With Del Piero on board, now’s the time for FTA television
By Tony Tannous, 12 Sep 2012 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, Alessandro Del Piero, Ben Buckley, FFA, football, SBS
Del Piero has signed with Sydney FC (Image: AFP)
Related coverage
If Ben Buckley wants to leave the game in a healthier state than it has been under his guidance, then he would do well to obtain a free-to-air TV element for this season, capitalising on the arrival of Alessandro Del Piero.
The talk around the traps is that Fox Sports want exclusivity for the upcoming season, which kicks off in just over three weeks.
Given that Fox signed a seven-year deal at the beginning of season two, they certainly should feel entitled to this.
The football team, led by producer Murray Shaw, have, in the main, done a great job, and they should certainly feel entitled to a sense of reward for backing the game at a time Frank Lowy needed the support.
History should judge Fox well for forking out $120 million over seven years, even if many fans of the game would suggest the length of the deal has actually impacted on the Socceroos in recent years.
The FFA, at the time, were certainly in no position to choose.
And many would argue, under the guidance of Buckley, they are in no greater position now.
But if there’s ever a time to get the product out to a broader market, beyond the reach of pay TV, it is now.
The arrival of Del Piero has been described in many quarters as a game-changer, and for many involved in the decisions that guide the future direction of the round ball code in Australia, this should mean being flexible and adaptable.
By having the A-League at least in part on a free-to-air network, most likely to be SBS, the local game would be in a position to touch the broader audience, aroused by the arrival of Del Piero next week.
Twelve months from now and who knows what the landscape will look like.
Certainly, it’s not a time for panic, but having Del Piero start at a time there’s a free-to-air element would help accelerate the growth of the game.
Indeed, in an ideal world, the deal being brokered now by Buckley and the likes of Fox and SBS should be short, no longer than three years.
With the AFL and NRL signing five year mega-deals, that would give football an opportunity to be ahead of the cycle by the time the next round of negotiations come around.
Strategically, that would allow the league some greater exposure in the short term, while Del Piero is in town, but it would also give incoming CEO David Gallop an opportunity to build something over the next couple of seasons that would be worth more in a few years.
By many measures Buckley’s rein at FFA will not be remembered fondly.
Chief among the failures has been a retreat out of Queensland, both in the north and south, and an inability to manage the game’s myriad of stakeholders, particularly the club’s owners.
Too often he’s barely been sighted, bunkered down at FFA headquarters.
The game’s been told this ‘low-profile’ is essentially so he can work on the next TV deal, the reason, we’ve been told, he was brought in.
If the sum of this work is a mere doubling of the deal to approximately $40 million dollars a season, as has been reported across the News Ltd network, then he will not be remembered for leaving a great legacy.
This is especially the case if you believe the suggestion in some quarters that there was a significantly larger offer on the table a couple of years ago.
But Buckley has a chance to change some of this legacy if he can somehow convince the folk at Fox to share at least a portion of their coverage with a free-to-air station this season.
Whatever that is, whether one game a week, live or delayed, or a highlights and analysis show, is better than nothing at all.
Certainly, the news that broke late yesterday that SBS had been granted the right to broadcast this morning’s World Cup qualifier in Amman, a hour delayed, points the way forward.
As I argued in this article almost two years ago, the more exposure football and the A-League gets in the mainstream, the more likely it is that people will want to sign up to Fox for more.
It’s an often-used cliche, but for the good of the game, it’s in everyone’s interests to come to the table and make it happen, particularly in light of the gift that has arrived in Del Piero.
Buckley still has time to make a mark.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
- Explore:
- A-League, Alessandro Del Piero, Ben Buckley, FFA, football, SBS

September 12th 2012 @ 7:28am
MV Dave said | September 12th 2012 @ 7:28am | Report comment
Hopefully SBS do get one game a week plus a highlights show in the next tv deal…the game needs the additional exposure and SBS at least have a history of supporting the game in Oz. However to get the full effect of the Del Piero signing the agreement needs to start this season…not sure if that will happen.
