Why are so many Wallabies injured?
By kingplaymaker, 1 Oct 2012 kingplaymaker is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- robbie deans, Rugby Union, The Rugby Championship, wallabies
Wallabies Will Genia passes from a scrum. AAP Image/Mick Tsikas
Related coverage
The starting Wallabies XV for the most recent South African Test match was the following:
Robinson, Polota-Nau, Alexander, Sharpe, Douglas, Dennis, Hooper, Samo, Phipps, Beale, Ioane, Mccabe, Ashley-Cooper, Shipperley, Barnes
The first proposition of this article is that the team named would be beaten by the following:
Kepu, Moore, Palmer, Horwill, Timani, Higginbotham, Pocock, Palu, Genia, Cooper, Tomane, Lealiifano, O’Connor, Mitchell, Turner
All of these players are injured. Nor are they the only injured players and there could be a considerable debate as to which injured team should be selected in different circumstances.
Recent Wallabies such as Ben McCalman and Cooper Vuna, young talents such as Chris Sautia, senior figures who played last year such as Dan Vickerman and Rocky Elsom – all of these and more are part of the vast ward of crocked players who otherwise might be able to play.
This was all before Saturday’s match, when the injury calamity reached the point of farce, with so many further wounded that 14 men finished the match.
Of course it should be obvious from the strength of the shadow XV that it would be a miracle to beat top three quality international teams, but such is the hysteria of Robbie Deans’ detractors that reason and fairness are not so much pushed aside as trampled into atomic particles.
If Deans had access to the players concerned, a far more dangerous outfit could be assembled and probably the best for much of a decade. In theory therefore, a dramatic watershed could take place on the international field next season.
But doesn’t this suppose that the plague won’t return, perhaps with greater vengeance, to blight the Lions tour and Bledisloe Cup once more?
The question must now be asked why Australia is losing so many more players through injury than its two regular adversaries, who take part in the same tournaments?
Firstly, it should be made clear that most of these injuries occurred at state level, or if during Wallaby training or play they are largely recurrences of injuries suffered with the franchises. Though of course, the fanatical anti-Deans cult would delight in blaming them all on him.
One idea is that Australian franchises insist on heavy weight training to make up for a perceived or real lack of physicality with respect to their New Zealand or South African foes. Perhaps after being out-muscled, the instinctive response of the fitness gurus is to lift big.
Another is that there may be over-exertion across the board because of the tremendous challenges faced against New Zealand and South African Super Rugby teams, and that strain and a lack of confidence lead to physical tension and stress which, in turn, generate injuries.
Is it a general style of fitness training in Australian sport, maybe the mistake of applying training ideas better suited to one sport in another, given the choice of systems from two other broadly similar codes close to hand?
Perhaps coaches don’t rest or rotate players enough, and expect their best to carry match after match, something less necessary in New Zealand where the replacement is often as good as the starter.
These are all little more than tentative suggestions. The author has not fathomed the source of this epidemic. One thing is clear though, if the malady is not remedied next season, the Wallabies will need divine intervention to put a competitive team on the field again.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (407)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (268)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (249)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (246)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (232)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Where have the Australian franchises five-pointers gone? (34)
- Brumbies weather Blues storm in Auckland (7)
- Force pip Highlanders 19-18 in Perth (19)
- Dismissed Hartley in Lions doubt (15)
- Snarling Dogs rally for AFL win
- Stormers deny Reds 20-15 in Super Rugby (11)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (238)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (238)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (175)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (212)
- Has McKenzie cost Cooper the Lions Tour? (122)
- Does Quade Cooper really matter? (31)
- Rebels vs Waratahs: Super Rugby live scores, blog (415)
- Chiefs vs Crusaders: Super Rugby live scores (182)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- robbie deans, Rugby Union, The Rugby Championship, wallabies


October 1st 2012 @ 7:11am
biltongbek said | October 1st 2012 @ 7:11am | Report comment
Not wanting to argue the point, afterall you would know better than me who the best xv would be, but AAC, Barnes, Beale, Ioane, McCabe and Samo has been regular starters under Deans.
Getting to the injuries, is it possiblemto list which players were injured during matches and which were injured during Training.
