Is Australia ready for its own football channel?
By Chad Bennett, 19 Sep 2012 Chad Bennett is a Roar Editor
- Tagged:
- football, Fox Sports, La Liga, Serie A
Manchester City's Pablo Zabaleta, centre, celebrates scoring against Queens Park Rangers with teammates Gareth Barry, right, and Sergio Aguero. (AP Photo/Jon Super)
Related coverage
As a football fan in this country, coverage of the English Premier League couldn’t be better, but the near non-existent coverage of continental European football leagues leaves a lot to be desired.
One of the essential ingredients of my weekend wind-down is a dose of live football every Sunday night and with the clash between Reading and Tottenham not beginning until after midnight, my pay-television coverage was rendered useless.
But a quick once-over of Livescore.com revealed a smattering of matches beginning across the European continent, including seven matches from Italy’s Serie A, beginning at the relatively friendly 3.00pm (11.00pm AEST) kick-off time.
The flair and excitement of both Napoli and Roma’s matches appealed but it was 2011/12 Scudetto winner Juventus I chose and after, ahem, a quick scan of the internet, I managed to find a stream and tune into to the Old Lady’s visit to Genoa.
It’s by no means legal, the streams are often patchy and it’s a rare privilege to find English commentary, but for those of us wanting to watch the domestic leagues of Spain, Italy, Germany and France, it is virtually the only option we have.
In 2012, despite the myriad of sports channels on pay television, four of the five best leagues in Europe are either inaccessible to football fans in this country or broadcast in minimal doses.
Spain’s La Liga was dropped by ESPN last year in what seems a baffling decision, while Irish broadcaster Setanta decided not to broadcast France’s Ligue 1 season this year.
Fans of Germany’s Bundesliga are fortunate to catch one or two games live on Setanta each week, with a few delayed broadcasts doled out after the event, while little-known broadcaster RAI International broadcast one or two live Serie A matches per week.
That’s right. Despite the likes of Ronaldo, Messi and a litany of stars pushing La Liga to become arguably the best domestic league on the planet, not one of our broadcasters could find a way to get the coverage on our screens.
It’s unthinkable, and it flies in the face of the steadily growing popularity of the game in Australia.
So in an age of digital technology and multi-platform broadcasting, the question must be asked: could a football-only channel be successful in Australia?
It’s worthwhile acknowledging that on a head-to-head basis, a football-only channel’s television ratings would pale in comparison with Fox Sports’ dedicated AFL channel Fox Footy.
That said, the AFL season proper lasts from late March until the last Saturday in September, giving broadcasters just over seven months worth of live action.
With leagues, cups and international tournaments thrown into the mix, a football-only channel would nearly have an endless supply of live matches to broadcast throughout the year.
Rather than matches occurring exclusively on Friday, Saturday and Sunday only, midweek fixtures could mean live football broadcast on four or five days of the week.
With Fox Sports executives currently in advanced negotiations with the FFA regarding the new A-League television deal, the timing could not be better.
Using the EPL and A-League as the jewels in their crown, ‘Fox Football’ – as we shall call it for the purposes of this exercise – could then look to acquire La Liga and Serie A rights, with the relative lack of competition for the rights increasing the chances of economically favourable deals.
Throw in a smattering of second-tier leagues such as they become available – think Holland’s Eredivisie, Turkey’s Super Lig, Brazil’s Brasileirão and Japan’s J-League, to name a few – and the channel begin to take shape with some serious content.
Should the initial response be positive, the rights to the UEFA Champions League – which expire with ESPN in 2015 – and Euro 2016 will become available.
Capture those and Fox Football becomes the undisputed bastion of football in this country.
Sadly, with the new A-League deal expected to be announced within the coming months, it is unlikely that Fox Sports will pursue such an idea, and in future years this concept might become outdated should European football follow the trend of US sports and bypass television networks to sell content directly online.
But is it viable? Should Fox Sports executives be willing to take a gamble, and could we see a football-only channel succeed in Australia?