Exciting times ahead for the HAL in any case and look forward to the Melbourne Derby with 45,000 others at Etihad on Friday the 5th October when Victory belt Heart!
September 12th 2012 @ 7:45am
Kevin said | September 12th 2012 @ 7:45am | Report comment
Tony great piece, we can only hope that the a league and tv execs have something in between their ears…
Ten have SFA when it comes to prime time sport, but they are run by half wits, all they look at is ” non ratings period no thanks”
The A league sooner or later needs to bite the bullet and realize that exposure is key, off course no one goes to the games if no one even knows their on
SBS still have issues about being forgotten last time
September 12th 2012 @ 8:35am
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 8:35am | Report comment
Tony refers to a ” mere doubling of the deal to approximately $40 million dollars a season” – by any objective measure, a doubling in the value of the rights is a pretty good achievement.
The NRL achieved more than double, which was a very good outcome for them, but they had the runs on the board.
In previous years, the AFL has managed price increases in the range of 45% to 60% (there has been no doubling in the value in the past 20 years).
So clearly, a 100% increase to the FFA in the value of the TV rights is a very good result.
Ask the NBL whether they would gladly have taken a 100% increase, or many other sports that are basically getting zero dollars from TV.
Soccer fans need to approach this subject with some realism.
TC
September 12th 2012 @ 8:48am
JAJI said | September 12th 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Tony you make very good sense in most of your articles – however I cannot accept commentary from journlaists that a rise from 17 to 40 million a year (an increase of 135%) is disappointing given the financial disrepair the TV Industry is in at present. You will find this is very close if not better than the Rugby Union deal (hard to gauge accurate numbers as the $437 is split over 3 countries and Australia has the least demand of the 3 countries). I do know the Rugby Deal was a 30% increase – so you appear to be whinging about 135%?
I remind you the deal for season one of the A League was $750,000 and dont need to remind you what kind of dollars were running around in Soccer Australia days. A $40 million deal with SBS and Foxtel together is a very good result, will fully fund all salary cap at A League clubs and will stabilise our game going forward. To complete the picture better performances from our National Side would also help….
Remember Buckley inherited a very long 7 year deal only 1 year in. Maybe the 7 year deal was too long but they had to do the deal back then coming from $750,000 a year – hence the Socceroos were thrown in
September 12th 2012 @ 9:55am
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Jaji
I agree with your points, I have said something similar above, but some clarification on the numbers is warranted (and I am more a numbers man than a wordsmith).
While I too have always understood that the 7 year deal was worth $120 milion ($17,142,857 per annum), the latest reports actually described it as being worth $18 million per annum in cash terms, and $3 million in contra.
The deal currently being mooted, and to which Tony is referring, is touted as being $35 million per annum in cash terms and $5 million in contra (or $40 million in total).
So in cash terms, the value is going from $17 to $18 million per annum to $35 million per annum, which is double or a 100% increase (more or less).
It would be incorrect to see it as an increase from $17 million to $40 million – that’s the key point.
But agree with your points generally.
TC
September 12th 2012 @ 6:07pm
phutbol said | September 12th 2012 @ 6:07pm | Report comment
Excuse my ignorance, but contra is what exactly? Value of free advertising?
September 12th 2012 @ 7:04pm
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 7:04pm | Report comment
Yes, more or less, promotion, anything paid in-kind.
TC
September 12th 2012 @ 10:55pm
Kasey said | September 12th 2012 @ 10:55pm | Report comment
Yes when football fans complain about the “lack of promotion being done by FFA” they are usually fresh from viewing a FTA TV advert for one of the other sports, being paid for not by the AFL/NRL (they pay to create the ad) but part of contra is the commercial stations running promotions for their partners and giving it a dollar value.
September 13th 2012 @ 9:40am
phutbol said | September 13th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
So we can expect nobody to see FTA adds on SBS in the same way nobody sees the ads on Fox now?
Thats where FFA should get Ch10 involved. Dunno if its accepted practice but they could flip Ch10 a highlights package for nothing more than contra which also mentions the SBS live coverage… Or even if Ch10 wont cross promote SBS (given they arent a ‘real’ commercial rival it might be doable??) at least it puts the A-league presence on a ‘mainstream’ FTA channel….