I think it is also important to distinguish between a contact and non contact injury.
AAC for example was a contact injury but due to the wrong tackling technique.
October 1st 2012 @ 7:37am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 7:37am | Report comment
biltong everyone has their own favourite XVs, but if I were choosing with the players above available I would have a backline of Genia, Cooper, Ioane, Lealiifano, JOC, Tomane, Beale (with Cooper brainwashed and his personality replaced with someone else’s), while in the pack despite Samo’s valiant efforts Palu would take precedence. So for me only two of the list you gave would be in a fit Wallaby team.
Regarding injuries, it would be very interested to see what relation match injuries had to training injuries, and whether there was a connection between certain kinds of injuries, perhaps contact-based, and training techniques. It’s been pointed out that there is a whole hospital ward of Wallabies with hamstring injuries, which may suggest a cause to those more expert than me in sports training.
October 1st 2012 @ 1:58pm
El Gamba said | October 1st 2012 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
I don’t think the make up of the best XV is the point. Lealiifano and Tomane would both be darkhorses in my opinion. I am a big believer in the competitive tension guys like that can bring to the squad – a mediocre game by any of the backs, and most of the forwards, will secure your position for the next week. An absolute shocker may get you relegated to the bench but that’s all.
I’m more interested in what I percieve to be your real point KPM. Why are so many players getting injured?
Perhaps we need some sort of centralised facility focussing on strength, conditioning and injury management for the Wallabies? I know that the Socceroos and Australian Cricket don’t but…
October 1st 2012 @ 2:20pm
Jutsie said | October 1st 2012 @ 2:20pm | Report comment
It has to be in conjunction with the super teams. I dont think an actual physical facility is required rather a department made up of top notch sports scientists, fitness gurus, sports dr’s, etc. Who would monitor the core group of wallabies throughout the super season and have input in the training and injury management processes employed by the super teams as well as at camp wallaby.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:46pm
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:46pm | Report comment
The problem is that most of these injuries occur at state and not Super level, so a centralised facility wouldn’t help that side of it.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:53pm
Mike said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:53pm | Report comment
That may mean that ARU has to be talking to the state RUs, pointing out the problem to them and asking them to co-operate in a scheme that will monitor and assist the players even at state level.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:02pm
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:02pm | Report comment
Mike I suppose it’s a case of who holds the whip hand. Do the ARU have the practical power to force the states to leave out Wallabies? Then they also might want these Wallabies to play the whole Super season in order for the franchises to perform.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:26pm
Mike said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:26pm | Report comment
Well that would be disaster, but if we are talking about a viable solution to the problem then I think wide-ranging discussion and dialogue is necessary. All stakeholders have to acknowledge that they all have legitimate interests – Wallabies, S15 side, State unions, clubs – but that there is a problem that concerns all, and that all must pull together to make the solution work.
October 1st 2012 @ 2:50pm
Adams said | October 1st 2012 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
Ohhhh , someone else has suggested that the Wallabies lack oFf field support, resources and facilities recently.
Nobody liked hearing it much….
October 1st 2012 @ 2:57pm
Jutsie said | October 1st 2012 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
No someone used it as a feeble excuse for his childish outbursts.
October 1st 2012 @ 7:28am
Johnno said | October 1st 2012 @ 7:28am | Report comment
For me a few theories: And I am no expert on sports medicine or exercise science or strength and conditioning:
-Super rugby squad sizes: 30 full time plus 5 wider training group: Need to find the money to fund 35-40 full time spots .
To allow rotation of top blue chip players, will help with player welfare. And create more depth as more players exposed to full time pro environment, so more talent will be found. And also create depth.
-Imports too. 5 per team imagine if each team could have 5 Gareth Delves, or james Haskell, or star pacific islanders in SUper rugby:
SANZAR need to relax import rules. Coz with star imports you can rotate wallabies or boks, knowing full well you not compromising on quality.
-Also what concerns me looking in and i am no expert but it is the warm up time too. It seem players warm up and stretch forever like for 30 minutes before games. Im amazed they have the energy when they get out there in the match the warm ups often look too physical and too much stretching.
