A critical two days coming up for Grant
By David Lord, 4 Oct 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
ARL Commission Chamirman John Grant. AAP Image/Dean Lewins
Related coverage
John Grant’s credibility will be under the microscope over the next couple of days. The Australian Rugby League Commission chairman of eight months has to deal with the James Graham biting allegation, and the Bulldogs shameful “Mad Monday” behaviour.
Bulldog Graham will face the judiciary tonight, having pleaded not guilty to biting Storm fullback Billy Slater’s left ear.
The weight of evidence makes Graham’s not guilty plea a mockery. But having taken that course, Graham is now fair game to cop a hefty holiday.
If the judiciary find Graham guilty and give him a bash-with-a-feather suspension, Grant must step in and take over. The Commission is the all-powerful authority.
The same applies to the guilty Dogs on “Mad Monday”. There’s probably only two or three of them, so it would be grossly unfair to lump the vast majority of the innocent in with the guilty.
Grant has already described reports as “serious”, and he’s recently received a shattered Canterbury chief executive Todd Greenberg’s assessment.
Greenberg has worked tirelessly to improve the Belmore culture over the last four years, only to have his valiant efforts torn down by a few in a matter of moments.
Let’s not forget one of Grant’s first decisions of import was to show David Gallop the door after a decade of great work keeping the code moving forward despite so many code damaging off-field disasters.
Gallop was one of the very best sporting administrators I’ve dealt with over nearly 50 years.
If that was an example of Grant’s muscle-flexing capabilities, then Graham if guilty, and the guilty “Mad Monday” players, face bleak futures,
And so they should.
What makes me, and plenty of others, very angry is hardly a word has been spoken this week about the sensational premiership victories of the Sydney Swans and the Melbourne Storm,
Nor the incredible comeback by the lowly ninth-ranked Australian cricketers to reach the semis of the World Twenty20 in Sri Lanka.
The conversations and media coverage have been about Graham, and “Mad Monday”.
Rugby league doesn’t deserve such bad publicity to end a season of tremendous football.
So put those two items to bed John Grant, and quickly.
![]()
Passionate about your league? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily league email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
The Crowd Says (53) | Page 1 of Comments
- Explore:
- Canterbury Bankstown Bulldogs, James Graham, John Grant, NRL, Rugby League


October 4th 2012 @ 4:14am
CizzyRascal said | October 4th 2012 @ 4:14am | Report comment
If he goes against the judiciary, surely he takes away all respect for it?
October 4th 2012 @ 5:04am
David Lord said | October 4th 2012 @ 5:04am | Report comment
CR, not if the judiciary bashes with a feather. If guilty, Graham deserves two years, anything less and the ARLC steps in. It’s no different to the High Court over-ruling the District Court.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:31am
Happy Hooker said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
It is different. That would be more like the government stepping in just because it didn’t like the verdict and/or sentence handed down by the courts in a trial like Gordon Wood’s. It is a ridiculous notion, and the ALRC under Grant will have more class than that. They have no right to summarily bump up the penalty because they don’t like it or want to be seen to be tough.
Even if they did step in (which of course they won’t) Graham could go to court and have any purported increase in penalty overturned.
You been sniffing the Pantene again Lordy?
October 4th 2012 @ 10:11am
Jay said | October 4th 2012 @ 10:11am | Report comment
Are you serious? two years.. James is 28 (I think) at the moment. That would ruin his career. I’d be happy with 5-7 weeks at most.
October 4th 2012 @ 5:39am
crip said | October 4th 2012 @ 5:39am | Report comment
How about John Grant stand up for Rugby League against Chanel 9?
Tell me what is worse – Comments made by drunk footy players for the ears of other drunk footy players picked up by spying equipment? Or the exploitation of women in pornographic magazines The Picture, People and Zoo Weekly owned by 9 Entertainment Co (the owners of channel 9?
I’m not apoligsing for their actions – I have a wife, daughter and mother so let’s cut the BS.
I guarentee you worse things would be directed at cheerleaders by the public in the stands at every single NRL game. And what are they there for anyway if not to be perved at?
“Rugby league doesn’t deserve such bad publicity to end a season of tremendous football” so stop dragging it through the mud channel 9.
October 4th 2012 @ 6:06am
David Lord said | October 4th 2012 @ 6:06am | Report comment
Ace it up crip, cut out the source and Channel 9 has nothing bad to report. You can’t blame the media for reporting fact. To follow your suggestion, how can Grant stand up for something that is radically and socially unacceptable?
Not on.
October 4th 2012 @ 7:01am
oikee said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:01am | Report comment
So would you send your wife into a pack of drunken hungry wolves looking for a story David.
Mate the only animal here is the pboss of this women, he is a grub and is treating his staff like bait.
Shame nine shame.
This story has little red riding hood written all over it, go on David, you must have read that old fable.
October 4th 2012 @ 7:22am
Dayer said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:22am | Report comment
stop flogging the issue …. DL. enough is enough. why do we have to keep on talking about this subject … it’s over. let the process work it’s way and I reckon 6 to 10 weeks is penalty enough for a first timer.. LET IT BE.
