SPIRO: The Wallabies face a huge test against the All Bull Springboks
By Spiro Zavos, 24 Sep 2012 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, wallabies
Wallabies player Digby Ioane crosses over to score a try during the Rugby Union International between Australia and Argentina at Skilled Park on the Gold Coast, Saturday, Sept. 15, 2012. (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
When the going gets tough, the tough get going.
That familiar and true sporting adage sums up the task facing the Wallabies as they embark on their difficult last two Tests in the 2012 Rugby Championship.
On Saturday night they play an embattled Springboks side at Loftus Versfeld Stadium at Pretoria and then a week later they face a passionate Pumas side at Rosario.
This, aside from playing at Eden Park in New Zealand against the All Blacks, is about as hard a rugby assignment as you can face.
Pretoria is the heartland of the Afrikaaner rugby ‘win-at-all-costs’ mentality. Visiting teams are often pelted with fruit.
The venue is not for the faint-hearted, either the visiting players or the referee.
And this brings us to another difficulty facing the Wallabies. The referee is Alain Rolland, the Irishman who has a penchant for rewarding the brutal, attritional, forward-power, kicking game of the Springboks with penalties.
Rolland refereed the Springboks v England Rugby World Cup 2007 final which was won on Percy Montgomery’s accurate kicking boot. In that game Rolland refereed in a way that favoured the kicking-tackling side.
If he does this at Loftus Versfeld Stadium, it could be a hard match for the Wallabies to win.
The point here is that the laws state, and this has been re-emphasised since the bleak, dour penalty-obsessed play of the Rugby World Cup 2007, that the tackler must immediately release the tackled player so that the ball can be placed immediately.
Then before the ruck is formed, the tackler or a second digger can have a go at turning over the ball.
The northern hemisphere referees tend to favour the tackling teams in their judgment calls about whether the ball has been immediately played. This tendency plays into the hands of kicking teams.
And one of the features of the inaugural The Rugby Championship has been the high count of penalties given, many of them against the side with the ball.
And a consequence of this is that there has not been a single match where a side has scored a bonus point for notching up four tries.
Of the 12 Rugby Championship Tests this season, seven will be refereed by northern hemisphere referees and five will be refereed by southern hemisphere referees. The logic here is that the IRB has a panel of its top referees and these referees are going to be used in Tests around the world, and not just in their own jurisdictions.
The problem with this is that there is a preponderance of northern hemisphere referees in the top list. In my opinion, a number of these supposedly top referees are anything but the best in the world.
Just to name a few names, Nigel Owens, Alain Rolland, Wayne Barnes and George Clancy do not impress as being of world class standard.
These referees, unfortunately, have given away far too many penalties and often for the wrong reasons. The Rugby Championship is averaging 21.6 penalties a match. This exceeds the Six Nations average even of 19.6.
It was ludicrous, for instance, that the All Blacks v South African Test at Dunedin saw Clancy give 25 penalties, 19 of them at the ruck.
The referee for the Test at Pretoria is the Irishman, Rolland. He can be extremely pedantic. In one Test in South Africa several years ago, for instance, he penalised the All Blacks twice for crooked feeds to the scrum, despite the fact that their scrum was shoving the Springboks around.
Fourie du Preez, the great Springboks halfback (their best in the professional era), was feeding into his own second-row as halfbacks generally do.
The Springboks total game plan is to put pressure on the rucks, drive from the lineouts and kick bombs to force penalties to goal from. This week I was sent an email from a disgruntled Springboks supporter with these words on it: The Boks Game Plan Is ALL BULL.
Having a referee who officiates for penalties, for this All Bull game, is a big plus for the Springboks, in my opinion.
The Wallabies go into the Test and, indeed, the entire road trip with a seriously depleted squad.
John O’Neill has been criticised for pointing out how many Wallabies are out injured. But he is right. And the additional point to make here is that unlike, say, New Zealand and South Africa, there is not the depth of players to cover when the stars are injured.
There are three captains out, for instance: James Horwill, David Pocock and Will Genia. James O’Connor, Quade Cooper and Drew Mitchell are out. These are all starters, or should be starters.
There has been a lot of talk about Cooper since he came back from injury. He played poorly against the Pumas, admittedly.
But I think the more mature (in his play and not in his off-field comments) Cooper on the field is an ideal number 10 for the Wallabies. His passing game is what distinguishes him from his peers.
If this passing game can be harnessed, the Wallabies have the potential to be a potent attacking side.
