Brian Lara, the newest ICC Hall of Famer
By David Lord, 17 Sep 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
West Indies captain Brian Lara greets the crowd after playing his last international cricket match against England of the Cricket World Cup at the Kensington Oval in Bridgetown, Barbados, April 21, 2007. (AP Photo/Andres Leighton)
West Indies batting genius Brian Lara was inducted into the ICC Hall of Fame on Saturday night, claiming his 213 against Australia in 1999 at Sabina Park in Kingston, Jamaica, was the best of his 34 Test tons.
There are many Australians, including myself, who saw and rate Lara’s superb 277 at the SCG in 1993 as his greatest dig, but who is to argue with the great man.
That dig was significant as Lara’s first Test ton in his fifth appearance, and he had to be run out to be dismissed he was in such scintillating touch with 38 peerless boundaries.
It was also significant as the first of only three run out dismissals in 232 visits to the crease. He was always a shrewd judge of a run.
Lara must have rated that SCG innings at the time, naming his daughter Sydney when she was born in 1996.
But I remember the 10th child of 11 to Bunty and Pearl Lara in Port of Spain, Trinidad for many reasons.
He’s the only batsman in history to score a Test hundred, as well as double, triple, quadruple, and quintuple hundreds.
Throughout his stellar 17-year career, Lara scored 20% of all West Indian runs, beaten only by The Don with 23%, and George Headley with 21%.
For any cricketer who has played the grand old game, it’s hard to get your head around scoring a first-class world record 501 not out, and an unconquered Test world record 400. The concentration, patience, and physical fitness required would be mind-blowing.
The 501* for Warwickshire against Durham in 1994 required only 427 deliveries in a tick under eight hours, with 62 boundaries, and 10 sixes.
The 400* for the Windies against England in 2004 took nearly 10 hours, facing 582 deliveries, with 43 boundaries and four sixes.
Mind-blowing alright.
I’ve been privileged in my time to see so many gifted left-handed batsmen, starting with Invincibles Arthur Morris, and Neil Harvey, when lefties were the exception rather than the rule.
In latter years Bill Lawry, Allan Border, Mark Taylor, Matt Hayden, Adam Gilchrist, and Justin Langer were Australian standouts. Mike Hussey is still going strong.
South African Graeme Pollock arguably ranks among the very best lefties, averaging 60.97 second only to The Don, Pollock’s career cut short by apartheid and sporting isolation.
Englishman David Gower was sheer poetry in motion, effortlessly stroking boundaries with perfect timing, while Sri Lankans Sanath Jayasuriya, and Kumar Sangakkara, tore apart the best attacks going around.
Bert Sutcliffe was the first Kiwi leftie to catch my eye, but Stephen Fleming ended up the better proposition.
And that leaves the calypso cricketers from the West Indies with Sir Garfield the first over 50 years ago. Since then Clive Lloyd, and Alvin Kallicharran were dangerous run-getters, with Chris Gayle and Shivnarine Chanderpaul still flying the leftie’s flag.
And in between, Brian Charles Lara, the Prince – the 17th West Indian to be inducted into the ICC Hall of Fame after Lance Gibbs, Gordon Greenidge, George Headley. Michael Holding, Rohan Kanhai, Clive Lloyd, Malcolm Marshall, Sir Vivian Richards, Andy Roberts, Sir Garfield, Sir Clyde Walcott, Sir Everton Weekes, Sir Frank Worrell, Courtney Walsh, Joel Garner, and Curtly Ambrose. What an impressive list.
But it’s hard to imagine Lara’s unbeaten 501 and 400 will ever be beaten.
If they are, it will be by one helluva batsman.
- Explore:

September 17th 2012 @ 8:31am
nick said | September 17th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
I hadn’t watched any footage of him in years until the other night when i got on a youtube roll and found myself watching his 400 and other various ridiculous knocks he put together.
Id forgotten just how beautiful he was to watch, that glorious high arc he swung from. The extraordinary power he could generate must’ve been devastating to bowl to, there genuinely seemed to be times when there was no answer to it.
September 17th 2012 @ 8:32am
nick said | September 17th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
capitan obvious alert I know, but sometimes the obvious still needs to be said!
September 17th 2012 @ 8:55am
josh said | September 17th 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
I remember as kid the SCG test. It seemed like he was in for days.