October 4th 2012 @ 6:17am
steve b said | October 4th 2012 @ 6:17am | Report comment
i agree with you crip ,whoever decided to run this story to the public instead of fixing it in house has done nothing more than drag the NRL through the crap again . They knew this would create an uproar but decided to run it anyway .The smart thing to do would have been to go straight to Greenburg and show him the tape and let him deal with the player ,staff or friend , but no thats what they hoping for was to drag up some dirt for a sensational story , and channel nine are supposed to be for us and promote the game in a positive ,not this rubbish .Listening devices helicopters , and they were asked to leave and they didn’t .And before all the do gooders come out and want to rip my head of i don’t agree with anything that was said , I just think this whole thing was handled poorly and could have been nipped in the bud before it got to this , and yes can’t wait to see what side of the fence Mr Grant is going to stand on ..
October 4th 2012 @ 7:00am
crip said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:00am | Report comment
Cheers Steve. You saved me having to tap out a reply to Lordy. If he doesn’t get what you or I’ve said then I don’t know where to start. Besides, I’m sitting in a crane cab tapping this out on my phone when I’m supposed to be bloody working!
October 4th 2012 @ 7:07am
steve b said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:07am | Report comment
Cheers crip yesterday i was on a bloody slag heap in the middle of roxby downs in 35 degree heat doing the same thing on my bloody phone , back in the office today with the aircon ,so i can take a bit more time in responses …
October 4th 2012 @ 7:23am
Dayer said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:23am | Report comment
i AGREE cRIB
October 4th 2012 @ 6:41am
Crosscoder said | October 4th 2012 @ 6:41am | Report comment
David .With due respect, you have a thread on the same subject on 2nd October 2012 re John Grant. Give the guy a break,I am sure he will do whatever is necessary in the best interests of the game both from a public and code perspective.
October 4th 2012 @ 6:56am
oikee said | October 4th 2012 @ 6:56am | Report comment
Graham did not bite his ear, he nibbled it. Looking at the video footage it clearly shows Graham not making a biting action, he simply had his mouth open and Slater’s ear must have fell into his mouth as other players were wrestling Graham. Not guilty.
As for John Grant and this Mad Monday incident. If the game wants to further retreat from the media he will be reactive, instead of proactive.
We might as well have Dave Gallop running the show if he becomes reactive. ?
He needs to send a message to these fools, the person who was stupid enough to send this woman into a mad monday pack of drunken rugby league players after a losing grand final has got no place in this society. He should be sacked, tarred brushed and left to rot as he has no values or duty of care to his staff.
He should be named and shamed so this never happens again. What sort of society are we living in, he probably makes he walk home alone as well through the red light district. Shame channel nine shame.
October 4th 2012 @ 8:15am
Bill Larkin said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:15am | Report comment
There have been a lot of silly comments about the Graham case, but this takes the cake. Didn’t bite? Nibbled? Not guilty?
If he doesn’t get all or most of next season out, the judiciary will be exposed as a very bad joke. Graham is a coward, and doesn’t even have the guts (and decency) to plead guilty.
October 4th 2012 @ 8:48am
oikee said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
He is not guilty, end of case.
If your not guilty you plead not guilty, end of story.
Or are you one of these people who go by guilty until proven innocent.
He was grasping for air, of course he had his mouth open.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:05am
Christo the Daddyo said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:05am | Report comment
“he simply had his mouth open and Slater’s ear must have fell into his mouth”
Seriously oikee, do you actually read the stuff you type before you click the “Add Comment’ button?
October 4th 2012 @ 9:34am
Happy Hooker said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Where did you get your irony bypass done Christo?
October 4th 2012 @ 9:55am
Christo the Daddyo said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
oikee is serious – that’s the worry.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:48am
Red Rooster said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
Mate it wasnt a nibble it was a chomp! He was chomping on it! Are you blind?
October 4th 2012 @ 6:59am
AGO74 said | October 4th 2012 @ 6:59am | Report comment
David – it would appear from reading SMH that the (disgusting) comments on mmad monday werenot made by players. Let’s just wait and see how it pans out before we go into hyperbole….
Speaking of that – two years for James Graham. You are kidding. If you were a judge in courts I am pretty sure we’d be having to build exxtra jails by now.
October 4th 2012 @ 7:04am
crip said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:04am | Report comment
In regards to the biting – I thought it was funny more than anything. Billy Slater is a dirty player and this time he got a bit of his own back.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:15am
sledgeandhammer said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Yeah, nearly as funny as Hoppa sticking his finger up other players butts, maybe it was a ‘love bite’. Very homo-erotic sport rugby league.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:19am
oikee said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Rugby league has long been a open honest sport without predudice, unlike the dribble you keep writing.
Go to the AFL blogs, they are the ones that seem to have homophobia problems.
October 4th 2012 @ 7:19am
AGO74 said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:19am | Report comment
John grant criticised David Gallop for being too reactive. The most reactive example of NRL leadership I have seen in recent years was the change to the shoulder rule 2 weeks before the finals – instigated by none other than John Grant.