But this is a matter for the end of season European tour, or next year providing Cooper is still playing rugby union.
Deans has tended to end the Tests playing two fliers, Michael Hooper and Liam Gill, as loose forwards. I think for Pretoria he needs to put as big a pack as he can on the field and and on the reserves bench.
This means, I would argue, starting with Sitaleki Timani and Nathan Sharpe in the second row. And bringing on Kane Douglas, who was most impressive against the Pumas, when the opportune moment comes. And leaving Hooper to handle the flier job by himself, something which he is perfectly capable of doing.
Hooper should be a starter, despite or because of the fact that he will be smaller and faster than any other forward on the field. A Zavos adage is this: the pace of the forwards is the pace of the fastest forward and the pace of the backs is the pace of the slowest back.
The All Bull falls down on both counts, which explains, I reckon, why they are struggling. Heyneke Meyer, the Springboks coach, seems to be infatuated with the Bismarckian principle that ‘might is right.’
He has the flier Heinrich Brussow available (and his injury was the key event in the Wallabies victory over the Springboks in the Rugby World Cup 2011 quarter-final), but refuses to use him.
This is rugby madness. Brussow would best the first forward I’d pick for the Springboks pack. Thank goodness for Meyer’s block-headed dedication to the All Bulls game which requires big men throughout the pack.
The other factor that is difficult for the Wallabies is that they have played 16 Tests at altitude in South Africa against the Springboks in over 80 years. And they have won just three.
The last victory, two years ago, at Blomfontein, with Kurtley Beale’s last-second, long range penalty, was the first Wallaby victory against the Springboks at altitude for 47 years!
Richard Loe rather famously, or infamously, predicted that the Wallabies would win only one Test in the 2012 Rugby Championship. Wrong.
They have won two, with home victories over the Springboks and the Pumas. This compares with the Springboks who have won one (against the Pumas) and drawn one (the Pumas also).
With all the team having played four Tests, Zealand have 16 tournament points (from four wins) and a points differential of + 56. Australia have 8 tournament points (two wins) and a PD -19. South Africa have 7 tournament points and a PD + 4. Argentina have 3 tournament points and a PD -41.
Only the Wallabies have a chance (and it is an outside chance with 100 – 1 odds) of taking the tournament from the All Blacks. But a win at Pretoria will go a long win to finishing second in the tournament in which case it would a matter of ‘eat your heart out, Richard Loe.’
Spiro Zavos, a founding writer on The Roar, was long time editorial writer on the Sydney Morning Herald, where he started a rugby column that has run for nearly 30 years. Spiro has written 12 books: fiction, biography, politics and histories of Australian, New Zealand, British and South African rugby. He is regarded as one of the foremost writers on rugby throughout the world.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- All Blacks, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, wallabies


September 24th 2012 @ 7:14am
Ziggy said | September 24th 2012 @ 7:14am | Report comment
“pelted with fruit” That’s for sissies. I have been pelted with BBQ chicken there!
September 24th 2012 @ 3:36pm
bluerose said | September 24th 2012 @ 3:36pm | Report comment
seriously with BBQ chicken???? WOW.
September 24th 2012 @ 6:14pm
Dez said | September 24th 2012 @ 6:14pm | Report comment
BBQ chicken is not as hard as an apple!!!
September 24th 2012 @ 8:47pm
sheek said | September 24th 2012 @ 8:47pm | Report comment
How wasteful…..!
September 25th 2012 @ 5:32am
IvanN said | September 25th 2012 @ 5:32am | Report comment
You lucky mate, some of the women there could throw their husbands at you.
Ive sat at Loftus many times, as its one of the best grounds in teh world to watch a game,
And when the Bulls lose, I have often seen women kick stand chairs right out.
Wallabies are going to be monstered in Pretoria, They have relied on VERY good teams to come away with
narrow victories in SA –
And Spiro, talking about two wins, compared to Boks one… Well mate, The Boks still have two home games to play.
September 24th 2012 @ 7:14am
Don't Leave it in the hand of the judges said | September 24th 2012 @ 7:14am | Report comment
‘Don’t Leave it in the hand of the judges.’ – is an old boxing saying. If the Wallabies are good enough then they shouldn’t have to worry about the referee. They need to do the basics well – get the ball and use the ball, pass the ball and catch the ball, keep possession of the ball, run with the ball and kick their goals. Defend well and take opportunities. The team that does those things the best will win the game.