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- South Melbourne saga shows the divisions in our football family (170)
- NSL lessons vital for A-League’s future (103)
- A-League expansion possibilities (102)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (92)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (86)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (82)
- Don’t be fooled: FFA Cup is too big a risk (78)
- Ernie Merrick back in A-League as Wellington Phoenix coach (14)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (39)
- Ferguson bows out as Man United draw 5-5
- EPL Super Sunday 2013: Final day live scores, updates, blog (38)
- David Beckham – the underrated superstar (19)
- Fired Mancini thanks Man City fans (2)
- Who would be a football manager? (6)
- EPL Super Sunday 2013: Final day live scores, updates, blog (38)
- David Beckham – the underrated superstar (19)
- Who would be a football manager? (6)
- Bundesliga: can Freiburg ‘do a Gladbach’? (0)
- R.I.P Sir Alex (0)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (89)
- EPL lacking drama for end of season finale (13)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- football, Fox Sports, La Liga, Serie A

September 19th 2012 @ 8:08am
MV Dave said | September 19th 2012 @ 8:08am | Report comment
Love the idea…also don’t forget the J League telecasts on Saturday early evening and MLS mid morning plus Argentinian Premiera and Libertadores Cup…then the various Continental Championships! Wow as a football fan our cup truly runneth over!
Is it financially viable? Of the 1.6 million football participants in this country maybe 5-10% would be needed to make a financial contribution by taking out a subscription…is that enough?
In order of importance these are the following comps that l enjoy watching;
HAL
ACL (Oz clubs)
EPL
UCL
Bundesliga
Europa
Championship
There are plenty of other comps that would have an audience, albeit small, here including;
La Liga
Serie A
Dutch
Turkish
Argentinian
Ligue 1
JLeague (Oz players)
Then add the World Cup qualifiers, WC itself and the various continental championships…
What it does reflect is the truly global nature of footballl.
Come on Foxsorts…make it so…
September 19th 2012 @ 8:37am
nordster said | September 19th 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
They’d need fox football 1 and 2 to cover any more leagues in a comprehensive way, especially around weekends. Unless folks want a lot of midweek catchup replays.
More international channels could fill the gap… Eurosport currently show little football maybe just some villa epl replays. Plus there is beIN (al jazeera) who own a bunch of international rights. Ligue1 at least, la Liga too in some countries, serie a potentially. Some Afc leagues would be logical to them.
Maybe better would be for football to just be more dominant on existing sport channels, international ones especially.
We are missing a few key leagues this season, i feel your pain Chad
September 19th 2012 @ 9:08am
Fussball ist unser leben said | September 19th 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Yes, absolutely and it will happen.
However, such a business strategy requires vision, risk-taking & flexible payment models, which means FoxSports executives will never proceed.
Therefore, in my opinion, a dedicated football channel will be the domain of online TV content providers, who are willing to ‘unbundle live football’ (and all other niche entertainment content) from the current lumpy “you have to buy everything” business model favoured by old fashioned & lazy organisations, like Foxtel.
September 19th 2012 @ 10:02am
nordster said | September 19th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
I agree but that model does so well for them and is the main thing propping up the largesse heaped on the dominant sports here. So i fear we have another couple of years of a business geared to the Platinum subscriber money pit! They just signed new deals after all. Unless other factors in the economy erode that strategy. I guess very few of these subscribers are on contracts at this point so it is somewhat shaky for them. Also hard to know what proportion of which rights fee is paid from which tier. I suspect they’d try and bump up their basic access fees if they ever lost too many of the top end payers!
Me i just resent paying for so much sport i dont watch. This is the expensive stuff. So unbundling all the sports and allowing people to pick and choose makes sense. Especially for afl and nrl fans who…lets be honest…are paying for a whole bunch they dont watch.
Question is for football…does our game pick up more potential new viewers being bundled with the eggball codes, than we would being broken off and sold to primarily ‘football people’? Are there enough of us to pay for separate football channels? Would the game lose more and are we effectively being cross subsidised in a viewer sense from the other sports? I dont know if i like the answer to these questions so will not attempt to answer them haha!
I hope time is on our side though, waves of sovereign debt refugees could swing things in our favour, numbers wise. Jump on a webjet.
September 19th 2012 @ 10:09am
Jetsfan said | September 19th 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
Foxtel and Fox Sports are independent of each other, there is nothing stopping PMG (owners of foxsports channels & content) from choosing to provide their channels online or to other providers (once any existing supply agreements with Foxtel expire). The fact that News Corp is heading in an online media content delivery direction could help with that vision. As IPTV evolves and reaches a suitable level of penetration Fox sports will have very attractive content and the means to adapt to the IPTV environment leveraging their content & brand to become more like their parent network in the US and other sports networks, BeIN & ESPN, Foxtel not so much, mainly due to Telstra’s role, ACC concerns & weaker content.