September 12th 2012 @ 8:50am
Punter said | September 12th 2012 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Excellent article Tony, I agree that the deal should not be longer than 3 years, as seen by the signing of Del Piero for the game in this country will just grow. Importance to show both Socceroos (delayed) & A-League on FTA, if this was the main reason for the lesser amount $40M, than so be it. However, I think Buckley’s reign will not be remembered well. I understand he is there for the TV deal, but I wish Gallop would take over ASAP.
September 12th 2012 @ 9:36am
Fussball ist unser leben said | September 12th 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Nice article, Tony.
There seems to be no argument that the new deal will include:
1. Foxtel (all live)
- HAL: 135 H&A plus 5 finals
- AUS NT: 10-12 WCQs plus friendlies
2. SBS
- HAL (live): 27 matches plus 5 finals
- AUS NT (1 hr delay): 10-12 WCQs plus friendlies
Notes:
a) SBS will provide Foxtel with the feed from the match it broadcasts, which will reduces FoxSports’ HAL production costs by 20% p.a.
b) FoxSports will provide SBS with the feed from the AUS NT matches
The big, and most important, deal will be the “digital/online rights”. All indicators suggest that, by the turn of the decade (possibly sooner), online platforms will be the primary choice for accessing LIVE sport.
I’d like to see FFA aggressively enter this space with PayPerView for HAL charged at $100-200/yr (less than $2/match), which gives access to every HAL & AUS NT match.
Additionally, I think we’ll see every match played by the other AUS NT (women, u23, u20, u17 – male & female) streamed live on the FFA’s website – the FFA has already done this for AUS WNT matches & ABC & FFA will stream W-League matches live next season.
An exciting era awaits AUS football.
September 12th 2012 @ 9:09pm
theworldofando said | September 12th 2012 @ 9:09pm | Report comment
Hey Fuss, where did you get this information? What’s your source?
September 12th 2012 @ 10:06am
Futbanous said | September 12th 2012 @ 10:06am | Report comment
Money is only worthwhile if used wisely,that applies to all sports in Australia not just football.
Its obvious that money, or lack of it invested in football in the past is now biting it on the bum. It will be given soon more money than its had before.
Other countries have been developing our top players for a while now,to suddenly exclaim suprise that these aging stars arent being easily replaced by “ready to step up” players produced in Australia,well its not rocket science to see why this is the case.
I remember thinking that amidst the euphoria of the 2006 WC,the day of the Guus & the second round appearance,that it placed a ridiculous expectation on future Socceroo teams.
Quite simply football was not yet that advanced in Australia & the “made overseas” Aussies were carrying the buckets to water the garden.
Their buckets have aged & are full of holes.
Pim saw the buckets wearing down & got the Socceroos playing accordingly.
Holger was supposed to repair the buckets & get the garden growing again.
Impossible task.
Question’s are can we qualify for the 2014 WC with the players we’ve got?
If we get there is their more 4-0 drubbings from the likes of Germany in store.
What is then going through Holger’s mind.
Do I Cast Lucas & co to the wind & bring in fresh blood because its touch & go anyway that we make the WC,better to build for the next one & the Asian Cup The following year.
What is going through the FFA’s mind.
Is it always more important to qualify regardless ,stuff the rebuilding,which if done right takes time.?
Lots of different pressures from all angles.
Personally whilst I supported the Socceroos long before the Roar,I feel we have to back off a bit about WC qualification. After all if your old enough you’ll remember the 32 barren years between the 1974 & 2006 World Cups.
I got more joy out of qualifying in 2006 than any WC appearance since.
Just appearing at a WC every 4 years wont grow football in this country.
What will is building a strong domestic league filled with home produced players of quality,that can be transferred & perform for top clubs in Europe straightaway. No bench sitters which is the present indicator of where the development of home grown players is at even at mediocre European clubs.