September 17th 2012 @ 9:29am
Bearfax said | September 17th 2012 @ 9:29am | Report comment
Marvellous cricketer. One of the greats. I also remember when he emerged at the end of the West Indies great period when Richards, Lloyd, Greeniidge, Roberts, Holding , Marshall, Garner and Ambrose were dominating world cricket in the 80s. This diminutive young champion in the making, was almost lost in the glow of that great team, but quickly assumed a status that even surpassed the greats of that group. And what a gentleman of a character he seems to be. He and Tendulkah have been the great batsmen of our age and both deserve the honour being bestowed on Lara.
September 17th 2012 @ 9:44am
Brett McKay said | September 17th 2012 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Hi David – he’s a worthy addition to the Hall of Fame, Lara, no question at all. Just one of the most beautiful techniques to watch when on song; the high backlift, the flourish on follow through, the outstanding timing..
A quick question on your thoughts around his marks being beaten though, if I may. I know you’ve said there it will take one hell of a batsman to top 400, but do you genuinely believe it will stay unthreatened? From memory, you’ve made the same call on Tendulkar’s Test tally never being topped.
Only reason I ask is a weight of numbers: of the 26 Test knocks of 300 or more, 13 of them have been made since 1997. That is, of all the triples in 130+ years of Test cricket, half of them have come in the last 15 years. Indeed, perhaps only an attacking declaration preveted Michael Clarke knocking off Hayden, and maybe even Lara, so well was he batting that day in Sydney this year.
You are certainly right that it will take one hell of a performance to top Lara’s 400 (nevermind his First Class mark!), but it would seem to me now that the modern batsman is much more well-equipped to bat for long periods of time. It would seem to me we’re probably more likely to see Lara’s mark topped than not..
September 17th 2012 @ 10:06am
josh said | September 17th 2012 @ 10:06am | Report comment
What makes the 300 stats even more interesting is that Gayle and Sehwag also join Bradman and Lara, with 2 triples.
September 17th 2012 @ 12:49pm
sheek said | September 17th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
Brett,
We might be assuming a lot that test cricket is even around in another 30-50 years. The ICC & other national authorities are very busy chasing ‘rainbows’ (ie, T20)! Perhaps their collective resolve to preserve test cricket is not what we might wish it to be?
Also, interesting that about half of the 300s have been made in the past 15 years. It would be further interesting to have a 300s per tests breakdown.
For example, many more tests are played today. Australia just by itself has probably played well over 200 in just the past 15 years. But in the inter-war years, for example, Australia only played 67 tests in 20 years.
September 17th 2012 @ 1:31pm
Brett McKay said | September 17th 2012 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
the number of Tests being played is precisely my point Sheek, and yet another reason why I find the suggestion that Lara’s Test mark won’t be topped to be interesting. With so many more Tests played on such flat wickets with such quick outfields, I would be genuinely surprised if Lara’s mark is still standing in five year’s time.
Hashim Amla batted for more than two days at The Oval in July for his 311*, and might still be batting now had Graeme Smith not declared (aside from the mere detail of the Test not being timeless). Clarke was in for roughly five sessions before declaring on himself well before Tea on Day 3 (the Test didn’t see a fifth day)..
September 17th 2012 @ 1:51pm
josh said | September 17th 2012 @ 1:51pm | Report comment
Most test 300′s in recent times have been scored at a decent strike rate of about 70 too. So its like scoring a triple needs to take a huge amount of overs. But on the other hand when was the last century scored in a session?
They seemed to be more common in yesteryear than today, even with the friendly pitches and fast ground and roped boundaries.
September 17th 2012 @ 2:30pm
Brett McKay said | September 17th 2012 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
Josh, hundreds in a session happen more regularly than you might think. Check out http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/index.html?category=3;class=1 and toward the bottom of the ‘Hundreds’ category of records, there are lists for hundreds scored in the first, second and third session in a day.
The rough eyeball test sees a bit less than half of those listed have happened in the 2000s..
September 17th 2012 @ 3:05pm
josh said | September 17th 2012 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
fair enough. I thought I’d be proven wrong by the stats. I guess back in the day (i.e. pre ODI cricket) 100 in a session was a bigger deal.
September 17th 2012 @ 4:35pm
sheek said | September 17th 2012 @ 4:35pm | Report comment
Brett,
I’m still inclined to think Lara’s 400 will stand, my cynicism (of the future of test cricket & authorities motives) not withstanding!
I know this sounds crazy, but there is a point when the number of runs scored by a batsman becomes counterproductive (to winning a test match).
And I’m thinking, depending on the circumstances of the match, that figure ranges between 250-300.
