Journalists should allow players Mad Monday privacy
By Curtis Woodward, 3 Oct 2012 Curtis Woodward is a Roar Guru & Live Blogger
- Tagged:
- Canterbury Bulldogs, Mad Monday, NRL, NRL media
So let’s get this straight: the media is in uproar because football players acted outlandishly on their Mad Monday less then 24 hours after losing the biggest game of the year?
Give me a break.
Reporters from the Nine Network, including Jayne Azzopardi, not only sat outside the premises but used a helicopter for this grand occasion.
The very same network that just paid over a billion dollars for the rights to broadcast the game they so dearly “love.”
Most of these players have not had an alcoholic drink all season. They are constantly in the limelight and rarely get a moment to themselves. The pressure on these players is ridiculous and people wonder why they acted the way they did yesterday?
A photo doing the rounds of the players urinating beats me.
They’re locked behind closed doors for some privacy and they get blasted for urinating?
Surely this is a better situation than the players being out in public. Oh imagine the stories if that was the case. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
Nobody is condoning the comments directed at Azzopardi. They included:
“There are some ladies here to stick their heads in your pants;”
“S. .K me off you dumb dog;” and
“I wanna go and punch you in the face.”
If Mad Monday was such a big deal to Channel Nine, wouldn’t they have sent a Rugby League reporter?
Or at least a sports reporter?
In a Twitter exchange with colleague Erin Molan, Azzopardi remarked:
“@Erin_Molan they’re yelling some colorful (sic) things out the window at us too. Definitely not children’s cartoon vocabulary.”
It almost seems like they were just sitting there waiting for the outbursts to begin.
You can play devil’s advocate and even ask why they didn’t send a hardened male reporter? Common sense needs to be used somewhere along the line and it doesn’t necessary have to start with the players.
The boss of the ARL commission John Grant has commented on the situation.
“Based on what I’ve heard, it’s a serious issue and will be treated seriously,” Grant said.
A report from the Bulldogs has been requested by the Commission too. What kind of penalty could the Commission possibly hand down anyway?
It is getting to the point where the media will expect to be allowed everywhere. A player is getting married and he is on his honeymoon with his wife. All of a sudden a reporter slides out from under the bed with a camera crew and starts taking happy snaps.
The player would then be hammered for not co-operating.
Fox Sports personality Ryan Phelan said it best on his Twitter account:
“Filming #Bulldogs from public property is irrelevant. You’re filming for a slip up #dirty journalism let them have their time #NRL.”
It is time we accept as a community that these players are human beings too and make mistakes like everyone else.
You can argue they make plenty of money and live a fantastic lifestyle. But the pressure on them is something many of us will never understand. Everyone needs to chill and give them some space, for the good of the game we all apparently love so much.
The Crowd Says (69) | Page 1 of Comments
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (180)
- How rugby league should expand (132)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (103)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (90)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (87)
- Newcastle Knights vs Canterbury Bulldogs: NRL Live scores, blog (89)
- Cronulla Sharks vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (100)
- Give Dugan time before elevating his star again (11)
- Farah calls for unity at Wests Tigers (5)
- Dragons hail superstar Dugan (9)
- Roosters hold off Cowboys 12-8
- Sorry Warriors cop record NRL thrashing (19)
- Newcastle Knights vs Canterbury Bulldogs: NRL Live scores, blog (89)
- Cronulla Sharks vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (100)
- North Queensland Cowboys vs Sydney Roosters: NRL live scores, blog (91)
- Penrith Panthers vs New Zealand Warriors: NRL live scores (10)
- St George Illawarra Dragons vs Parramatta Eels: NRL Live scores, Blog (85)
- Albert Kelly should be the Blues’ number six (29)
- Cowboys discover the NRL is no country for old men (32)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Canterbury Bulldogs, Mad Monday, NRL, NRL media

October 3rd 2012 @ 6:46am
Morotti said | October 3rd 2012 @ 6:46am | Report comment
totally agree. After a huge year and losing the GF the players would obviously be devastated.
I think the ARLC should be putting a call into Nine for a please explain.
Surely some things are off limits and privacy should be respected.