- i have been reading a bit lately about stretching, is it like static stretching or other types of stretching. Now I am after reading many experts say stretching before matches is not good as stretching stretches muscles to much and you slightly tear muscles and work muscles , then go out and play it is too much.
-Or another one is just the physical contact of modern pro rugby. And this is linked with concussions. The hits get harder despite all the extra weight training and conditioning, the sheer power of the hits and collisions now is so much tougher on the body. While foul play has been cut down massively due to camera and video scrutiny , the actual hits are a lot harder.
-Will we in 20 years see gridiron type helmets or all body armour , who knows maybe one day. Funny I know but many rugby league players who have retired in the modern game and doctors say some of the tackles in the footy codes are similar to minor car crashes. SO bodies in contact sports are becoming train wrecks.
-I must say I like the new concussion rule, as long as it doesn’t get abused where teams milk it like the wallabies are doing with the been robinson prop subbing ploy which i think is going against the spirt of the game, then the concision rule will be a good 1.
October 1st 2012 @ 7:42am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 7:42am | Report comment
A lot of good ideas there Johnno.
The number of concussions to leading Wallabies seems striking. What’s causing this? Or rather why does this happen more to Australian players than NZ and SA players.
Stretching never seemed to do much to me and a physiotherapist I spoke to once said there are medical theories that it just makes you ‘stretchy’ and doesn’t prevent injuries at all.
I think squad sizes should be bigger in the end and of course that would cost money the ARU claim not to have. Perhaps without a national competition there are fewer players prepared and ready to jump in. Imports, too, are something else that could help here indeed.
October 1st 2012 @ 8:03am
Johnno said | October 1st 2012 @ 8:03am | Report comment
KPM it may seem that way but after reading th enZ herald which has been doing a lot of articles on it lately, it is just as big a problem in NZ too, but maybe less AB’S than wallabies. Adam ashely cooper’s hit that could of happened to any player, and TPN the wallaby hooker that to me has nothing to do with being aussy. In fact he is aussy of Tongan heritage so very strong naturally , his style is just bad in his tackling technique i don’t know if that has to do with being aussy or kiwi. But here is 1 article in NZ herald last month there are about 10 of them done in some sort of sort of chapter in NZ herald .
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10833627
SO it is happening in NZ too but yes it seems more wallabies are getting knocked out why i don’t know.
October 1st 2012 @ 3:32pm
Mike said | October 1st 2012 @ 3:32pm | Report comment
Johnno, good points. I don’t know what the detailed answers are, but I do think we need a centralised responsibilty for each of these issues. Does anyone at ARU have responsibilty to formulate responses to fitness and injury management issues?
October 1st 2012 @ 8:02pm
Minz said | October 1st 2012 @ 8:02pm | Report comment
A good thing to note would then be that the gridiron armour was designed to prevent players dying during games from fractured skulls, ruptured organs etc (along with rule changes; the US Congress was threatening to outlaw the game due to the large number of fatalities!). The armour’s actually a source of injury these days – the hard armour and helmet is used in tackles and causes a lot of injuries (I suspect this is because the armour and helmet makes players feel invulnerable, so they put themselves in significantly more dangerous positions than they would without it). Helmets aren’t particularly effective against concussion because it is caused by your brain bouncing off your skull and hence very difficult to prevent with an external device. Constant head knocks appear to make NFL players more susceptible to degenerative brain illnesses.
Ultimately, it appears that playing with armour actually makes gridiron more dangerous, rather than less – it’s probably not the best idea to introduce it to other sports!
October 1st 2012 @ 7:36am
Rabbitz said | October 1st 2012 @ 7:36am | Report comment
Rotating and Resting players is an interesting conundrum.
Don’t rotate – get bagged by players and spectators over injury rates, too much footy, reduced careers etc etc etc.
Rotate – get bagged by players and spectators over not respecting the jersey, not taking tests seriously, tanking, giving some players preferable treatment etc etc etc.
Who would be a sports administrator or coach eh?
October 1st 2012 @ 7:55am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 7:55am | Report comment
Rabbtiz the difference here I believe is that New Zealand can bring in a great player who some might say should be playing anyway while for the Australian franchises a player who is hardly good enough is replaced by a club standard fill-in.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:08am
Rabbitz said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
I actually agree that a rotational / resting policy is needed in modern rugby, although oddly I don’t like the 7 and 8 man substitute idea, Two or three is plenty.
