What next for second-best Wallabies?
The Wallabies were almost caught out by Los Pumas on Saturday night. (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)
Related coverage
Let’s not forget that the 2012 Wallabies, with some help from their 2011 teammates, are the second-best rugby team in the world. And this is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
The third-best team, the Springboks, are in relative disarray and under massive scrutiny from their press and supporters. The first-ranked team, the New Zealand All Blacks, are unlikely to lose sufficient form and hence games to give up the top spot.
The Wallabies have beaten Wales, the top ranked European team, four times in a row in recent times.
So what lies ahead?
Firstly, leaders need to emerge from the player group and take control of that group. Not just the on-field captain but the guys with the brains and leadership authority and communication ability of the group – Horwill, Pocock, Genia and even youngsters like Hooper, Gill, Foley and Stirzacker.
They need to initiate the decision and implement it. Coaches cannot do it. They can seed the idea with the leaders, but the leaders must do it.
Secondly, and most importantly, with such a dominant team in first-place, the Wallabies need to decide, as a group, to either consolidate second or go for first.
This means a conscious decision, written in blood by all players in the group, injured and fit, and done so fervently, that the agreement is instilled in everything that they do in every aspect of their preparation and on-field performance.
Thirdly, it then needs to be implemented and lived out. It needs to become an obsession; one where they live, eat, sleep, dream and breath it. They need to observe and know their opposition inside out; stalk them and dominate them physically and mentally.
This decision only works if there is true honesty. With true honesty comes a bond that will continue for the rest of their lives and that expands upon the Wallabies jersey.
When this group decision is not upheld, the group need to openly discuss it and decide what steps to take. Every player has a standard to achieve, consistently. Repeat offenders get moved on until they are prepared to abide by the group decision and bring consistency.
Take Quade Cooper as an example. He is not yet back to his best. This is clear. However, to fail to clear a simple kick for the line is unacceptable for any fly half or fullback.
Berrick Barnes’s multiple failures at short drop outs is also unacceptable. Kurtley Beale’s poor defence in Sydney is unacceptable. And so it goes on.
Aimless, brainless kicking is also unacceptable. Moving away from the agreed game plan by any player is also unacceptable.
The hooker must throw every lineout throw straight, even if it is a very windy night. Polota Nau and Horne specifically must remove kamikaze tackles when they are out of position (tackling technique) from their game.
The risk of injury is simply too high and there is too much invested in these players to lose them to major injuries.
Penalties have a very large impact on a rugby game. As a golfer says, you lose stroke and distance if you concede a penalty. Worse, you can concede three points. Penalties must be eliminated and are an unacceptable error. Yellow cards are even more serious.
The area of greatest confusion is the breakdown. Each referee bringing a different interpretation and further complicates this. Err on the side of caution. If you are prepared to kick possession away 15 to 25 times a game, why risk conceding “stroke and distance” or three points to get the ball back?
Being the second-ranked team requires a decision. Consolidate or strive to be number one. For the Wallabies, the supporters will say go for number one.
It is the stuff of all great teams and they often emerge from very dark days. Just ask the 1984 and 1999 Wallabies teams.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (404)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (229)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- What happened to all the rugby enforcers? (25)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (52)
- Wallabies coaching job poisoned chalice (5)
- Manu Samoa squad to tour South Africa for June Tests (5)
- Looking at the weekend’s Super Rugby games (3)
- Reds set to unleash veteran Samo
- IRB Law 12: The forward pass (5)
- What happened to all the rugby enforcers? (25)
- Manu Samoa squad to tour South Africa for June Tests (5)
- Looking at the weekend’s Super Rugby games (3)
- IRB Law 12: The forward pass (5)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (229)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (45)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (10)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- rugby, Rugby Union, wallabies


September 19th 2012 @ 3:09am
Ben.S said | September 19th 2012 @ 3:09am | Report comment
Edit: England are the top ranked European side, then France and then Wales.
With regard to Australia, I don’t think they’re that far from disarray themselves. Two away losses and the two very close home wins start to look even more unimpressive, with the results aside there being little tangible improvement IMO.
Positives:
* Timani has looked physical and interested, but he’s not really a modern 4 lock in terms of his all-round play, and so he needs to be accompanied by somebody who is very good in the air, either a 5 lock or perhaps Higginbotham. A balance definitely needs to be struck.
* Douglas had a very good debut, but let’s see how he develops. Personally I think he should be a starter ahead of Timani who could be utilised as an impact sub.
* Hooper has shown some absolute mongrel, the likes of which I haven’t seen from a Wallaby in years. He has really, really impressed me.
* Higginbotham has shown glimpses of mongrel also, and has shown some neat aerial touches and impact off of the bench. I don’t think he would complement the Wallaby pack as a starting 6 or 8, but IMO he is a great bench option.