September 19th 2012 @ 10:14am
nordster said | September 19th 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Guess it depends on how their ownership sorts out. They most likely will end up closer companies, good thing for them as their shareholding is less complicated they can be more agile to restructure their business. Must be irritating for them though…they are finally doing ok after a long investment build-up and along comes technology and the market to muddy things lol.
September 19th 2012 @ 9:26am
Minister for Information for the Democratic People's Republic of Football said | September 19th 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Australia definately needs to be exposed to more continental european football. Only watching EPL will stunt your “cultural learnings” of our great game.
September 19th 2012 @ 1:35pm
langou said | September 19th 2012 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
What about people like me who only watch A-League, Socceroos and Asian Champions League, is my learning being stunted?
September 19th 2012 @ 3:33pm
Minister for Information for the Democratic People's Republic of Football said | September 19th 2012 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
In a word…Yes. ACL is very interesting but if you want to learn more about football in a classical sense you need to tune in to some Bundesliga, La Liga, Seria A and of course Champions League and Europa League.
Live streaming can be a bit of a nuisance but that’s all we got at the moment.
September 29th 2012 @ 10:49pm
Evan Askew said | September 29th 2012 @ 10:49pm | Report comment
Honestly he is right. My only interest is in the A league, National team games, Asian Champions league and I follow South Melbourne TV and the NSWPL on youtube and a bit of BPL on the washing line. I don’t give a crap about overseas football because I have no emotional investment in it other than games in which Aussies are playing. But I try to watch at least one quality match from Germany or Netherlands, a champions league game and a match from the Copa Libertadores to get a greater feel for the game. Plus it is from these countries rather than the UK from who we should be learning.
September 19th 2012 @ 9:59am
Damiano said | September 19th 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
I’m missing watching Serie A & Bundesliga on One, you can however find some legal and not so legal streams of both online, but its not quite the same.
I’m sure a dedicated Football station would do well.
I’m happy to watch EPL, but I don’t have an emotional connection to it as I do with the A-League & Serie A (representing my home, and the old country).
September 19th 2012 @ 10:13am
Titus said | September 19th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Absolutely…….I would love to see some more J and K-League and even some Chinese Super League to catch up on all the Aussies.
Continental Europe, South America, MLS, Internationals, even some of the bigger second tiers.
Some more football talk shows and weekly highlights wraps of various leagues would be brilliant.
As someone who is getting Fox back on after a long absence purely for the Football, I think this would be a great idea.
September 19th 2012 @ 11:38am
Bondy. said | September 19th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
I’ve been banging on about this for a while now,one could also put forward a case that there would be less coverage now on cable as to what there was on fta 15 years ago?. In fact i’d suggest there is less international content than 20 years ago on both fta and cable.
Football needs a dedicated channel because the likes of vfl and nrl are sidedishes there not really that important to me and no financial outlay will be made for these sports as far as i’m concerend. Domestic sports are sidedishes for football people and thats something tv execs will never understand.
It doesn’t make a great deal of sense to see a sport that doesnt stop continues to offer live football and vfl have their own dedicated channel it doesnt make sense and football people should be asking what is the validity to fox footy annually ?. Should aussie rules have precendence of a global sport ?. Justify it?
Overall I believe there is less global football content on our screens now that what there was 20 yrs ago”but now i’m paying through the nose”.
This fox footy thing it doesnt run all year round does it. When aussie rules is being played do you feel it truly unites the nation and have you ever felt that afl captures the whole australian sporting nation.
Some great football this morning.
I’d be just as concrened as to the level of gridiron being promoted in this country from espn as well.
Tv execs in this country believe we are committed to domestic winter tv sports in this country how wrong they are.
September 19th 2012 @ 11:52am
Reynoldsinski said | September 19th 2012 @ 11:52am | Report comment
What’s your story then? Is your post a joke? Have you deliberately written it in an incomprehensible way?