October 3rd 2012 @ 7:49am
josh said | October 3rd 2012 @ 7:49am | Report comment
Doesn’t mean the players/representatives of the club need to act like they have. They players could have just as easily said, There’s no story here, can you leave. Instead they showed a Grade 9 mentality. And surely it wasn’t the players by themselves, club officials could have asked the reporters to leave, especially if they were on private property. regardless it doesn’t mean you have to be dropkick about things.
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:02am
Dogs Of War said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:02am | Report comment
The media weren’t on private property, they were outside a locked gate. The Bulldogs tried to get privacy, Channel 9 even brought a helicopter to do flyovers to get pictures of the place.
October 3rd 2012 @ 7:58am
Dogs Of War said | October 3rd 2012 @ 7:58am | Report comment
GIven the media used listening devices to get the story,and the comments weren’t said to her directly as she was 40 metres away, rather they were private comments between friends who didn’t know that the media would sink so low as to record everything in that way.
I wonder if the Bulldogs could charge channel 9 for using listening devices in that manner, and just make them apologise for doing so on the news. It may be something that stops this sort of media beat up story occurring in the first place.
October 3rd 2012 @ 12:03pm
damoinaus said | October 3rd 2012 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
we were taught at uni that journalists are supposed to have thick skins…azzopardi goes crying off to mama because the big boys said garbage words. pfft.
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:19am
Will Sinclair said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:19am | Report comment
Curtis, I am going to repeat my comments made elsewhere on these pages:
So the big, strong Bulldogs players (allegedly) sexually and physically threaten a young woman… and it’s HER fault?
Give me a break.
No excuses for that sort of behaviour. I don’t care how much you’ve had to drink, how stressful your job is or what stupid children’s character you happen to be dressed as at the time – sexually and physically threatening women is NEVER OK.
October 3rd 2012 @ 9:00am
Dogs Of War said | October 3rd 2012 @ 9:00am | Report comment
Will,
They never said it to her face. She was using a listening device to record what the players were saying. The comments were NOT directed at her, they were said in private about her. They are young guys blowing off steam, commenting as young guys do on women at times when they think the conversation is private.
October 3rd 2012 @ 9:18am
Will Sinclair said | October 3rd 2012 @ 9:18am | Report comment
Sorry Dogs, can’t agree.
I don’t know who you hang around with, but if any of my mates said they wanted to punch a woman in the face – whether in private or not – they’d be informed in no uncertain terms that it’s not acceptable.
If this young lady was your wife, girlfriend or sister I suspect you’d feel differently about things.
October 3rd 2012 @ 11:17am
oikee said | October 3rd 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Will, your losing credibilty if you are going to sit with the papparatzi.
If it was my wife, my daughter my mother my cousin my godfather, i would still give the same message, bugger off and leave the players alone .
None of them would do this anyhow, they would have more respect.
October 3rd 2012 @ 11:48am
mushi said | October 3rd 2012 @ 11:48am | Report comment
You would say to your wife that you’d punch her in the face?
October 3rd 2012 @ 12:05pm
Will Sinclair said | October 3rd 2012 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
What the young lady does for a living is not relevant.
It doesn’t matter whether she’s a journalist, a waitress, a manager or anything else that might bring her into contact with football players.
Telling a woman you want to punch her in the face, or she’s a dog who should suck you off, is simply unacceptable. End of story.
October 3rd 2012 @ 12:35pm
Ryan O'Connell said | October 3rd 2012 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
It might be unacceptable, but so is the method in which the comments were attained.
Gutter journalism. Grubby, disrespectful players. There is no winner here.
October 3rd 2012 @ 12:20pm
Boomshanka said | October 3rd 2012 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
Whilst they actually said “I wanna go and punch you in the face.” , was this directed at Azzopardi specifically or perhaps the wider Channel Nine scum media pack that may or may not have baited them.
Nine have form for baiting people and half reporting the truth.
Have we got the full picture? If its a Nine story or exclusive, I’d think not.
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:22am
WQ said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:22am | Report comment
Pathetic,
These people are entitled to relax and unwind at a private venue. They are also entitled to have fun. However they are not entitled to act like idiots, regardless of it being a private function or not!
They are not entitled to throw out all rules, abuse people, especially Woman and certainly not entitled to Urinate on what belongs to the Members of their Rugby League Club!
Where was the leadership for this group of young people?
