seem to rush them. They should, but they don’t.
September 11th 2012 @ 11:14am
kingplaymaker said | September 11th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
OJ really it’s raw forward power which has been the only thing that disturbs this All Black team: hence the disruptive affect of South Africa, Argentina and France.
None of the three except occasionally France has the backline quality to capitalise on it however.
September 11th 2012 @ 12:39pm
Uncle Argyle said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
OJ,
The few times I’ve seen the All Blacks bothered is when they are up against a back row that can run. I will go as far back as 2009 in Dunedin when a young french bloke by the name of Louis Picomoles came on as a reserve 8 and just ran at the All Blacks. It had a big impact on the game which the French ended up winning.
Although loosing I thin 14-9 the next week in Wellington it was hardly a convincing All Black win. The French back row again in the 2011 World Cup Final were superb with ball in hand in a game they came very close to winning.
In 2011 in Brisbane a running Radeke Samo reaped the reward for actually running good lines at the All Blacks defence. I was not shocked to see Lobbe also had a good running game against the All Blacks.
Its clear when up against a good pilferer like Pocock the All Blacks team him out of the game. However As the evidence suggests when up against a good running back row the All Blacks can be rattled. I guess the morale of the story is get a back row running game going.
September 11th 2012 @ 8:41am
Jerry said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Uncle – Armstrong was supposed to say that but he messed it up and said “One small step for man” – no ‘a’.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:11am
Andrew C (waikato) said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:11am | Report comment
What’s the Australian Rugby Team and ‘mankind’ gotta do with one another; it’s like going to the zoo and saying “Where’s the Chimps’ cage?” and being shown the Giraffes !! …………. Get rid of John O’Neill, send him over here, we”ll put him in a time capsule (with Alan Jones – yet another jerk) and send them both to SpaceStationTimbuktoo !!
………… both teams in Perth were ordinary and I’m picking the All Blacks will finally click under the roofed-in stadium in Dundein and give the Boks a well-deserved thrashing (and that one will be for SuzyThe Waitress !!
)
September 11th 2012 @ 12:33pm
Sage said | September 11th 2012 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
and Mr Gonsky, Jerry
September 11th 2012 @ 8:42am
The Battered Slav said | September 11th 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
Agreed about the subs UA.
Particularly Higgers. I’ve been critical of Higgers recebtly, but his spell off the bench was great on the weekend. Perhaps that’s just how he operates at his optimum, off the bench.
Also agree with you about Fatcat. Finally Benny A has a sound game, we just need Fatcat to lift a bit and redoscover the form he had a year or two back. Super impressed with the forward effort though.
Hooper was immense. I reckon that when Pocock returns, he should be played at 6 with Hooper retaining the openside spot. I think with this balance, we may not need a traditional 6, as Pocock tackles hard and does a lot of tight stuff well, and with Hoopers more open running/passing game, it might be a good bet.
Anyone else on board with the Pocock/Hooper flanks combo, or am I as silly as a certain Mr Lord?
September 12th 2012 @ 9:31am
jameswm said | September 12th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Worth a shot BS. We do need an 8 who can jump though, which rules Palu out a bit. Higgers can do it.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:29am
sheek said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:29am | Report comment
Hi Uncle,
Of course, the chronology of Australian rugby has been the reverse of the Apollo program for quite some time.
Our version of “Houston, we have a problem”, translated as, “St.Leonard’s, we have a problem (or three, or 10),” long preceeded the one small step forward for the Wallabies last Saturday night.
September 11th 2012 @ 9:40am
gekko said | September 11th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
September 11th 2012 @ 10:00am
Morgan said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Backrow should be Higgers (6), Hooper (7) and Pocock (8). That much is clear. Dennis is a nice bloke.
Let Beale miss the rest of the season, including the European party in November. Put in a great season with the Rebels and then maybe get his spot back at 15 in the Wallabies. Use Morahan, JOC or Barnes at 15 for the remainder of 2012. Leave AAC at 13.
Selection is only one part of becoming a better team, the bigger issue is our style of play. The most obvious difference between the All Blacks and Wallabies is the support play. Until we learn how to offload in the tackle, to stretch the defence with one or two more passes before going to ground, before we learn to create fewer rucks per pass, we will always appear static and will continue to score tries.
September 11th 2012 @ 11:00am
WQ said | September 11th 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
Perhaps Morgan Australian Rugby needs SBW planted into the Reds for a season or two, become eligible for the Wallabies and then kick the s*#t out of the All Blacks using their own tactics against them?
September 11th 2012 @ 10:05am
mania said | September 11th 2012 @ 10:05am | Report comment
morgan – “The most obvious difference between the All Blacks and Wallabies is the support play.” more to the point the biggest diff is team work and team spirit. support play comes under this but is just one aspect of the AB’s team effort.
eg – pocock is the turn over king not only i the world but very much so for the wb’s. in the AB’s its everyones responsibility to turn over the ball. individually no one in the AB’s is better at turn over ball than pocock yet when playing vs the AB’s pocock is a non entity due to the teamwork the AB’s put up against him.
the diff i see on the field is the AB’s are willing to bleed for each other. i dont get the same feeling from the wb’s