The following sentence is mind-boggling – “It doesn’t make a great deal of sense to see a sport that doesnt stop continues to offer live football and vfl have their own dedicated channel it doesnt make sense and football people should be asking what is the validity to fox footy annually ?. Should aussie rules have precendence of a global sport ?. Justify it?”
September 19th 2012 @ 11:54am
Titus said | September 19th 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
You haven’t met Bondy before?
September 19th 2012 @ 12:11pm
Bondy. said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
I’m sorry pal thats just whats on my mind. Do you ever really meet people like me with that philosophy ?.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:57pm
BigAl said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
Not one of his better efforts, but I can assure it is not a joke – people of Bondy’s ilk do not joke
September 19th 2012 @ 11:52am
Titus said | September 19th 2012 @ 11:52am | Report comment
If anything this makes a lot more sense than an Aussie Rules channel. With Aussie Rules you only have the AFL, which is played 6 months a year and only on weekends, so I assume the rest is just replays, but what is the point of replays when you can just IQ the games you are interested in and watch them when you want?
Sure I am guessing there are some talk shows but come on.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:02pm
Matt F said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
As far as I’m aware, the main reason they have Fox Footy is because they needed an extra channel to show all the games on. In Winter you can have Super Rugby, NRL, AFL (now that Fox has all 9 games a week they have clashes as well) and the A-League for a period of time as well. Many games are all held at the same time (especially Saturday nights) and the 3 fox sports channels aren’t enough at times. Most of the A-League is in summer when there isn’t as much sport on (there’s basically the A-league and domestic cricket on Fox in prime-time) so the 3 Fox Sports channels (plus Setanta and ESPN which all own the rights to diferent leagues/competitions) are able to cover it all.
It’s my understanding that Fox Footy will be take off in summer.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:11pm
Titus said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
I see, makes sense, thanks.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:15pm
Bondy. said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
MattF.
I think their are more sports to cover in Summer ,ALeague,big bash,tour downunder,australian open tennis,golf tournamnets, I think its a quite time for sport in Australia through winter.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:17pm
me, I like football said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Fox Footy channel has been the highest rating STV station every week for the last 25 weeks when the season started. There mght not be much live footy a week ~27 hours, but there is certainly an appetite for all things football.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:43pm
Bondy. said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
Has the level of subscriptions to cable tv increased due to fox footy ?.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:53pm
Titus said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
NRL is the most viewed show on Foxtel I would guess, the fact that the games are split between 3 channels would be the reason that Fox Footy rates highest.
September 19th 2012 @ 2:32pm
me, I like football said | September 19th 2012 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
Using Roy Masters method of cumulative audience (based on average per a game, not length of game) the AFL has to date 38.2m viewers and the NRL has had 30.3m viewers. you could probably add ~10% to the AFL figures and 2% to the NRL figures due to areas not surveyed
September 19th 2012 @ 2:56pm
TC said | September 19th 2012 @ 2:56pm | Report comment
It’s fair enough that soccer fans want a dedicated soccer channel – there is enough product for Fox to show, no problems there.
The question is: is it worthwhile for them? If it was, it would be up and running in a heartbeat.
It’s pointless bringing the AFL into it. They negotiated a return of Fox Footy, and the ratings have been huge.
As milf says, it has been the biggest rating STV channel every week for the last 25 weeks, not by a little bit, but by a lot. In some weeks, its audience has been double the second highest rating channel. In the TV industry – that equates to an absolute smashing.
In week one of the AFL finals, four games got a total audience across Fox and FTA (5 city metro) of 4.9 million.
Last week, two AFL finals got a total audience of 3 million.
These a massive numbers. It’s pointless trying to argue that the Fox Footy doesn’t deserve to exist when it’s getting numbers like that every week for 6 to 7 months of the year.
On the weekend, Adelaide vs Freo got 394k on Fox (two non-Vic teams) and Collingwood vs WCE got 422k on Fox.
These are massive ratings.
People need to lose the lie about AFL ratings peddled by the AFL haters – the ratings are massive.
On Monday night, the All-Australian awards got 135k and On the Couch got 113k – it’s not just the 27 hours of live games (which turns into 81 hours after double repeats, all of which rate well) – the talk shows do very, very well.
If soccer can do the same in the future, then no doubt they will earn their own channel – it’s that simple.