September 12th 2012 @ 10:29am
Tony said | September 12th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
{{ 32 barren years between the 1974 & 2006 World Cups.}}
You must be Old and wise anough to have gone through those year withought pulling out all your hair. Just 2000 loss in Quali to Iran was enough to make me cry. Can’t bear it more then that.
We should make it through WC qualification, provided we have a good coach. Good domestic need FTA tv broadcast so that everybody get to see the product they are showcasing. Otherwise why would you go to the game?
September 12th 2012 @ 12:11pm
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Tony
that loss to Iran was actually in 1997 (and strictly speaking, it wasn’t a loss as such).
TC
September 12th 2012 @ 1:34pm
AndyRoo said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
We went undefeated through that entire World Cup qualifying campaign and failed to qualify.
I wonder if that is a record?
September 12th 2012 @ 1:38pm
Matt F said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
I never thought og that. Quite possibly! Quite a remarkable stat. Then again NZ were the only undefeated team at the last World Cup…..
September 12th 2012 @ 10:36am
Midfielder said | September 12th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Tony
Great summary of BB’s time in charge…. if its 35 million cash 5 million contras as suggested in some quarters and no FTA this coming season then BB has failed totally …
If he fails this badley then question must be asked why he was resigned by the board…
September 12th 2012 @ 10:52am
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Midfielder
You will recall that you wrote a couple of articles on the potential value of the TV rights, and provided a financial model for working it out.
I actually agreed with your model overall, but I disagreed with some of your starting values.
I re-worked some of your values and assumptions, a couple of times from memory, and I could be wrong here, you might need to correct me, but my memory is that I kept coming up with a cash value of $33 mill to $34 mill, consistently.
The point I’m making is, even using your well thought out model, there is a basic value there, and it’s very, very hard for anyone to wring anything more than that – very, very hard.
Buckley has ended up getting what it’s worth, maybe a mill or two more.
No one could have done any more.
TC
September 12th 2012 @ 10:50am
Ian Whitchurch said | September 12th 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Pay TV to make money, free to air to grow the code.
Pay per view delivered via the internet, is a great business model – but it competes with “conventional” pay TV as it lets people who only want to watch one code unsubscribe from a generic sports package and buy only the code they like.
Bluntly, its either sign Fox Sports for guaranteed money or make pay-per-view available in Australia, but not both, because if you allow both, then people like Fussball will avoid paying Fox Sports to just buy what he wants, which is all association football all the time. Good if you’re him, bad if you’re Fox Sports.
A pay TV contract and match of the week on FTA, a weekly highlights show and the national team on delay is a great outcome for any code.
September 12th 2012 @ 12:21pm
Futbanous said | September 12th 2012 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
“National team on delay”
For any serious football fan,I dont think so.
In fact you could argue that its a backward step considering SBS showed the Socceroos live previously.
Ironic really that SBS had the rights, when apart from the final crunch match home & away and to a lesser degree NZ ,games against Western Samoa or Vanuatu just didn’t cut the mustard.
Now we’ve got genuine contests against Asian opposition for 14 or so matches for the WC let alone ACQ’s,its delayed on SBS.
A-League sure any free to air exposure is beneficial,but Socceroos delayed very poor effort.
Nothing worse than delayed telecasts,dont care what the sport.
September 12th 2012 @ 1:11pm
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
The delayed telecast is probably a bigger failing than the overall price of the TV rights (if what has been reported turns out to be correct).
Agree that any delay for sport is not really acceptable in the modern age.
My guess is that Fox were going to demand a massive price cut if anyone else was going to get to do live games as well.
Unfortunately, the FFA probably isn’t in a position to hang tough, and it was a case of take it or leave it.
One only needs to look at the NBL to see what happens when you leave it.
TC
September 12th 2012 @ 1:14pm
Matt F said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
I would imagine that the delay would have been at Foxtel’s request. Being the only network to show it “exclusively live” is a big plus for them and having SBS show it live would significantly reduce what Foxtel would otherwise be willing to pay
September 12th 2012 @ 1:16pm
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
Agreed.
TC
September 12th 2012 @ 1:27pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
“Agree that any delay for sport is not really acceptable in the modern age.”