September 24th 2012 @ 7:27am
Johnno said | September 24th 2012 @ 7:27am | Report comment
No chance we have not won there in like 45 plus years. And don’t like our chances to face Argentina in Argentina, on the back of an altitude sapping game, and a 10 hour flight . While Argentina will not be playing at altitude and have no travel fatigue so will be fresher compartitivly than the Wallabies who will be exhausted I think.
September 24th 2012 @ 8:13am
Rugby Tragic said | September 24th 2012 @ 8:13am | Report comment
Johnno, ‘not a chance?’ – you are probably right but we live in hope.
The Boks themselves are not travelling that well and while home ground advantage is huge in the Republic, it is my thoughts that now, without QC, there will be less division in the team. They will play for each other, hopefully as a team.
I recognise some of the skills of QC can be exhilarating to watch, but each advantage he creates is countered by an error or irresponsible action that puts his team mates under so much pressure to clean up while he retreats to the back. Test rugby is not Super 15 rugby, defences are tighter and the intensity is much higher.
September 24th 2012 @ 8:20am
Johnno said | September 24th 2012 @ 8:20am | Report comment
rugby tragic true. But if you look at history like the last 45 years at preotira. And a lot of wallaby injuries, tough home ground adavatange in both Sth africa/Argentina really hostile passion and 2 teams of same ability as OZ, plus the travel fatigue vs argentina., all advantages to both sth africa/argies. If i was a betting man or playing russian roulette like the deer hunter movie style all advantages to boks/argies and the little boxing kangaroo/wallaby better have a lot of fight in him to stand a chance.
September 24th 2012 @ 8:36am
Rugby Tragic said | September 24th 2012 @ 8:36am | Report comment
I understand all that Johnno but I remain an optimist and will be up at 1 am Sunday morning watching the Loftus game. They won at Bloemfontein in 2010 for the first time since 1933 (? whenever but a bloody long time ago).
I just feel that the Wallabies with their back to the wall and without the devisive QC stand a chance. I think they will play more as a team without QC. Wallabies are $2.65 (not bad in a 2 horse race) at the TAB at the moment – might take a little all-up with a spread in the following test between the Pumas and AB’s!
September 24th 2012 @ 10:06am
Suzy Poison said | September 24th 2012 @ 10:06am | Report comment
Rugby Tragic, As a die-hard Bok fan, I too will be up at 1am, watching the game. Good luck. This game will decide the fate of both coaches. I have heard from a reliable source, that Deans has lost the support of his players. And this is also why Cooper is not worried about his tweets. I am sure negotiations have already started with Ewen. Also I have heard that, should Australia lose both games, these next two games, will be the last Deans coaches Australia. Meyer is also under immense pressure back in South Africa. If the Boks lose, at Loftus, I don’t think he will see out the year either. If Meyer’s defence, was the improvement (kicking aside) the Boks showed in their last game against the All Blacks. They appear to be heading in the correct direction.
Looking back, the Wallabies win in Bloemfontien was a special win, for you guys. Genia, Horwill, Cooper and Pocock were all playing. That was in my opinion, the peak of the Deans coaching. This year, the Wallabies, have been gutted by injury, and have failed to score a single point in the only away game they have played. I would be surprised if the Wallabies managed a win, in two very tough touring environments. However the Wallabies certainly know how to play the Boks and negate the strength of the Bok forwards by moving them around, till they tire. Loftus is probably a bit more intimidating than Bloemfontien. I will also be interesting to see if the odds to drift out, now that Goosen has been reporting as starting the game. The whole Bok game is based on the Highveld kicking game. Despite some criticism of the Bok backline play, the Bok forwards really took it the Kiwis, unlike the Wallaby forwards who were really under pressure. The Boks beat Argentina at home by three tries to zip, and drew against the Pumas over there. Seeing the Pumas really surprise everyone, in their tour over here, has vindicated what Meyer has said from the start, that Argentina are a much better team, than people give them credit for. All the signs show that this Bok team, is slowly improving. Some Bok fans are even going so far as suggesting a 20+ score, against Australia. I still however, think the game will be a lot closer than most of the Boks are predicting, and expect the Wallabies to still be hanging in there with 20minutes to go.
September 24th 2012 @ 10:48am
Rugby Tragic said | September 24th 2012 @ 10:48am | Report comment
Suzy, I know the odds are against the Wallabies winning. That said, they are much more dangerous when written off. It is in the DNA of Aussies the ‘never say die’ attitude (until they are dead!). What I long for is a good game played by both teams. Who I long to win has nothing to do with a stronger desire to watch a competitive match that is fairly ref’ed.
