Lance Armstrong doping: ‘Undeniable’ evidence shown by USADA
Related coverage
A US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) report on doping by Lance Armstrong released on Wednesday details evidence against the US cycling star that shows guilt despite his lack of a positive doping test.
USADA delivered the report to the International Cycling Union (UCI) and World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) on Wednesday and made it public, showing the evidence that prompted USADA to issue a life ban against Armstrong in August.
Armstrong, who maintains he did nothing wrong, declined to contest USADA’s charges against him after losing a legal challenge to USADA’s arbitration hearing system, saying he was the target of a witch hunt and was tired after facing years of facing doping allegations.
USADA chief executive Travis T Tygart said Armstrong was at the heart of the most elaborate doping scheme in sport history, one in which he pressured teammates to take performance-enhancing drugs and keep silent about it.
“Different categories of eyewitness, documentary, first-hand, scientific, direct and circumstantial evidence reveal conclusive and undeniable proof that brings to the light of day for the first time this systemic, sustained and highly professionalized team-run doping conspiracy,” Tygart said.
Clandestine meetings, late-night doping deliveries and interlinked testimony from eyewitnesses plays heavily into USADA’s reconstruction of years of systemic doping plans.
“So ends one of the more sordid chapters in sports history,” the report said.
Among the evidence cited by USADA:
- US Postal Service team riders used EPO, testosterone, human growth hormone and cortisone, according to riders George Hincapie, Tyler Hamilton, Frankie Andreu and Jonathan Vaughters and team employee Emma O’Reilly
- Armstrong required O’Reilly to dispose of syringes after the 1998 Tour of the Netherlands
- Hincapie and Hamilton testified they were aware of Armstrong’s EPO use as early as 1998, Vaughters confirmed Armstrong used in the Tour of Spain and said he saw Armstrong inject himself with EPO in a hotel room
- Vaughters and Christian Van de Velde saw a doctor bring saline to Armstrong to help him avoid doping detection
- Hamilton testified he saw Armstrong take EPO during the 1999 Tour de France, having blood removed before the 2000 Tour and receiving a transfusion during the 2000 Tour
- Armstrong met with physician Michele Ferrari regarding doping in 1999 near Milan, according to Andreu’s wife Betsy.
- Armstrong offered Hamilton a vial of EPO from a refrigerator at his villa in Nice, France, in May, 1999. Hincapie also testified to being aware of 1999 EPO use by Armstrong
- Hamilton and Kevin Livingston were Tour de France roommates in 1999 so Armstrong and Johan Bruyneel could visit them and speak openly about doping
- O’Reilly testified team officials fabricated a story to explain why Armstrong tested positive for cortisone, including a backdated prescription for a cortisone cream to treat a saddle sore when he really had taken a cortisone injection
- Hamilton said he witnessed Armstrong use EPO during the 1999 Tour every three or four days
- retesting of Armstrong samples from the 1999 Tour found EPO traces in six samples
- Hamilton said new EPO tests for the 2000 Tour required a switch to blood doping for himself and Armstrong, with samples taken in Valencia, Spain
- Hincapie said in 2000 Armstrong admitted taking testosterone and that Armstrong dropped out of a race after Hincapie notified him drug testing officials were at the team hotel
- Hamilton said he was with Armstrong when they received blood transfusions at a hotel on July 11, 2000
- Hincapie said onversations with Armstrong made it clear Armstrong used blood transfusions from 2001 through 2005
- Armstrong sent Hamilton EPO by mail in 2001, Hamilton testified
- Hamilton said he recalled Dr Ferrari telling Armstrong he could stay on EPO in 2001 if he used tiny doses and slept in an altitude tent that would boost natural EPO production
- Hamilton and Floyd Landis said Armstrong said had made a positive EPO test at the 2001 Tour of Switzerland and made a payoff to the UCI to make the test disappear. A testing doctor told USADA Armstrong had a positive test at the race
- Hamilton testified he saw Armstrong use testosterone patches and Landis said Armstrong gave him some in 2002
- Landis saw reinfusion of blood into Armstrong the night before the time trial at the 2002 Tour de France
- Van de Velde said Armstrong told him he must follow Ferrari’s doping plan to stay on the team
- Landis said Armstrong asked him to watch refrigerated bags of his blood in 2003 and watched blood extracted from and reinfused to Armstrong. He also said he saw Armstrong use EPO to help mask the transfusions.
- Landis said Armstrong gave him a box of EPO syringes in 2003
- Landis said he saw Armstrong receive blood transfusions and EPO twice at the 2004 Tour de France. Leipheimer and David Zabriske said Landis told them of the incident in 2004 and 2005
- 2004 Tour rider Filippo Simeoni said Armstrong told him during a breakaway that he made a mistake when he testified against Ferrari and sued Armstrong, saying, “I have a lot of time and money and I can destroy you.”
- Hincapie said he saw Armstrong blood doping at the 2005 Tour de France and that Armstrong administered EPO to Hincapie that year before the race
- Hincapie said Bruyneel wanted him to do a sweep of Armstrong’s apartment after the 2005 Tour to be certain no doping-related materials were there
- Expert examination of Armstrong’s blood from the 2009 and 2010 Tour shows the odds of such a composition with lower red blood cell count compared to earlier blood samples being natural were less than one in a million.
© AFP 2013Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
The Crowd Says (16) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Cycling, Lance Armstrong

October 11th 2012 @ 10:32am
FrancisC said | October 11th 2012 @ 10:32am | Report comment
So what now? An admission would be nice to close off the books.
October 11th 2012 @ 10:39am
Herbie said | October 11th 2012 @ 10:39am | Report comment
Just get them repay all the money we’ve spent on jerseys, books and other rubbish based on the Armstrong lie!
