HENRY: Australia scrape into semis with work still to do
Pakistan have a batting order spring loaded to attack from first ball to last but have become gun shy after getting knocked over by India cheaply.
Their picket fence approach through the middle overs was a tribute to the variation of Australia’s attack and their own insecurities.
Left arm is the word for Australia at the moment, with X Doherty and Mitchell Starc getting the new aspro.
With Shoab Malik, Umar Akmal, Boom Boom and Razzaq sweating up the dug out seats, Nasir Jamshed (who once spent time in prison when caught cheating on a year 12 exam) and the veteran Kamran Akmal decided to ‘have a look’ at the bowling.
20 over cricket doesn’t generally afford a settling in period of more than a ball or three, and although they got a move on in the middle overs with some long bombs, their early tardiness meant the team finished with 149 – which at the time assumed only modest but competitive proportions.
Doherty’s 4 overs for 27 and a wicket off his last ball was a portent of what was to come in the run chase.
In any form of the game, wickets need to be taken to slow the run flow.
Mitchell Starc is stopping runs and taking wickets. Bradd Hogg, so often a breakthrough merchant, is not taking the big wickets, nor bowling his quota.
Cummins went to the off break once too much and Razzaq airmailed a deposit to the sightscreen. He wisely went back to the vanilla flavoured Yorker in the 19th with a little more economy.
Then he the slower bouncer which Razzaq flayed vertically but not a lot horizontally. He finished the 19th with another precise slow bouncer, which is not an easy thing to bowl.
The sensitive new age fast bowler knows when and how to bowl slow ball. Cummins thinks it through so well for a young man and that is much of his strength at the moment.
The body has been frail but the mind is anything but.
I didn’t see the stats sheet but I reckon Shane Watson fielded every second ball! You just can’t keep him out of the game at the moment.
Maxwell and Hogg again totalled 4 overs between them for 35 runs, which was in stark contrast to Pakistan’s approach.
Pakistan, too, saw the advantages of slow bowling with the new ball and Warner shuffling across was palpably LBW to Hafeez to everyone except umpire Gould.
When Watson swept, and could you believe it, missed, this time umpire Gould was, fortunately for Pakistan, standing at square leg. Warner lost patience (can you write that about a 20/20 innings?) and Hafeez got the nod and the index finger.
8 from 13 balls.
Maybe the Australians were under instruction to just get the 112 needed to qualify for the semi finals rather than win the match. Poor thinking for a team on a winning roll.
Hafeezl replaced left arm slow Raza Hasan with right bower Saeed Ajmal, then moments of Test cricket followed as bat and pad were thrust distrustingly down the pitch in defiant defense.
With DRS in action Hussey M, would have departed LBW on a pad first strike and then on to bat. Batsmen do seem to get extraordinary benefit of the doubt in this shortest form.
Afridi followed Hafeez, Malik followed Ajmal, spin followed spin, and all in a considerable variety, high quality, and dizzying rotation.
Hussey called for new gloves after facing 15 balls.
Sweaty palms?
Everything was sweaty.
Umpire Kettleborough got his man on the second attempt as captain George swung and missed. Cameron White had a chance to play the hero, he had time and a lowish total to chase to qualify.
Heart rates were rising at the same rate as the runs required. White didn’t get the job done. Glen Maxwell didn’t get the job done.
Mike Hussey left it until the 20th over to make the qualifying run. This was not the form Australia had brought in to the game, but maybe it was the loss ‘they had to have’.
Australia have so far persisted with pace and had some success, though it now seems strange that they have added the left arm slow of Dougherty to the XI and then, for two matches in a row, only bowled Hogg and Maxwell a total of 4 overs in each.
Has Captain George lost confidence in his spinners?
The selection seems counter-productive and still Cameron White struggles.
There is a better balanced team in the mix and Mickey Arthur and Captain Bailly will have some serious think tanking to do before the semi.
