Bulldogs to donate $30,000 after Mad Monday mayhem
Related coverage
The NRL has announced via a lengthy press release that the Canterbury Bulldogs will contribute $30,000 to a nominated charity after the fallout from the team’s Mad Monday celebrations after losing the grand final
Full release from the NRL:
“After consultation with the NRL, the Canterbury Bulldogs have today advised they will contribute $30,000 to a nominated NRL charity as part of the Club’s contrition toward their handling of post Grand Final celebrations.
In accepting the contribution as appropriate, the NRL has warned that all clubs must be accountable in ensuring that all functions are managed in a professional manner at all times.
The money will be paid by way of a donation to charities agreed by the NRL, with all players contributing in line with a resolution proposed by the Bulldogs playing group.
Today’s decision follows an extensive review process that included the Club’s own internal report, video evidence, an independent security report requested by the NRL and a review of media footage.
The reports establish that:
· Some of the comments reported by the media were incorrectly recounted and should not, on the evidence since provided, be construed as having been directed to the reporters
· Irrespective of any arguments as to whether other remarks were directed to the media the language was unquestionably offensive, loud and left open to interpretation
· At the same time at least some players and guests were interacting with media representatives in a manner that could be taken as threatening
· The Bulldogs club was aware of the presence of media cameras and the likelihood of their actions being recorded
· There were a number of statements and hand gestures directed towards the media by those at the club
· The club did not take adequate steps to ensure that its representatives behaved in a responsible and professional manner.
ARLC Interim Chief Executive, Mr Shane Mattiske, said that it was time for the term ‘Mad Monday’ to be scrapped from the game:
“People should be able to celebrate the end of a season but regardless of whether it is at the end of the season or any other time of the year they have a responsibility to abide by the game’s agreed code of behaviour.
“There is no place for ‘mad’ behaviour at any level in our game. Calling something ‘Mad Monday’ is almost an excuse to go over the top and it is time for clubs across all levels of the game to seriously review how end of year celebrations are planned.
“The focus needs to be more about modifying actual behaviour rather than keeping the public away.
“The management of the function and the interaction with the media was in this case inappropriate.
“Regardless of arguments about who the statements were directed towards the language used was offensive, threatening and open to interpretation by anyone in hearing range.
“We accept that the club has recognised this and their contribution to a nominated charity partner demonstrates a suitable outcome for all parties.”
Bulldogs Chief Executive, Mr Todd Greenberg, said today that the club deeply regretted the damage caused to the club and the game:
“We are the first to admit that we should have handled things better.
“After completing a thorough investigation, I am now aware of every comment made. I am aware of every person that comments were attributed to and the context in which those comments were made. The players and staff have all been forthcoming with the information and honest in their discussions.
“It is clear that there were a number of inaccuracies in the media reporting but the players are gutted and are deeply concerned that language used within the room has been interpreted as having been directed to the media.
“There was a lot of sledging going on between the players and they used language that was inappropriate.
“This is something that the whole club, the players and administration, have to take responsibility for and that is why the whole club will make a contribution to an NRL nominated charity.
“It would not be helpful or fair to single any one name out and it can only produce a result that will be disproportionate with the actions of any individual.
“This is the result of the behaviour of a number of persons not anyone specifically.
“Players and staff answer to me as Chief Executive.
“The Club will engage them individually within their contractual terms and within the Club’s Code of Conduct. That is good business practice and is in line with the way we manage our Football Club.”
(ends)”
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Canterbury Bulldogs, NRL, Rugby League

October 9th 2012 @ 5:16pm
Ryan O'Connell said | October 9th 2012 @ 5:16pm | Report comment
The plot thickens…
If they’re now saying the comments weren’t even directed at the media, let alone Jayne Azzopardi, then the outrage has been a little out of whack, hasn’t it?
October 9th 2012 @ 6:09pm
Michael said | October 9th 2012 @ 6:09pm | Report comment
You believe them?