I think the game played earlier will have little bearing on the two games that follow in the Republic. In Australia, there is a frustration that the games have been punctuated with penalties, basic errors (like pass and catch) and aimless kicking. In NZ, they talk about playing better without regard to the opposition – a hint of arrogance to be sure. In SA, I am sure that there has been a lot of frustration, both from their loss against Austrlalia after leading 13-3 and the missed penalty opportunities against the AB’s
And what can one say about the Puma’s – they have been a revelation – never excuses but they themselves must be frustrated for not closing out the draw against the Boks and letting the Wallabies back in aftger leading 19-6 with about 25 mins to play. They have been though a class act in this their 1st year in the big league and their fans who attended the game on the Gold Coast were absolutely great!.
In Goosen, SA has a play for the future, provided that the Bok machine can change their tactics against possibly their instinctiveness. It will be be fascinating to watch the WB v Boks match where the coaches on both sides have copped heaps of criticism.
September 24th 2012 @ 12:28pm
Mike said | September 24th 2012 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
“I have heard from a reliable source, that Deans has lost the support of his players.”
Ah, the wonders of non-attributable comment on-line. Leave old-fashioned whispering campaigns for dead…!
September 24th 2012 @ 1:10pm
Suzy Poison said | September 24th 2012 @ 1:10pm | Report comment
Mike, I am a complete stirrer, and nothing I say would stand up in a court of law. However perhaps Quade tweets tell the tale. And am just confirming that I heard a similar rumbles weeks ago, coming from sources within the Wallaby inner circle. Whether it’s true or not we will find out in two weeks time, at the completion of the Rugby Championship.
September 24th 2012 @ 1:12pm
Mike said | September 24th 2012 @ 1:12pm | Report comment
True.
September 24th 2012 @ 1:20pm
Suzy Poison said | September 24th 2012 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Oh Yes, Rugby Tragic. I will go on record that I think the Pumas have a very good chance at beating the All Blacks, this weekend. Remember, the Pumas beat France a few weeks ago at home.
September 24th 2012 @ 2:18pm
ohtani's jacket said | September 24th 2012 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Do you really think the Boks performance in Dunedin was a sign that they’re moving forward? It looked like the kind of default performance they always put in against the All Blacks. Trouble is if they put in their typical performance against the Wallabies they’re going to lose. They need to take things up a notch. I can’t understand why there isn’t much indignation about this losing streak to Australia. Shouldn’t the Boks camp be hell bent on ending it? Why do they always drift so aimlessly?
September 24th 2012 @ 2:36pm
Suzy Poison said | September 24th 2012 @ 2:36pm | Report comment
At least Dean Greyling won’t be gifting away 6 points and a yellow card….But I agree with you OJ….Boks still pretty weak….watching all the soft tries they gave away kills me.
September 24th 2012 @ 5:08pm
ohtani's jacket said | September 24th 2012 @ 5:08pm | Report comment
I actually meant to say that by their default performance against the All Blacks that it was typically solid. I just didn’t see it as any different from how they usually play against us regardless of form.
September 25th 2012 @ 5:37am
IvanN said | September 25th 2012 @ 5:37am | Report comment
Ek dink jy bly al te lank in die land van die tronkvoels.
Bokke gaan oor die Aussie pak loop soos n trein sonder brieke.
Hier kom n Springbok pakslae, ek voel dit – en soos ek gese het ons gaan NZ wen in Dunedin,
waar almal vir my gelag het – waar ons MOES wen – ek kan weer se, die bokke gaan ore aansit.
September 25th 2012 @ 6:00am
mania said | September 25th 2012 @ 6:00am | Report comment
ufa, kaukala faa lelei
September 24th 2012 @ 8:46am
kingplaymaker said | September 24th 2012 @ 8:46am | Report comment
I would say the main thing to win this match is playing Beale at 10, in practice if not on the teamsheet. He is the only available player with a similar level of creativity to Cooper.
The Wallaby pack has been far better this year than, with exceptional instances, for a very long time. TPN, Timani and Samo should have enough firepower to handle the Boks forwards and with it destroy their game. But for the Wallabies to then win, they need the backline to do something worthwhile and that means a creative player at 10.
September 24th 2012 @ 9:17am
mania said | September 24th 2012 @ 9:17am | Report comment
no play harris there. he wont screw it up as badly as beale or barnes. your not gonna win the RC so maybe its time to experiment.
the experiment with timani and douglas went well.
