Big changes in United States rugby
By Working Class Rugger, 14 Sep 2012 Working Class Rugger is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, US Rugby
Related coverage
During my time on The Roar, I have written a number of articles regarding the growth and development of rugby in the United States.
It would appear for the first time I may be writing about something negative occurring in terms of competition structures.
The Rugby Super League in conjunction with USA Rugby announced the disbanding of the Championship, dubbed the elite level of rugby in the United States, over its 16 year history.
The league has seen a steady decline over the past five or six years with team after team withdrawing as the expenses involved in participating the competition became too much for many clubs.
Yet, the competititon still it maintained its place until recently. A cog in the development machine lost. Or so it seems.
One of the major limitations for players in the RSL was the sheer lack of game time available within a strict structure, with many barely playing 10 games a season.
Far too few to develop talent to the level to provide the national team with the quality to compete.
So, where to now for senior rugby in the US and what is this silver lining?
Well, the RSL disbanding was actually in reaction to and in line with a complete restructure of the senior club structures within the USA.
As of next season (2013/14) divisions one and two will be structured into new geographical leagues and division three into more localised regional leagues. Part of the plan also allows for the emergence of a division four sometime in the future, creating greater depth in the club scene within the US.
In terms of the Super League most (not all) will participate in the new structures while those who choose not to will form their own schedules.
Each league will contain eight teams across eight individual leagues. The leagues will be then split into two distinct conferences, the National League (West) and the American League (East).
Each club will be required to play a minimum 14 league games with the top team from each league progressing to play off against other teams within their respective conferences to decide and conference winner.
The winners of each conference will then play in a final to decide the best team in the land. Simple enough to get one’s head around. All clubs will also be required to provide Sevens squads as well.
On top of this, a new cup competition will be established as the direct replacement for the RSL.
Dubbed the Elite Cup, it will initially contain the remaining seven RSL clubs plus Glendale.
Each will play three games before a final between the top two squads. In preceding years, the existing RSL teams will be replaced by the winners of their respective leagues and it will move to a home and away basis on top of the D1 structures.
Now to College Rugby.
The College Premier Division renamed D1A has experienced some radical changes with new conferences emerging everywhere.
Many teams have opted for alternative avenues and some interesting developments have occurred.
Early on I questioned the movement as a means to an end not an end itself.
It appears I was correct. Early on, it saw the establishment of the Ivy League, Sec and ACRL conference set ups.
Now we have seen the emergence of other traditionally based conferences such as the new PAC-12 and unofficial Big Ten conference, which have established themselves as entities with access to broadcasting facilities.
Another interesting development has been the establishment of the Varsity Cup. Set up by the likes of Cal, BYU and co. it appears to be looking to emulate the growth and success of NBC’s College Rugby Championship in terms of creating a viable commercial entity.
Time will tell if it is successful.
Things are realigning and developing at a frightening rate in the US and it’s hard to keep track sometimes, but still interesting to observe.
Elsewhere in the rugby world. Athletico Madrid has signed an agreement with CRC Madrid with CRC adopting Athleticos’ moniker and colours meanwhile Vigo Rugby has signed significant sponsorship deal with a Spanish Tech company.
Both clubs compete in the ever improving and professionalising Division De Honor in Spain. This has followed Conrinthians (one of the largest soccer clubs in the world) in Brazil establishing its own rugby wing.
And finally, The Black Sea Cup has expanded to include 12 teams in its second season with six coming from Germany, four from Belgium and two regional teams from the Netherlands.
This has effectively doubled its size and looks like a promising championship. It has room to grow with the possible inclusion of Polish clubs in the future.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (407)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (268)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (249)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (246)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (232)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Where have the Australian franchises five-pointers gone?
- Brumbies weather Blues storm in Auckland (6)
- Force pip Highlanders 19-18 in Perth (13)
- Dismissed Hartley in Lions doubt (10)
- Snarling Dogs rally for AFL win
- Stormers deny Reds 20-15 in Super Rugby (5)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (221)
- Where have the Australian franchises five-pointers gone? (1)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (221)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (174)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (212)
- Has McKenzie cost Cooper the Lions Tour? (122)
- Does Quade Cooper really matter? (30)
- Rebels vs Waratahs: Super Rugby live scores, blog (415)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, US Rugby


September 14th 2012 @ 6:53am
tc said | September 14th 2012 @ 6:53am | Report comment
WCR good article ,I think with the United States rugby is growing so fast I don’t know if they know how to handle it ,but at the end of the day it’s all good . Remember what Nigel Melville said they wanted teams in Super Rugby , we are in interesting times for rugby on a global scale.