* Shipperley – nothing breathtaking, but he is a young lad who has come in and done a far better job than Vuna, for example. He probably isn’t the next Joe Roff, but he’s acquitted himself well IMO.
September 19th 2012 @ 8:01am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 19th 2012 @ 8:01am | Report comment
Ben.S thanks for the correction. I should have said euro champs. Well, if you read and believe the press, then there is disarray in all teams, except the AB’s. While the Wallabies have been poor in certain areas, but this has been exposed by the AB’s excellent play.
I completely agree that the road trip will give us more insight and may well change the rankings. SA away is not easy, nor is it impossible. the argies away will be very tricky, ozzing passion.
Douglas had a good first test but has peviously gone walkabout, so lets hope that he has learnt from that.
Hooper is all class, and will put pressure on Pocock.
Higginbotham, like McCalman, in his second season as a wallaby has gone off the boil.
Shipperly and roof do look similar, at least.
September 19th 2012 @ 9:07pm
Ben.S said | September 19th 2012 @ 9:07pm | Report comment
In all honesty I think England are on the right track. I’m still underwhelmed by some of what I’ve seen, and some of the play out in SA was very, very poor, but then it’s easily the youngest side in the world, and they have managed to eke out results. Most importantly there is harmony in the camp. I would imagine that Wales and Argentina and Scotland aren’t in disarray either. I do really think Australia and SA are in very tenuous positions ATM.
I don’t think Higginbotham is an 8, and whether that was temporary or not I doubt he’ll end up there. That said, I actually thought Higginbotham showed some good aggression at the ruck and worked well in the air. He has gathered some form off of the bench too. I think he will be an important player for Australian rugby over the next few seasons.
Shipperley is the sort of player that English rugby doesn’t produce – a big and athletic young man. Not sure why…
September 19th 2012 @ 10:49am
Riccardo said | September 19th 2012 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Hooper has been a revelation Ben and already demands a starting spot, whether Pocock plays or not. Maybe he’s the answer at 6?
I’m surprised you haven’t mentioned AAC as he has been the other standout Wallby for mine.
Agree with your opinion on Higgs. I’ve seen it posted before and concur he will make the most impact from the bench.
September 19th 2012 @ 8:59pm
Ben.S said | September 19th 2012 @ 8:59pm | Report comment
Tbh I’ve always been a fan of AAC. He has great tenacity and generally is error free. He’s not the most skilled back out there, but he’s a warrior. He hasn’t been at his best for a while, but he has perked up in the last few Tests.
I haven’t seen enough of Douglas in the Super season, but you can tell a lot about a player by their on-field posture, and he looked determined and cool, which is always a good indicator in your first Test. Obviously Timani has improved, but against Samoa in his first game he looked intimidated. I read somewhere that Douglas has really been working on his lineout work too.
Personally I would not look for a short 6-7 pairing like Waugh-Smith. I don’t think Australia are good enough technically at the lineout or restart for that. That said, who is the next 6? Dennis isn’t the man, and I don’t think Higginbotham is the right fit in terms of balance. I quite like Schatz, and although Hooper plays like a 6 IMO I’d pick the 6’3 player every time.
September 19th 2012 @ 9:02pm
Ben.S said | September 19th 2012 @ 9:02pm | Report comment
Just to add: Personally I would start Moore and Douglas, and then A.N. Other at 6. I really like the idea of TPN, Timani and Higginbotham all coming on as impact replacements. That has long been a bane of Wallaby rugby under Deans.
September 19th 2012 @ 4:53am
Johnno said | September 19th 2012 @ 4:53am | Report comment
I agree Ben S. hooper is the real deal and comes with real pal pedigree. Was under-20 aussy captain at 2011 world cup. Was awarded player of the under 20 world cup in 2011. Liam gill who was captain of under-20 world cup 2012 has been great too.
Funny Berrick barnes has been terrible at I/C and 5/8, and all those going on about quad cooper to the rescue, but he has been just as horrible. Both are awful . In may ways like Barnes is now showing i think quad cooper’s best spot may be full back. He can rome the lines with freedom campo style, has a good enough boot from the back, can run lines freely, nice passes bobbing up. Suspect under the high ball , and defence though. However as a fullback he wont have to do as much defence.
September 23rd 2012 @ 1:26pm
Lannash said | September 23rd 2012 @ 1:26pm | Report comment
Sorry Johnno – Just what Australia needs, A full back who can’t tackle and who is suspect under the high ball. If he can’t master the skills of a 1st 5 perhaps he would be better playing league.
September 19th 2012 @ 8:31am
bink said | September 19th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Nice article. Not doom, gloom and negativity that you see so often.
September 19th 2012 @ 9:01am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 19th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
But today we hear that QC is now also in sickbay!!!! For the rest of the season. Wow. last man standing will get the 10 jersey…….