September 24th 2012 @ 9:28am
kingplaymaker said | September 24th 2012 @ 9:28am | Report comment
mania Harris is not creative: he’s not a bad player but he’s not a creative one. The Wallabies need a creative player at 10 and Beale is the only candidate.
September 24th 2012 @ 9:48am
mania said | September 24th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
kpm – beggars cant be choosers. creativity is great provided theres a low error rate. harris has a low error rate and thats the best wb’s can hope for at this stage.
its not written in law that the 1st5 has to be the playmaker. first measure should be that they dont screw up and choke the backline. barnes chokes the back line. beale hasnt proven this season that he’s at test level so cant be rewarded with such an important position.
September 24th 2012 @ 9:45am
bennalong said | September 24th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Good article Spiro!
Couldn’t have said it better myself
We can beat ‘em like we beat ‘em before the World Cup when the knockers were in full flight as now
But reading that Rolland is reffing the match depresses me
I wrote in a number of blogs about the number of bodies on the ground at the breakdown and if one thing needs fixing in Rugby it’s this area. A crooked ref (they do exist in the professional game) cannot be ‘taken out of the game’ if the laws do not stop this chaotic part of the game where a penalty can go either way in so many cases.
September 24th 2012 @ 10:22am
Riccardo said | September 24th 2012 @ 10:22am | Report comment
Rolland as Ref clinches it for me.
The Boks are about to get one over the Wallabies and maybe begin the reversal of poor form they have shown against them in recent times, something I still struggle to comprehend.
This game will be all about Alain and his style of imposing himself on the game.
What really interests me is whether or not Goosen gets a start and what the young man can bring.
September 24th 2012 @ 11:00am
Suzy Poison said | September 24th 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
Afrikaans Pretoria based paper called “The Report” has stated Goosen knows he is starting.
September 24th 2012 @ 12:09pm
El Gamba said | September 24th 2012 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
There is another article on League vs Union Riccardo and your:
“This game will be all about Alain and his style of imposing himself on the game.” sums up, for me, why rugby is struggling as a spectacle right now.
The “poor form they have shown against them in recent times, something I still struggle to comprehend” is simple when explained as the referees generally reffing SA more than Aus and in turn Aus more than NZ (said somewhat tongue in cheek…)
I thought Steve Walsh’s reffing of the Qld club final yesterday was very good, he has had the odd moment but generally it is not all about him.
September 24th 2012 @ 10:54am
tubby said | September 24th 2012 @ 10:54am | Report comment
as good as brussuow can be, I’m amazed that people still think he should be an automatic inclusion. he simply hasn’t been anywhere near his best this year. luow is a far better option at this stage
September 24th 2012 @ 10:59am
Suzy Poison said | September 24th 2012 @ 10:59am | Report comment
Agreed, and he is only just returning friom injury.
September 24th 2012 @ 10:57am
Suzy Poison said | September 24th 2012 @ 10:57am | Report comment
Spiro wrote…“ Only the Wallabies have a chance (and it is an outside chance with 100 – 1 odds) of taking the tournament from the All Blacks.”
Not strictly true Spiro. The Boks potentially could win both games at home by scoring four tries and getting a bonus-point, and potentially the All Blacks could lose both games, and could potentially could be denied a bonus point, from both losses. This scenario is still unlikely, but possible.
September 24th 2012 @ 11:38am
Louis said | September 24th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Rwc 2007 penalty obsessed and dour, were we watching different tournaments? 07 was brilliant unpredictable, thrilling, giant crowds for every team and big drama in every game, just because the Wallabies and All Blacks got knocked out early doesnt mean the tournament is boring. 2011 had a better final then 2007 but not a better tournament unless you like scores of 9-8 or 11-9.
September 24th 2012 @ 11:46am
Jerry said | September 24th 2012 @ 11:46am | Report comment
I agree with Spiro – the rugby of 2007 was pretty dour.
I’m not sure what your point about scorelines is – there were plenty of low scoring matches in 07 too – scores like 10-12, 14-9 or 15-6.
September 25th 2012 @ 5:40am
IvanN said | September 25th 2012 @ 5:40am | Report comment
no mention that hte Boks scored the most tries in that World cup.
September 25th 2012 @ 5:49am
Jerry said | September 25th 2012 @ 5:49am | Report comment
That’ll be because the All Blacks scored 15 more tries than SA did.
September 25th 2012 @ 5:04pm
IvanN said | September 25th 2012 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
or that.