October 11th 2012 @ 10:46am
FrancisC said | October 11th 2012 @ 10:46am | Report comment
Would love it if that happens. I doubt it though. All this time he is revered around the world! And before we know this is all a lie. Shame!!!
October 11th 2012 @ 10:37am
Herbie said | October 11th 2012 @ 10:37am | Report comment
UCI in denial – shame on them! Paul Kimmage is right, they need to torn down and rebuilt – cycling stands no chance with the UCI as it is! Take a look at the way Armstrong tore into Kimmage in this video from an interview on the Amgen 2009 Tour of California makes you sick!!
October 11th 2012 @ 10:48am
FrancisC said | October 11th 2012 @ 10:48am | Report comment
We can really see now what/who is the cancer, tsk tsk tsk. Such a wasted legacy – if there is one at all. If there is one (so they think), it is based on a lie.
October 12th 2012 @ 4:13pm
Rob said | October 12th 2012 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
Lance has 3 reasons why he did not use drugs
1. I have never tested positive
2. I had testicular cancer
3. I raise money for cancer awareness
The first point has been shown to mean next to nothing. And although its nothing to be laughed at, having cancer has nothing to do with doping and he needs to stop looking for sympathy by continuously anouncing it. It is also interesting to know that livestrong donates a grand today of zero, zilch, nothing to cancer research. It all goes to cancer “awareness” whatever that means. I think that is another way of saying “lance Armstrong awareness”. For which he is doing very well. He charges hundreds of thousands of dollars to speak at charity fundraisers and flies around in private jets. Not only is he a liar and a cheat, he is a shocking person to boot.
October 14th 2012 @ 10:11am
GRnis200 said | October 14th 2012 @ 10:11am | Report comment
Is that David Millar between Levi and Ivan rolling his eyes?
October 11th 2012 @ 12:16pm
nickoldschool said | October 11th 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
The masks have finally fallen off. Kudos to the cyclists, doctors, staff etc who have broken the omertà rule which reigns over the cycling world.
We have had many discussions over years, here on the roar and elsewhere with LA fans claiming we were persecuting their star without evidence. True, it was hard to get him but they finally managed to do so. LA was wrong, one of the worst cheaters in sports history. He was greedy, manipulative, a bully. Redemption is a long way away but admitting his guilt would be a start.
October 11th 2012 @ 1:04pm
Aljay said | October 11th 2012 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
Just out of interest – is anyone aware of Matt White (US Postal rider 2001-3, current Sports Director of Greenedge and the Australian Men’s Road Team) being on record addressing doping by either Armstrong or other US Postal riders?
October 11th 2012 @ 6:55pm
Erik said | October 11th 2012 @ 6:55pm | Report comment
I am coming around to the idea that Lance doped with everyone else, but I can’t seem to accept that without also concluding the cycling has been irrelevant for at least the last 15 years. Whether or not Lance doped becomes unimportant, because if he did, cycling itself is unimportant. The best road back for the sport may be for most of the money to leave the sport until it can be rebuilt by riders who care more for the sport than for victory.
October 11th 2012 @ 7:52pm
Herbie said | October 11th 2012 @ 7:52pm | Report comment
Hang on – don’t brand cycling as bad for doing something about drugs! OK this looks specifically bad for Lance and US Postal, but no other sport is tackling drugs seriously like this. It damages the image of cycling, wrongly, where other sports just keep their head in the sand. Not sure why USADA don’t do the same in Basketball or Indie Car racing etc…. like Operacion Puerto where only the cyclists amongst many other sportsmen and women got sanctioned:-
Excerpt from Wikipedia article “Football has however been criticised for not sanctioning players implicated in performance enhancing drug scandals. Most recently, Operation Puerto implicated approximately 50 cyclists and 150 sportspersons of other sporting codes, including several “high profile football players”. While the cyclists were named and pursued by the governing bodies of cycling, none of the football players were named or punished for their involvement in the doping ring.“ FIFA, IAAF and ITF have all denied that their named players from Operacion Puerto were guilty – despite exactly the same level of evidence used to convict all the cyclists.
October 11th 2012 @ 8:07pm
sittingbison said | October 11th 2012 @ 8:07pm | Report comment
anyone for Tennis?
October 11th 2012 @ 8:10pm
Herbie said | October 11th 2012 @ 8:10pm | Report comment
Precisely – several very high ranking Spanish Tennis players amongst the clients of Dr Fuentes, and with same level of eveidence against them as sanctioned cyclists, such as Valverde, Basso etc. It’s not a level playing field!
October 11th 2012 @ 8:32pm
sittingbison said | October 11th 2012 @ 8:32pm | Report comment
OK, I will broach the subject, then duck for cover.
Of particular interest for Australian cycling fans is current Sky super domestique Mick Rogers has been directly implicated with doping. Directly implicated in Levi Leipheimers affidavit, being named as attending Dr Michele Ferrari “training camps” with Levi, Popovych, Kashechkin, Vinokourov, Salvoldelli . Not once but twice. In 2005.
http://d3epuodzu3wuis.cloudfront.net/Leipheimer%2c+Levi%2c+Affidavit.pdf
This is on top of being implicated in the Telekom “Freiburg University” scandal that rocked German.
OK, I’m ducking for cover now. Over to the rugby forum
October 12th 2012 @ 1:16am
DerailleurED said | October 12th 2012 @ 1:16am | Report comment
Allan Davis was linked in Operation Puerto too. That is nothing new though. Would love for Stephens and White to come clean too, they must know some dark shit. On the subject of White, has the whole Trent Lowe story come out yet?
October 11th 2012 @ 10:54pm
yewonk said | October 11th 2012 @ 10:54pm | Report comment
wow where did you get that from. yes its now reasonable to suspect and be cynical of every one. hard to imagine so many with out integrity.