Greg inglis takes a running and jumping shot at Dean Youngs head, knocks Young out and Inglis gets a 4 week ban. It would appear that by David Lord’s standards that biting is 26 times a worse offence than jumping into somebodys head with your shoulder.
October 4th 2012 @ 7:49am
David Lord said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:49am | Report comment
I can’t believe the thread of some posts this morning from blaming Channel 9 for showing the “Mad Monday” footage to blaming John Grant for not sticking up for rugby league against Channel 9s footage. Not one post has criticised the Bulldogs for their actions, yet they were the ones who created the stink. They behave and it’s a non-event.
October 4th 2012 @ 8:17am
Lovey said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:17am | Report comment
OK, have we got the real story? If Channel 9 had turned up, as usual, to do a normal report, as usual, and the female reporter had this spray directed at her, that is one thing. If they turned up, had it made clear they were not invited, instead staked out the premises from across the road (with the team members not knowing how long they would be there), and picked up these comments through a slightly opened window, with listening equipment which amplifies conversations, that is another. That is not reporting news, that is creating it, and is unethical.
October 4th 2012 @ 8:32am
steve b said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
And it’s against the law ,to use this equipment and they would have had to from forty metres !
October 4th 2012 @ 8:57am
Australian Rules said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Lovey, the allegations about enhanced listening equipment are rubbish. The players yelled those comments audibly for everyone to hear.
People blaming Ch.9 are missing it completely.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:22am
oikee said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:22am | Report comment
You keep saying that as if you were there.
The media were asked to leave and refused.
Sending a woman to a mad monaday grand final losing team is criminal. Some poepl should have more sense.
Little red riding hood is now a true story, presented and played by channel 9.
October 4th 2012 @ 8:44am
crip said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Get real Lordy this isn’t Watergate. These are comments from people living in the real world. If you record an end of season booze up of any sports team including netball then you would get the sorts of things recorded at Belmore. II’d bet my house that you would have witnessed worse behaviour. That is the truth. Something the media have no idea about.
October 4th 2012 @ 8:47am
Gaz said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:47am | Report comment
David, what do you not understand about the wrong in sending a female reporter to address a bunch of guys who have been on the drink all night having lost a grand final and are are letting their hair down, drowning their sorrows behind closed doors.
The media and in particular the nine network are the root cause of this incident and if Kerry Packer was still around the person responsible for sending that lass into a vulnerable position she found herself would have been sacked. Nine have been guilty of creating their own news stories and this is one of them.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:12am
sledgeandhammer said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Love the dumb comments about the ‘wrong’ of sending “a female reporter to interview a bunch of guys”. In a Western Democracy in 2012 a women dared interview adult men. How dare she? She got what she deserved, right?
October 4th 2012 @ 9:19am
crip said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Yep. Those commenters are brain dead
October 4th 2012 @ 8:56am
Crosscoder said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
That’s ridiculous David,many on other threads have lambasted the Dogs for what allegedly went on.I have been emphatic on having zero tolerance.I have daughters and you can guess my reaction.
All you are doing is going over old ground,before a final adjudication has been made on the matter.
John Grant will do what has to be done.anyone found guilty will get due process.
The papers and electronic media are full of it,trying to squeeze every drop out of an appalling incident.
The report has gone to the ARLC,await the outcome,instead of the lynchmob mentality that prevails at times.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:27am
AGO74 said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
David – I criticsed John Grant on the decision to change the rules 2 weeks before finals. That is all I criticised him on. And if my opinion is not worth much (which it usually isn’t) then perhaps you should liaten to the highly regarded league coaches and commentators who overwhelmingly have the same opinion as me and other fans.
As for the rest of the criticism I made it is mainly about your jumping the gun hyperbore without giving the opportunity for due process to take place.
I don’t condone the statements made to the reporter. They are appalling. I do question the way the material was collated. If James Graham is found guilty then he certainly deserves a lengthy 10 week suspension but certainly not 2 years when you compare it to the reckless and intentional knock out of Dean Young by Greg Inglis.
October 4th 2012 @ 9:52am
Red Rooster said | October 4th 2012 @ 9:52am | Report comment
Its Coffs Harbour all over again – the same attitude. The Bulldogs still havent changed.
October 4th 2012 @ 7:47am
danosmo said | October 4th 2012 @ 7:47am | Report comment
With no football to write about we have descended into high farce. Two years? There are a whole bunch of sports writers (I purposefully don’t refer to them as journalists) running around frothing at the mouth and this is yet another example. If Graham is found guilty – IF – then it is difficult to find that a bite is worse than attacking the head of an opponent or lifting beyond horizontal in a tackle and potentially paralysing a player. Let’s all take a spoonful of common sense and have a lie down.
October 4th 2012 @ 8:36am
Allan said | October 4th 2012 @ 8:36am | Report comment
Well it pays to be impartial untill the hearing. I’m still having bother by what I saw. But perhaps I’ve got it wrong and should not believe the TV media.who should apologise for their footage. As for comments that may have been said to someone or another at a booze up, we have government members doing better to their own ex leader every time they get a whim.