October 9th 2012 @ 6:15pm
Ryan O'Connell said | October 9th 2012 @ 6:15pm | Report comment
Channel 9, Jayne Azzopardi & her cameraman strongly refute that the comments weren’t directed at her.
My head hurts.
October 9th 2012 @ 6:15pm
millane said | October 9th 2012 @ 6:15pm | Report comment
thought afl and the afl-luvven melbourne media were the only ones to sweep things under the carpet
October 9th 2012 @ 8:27pm
Ryan O'Connell said | October 9th 2012 @ 8:27pm | Report comment
I can see why you would think that, but what would be the point? The damage has already been done. If they’d come out and said it was the players and it was directed at the media, everyone would feel like “Um, we know.”
Sweeping it under the carpet would be if it never made it into public.
October 9th 2012 @ 6:20pm
eagleJack said | October 9th 2012 @ 6:20pm | Report comment
I think a $30k fine donated to charity is a fair result. Hopefully now we can put this to bed and move on.
Without wanting to re-hash old news it does just reinforce how over the top the $100k fine issued to Manly was in 2009. Hopefully the ARLC show consistency in relation to these sorts of matters.
October 10th 2012 @ 9:22am
Mals said | October 10th 2012 @ 9:22am | Report comment
Exactly but that was under Mr David “Reactive” Gallop’s tenure. Thankfully he is now gone.
October 9th 2012 @ 7:23pm
Roarsome said | October 9th 2012 @ 7:23pm | Report comment
That’s a great tax deduction.
October 9th 2012 @ 9:00pm
bazza said | October 9th 2012 @ 9:00pm | Report comment
i have apologised unreservedly to the female reporter….. But the remarks were not made to her….. HUH?
October 10th 2012 @ 12:05am
bozo said | October 10th 2012 @ 12:05am | Report comment
Asit has been decided there was not a problem a compulsory donation of $30k seems a bit rich. Sets a bit of a bench mark if something nasty happens.
October 10th 2012 @ 10:32am
clipper said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:32am | Report comment
no – it was never decided there was not a problem – 30k was the price for anonymity. which would seem a bit rich if you were not one of the players involved (even after the tax deduction)
October 11th 2012 @ 9:14am
Crosscoder said | October 11th 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
That is the minimum figure,Greenberg has alluded to further fines for players/officials directly involved as per SMH .Hardly tax deduction material.
October 10th 2012 @ 9:51am
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
For all the damage the dogs have cuased to the game they should have donated the whole prize money for winning the minor premiership, 30K is nothing to the bulldogs or any club.
October 10th 2012 @ 10:01am
steve b said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
It is when each player has to chuck in ,and for what , and what damage , no proof on offer , no evidence that the boy’s aren’t telling the truth ,sensational journalism at it’s worst …
October 10th 2012 @ 10:24am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:24am | Report comment
By that rationale, how much money should Channel 9 donate then?
October 10th 2012 @ 11:03am
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
For what exactly,
October 10th 2012 @ 11:13am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Surely if the ruling (and I’m not saying I agree with it) is that Channel 9 reported incorrectly, then they have done damage to the game? So by your rationale, they should cough up some money too.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:31am
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
Ryan, im not aware where its been said ch9 has reported incorrectly ? How could they, all theyve done is play the audio . I wish this would all just go away but i dont believe it will till TG gets on the front foot and comes out publicly and explains the whole situation one way or another.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:32am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
It’s the PR release from the NRL, and in the story above!!
“Some of the comments reported by the media were incorrectly recounted and should not, on the evidence since provided, be construed as having been directed to the reporters.”
October 10th 2012 @ 3:37pm
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
I did forget about that line in the article, but still, becuase the bulldogs and/or the NRL given thier performance on this matter are trying to deflect the focus doesnt make it so. I firmly believe the media has done nothing wrong in this matter except to keep it going.
October 10th 2012 @ 3:49pm
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
I’m over it. The whole thing is ridiculous. No one comes out of this whole mess looking good regardless of whether it’s individually fair or not. Not the Bulldogs, not the media, not the NRL, not the fans, and certainly not the code.