Geoff Lawson OAM is a former Australian cricketer and the former coach of the Pakistan cricket team. Nicknamed "Henry" after the Australian poet, Lawson was a fast bowler for New South Wales and Australia.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
The Crowd Says (8) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, T20


October 3rd 2012 @ 11:03am
Luke said | October 3rd 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
Can anyone explain to me why teams like Australia, India, South Africa, Pakistan were all in the same Super 8′s group (despite finishing first in their respective pools). And the teams that finished second in their pools Sri Lanka, West Indies, England and New Zealand all were in the same group together?
It seems that you were rewarded for finishing second in your pool (by having easier qualifying games against weaker teams) and punished for finishing first by playing the better teams.
India and South Africa can be rightfully upset imo that they had to be in the same Super 8′s group as Australia and Pakistan. If they were in the other group and had to play some of the weaker teams then they would of stood a better chance to progress.
Was this whole system setup just to ensure that Sri Lanka made it through to the semi finals to keep the home crowds interested?
October 3rd 2012 @ 1:08pm
Scuba said | October 3rd 2012 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
Luke, the system (stupidly) appears to be this:
1. take the ranking of each team prior to the tournament and apply it to each group – eg in Australia’s group, because of our rubbish world ranking coming into the tournament, West Indies rank 1, Australia 2, Ireland 3.
2. once out of the group stage (groups A to D), the super 8s groups are formed as follows – Group 1 = A1, B2, C1, D2 and Group 2 = A2, B1, C2 and D1.
3. now for the stupid bit – with West Indies ranked 1 in our group and us at 2, it is IRRELEVANT where those teams finish in the group stage – ie, by reason of their higher ranking in our group (Group B), West Indies would ALWAYS be B1 and Australia would ALWAYS be B2.
As such, the group stage was irrelevant provided you beat your minnow – the teams who you would face in the Super 8s was pre-destined.
October 3rd 2012 @ 1:57pm
Brian said | October 3rd 2012 @ 1:57pm | Report comment
Its just a stupid system not revenue raising because the ICC would actually make more with India reaching the semis.
As it was India played 5 games for 4 wins and a loss and went home. The West Indies played 5 for 1 wins, 1 draw, 1 tie and 2 losses and make the semi-finals.
October 3rd 2012 @ 11:38am
Cave Dweller said | October 3rd 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
20/20 cricket mus be popular under the bookies. It just have so much potential for foxing and throwing games and that thanks to the ICC.
Sri Lanka lost on purpose to SA and thus avoided the group of death. Teams like SA, England and Australia must start to look at the draws before hand and they have to work it out how to go about it. It is been setup so the sub continent teams can at least reach a semi or final to maximize profits. So to avoid groups of death and dangerous situations you have to lose a group match here there on purpose.
NZ did the same thing in the 2003 WC and thus knocking SA out by forfeiting against Kenya.
October 3rd 2012 @ 2:01pm
Luke said | October 3rd 2012 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
Thanks Scuba, that helps shed a bit of light on the setup. And you are right it is a stupid system.
It’s devalued the tournament slightly for mine. A tournament should be based on how you perform “in that tournament” not how you have performed previously.
I do get the feeling that this system has been put together to ensure Sri Lanka make it through to the semis. The organisers obviously looked at the tournament beforehand and conjured this way up to maximise gate takings. Because really all Sri Lanka had to do was ensure they beat Zimbabwe and they would be through to a relatively comfortable group where they would be odds on to finish at least second and qualify for semi finals.
October 3rd 2012 @ 2:57pm
Brian said | October 3rd 2012 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
With Maxwell and Hogg sharing 4 overs its hard to see how the team would not be better with David Hussey replacing one of them and bowling an over.
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:59pm
Disco said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:59pm | Report comment
Onto matters relating to proper cricket, I see Haddin’s recent Shield century has him discussing a potential Test recall. The boys’ club will see that he gets it too.
October 4th 2012 @ 10:47pm
The Summer of Cricket said | October 4th 2012 @ 10:47pm | Report comment
This ‘world cup’ has just emphasised to me what a lousy game T20 Cricket is. The dumbing down of one of the greatest sports.
As far as I can tell its nothing more than a game of chance won by luck rather than skill. How did Ireland get to be ranked above Australia?!
Cant wait for the Aussies to put on the whites and hopefully play a full 5 day test at the Gabba in Nov.