September 14th 2012 @ 7:13am
Emric said | September 14th 2012 @ 7:13am | Report comment
Now is the time for USA rugby to start direct negotiations with SANZAR about a team or teams to play in a Argentinian conference or even have their own conference teams join SANZAR. SANZAR want it the USA want it and there’s 4 years to run on the TV deal get a firm plan in place locate a tv station in the USA which is prepared to assist in the funding and let the good times roll
September 14th 2012 @ 11:57am
klestical said | September 14th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
and then we can have 1 team from japan, 1 team from russia and 1 team from brazil!
Fans and players rejoice! *cough*
If SANZAR get involved, they will ruin American Rugby
September 14th 2012 @ 12:09pm
klestical said | September 14th 2012 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Adding to my comment above..
I think USA rugby are doing pretty well considering the rapid change constantly occurring. Let them find the best method to take American Rugby forward. It is only a matter of time where there will be enough colleges playing quality rugby (its only a matter of time before it will becomes a “varsity” sport IMO) for NBC to create a televised 15s college competition, on top of a 7s competition.
This will be the backbone for a future American Rugby Tournament!
Rugby is sort of sport, which needs the tribalism. The game is too difficult to be introduced from a ‘top-down’ approach. As an American consumer, I could not think of anything worse than watching the Lions, Force, or the Highlanders!
It seems that SANZAR sees this purely from its own perspective and is getting blindsided by the easy money. If SANZAR comes in, they will ruin any chance of a professional American rugby competition.
September 14th 2012 @ 12:50pm
Working Class Rugger said | September 14th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
You make a very good point regarding the best means to the game achieving some sort of professional structures within the US. I honestly do not believe that Rugby r any other sport for that matter could reasonably expect to develop long term meaningful success without the effort to develop the base from the bottom up.
USA Rugby has been endeavouring to do just that with substantial success. The game has been expanding at a phenomenal rate of late at the youth level with many clubs struggling to service the numbers. They need to keep on slogging away and developing new strategies to capitalise on the significant growth in High School and Youth Rugby over the past 5 years. If they achieve that, in time Rugby in the USA will provide a strong level of competition internationally.
September 14th 2012 @ 1:21pm
tc said | September 14th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
klestical isn’t US rugby building from the bottom up alresdy so if SANZAR goes in whats the problem we will supply the icing on the cake. Also Kevin Roberts said to one of the New Zealand papers not long ago that if you are going to give the American people a new product it had better be the best or don’t bother coming ,we will be offering them the best rugby comp in the world.
September 16th 2012 @ 3:56pm
klestical said | September 16th 2012 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
hi tc, i have been waiting to reply, however it has been a big weekend!
I think what myself and possibly a number of roarers would argue is that you can’t simply insert a team into a new region, particularly one which is relatively new to the sport.The NFL is a fantastic example, as they have attempted to globalize their sport on a number of occasions, however have largely failed – look up ‘NFL Europa’. Even with their almost unlimited amounts of money, they still cannot decide whether to put a professional franchise in London!
Yes, Super Rugby might have the best rugby in the world, but is it the best competition? Sport goes beyond what is played on the pitch. Where almost every other sporting competition in the world has teams which have evolved from a clubs/city model – in Super Rugby, players are playing against artificially created franchises, which have largely ignored the game’s historical roots. When there are consumers of Super Rugby that do not even enjoy their own competition, how is the American rugby public expected to enjoy it?
Yes, rugby in the US is building from the bottom-up (and significantly) but I am hoping that this growth continues organically, rather than SANZAR coming in for an easy opportunity. It is already taking massive steps in the right direction. Already in its second year, NBC has televised the Collegiate Rugby Sevens, which pits the top colleges in the nation against each other. If you can, watch a couple of clips on YouTube and you will be able to see its potential. This will only get bigger, as rugby increasingly grows its presence across America’s universities, with the result being that rugby will gradually become more ingrained in the American psyche.
September 14th 2012 @ 9:21pm
sheek said | September 14th 2012 @ 9:21pm | Report comment
Those of you demanding USA inclusion in super rugby (& inclusion) – how seriously have you thought this through?
Some of sound like those military generals pouring over a map.You think moving resources is as easy as moving a finger a short distance across a map.
Have you given any thought to vast travel times, & the debilitating effect that has on the body over time?
September 14th 2012 @ 7:28am
Stop Kicking said | September 14th 2012 @ 7:28am | Report comment
Looks like they are developing a strong structure with up to 4 divisions. It may also open the option to create regional or divisional representative teams that could provide another level of increased competition.