September 19th 2012 @ 9:37am
Brett McKay said | September 19th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Certainly will miss the last two games of TRC, Leftie. May be a chance for Europe in Spring possibly, depending on how the knee cartilage clean-up goes…
September 19th 2012 @ 11:30am
mace 22 said | September 19th 2012 @ 11:30am | Report comment
Firstly don’t they need to do both consolidate second and go for number one. How can you be best if your the third or fourth in the rankings. Also if you want to drop the players you mention, you have to give the replacements time to form good combinations and don’t drop them after a bad game. On penalties I wouldn’t be surprised if penalties are as much part of a defensive pattern as a rush, umbrella, up and in or a up and slide defense. Better to give away three than seven points.
September 19th 2012 @ 1:19pm
ceboss said | September 19th 2012 @ 1:19pm | Report comment
i think our best fullback has been AAC and its gonna b a huge headache for the selectors when pocock comes back which leaves them with the thought of how to use Hooper, he has been awesome for us, he is really mobile and he is a strong runner of the ball aswell as a.real pest at the break down.
September 19th 2012 @ 2:57pm
sittingbison said | September 19th 2012 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
The second they don’t strive to be the best is the second I chuck in my S15 membership and stop bothering with the wallabies.
For me the worrying thing about the Wallabies this season is the ludicrous mistakes being made – it is not simple dropping the ball stuff but side splitting laughter stuff. And they are in disarray, because all those three tests against Wales could VERY easily have been three losses, just as the Boks and Pumas could have been. To their credit they have toughed out wins, but it could oh so easily have been zero wins this season.
The best way I can sum up my thoughts on the wallabies this season is “flaky”, which is the exact opposite of what I thought a Deans team would be. They just dont seem to be ruthlessly professional in going about their business. They are ill disciplined. They dont follow plans. They dont seem to prepare (studying opponents weaknesses and exploiting them, studying refs traits and exploiting them). Its all just so haphazard
September 19th 2012 @ 3:02pm
bink said | September 19th 2012 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
the wallabies have won 13 of their last 18. every game is a rollar coaster ride of emotion!
September 19th 2012 @ 6:33pm
AJH said | September 19th 2012 @ 6:33pm | Report comment
Sittingbison,
I have to agree the momen a team is not striving to be no 1, heads need to role. Consolidating 2nd is not an option – just admitting defeat. A Wallaby coach must demand perfection , must be strict, grab these y gens where needed and bring them into line. No soft measures. Player loyalty is part of amateurism. Being wishy washy does not cut it.
Form is everything and the message has to be clear – play well or someone else will take your place. This would be pretty motivational I would think. Some young players just have not got a chance when they should have – Dan Palmer, Tapaui, Harris (probably), Luke Moro an, Mogg, Fardy to name a few. Shipperley has not been brilliant, but steady, consistent and dependable. What more can you ask for from a rookie. Just a shame more rookiesdid not get a chance when stocks were depleted.
September 19th 2012 @ 7:14pm
pragmatic said | September 19th 2012 @ 7:14pm | Report comment
Right on AJH,
So what if we have a rookie scrum half, second rower and winger and a very new open side flanker. I want a player to know if he doesn’t perform EVERY GAME he will be dropped, regardless of the players around him. Test experience is no reason to be given first shot at a position. You have regularly proven yourself at test level, SO WHAT. your as good as your last game. This fear of being dropped and not being able to get comfortable in the position will make them perform like they are paid to do.
September 20th 2012 @ 6:44pm
IvanN said | September 20th 2012 @ 6:44pm | Report comment
I have to disagree – the rankings will not stay like that for the near forseeable future – the Wobblies will lose horribly in Pretoria, and then lose narrowly in Argentina. The Boks rattled the Blacks in Dunedin, and had it not been for poor kicking, poor passing and an idiot that thought he was superman, the Boks should have beaten the Blacks well on that occasion.
I think the Boks will win both their home games, with their current state of affairs – and once the pick a decent backline that can pass and actually work a move, the #1 title will be a two horse race only.
Aus will be fighting to keep their #3 from England, who are definitely on the up.
A win is a win, and well done for getting it – I just feel that the Boks will get it right at home, and the result is going to be a big win against Aus, and a tight win against NZ.
September 21st 2012 @ 4:02pm
ABC said | September 21st 2012 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
You said the same thing the last time the wallabies played you boys, I think you even said the Argies would beat the wallabies on the Gold Coast:)
September 21st 2012 @ 4:53pm
IvanN said | September 21st 2012 @ 4:53pm | Report comment
I think the Wobblies were quite fortunate to scrape against the Argies at home. Im predicting a win for Arg in Arg.
Short end of it all, Australia dont look like theyre going to improve much anytime soon, the Boks do.
NZ can improve allot, and are still number 1 – but i am hoping the Boks can beat them in soweto.