I also agree that the player pool available to the ARU is far too shallow and needs to be fixed.
I was more commenting on us commenters…
October 1st 2012 @ 9:57am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Rabbitz agreed, the supporter market is insatiable and doesn’t considered niceties such as the players well-being!
October 1st 2012 @ 7:46am
Sailosi said | October 1st 2012 @ 7:46am | Report comment
I’m not somebody who takes much notice of injuries but this is getting ridiculous. The worrying thing is that a number of them are very serious.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
October 1st 2012 @ 8:43am
sheek said | October 1st 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
“Why are so many Wallabies injured”?
It’s a good question, but we should not be too hasty in arriving at the answers. Biltongbek for example, poses some good questions of his own.
I’m curious to know how many of the injuries can be attributed to cumulative wear & tear on the players. We all know injuries are more likely to occur when a player is physically & mentally tired.
How many injuries can be attributed to players fatigued by consecutive years of constant, hard rugby? Perhaps the answers are not so easy to discern.
Certainly one immediate & obvious observation is to build the player participation base (here in Australia). Now that seems more imperative than ever before.
When I developed my “mixed bag of goodies” proposal several years ago – internationals, super rugby (HC-style), national comp, premier rugby, etc – the likelihood of injuries didn’t figure strongly in my representations.
But now on reflection, I think it adds more credence to my “mixed bag of goodies” proposal. A player may end up appearing in the same maximum number of matches in a season – about 30 to 35 (barring injury) – but importantly it allows players to “refresh” themselves mentally between different comps.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:07am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:07am | Report comment
sheek from what you say I imagine two keys here might be quality of players and quality of matches. Although I agree conclusions on such a difficult subject should be arrived at slowly.
It would be a lazy answer to say the longer season is responsible in itself, as New Zealand and South Africa seem to cope better with it. What may be the case is that because of a lack of high quality players across the franchises, there is less rotation, more pressure on individuals, more pressure to rush back from injury, play through pain barriers etc….Hence the need for a national competition to prepare players better and identify them better.
The second is quality of matches. European matches has endless seasons, but at a far lower intensity as there are more than double the number of teams in countries of comparable playing strength (England, France). So there are fewer injuries because of this.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:35am
sheek said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
KPM,
Let’s say the seaon is made as follows:
10-12 test matches
2-3 pre-season matches
8-10 super rugby matches
8-10 national comp matches
3-4 premier rugby (club) matches
That’s a total between 31-39 matches of all types, but realistically no-one would be allowed to appear in more than 35 matches max.
Also, another reason why I suggest a truncated super rugby comp is because it means players can spend less time traveling overseas & more time traveling within their own country. Surely, that would be a bonus to the body as well.
I think the 24 matches mentioned by Biltongbek in the study below is unrealistic.
However, if you reduce test matches & increase (opportunity to play) club matches, that will help the player, although it won’t help the major union’s revenue streams.
I guess the ARU & other unions are going to have to ask themselves if they’re going to chase 100% maximisation of profits every year, & risk massive player burn-out, or maybe aim for 90% maximisation of profits every year, & allow for better player welfare.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:00am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Sheek that’s a reasonable number, as presumably the national competition would be a lesser intensity as would those club matches, although it would probably be different players than those taking part in the simultaneous Wallaby fixtures for example returning from injury.
It’s tough for the ARU probably because fewer matches does mean less revenue, and revenue is a big problem…
October 1st 2012 @ 3:34pm
Mike said | October 1st 2012 @ 3:34pm | Report comment
Sheek, good points.
Perhaps its time to dust off your original article and put forward again on the Roar?
October 1st 2012 @ 8:54am
biltongbek said | October 1st 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Doctor Tim Noakes of the sport institute of SA, did a thesis on rugby players a few years back and he was of the opinion that a rugby player should play a maximum of about 24 matches per year.