I agree today’s batsmen generally score at a quicker clip, & they enjoy many advantages from helmets to truer pitches, to pristine outfields & shorter boundaries, etc.
So I’m thinking unless there is a specific situation where a team feels one of their players can better the 400, then generally they won’t worry about it.
BTW, did I say Lara is special? If I wanted someone to bat for me for a week, I might pick Tendulkar. But if i wanted someone to bat for me in one innings, I would go with Lara.
September 17th 2012 @ 4:56pm
Brett McKay said | September 17th 2012 @ 4:56pm | Report comment
Sheek, from rough memory, I think both Lara’s records resulted in drawn matches, which kind of underlines your point..
September 17th 2012 @ 9:52am
Sailosi said | September 17th 2012 @ 9:52am | Report comment
One of his most underrated achievements was the 688 runs he scored against Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka in a 3 test series when he dominated Murali. The windies still managed to lose 3-0.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
September 17th 2012 @ 10:04am
Sailosi said | September 17th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Brett, no doubt that physical conditioning of batsmen has improved over time, smaller and faster outfields due to safety constraints and improved turf management and flatter and more batsmen friendly wickets due in part to better wicket covering techniques has probably led to a greater number of big scores being posted in the last 25 years. I’m not sure whether 500 will ever be eclipsed but I could see 400 being nudged. I remember hearing Brian Lara saying that Chris Gayle would be the most likely to break it because of his boundary hitting ability and his ability since a young age to bat for very long periods. Interestingly enough a couple of months after that at the infamous Recreation Ground (would have to be the favourite venue along with the SSC ground in Colombo for it to be broken) Gayle scored 317 against SA, then in Colombo he posted 333. His and Sehwags time has probably passed now but maybe in another 10 years similar players will emerge.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
September 17th 2012 @ 10:43am
Brett McKay said | September 17th 2012 @ 10:43am | Report comment
True Sailo, all valid points. Sehwag of course three a third Triple away, too, holing out on 293 only a few years back..
September 17th 2012 @ 11:30am
frangela, Trinidad said | September 17th 2012 @ 11:30am | Report comment
Brian Charles Lara, in his native land named, The Prince of Port of Spain, is revered as one of FOUR greatest human Gifts to Cricket. It could be said he made three templates as the hallmark of his career. Template No 1 – The First to regain the highest test inning score and that, within a quick six month period, after his previous record became broken. This is an historic piece of redemptive poetry in cricket which may never be rewritten because the nature of the game rarely produces an inning record much more one to be regained (by the same batsman). Template No 2 – The First to achieve the career first class century, double century, triple century, quadruple century and quintople century. Template No 3 – He is the very first batsman to score a test inning of 400 and not out at that! Alas! we all agree there is no need for The Prince of Port of Spain to patent his templates, why? Simply because he was the first man to land them on the cricket moon; they are his prototype – any takers will have to merely ‘copy that..’ Whilst he is the 67th to be inducted in the ICC Hall of Fame, he is one of only FOUR cricketers who have planted different flags on cricket’s moon in their own incomparable landing styles (each with feats unique all their own – feats not indistinguishable from each other’s but feats that make them more than legendary; they are Institutions all their own – these Four Flagships in cricket history are now known as Sir Don Bradman for his feats in batsmanship attaining the almost 100 per cent Test average; Sir Garfield Sobers for his feats in batsmanship and bowling attaining the acclaim as cricket’s greatest allrounder; Sachin Tendulker for his feats in batsmanship achieving 100 centuries and highest accummulated scores across both disciplines of Test and ODIs and Brian Charles Lara with his unique feats aforementioned. These four are the heroes on the cricket moon and other cricketers will compete to be the next astronaut to make the fifth landing with another set of cricket’s grand and unique historic feats. The world will be looking on!
September 17th 2012 @ 11:49am
Mantis said | September 17th 2012 @ 11:49am | Report comment
I always liked watching him more then Sachin. Don’t know why, cant explain it, and I am a huge Sachin fan. Just the way Lara went about it was something else.
September 17th 2012 @ 11:59am
adam214 said | September 17th 2012 @ 11:59am | Report comment
I think brian lara transcends cricket he is one of the greatest sportsman of the modern era to ever live.His feats much like the great don will stand the test of time even if they are surpassed.
September 17th 2012 @ 4:12pm
Larry said | September 17th 2012 @ 4:12pm | Report comment
great list/interesting stats.