Selector Inverarity hints at no spinner for the Gabba Test
By Kersi Meher-Homji, 17 Oct 2012 Kersi Meher-Homji is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Ashes, Cricket, Shane Watson, South Africa cricket, Test cricket
126 Have your say
Australian Cricket selector John Inverarity speaks with spin bowler Nathan Lyon. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
Related coverage
Although selection for the first Test in Brisbane is a fortnight away, chief selector John Inverarity hinted that the Australian team will have three to four fast bowlers and no specialist spinner.
“Skipper Michael Clarke will do the spinning”, he said at the ‘Cricket’s Back Week’ in Sydney on Monday. He was full of praise for Clarke’s enthusiasm even when playing grade cricket in Sydney.
But the cricketer in maximum spotlight was Shane Watson. He has been recalled from South Africa where he is playing Champions League T20 for Sydney Sixers. Cricket Australia strongly feels that he should be playing more with red balls than with white in preparation for the Australian summer of cricket, and the Ashes.
Pat Howard, Executive General Manager of Team Performance, said, “Shane’s unique. He’s an all-rounder. [To recall him from South Africa] was in the best interests (of) Australian cricket and for him. The dialogue between Shane and Cricket Australia has been cordial and he understands it.”
When asked about who would be keeping wickets for Australia in the Brisbane Test, Inverarity appeared in two minds. To recall Brad Haddin or stick with Matthew Wade poses a problem, he felt and indicated a final decision will be made on the 30th or 31st October.
Inverarity was pleased with the fast bowling stocks: Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, Mitchell Johnson plus the medium-fast Shane Watson would be ideal for the bouncy Gabba pitch.
Head coach Mickey Arthur stated that he wants to bring Australia back to number one position. He was asked whether he felt uncomfortable coaching Australia after coaching South Africa in the past.
“At personal level, it adds an extra spice”, he said with a smile, but added that to bring Australia to top position is his current goal.
Will the staging of Tests against South Africa on pace friendly pitches in Brisbane and Perth be an advantage for the tourists? After all they have a speed battery of Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel and Vernon Philander.
Arthur replied that there will be little advantage as venues have been decided well into the past and traditionally the Melbourne Test starts on Boxing Day and the Sydney Test on the second or third of January.
Besides Australia also have fast bowlers to take advantage of the bouncy pitches in Gabba and WACA.
What about the spin department in the Australian line-up?
Inverarity replied that off-spinner Nathan Lyon and slow left-arm orthodox Jon Holland will play in subsequent Tests in Melbourne and Sydney.
He added that rotation policy is not a dirty word but a reality with so much cricket being played around the calendar.
Here is my Australian XI for the first Test in Brisbane (in batting order):
Ed Cowan, David Warner, Shane Watson, Michael Clarke (capt), Ricky Ponting, Mike Hussey, Matthew Wade (wk), James Pattinson, Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Nathan Lyon or Ben Hilfenhaus.
What do you think, Roarers?
Kersi is an author of 13 cricket books including The Waugh Twins, Cricket's Great All-rounders,Six Appeal and Nervous Nineties. He writes regularly for Inside Cricket and other publications. He has recently finished his new book on Cricket's Conflicts and Controversies, with a foreword by Greg Chappell.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Ashes, Cricket, Shane Watson, South Africa cricket, Test cricket

October 17th 2012 @ 7:14am
ADSA said | October 17th 2012 @ 7:14am | Report comment
No Peter Siddle, he carried us through all the tests last year?
October 17th 2012 @ 11:23am
Max said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
Straight away as soon as I read the list I noticed Siddle as an exclusion. Are you kidding me???? Easily our best fast bowler at the moment.
October 17th 2012 @ 11:30am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:30am | Report comment
And Cummins needs to play Shield cricket for a while to hone his skills and improve his fitness.
October 17th 2012 @ 12:32pm
jameswm said | October 17th 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
Agreed, Sids would be our first bowler picked right now. He’s ranked what, about 5th in the world?
October 17th 2012 @ 8:49am
Red Kev said | October 17th 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Promises to be an interesting summer.
I see Hughes is back in contention. I will be interested to see if Boof can revive Khawaja’s stalled career, and if any of our bowlers can stay injury free. I also want to see if Ponting still has what it takes against a decent attack (rather than the pies the Indian pacemen were chucking last summer).
October 17th 2012 @ 8:54am
Brett McKay said | October 17th 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Kersi, it will be interesting to see whether Australia do go into Brisbane with four-and-a-half quicks and no spinner. Warne used to say ‘if it’ll seam, it’ll spin’, and both he and MacGill counted the ‘Gabba among their favourite grounds to bowl on. Obviously, we don’t have Warne and MacGill any more, but I still think it’s something of a risk to not have a proper slow option.
Perhaps the weather in Brisbane over the next fortnight will decide it??
October 17th 2012 @ 10:34am
rl said | October 17th 2012 @ 10:34am | Report comment
The bowling attack this time last year all performed well (Pattinson, Siddle, Starc, Lyon with Huss picking up a sneaky wicket), and that was without Watson. Given their form to date (paerticularly Pattinson), I don’t see any reason not to stick with the same attack, and with the benefit of Watson in (hopefully he won’t be needed).
As you say Brett, Lyon’s participation really just comes down to a call on the pitch (and Brisbane’s weather). Still a way off, but the extended forecast has some rain in the week before the test, and possibly a famous Brisbane afternoon thunderstorm or two during the game!