Regardless of what side of the fence you sit on, or which sport you follow, I’m sure we can all agree on one thing: it’s yet another black-eye for rugby league.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:14am
JVGO said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
I assume for the damage they have caused the game, insupportedly it appears or at least the Bulldogs contend.
October 10th 2012 @ 10:18am
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
It is only $1200 per player in the top 25, They jsu signed hasler on 1 Mil a year. There salary cap is what? if it is 4 mil then that equates to .75%. annoyingly all the press after a great season is all about the bulldogs behaviour. Talk about giving other codes a free kick
just becuase a few blokes cant handle Alcohol. FFS, all they had to do was close the window and ignore the press.
October 10th 2012 @ 10:25am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
So you want to fine them more than $30k for not shutting a window?
October 10th 2012 @ 11:04am
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:04am | Report comment
No for stupidity
October 10th 2012 @ 11:11am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:11am | Report comment
I think if we start fining for that, there will be a lot of broke players in the comp!
October 10th 2012 @ 10:43am
steve b said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:43am | Report comment
Pot Stirrer ever had a heated argument ,raised your voice ,and if the story about the media being 40 metres away is true they must have been really yelling or something else was used , bloody good mic a !!
October 10th 2012 @ 10:48am
Dogs Of War said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:48am | Report comment
Given the camera’s were rolling, I am sure they will show us that video of the players yelling out the window, rather than the ones they showed them sitting next to the window side on.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:07am
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:07am | Report comment
Steve, i think wel have to agree to disagree. 40mtrs isnt far but thats missing the point. If the reporter and crew themselves had not heard it they wouldnt have known to record it.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:13am
Brewski said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Everything is fine for Steve, he can send his sons around to extract an apology, if his daughter in law or daughter is slurred !!.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:23am
steve b said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
Stay away from the personals , and stick to the facts given , their is still no evidence that they were referring to the nine reporter ..
October 10th 2012 @ 11:28am
Brewski said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:28am | Report comment
All i am simply pointing out is something that you previously posted, maybe, just maybe !! not everyone has family to look after them in certain situations, there are many thousands of girls/women who don’t have the benifit of brother/fathers/to stick up for them.
And quite frankly it appears that your an apoligist.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:42am
steve b said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Brewski i take your point ,but first you have to be sure before saying that the lads in question were talking about the female reporter and there is still no evidence , as for an apologist you will have to in lighten me on that one , i have been called a lot in my time but never that ..
October 10th 2012 @ 11:17am
steve b said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
So you don’t believe the Graham Kasiano story that they were talking to each other in raised voices ?
October 10th 2012 @ 11:27am
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:27am | Report comment
No i dont. I think Tod greenberg has handled this like an amature. Why would he then apologise in the first place, and He said he apologised to them evryday over the following week. Surley he would have spoken to his players before he did anything and offered that as the excuse first time. Also if it that was the truth why would they then offer to pay anything. And imo its still being handled very poorly.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:50am
Dogs Of War said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
When you are having a drink, it’s not unusual to raise your voice. Especially when both of those mentioned have thick accents, for some reason it’s thought yelling makes you easier to understand.
October 10th 2012 @ 10:47am
Brewski said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/nrls-season-ends-in-darkness-afls-in-a-burst-of-light-20121009-27bbx.html
“In that environment, little wonder a female reporter is seen as fair game for obscene, cowardly taunts. Or that, in yesterday’s unsatisfying ”apology”, the Bulldogs seriously expect us to believe the still unnamed culprits were singing in the shower.”
Absolutely spot on article by Richard Hinds.
October 10th 2012 @ 10:53am
Punter said | October 10th 2012 @ 10:53am | Report comment
Written by an AFL sports writer, of course it absolutely spot on by a AFL supporter.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:06am
millane said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:06am | Report comment
afl sports writer?????
October 10th 2012 @ 11:16am
JVGO said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Totally. And winner of worst journalist award one year as well.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:32am
Brewski said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
And with the way the Australian media seems to be heading, then that award would probably mean the opposite … right !!.