Perhaps the ARU could learn something from the yanks on structuring competitions and development
September 14th 2012 @ 7:36am
kingplaymaker said | September 14th 2012 @ 7:36am | Report comment
If SANZAR is serious about bringing the U.S. into Super rugby they must aim for teams in both coasts as soon as possible. This is to ensure the European clubs don’t get a foothold on the east coast. SANZAR must stamp America as its territory. So firstly a team in L.A. and then New York when there are enough players to fill it.
September 14th 2012 @ 9:29am
tc said | September 14th 2012 @ 9:29am | Report comment
KPM
I totally agree we must make the Americas our own otherwise they will pillage the S/H into oblivion.
September 14th 2012 @ 10:09am
kingplaymaker said | September 14th 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
tc given the playing numbers in the U.S. I would say that if you halved the extended national squads you would have the basis for two teams.
September 14th 2012 @ 7:57am
Gurudoright said | September 14th 2012 @ 7:57am | Report comment
You will find WCR that it is the North Sea cup not th Black Sea cup that has the German, Dutch and Belgian teams
September 14th 2012 @ 11:23am
Working Class Rugger said | September 14th 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
You’re right. I always muck the name up.
September 19th 2012 @ 5:07pm
Working Class Rugger said | September 19th 2012 @ 5:07pm | Report comment
I should also mention that the North Sea Cup isn’t the only cross-border championship to have been established recently. Two others with teams located from the ‘general’ Balkan and Baltic Sea area. In total teams from over 12 nations are represented in this FIRA initiative. Something to build from.
September 14th 2012 @ 8:53am
Sailosi said | September 14th 2012 @ 8:53am | Report comment
I’m actually going to the states in a few months to visit family who are pretty heavily involved in rugby in San Diego so i’ll be interested to hear their thoughts. The way i see it USA rugby doesn’t know the best way in which to manage the incredible growth they are experiencing, the biggest issue is the structure of elite rugby. In principle i agree with the conference structure they have set up but they need to find a way of getting the best 200-250 home based players involved in elite competition. The Super League wasn’t the answer because a number of talented players chose not to play. The USA are the biggest underachievers in world rugby and will continue that way until they make a tough decision regarding the elite setup they desire.
September 14th 2012 @ 9:31am
tc said | September 14th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Sailosi ask your family if they would like US rugby to have Super Teams in SANZAR.
September 14th 2012 @ 10:14am
Sailosi said | September 14th 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
There is definately a recognition that something needs to happen to progress the sport. If they did include say US, Canadian and Argie teams, the conferences need to have more meaning than they do now. In US sports winning your conference is a really big deal. Super rugby needs to address this.
September 14th 2012 @ 11:18am
tc said | September 14th 2012 @ 11:18am | Report comment
I agree as the conference system becomes more important there needs to be recognition of topping your conference especially if they increase the number of teams per conference in the future.
September 14th 2012 @ 10:56am
YANKEE_ROB said | September 14th 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
WCR, do you know what the new Geographical Unions will be? I know Texas, Southern California, Empire and New England were the 4 test unions. What are the others being formed?
September 14th 2012 @ 12:50pm
Cattledog said | September 14th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
In 10-15 years when they really have their S**t in one sock, it’s unlikely the ABs, Wallabies and Boks will remain the big 3!
The difference between the growth of rugby in the USA to ,say, China or Russia, the USA really know how to develop competitive teams, regardless of the sport, throughout the country. Their current fiscal position will be the only deterrent to this growth.
September 14th 2012 @ 12:52pm
Cattledog said | September 14th 2012 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
Meant to include WCR, good article and interesting information. Have you got a ball park figure on registered player numbers compared to Australia?
September 14th 2012 @ 1:09pm
Working Class Rugger said | September 14th 2012 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
Officially it has topped the 100,000 player mark for the first time with around 350,000 unregistered players. Those are the ones on the USA Rugby fact sheet. However, and this has come up on many, many occasions when discussing playing numbers with American Rugby folk, a great many clubs only actually register their first teams. This is also done in the High School sector of the game. So there’s really no accurate way of telling what the true numbers are. Interestingly enough, according to a survey conducted by a major sports manufacturing body returned figures as high as 1.5 million participants. When you add the official and unofficial numbers together there’s still a significant gap in terms of player numbers. Another measure could be the consistent ratings that the two main Sevens events receive which suggests a growing base.
September 14th 2012 @ 12:57pm
Demers said | September 14th 2012 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
Looking way ahead, a medal in the Rio Sevens would intro rugby to a zillion US sports fans who don’t now follow the game.
American Sevens prowess is building. I recently saw, in Victoria, BC, teams from the US Military and Utah that were definitely competitive. The rugby world is waiting for the US to become a real full-team power. A Canadian 15, world ranked at 13, beat the US by just six points last time they played in Toronto.