He also discussed by way of graphs the recovery period players required for an injury to completely heal, he said before the 2011 RWc in 2010 that PDV should rest all his RWC players for a period of three months at the end of 2010 and that they should not go on the November tours as these players required not only physical recovery but also need to get away from rugby mentally for a long period.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:59am
atlas said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
maximum 24?
tell that to the many moaners about Richie McCaw taking six months off; saw it reported he is near 400 first-class (Air NZ/ITM, Super/international) matches since 2001.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:59pm
chris said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:59pm | Report comment
Hmm, would love to see the source of the claim that McCaw has played near 400 games in the last eleven years. He’s got about 110 test caps and maybe 130 super rugby caps. I’d be suprised if he has more than 50 ITM caps. It is also worth noting that he has been missing a lot of Super rugby over the last couple of years.
October 1st 2012 @ 8:57am
nickoldschool said | October 1st 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Its an interesting question KPM. Would love to be able to compare with previous years though as it might just be ‘bad luck’.
Also I dont know if we have more injured players than SA or NZ as such or is it just that its mostly our wallabies that have been hit at SR level vs non ABs/boks during SR.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:17am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:17am | Report comment
nos I don’t have figures so wouldn’t recall which non-Wallabies or non-ABs were injured in SR. However, I can only think of a couple of All Blacks who were first choice and are now injured, when the figure is pushing 30 for the Wallabies now.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:01am
sixo_clock said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Sand dune training, very good for ligaments and tendons, improves balance by strengthening the core and probably very much out of vogue.
However the short answer is rotation strategies which in a long campaign for the top level players is vital.
October 1st 2012 @ 3:35pm
Mike said | October 1st 2012 @ 3:35pm | Report comment
True. And that can only be done if there is a single person (or single group) whose job is to keep an eye on how many matches players are taking on – not just the top players but the rung below as well.
October 2nd 2012 @ 7:30am
sixo_clock said | October 2nd 2012 @ 7:30am | Report comment
True. You would hope that the Rugby admin community could play the team game and listen to the advice, do regular testing and shepherd the players, at least physically through their careers.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:25am
Atawhai Drive said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Somebody with much more knowledge of the subject than me might like to contribute a post on the effects of constant travel, much of it long-distance, on the human metabolism. In particular, what effect does a long-distance flight have on a player who only a few hours previously has come through a hard Test match, possibly picking up a minor injury in the process?
One big difference between northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere rugby is the amount of travel players must do. A professional player based in the south of France is rarely going to travel more than an hour away from his own time zone.
It seems obvious that Australia must embrace some form of player rotation, but tell that to the coaches.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:36am
Johnno said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
But now they get the week off between the big matches, well sort of anyway. When you play south africa you then have to back up with a 10 our flight to Argentina and a 5 hour time zone difference. And 3.5 hour flight to NZ 2 hour time zone difference.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:15am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
AD certainly that would be worth investigating not least because of the pressure in planes on injured limbs but it would apply to New Zealand and South Africa as well, although there is obviously less travelling within New Zealand than Australia.
October 1st 2012 @ 3:37pm
Mike said | October 1st 2012 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Yes. The reality for Australian rugby (even an internal ARC) is that our players are going to travel far more than European players, so we have to accept that, analyse the problem and implement a solution.
“It seems obvious that Australia must embrace some form of player rotation, but tell that to the coaches.” – good point, but of course can’t blame the coaches since their brief is to win games in their comp. The ARU has to take ownership of this problem.
October 1st 2012 @ 4:43pm
Atawhai Drive said | October 1st 2012 @ 4:43pm | Report comment
Coaches’ jobs depend on results, so they will always want their best players available.
Unless, of course, the ARU steps in NZRU-style and says to a Super Rugby team, “Sorry, guys, but X is not available for the first eight rounds of Super Rugby, you’ll just have to find someone else.”
They’ve learned to accept that policy in New Zealand (Lord McCaw is having a sabbatical next year, which the Crusaders will just have to deal with) but you suspect all hell would break loose in Brisbane if Ewen McKenzie was told he would lose an uninjured Will Genia for half the season.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:17pm
atlas said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:17pm | Report comment
‘Lord McCaw’ – he is approaching his 400th first-class match.
Has never had a proper rest from rugby apart from when injured – when there is an expectation to maintain fitness. Played with a fractured foot, pins and rods installed and removed. No holiday is it?