October 10th 2012 @ 2:32pm
clipper said | October 10th 2012 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
Where exactly did this award originate? Facebook, RL weekly or some other equally credible source?
October 10th 2012 @ 7:33pm
JVGO said | October 10th 2012 @ 7:33pm | Report comment
Are you calling that piece anything but a piece of trash? Even you can read Clipper. hinds is a biased moron not a professional journalist. If I wrote the equivalent of that regarding the AFL it would never pass the mods even on this website.
October 10th 2012 @ 8:44pm
Crosscoder said | October 10th 2012 @ 8:44pm | Report comment
Was one.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:19am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:19am | Report comment
I spoke to Richard on Saturday, and it’s fair to say he made his position on this matter quite clear. In particular, he said it wasn’t the media’s fault, and he was extremely disappointed in the players.
As such, I’m surprised he didn’t actually go harder in his piece. Be that as it may, it’s hard to disagree with anything he wrote.
I would say, if you shoved a microphone in an AFL change room, I don’t think they would be saints. Just saying.
And, to be fair, Richard is not an AFL writer.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:24am
Brewski said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
Ryan, I agree with all your above statements.
And i particuarly liked Hinds statement about Gillon being Smithers to AD’s Mr Burns …LOL
October 10th 2012 @ 12:12pm
Redb said | October 10th 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
Ryan,
Hinds must be an AFL only writer how else could the posters here explain that article. Stop interupting with logic and an informed view.
October 11th 2012 @ 9:24am
Crosscoder said | October 11th 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Ryan
.Accoring to ufollow.com.”
R Hinds is a melbourne based sports writer for the SMH.He has covered the AFL for two decades almost,several OPS golf and grand slam tournos.Hinds grew up in Victoria where he witnessed the expansion of the national comp,and during his time with the SMH ,has reported on some of the key moments in the Swan’s gradual rise from unloved interloper to Sydney icon.
If that is not someone with a background in AFL reporting,I didn’t type this post.
Of late he has done a few rl stories,courtesy of his employer’s instructions.Well so has Rothfield,FitzSimons and even Paul Kent on AFL. And that is also being fair.They all do stories such as OP,golf etc.
October 11th 2012 @ 9:39am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 11th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
I never said he didn’t have an AFL background, but simply labeling him an AFL writer is a little misleading. He writes on a broad range of sports (hence his job title of Chief Sports Columnist) both for the SMH and Inside Sport. And to be fair, he’s penned more than just a ‘few’ rugby league stories.
Above all, I can tell you first hand that he likes rugby league.
October 10th 2012 @ 11:15am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 10th 2012 @ 11:15am | Report comment
You know what I have a issue with, and what smells fishy?
First of all, the defence was that the media shouldn’t have been there. Then it switched to “it wasn’t actually the players”. Then the main sponsor said it happens in bars all the time. Then finally that it wasn’t actually directed at the media.
That’s a lot of misdirection, and a few different excuses.
October 10th 2012 @ 12:05pm
Mals said | October 10th 2012 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
Ryan you have nailed it!
October 10th 2012 @ 3:41pm
Pot Stirrer said | October 10th 2012 @ 3:41pm | Report comment
yes and on top of all that we have the CEO of the club apologising, If it was an interview for the gallops old job i think he just failed.
October 11th 2012 @ 9:04pm
Blacklisted said | October 11th 2012 @ 9:04pm | Report comment
“That’s a lot of misdirection, and a few different excuses.”
For a second I there I thought you where talking about Journalists. There’s a reason why they rank down there with used cars salesmen and politicians.
And I’m still waiting to see the legal obligation thats states where the Bulldogs had to do interviews on mad monday.
To say, like most journalists have, thats it expected and therefore some how gives them the right to try and gate crash the celebrations just makes them look like petulent little children who have got the sh*ts thy diddn’t get invited.
To me a couple of dodgy comments pales into insignifigcance next to the futher decline in journalistic standards this whole over blowen saga represents.
And thats pretty hard to do considering how low the standard already was. In fact if it wasn’t for the balance article referenced below I would have lost all hope in your profession.