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:23am
Ballymore said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:23am | Report comment
Hear hear.
The gutter press were looking for trouble and got it. I could care less about the feelings of a tabloid reporter and the antics of boozed up
20 somethings.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:27am
oikee said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:27am | Report comment
I think John Grant has to hand down some punishment alright.
The media will be banned from league players if they keep writing this rubbish.
Any activities on Mad Monday, unless it is Murder shall be reported in a good light.
Any reporting of bad behaviour will be reason to close up shop and take players to Palmers resort where he has a geniene love and feel for such players.
Your off the list if you write this rubbish about league players.
As you have said Curtis, they have behaved well all year, and not had drinks or many.
They looked like 2 year olds on the turps, why make fun of them, go sit outside a Cross Nightclub and lets compare.
So much is wrong with reporters who are now just out to destroy the image of rugby league. I think it is time for a 100 thousand march through Sydney. I have had a gutful of these so=called reporters putting crap on our players and game.
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:45am
John 360180 said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:45am | Report comment
Bulldogs doing a great job of destroying image of the game themselves.
No excuse for their actions on and off the field over the weekend.
If you were a parent deciding which code your child should play or watch over the weekend which way would you direct them.
Max penalties for all concerned only option.
October 3rd 2012 @ 9:12am
oikee said | October 3rd 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Rugby league has strong morals and ethics, i dont buy that rubbish, if they want to take their kids to other codes, be our guest.
This is the rubbish i am talking about, always trying to make out league is a unethic code.
Garbage, our code teaches great values and team spirit and respect.
This is the very sort of reporting our game can do without.
Our game has just won a award in London for the work it has done in the indigenous communities, they dont need this rubbish reporting about mums and kids going to other codes, just go if you think other codes are perfect.
It will never be perfect.
October 3rd 2012 @ 8:57am
B.A Sports said | October 3rd 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Is it gutter journalism? – absolutely. They Sent Jane Azzopardi – a very good court reporter and journalist to do a rugby league story. Why wouldn’t they send the Weidler or even Molan or Roz Kelly? Because Azzopardi is an attractive woman who will conjure a response. So yes it is poor form.
Having said that, is the behaviour acceptable? Absolutely not! Especially as the club has made a point of telling us they sign players based on character, not just ability. And this episode, coupled with Graham’s effort in the GF, show that they probably don’t.
And in a week with the horrible events in Melbourne, Alan Jones’s lack of respect for our female PM, it means I get a gob full about how men don’t respect women from my wife. (while I was washing the dishes mind you…)
October 3rd 2012 @ 9:12am
Happy Hooker said | October 3rd 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Are you saying Roz Kelly isn’t attractive? She could her shoes under my bed anytime!
October 3rd 2012 @ 9:22am
B.A Sports said | October 3rd 2012 @ 9:22am | Report comment
Happy, please! She’s all yours and so is her standard Channel 9 inability to speak English.
Ch9 fazed her off of rugby league, and I think you will find there was a reason for that, and it is not that her amazing journalistic talents were being wasted.
October 3rd 2012 @ 10:24am
Chui said | October 3rd 2012 @ 10:24am | Report comment
Be careful with the lines about sending an attractive woman to conjure a response. Your starting to get into “women wearing short skirts deserving it” territory.
What she looks like should be irrelevant. Is it so hard to just behave like a decent human being?
Maybe I just don’t let of steam in this somehow acceptable manner.
October 3rd 2012 @ 11:20am
B.A Sports said | October 3rd 2012 @ 11:20am | Report comment
Chui
Azzopardi goes to the assignment she is told to go to. She doesn’t ask for it. Nine News Bosses would have told her to go.
October 3rd 2012 @ 12:38pm
Ryan O'Connell said | October 3rd 2012 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
I tend to agree B.A.
I don’t think anyone comes out of this incident looking great.
I really think the players should have been left alone though. There is no question they shouldn’t have said what they did, but c’mon, they’re on private property, drunk, tired and doing their best NOT to be in public or in front of the media.
October 3rd 2012 @ 9:02am
Naught said | October 3rd 2012 @ 9:02am | Report comment
When can we expect the Tracy Grimjaw exclusive with an ex player who once left the lid seat up on a Mad Monday?