This planned 6mth break was written into his contract – as with other players have had, though they chose to chase money playing rugby overseas – Carter, Nonu etc
Give him a break!
October 1st 2012 @ 10:31pm
Atawhai Drive said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:31pm | Report comment
Give him a break? Exactly. If anyone’s earned it, McCaw has.
Rugby’s aristocrats deserve looking after.
Australia’s more humble playing stock only get a break when injury strikes.
The question remains: why are so many Wallabies injured?
October 1st 2012 @ 10:42pm
Mike said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:42pm | Report comment
I think your first post hits the nail on the head. Australian Rugby has not adapted to the greater intensity of our players’ commitments, in particular S15. We have been caught napping, and we now have to adapt. We need to learn from how SA Rugby and NZ Rugby manage these things, and we need to learn from the other codes in Australia – both AFL and NRL seem to be ahead of us in this department.
Possible solutions:
1. ARU to take a more central role in injury and fitness management, but also to work with S15 and State unions to achieve best results, but taking into account their legitimate concerns rather than just dictating a solution without discussion.
2. KPM’s idea of allowing more foreign players into our S15 sides, temporarily, to ease pressure on the player pool.
3. Study the solutions used by other countries and other codes, to see which most appropriate to Australian conditions.
October 1st 2012 @ 11:00pm
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 11:00pm | Report comment
Mike the problem with much of the ARU’s strategy is that it’s too slow, too little or too late. So with this injury issue they have allowed the Western Force one player more, and the other franchises one player more, when the Force probably need a quota of 5 to make any difference, especially as one of the imports is likely to be injured much of the time.
This is a short term fix, while a national competition although it would probably have very fast results is a harder and bigger step.
Combined they would go a long way to solving the problem.
October 1st 2012 @ 9:36am
Sam Taulelei said | October 1st 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
KPM
When looking at injuries, you’ll need to look beyond the current season and assess how many of these injured players have reinjured the same injury that occurred last season?
How many of these injured players suffered injuries that physiologically are related to a previous injury?
Assess the workload of injured players throughout the season as well as for international players from last season. 2011 was the first year of the expanded Super 15, closely followed by a truncated Tri Nations campaign, a world cup campaign and for the Wallabies an end of year fixture against Wales. Wallabies had a much shorter off season compared to the All Blacks who had no rugby since mid October plus some of them returned to Super rugby in a staggered fashion
As Biltong mentioned how many injuries were incurred in a match and how many were during training?
One of the criticisms that Cooper aired was the lack or injury management and player recovery in the Wallaby camp, so while most of these occurred before they played for the Wallabies some players may have been picked before they were fully recovered.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:13am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Sam it could be a more long-term pattern, you’re right, and the same might go for your second point, both of which might indicate a deeper malaise.
Players may be rushed back for the Wallabies, but my sense is that at the Australian franchises where success tends to revolve around a small number of key players, they are brought it as soon as the plaster is off or they can walk on one crutch instead of two.
The coaches may bear responsibility too. I remember being amazed at players being allowed to play on after some injuries and not only concussions.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:33am
Sam Taulelei said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Cooper and Drew Mitchell are two players that immediately spring to mind for the same injury recurring.
Richard Kahui is similar in that despite several operations to his shoulders the same injury recurs, in fact 2011 was his first season since his All Blacks debut in 2008 that he finished uninjured.
Injuries incurred during a match comes with the territory and is the luck of the draw. This year the Wallabies are suffering more than their fair share and it’s accentuated with the shallower depth of playing resources compared to SA and NZ.
October 1st 2012 @ 10:43am
kingplaymaker said | October 1st 2012 @ 10:43am | Report comment
Sam it’s true that it does seem to be happening in training more and more. I just recall hearing again and again throughout SR that a player had been injured in training.
Perhaps a key here is that more injuries occur with a shallower playing pool, not just that things get worse once the injuries have occurred.
October 1st 2012 @ 3:53pm
Adams said | October 1st 2012 @ 3:53pm | Report comment
Another effect of the shallow pool is unbalanced teams.
With an injured or lesser skilled player in the side the guys either side have to work harder to pick up the slack.