TC
September 19th 2012 @ 4:05pm
Bondy. said | September 19th 2012 @ 4:05pm | Report comment
It doesn’t make sense.If its that good you should make it International then.
September 19th 2012 @ 4:45pm
TC said | September 19th 2012 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
If Fox could make money from an international audience, they’d be in there with bells on.
If Fox could get similar ratings for a soccer channel, they’d do it.
Although be warned, a channel specialising in soccer, showing wall to wall soccer matches from overseas is not necessarily such a great thing for the local game.
For starters, the money to buy those rights is all going overseas.
TC
September 19th 2012 @ 5:01pm
Bondy. said | September 19th 2012 @ 5:01pm | Report comment
Another landmark moment for Australian Football.
September 19th 2012 @ 2:08pm
Tim said | September 19th 2012 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
The amount of gridiron we are subjected to on espn is beyond a joke now, specifically setanta have now hoarded up the rights to even more football (English lower leagues). I’m also sick of Fox Sports showing live baseball games which go almost an hour over the scheduled end time when a replay of the weekend’s EPL game is scheduled at the conclusion of said baseball game.Consequently, the replay of the “full” game is condensed into a mere highlights package.
It is time for a football only channel, I would hazard a guess that many more people in Australia are interested in football than both the incredible bores that are gridiron/baseball combined, these American sports don’t deserve priority over football in Australia, specifically when baseball is a dumbed down, skill-less form of cricket and gridiron is essentially nothing more than plagirised tactical military drills repeated around a dozen times a game, conflated out for 3 hours with more footage of players milling around the sidelines, replays and commercials than anything resembling a sporting contest, essentially a game of rugby with all the good bits taken out.
September 29th 2012 @ 3:45pm
Kath said | September 29th 2012 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
Ben Graham and Saverio Rocca ring a bell to you? Both are ex AFL players who were drafted in the NFL and their fans (like me who follow both codes) will say that NFL is better than sockah, somee fans of Australian codes need to realize this
March 21st 2013 @ 9:02am
Football for all said | March 21st 2013 @ 9:02am | Report comment
@ Kath you talking about 2 guys only. How many Aussie footballers play abroad. Many mate. Aussie footie is ok. I only tune in to watch Collingwood but truth be told I can tune in to watch Getafe play Mallorca, NAC Breda play Venlo without any hesitation. It all due to loyalty of the world game. Foxtel sucks. Did you know of all developed countries in the world we get less content for our money than any other country. In South Africa they have 8 dedicated sports channel of which 3 are for soccer and the rest broadcast other sports( not including espn, track and other small channels) Aussie entertainment is dead mate just dead. Even Indonesia provides more content than us
September 29th 2012 @ 10:56pm
Evan Askew said | September 29th 2012 @ 10:56pm | Report comment
Not to mention that Setanta show the Effin blue Square premier league which pisses me off. It is complete and utter crap when they could be showing matches from, of I don’t know, Germany, Porftugal, Netherlands, Russia and France or even English league one and two for crisakes. Stick any one of our Australian state leagues (possibly excluding Tasmania and NT) on a decent pitch with a crowd behind them and the standard will appear to be at least three times better.
September 19th 2012 @ 11:42am
David said | September 19th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
The beIN network (owned by Al Jazeera) could provide this (if they brought their product to Australia). They bought the rights for la Liga (from ESPN) and Ligue 1 (from Setanta) which is why neither are on Australian TV ATM. If there’s a market for it, who knows…. they could provide that plus a stack more leagues. But at this point, I’m not sure there’s really a demand for it (yet).
It’d be cool if you could get the channel online too (like Setanta-i), because I know I’ll never pay for pay TV, and all the crap you get along with it.
September 19th 2012 @ 1:09pm
pete4 said | September 19th 2012 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
I always thought Fox Sports here could even relay most of the content from Fox Soccer channel in the USA. You would think that would be pretty cost effective?
September 19th 2012 @ 1:43pm
Matt F said | September 19th 2012 @ 1:43pm | Report comment
No. Fox Soccer only own the American rights to the various leagues that they show. Fox Sports would have to buy the Australian rights from the various governing bodies anyway
September 19th 2012 @ 2:54pm
Soccerlogic said | September 19th 2012 @ 2:54pm | Report comment
Yes.
That is all.