I recall AFL matches are on delay on Ch7 on Friday night to allow them to screen “Better Homes & Gardens”
The AUS NT matches will still be live on Foxtel.
Would people rather have:
a) 1 hr delay on FTA Tv; or
b) Nothing on FTA Tv?
September 12th 2012 @ 1:37pm
justafan said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Better having the delay, I know plenty of people not on fox who would love to watch the socceroos so will watch on delay. For 1 hour do not find out the scores (no internet and so forth) and enjoy the game, better than at present which is nothing. Not everyone has or can afford foxtel.
September 12th 2012 @ 4:33pm
Ian Whitchurch said | September 12th 2012 @ 4:33pm | Report comment
Channel Nine routinely delays rugby league games as well.
Its one of those things that everyone hates, but at the end of the day we find acceptable.
September 12th 2012 @ 4:43pm
TC said | September 12th 2012 @ 4:43pm | Report comment
That’s right, it did happen, and fans jacked up.
It’s difficult because ch 7, for example, would happily return to showing a mainstream show like Better homes and gardens at the prime slot of 7:30 (huge ratings), and suffering a ratings drop for the footy on delay. From their perspective – it maxismises revenues.
From the fans perspective – it sucks.
September 12th 2012 @ 4:45pm
Nick said | September 12th 2012 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
Not anymore, Friday night, Saturday nights and Sunday AFL games are all live.
Only FTA AFL game not live is Saturday arvo on an hourish delay
.I watched the Jordan game on the 1 hour delay and unless you get nervous and check the scores it is as good as live anyway.
September 12th 2012 @ 4:19pm
Ian Whitchurch said | September 12th 2012 @ 4:19pm | Report comment
Futabanous,
I should have been clearer – I think the national team on delay on FTA and live on pay TV is a good compromise between wanting FTA exposure, and leaving some money on the table for the Pay TV company thats signing the cheques.
September 12th 2012 @ 1:39pm
AndyRoo said | September 12th 2012 @ 1:39pm | Report comment
I think it’s a fair balance in order to get the $$$ (only coming from Foxtel) and improve the situation for fans.
Your exactly right that serious fans won’t tolerate the 1 hour delay….. and that’s good as it justifies the $$$ from Foxtel.
I think the FTA replays will be a godsend for casual fans though especially for games that were on at 1 am. Little Billy can watch it before he goes to school.
After that Socceroos performance, detention won’t seem so bad.
September 12th 2012 @ 2:34pm
Lucan said | September 12th 2012 @ 2:34pm | Report comment
As a serious fan, I’ll happily tolerate the delay for the middle of the night/morning matches.
For the matches I want to watch live-live, I’ll get myself to the stadium or to a “Live Site” where I can enjoy it with fellow Socceroo supporters.
10-12 Socceroo matches does not justify a Foxtel subscription.
September 12th 2012 @ 4:40pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | September 12th 2012 @ 4:40pm | Report comment
“then people like Fussball will avoid paying Fox Sports to just buy what he wants”
The future is here. For the first time since cable TV started in the USA, total subscriptions numbers have fallen.
Derek Thompson, who is a senior business editor at “The Atlantic”, explores “The End of TV & the Death of the Cable Bundle” and concludes:
“The question isn’t really if the Internet’s unbundling revolution will visit the television industry but when.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/07/the-end-of-tv-and-the-death-of-the-cable-bundle/259753/
September 12th 2012 @ 12:11pm
nordster said | September 12th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
The more they can spread the league among many broadcasters the better. Now the fox exclusivity period is ending …which they absolutely earned the right to have for a period …the league can start to push into new delivery channels. (Perfect timing too if a little ahead of the curve.) Whether that be a free to air game on SBS, highlights on the ABC for a-league and w-league (?) or online direct subscriptions, its all good in the long run. The absolute clincher will be a second bidder for subscription TV games, one match on beIN sport is my hope. Al jazeera have a knack for pushing up the price a little where they bid for domestic leagues. Could be good for rugby league and union in the long run too.