October 17th 2012 @ 8:57am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 17th 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Good morning Kersi,
It’s great to think another summer of international cricket is around the corner. Just a quick question: you mention that Mitchell Johnson would be ideal for the bouncy Gabba wicket, but surely we have moved on from Mitch?
He’ll be 31 in November, there is no indication he had mended his erratic ways, and we have an abundance of good, quick young bowlers at our disposal now.
October 17th 2012 @ 10:22am
JohnB said | October 17th 2012 @ 10:22am | Report comment
I think either Inverarity was trolling there or Kersi heard James Pattinson but typed Mitch.
October 17th 2012 @ 11:25am
Max said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:25am | Report comment
I thought trolling was frowned upon on the roar…. very rude Kersi!
October 17th 2012 @ 11:52am
Kersi Meher-Homji said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:52am | Report comment
What is trolling, Max?
October 17th 2012 @ 12:35pm
JohnB said | October 17th 2012 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Kersi – I mentally typed “inadvertently” before the word “typed” in the original post but failed to do so physically. Apologies if that suggested anything deliberate on your part! And you can’t possibly have been so busy with your book – what was that title again? – to not know what trolling is!
October 17th 2012 @ 11:35am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:35am | Report comment
You never know – the selectors have disturbing, misplaced faith in Johnson.
October 17th 2012 @ 1:44pm
Tobes said | October 17th 2012 @ 1:44pm | Report comment
i agree with Disco….to even mention the name is a worry!
October 17th 2012 @ 1:50pm
Tobes said | October 17th 2012 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
We are going to need to bat deep to match the SA who have a long batting order. Not to mention an awesome bowling line up. With a fragile top order i wonder if the 4th bowling spot will go to a bowler who can offer something with the bat? Maybe that is how Johnson is getting a mention. Didn’t Cutting just get a ton for Queensland? Could be a smokey to bat at number 8 in a team as follows:
Warner
Cowan
Watson
Ponting
Clarke
Hussey
Wade
Cutting
Patinson
Siddle
Hilfenhaus
Starc an unlucky 12th man….
October 17th 2012 @ 2:03pm
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 2:03pm | Report comment
And Johnson isn’t even a particularly effective No.9 anymore. Siddle is a far better batsmen.
October 17th 2012 @ 9:01am
Brett McKay said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Just on your side there, Kersi, Invers yesterday suggested that if four quicks is the formula for Brisbane, Siddle would be among them, and that Cummins will play some games through the summer. So over than that little switcharoo, I’d reckon you’ve nailed the First Test team…
And congrats on the release of the new book too!! Make sure you get a plug in today and throughout the series..
October 17th 2012 @ 9:13am
Kersi Meher-Homji said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:13am | Report comment
Thank you, Brett, for your good wishes. The Roar editors have been wonderful to me over the years, especially in promoting my books.
CRICKET CONFLICTS AND CONTROVERSIES will be in bookshops in early November, I’m told.
I agree with you and ADSA that Siddle would be a good choice on Gabba.
Ryan, I have not lost my hopes on Johnson. If only Mickey Arthur would insist that he bowls at the stumps and not at 3rd slip, he can be a match-winner.
October 17th 2012 @ 9:38am
Bayman said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:38am | Report comment
Kersi,
What was the name of your new book again?
On the question of Mitchell Johnson, Kersi, I don’t think it really matters what Mickey Arthur insists on – it depends entirely on whether Johnson can actually do what is required. And I’m a long way from being convinced he can even get close.
October 17th 2012 @ 9:41am
Brett McKay said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Bayman, CRICKET CONFLICTS AND CONTROVERSIES it’s called, and I’m told it will be in all good bookstores in November!
October 17th 2012 @ 9:46am
Ryan O'Connell said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:46am | Report comment
I agree Bayman. When it comes to Johnson, I don’t think it’s a lack of intent, I think it’s a lack of execution.
October 17th 2012 @ 11:39am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:39am | Report comment
Yeah, I doubt whether Johnson is sufficiently skilful to turn from match-loser to match-winner. I wouldn’t even place him in the top ten available fast bowlers.
October 17th 2012 @ 9:34pm
sheek said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:34pm | Report comment
Bayman,
Please get in touch with Kersi & I, we’re planning another luncheon.
Be pronto…!!!!!
October 18th 2012 @ 9:55pm
Bayman said | October 18th 2012 @ 9:55pm | Report comment
Sheek,
Any day but October 30th.
October 18th 2012 @ 10:44pm
Jason said | October 18th 2012 @ 10:44pm | Report comment
OK. Well enjoy yourselves then. The rest of us will carry on with our lives.
October 18th 2012 @ 11:43pm
Bayman said | October 18th 2012 @ 11:43pm | Report comment
Alright Jason, you can come too! Probably the Rugby Club……….
October 17th 2012 @ 9:50am
iambunney said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
Kersi,
I’m glad you amended the Siddle non-selection – Pat Cummins is a talent, but a long way off deserving a spot in the test team.
As for Johnson, I’ve been a long time fan, but in reality, he has lost all credits and needs to kill it in the shield comp for a min 4 consecutive games before he is considered again. I think what you say re: bowling at the stumps over at 3rd slip has some merit, but the real problem is the over-modifcation of his action. He had a beautiful side-on action that has been changed more and more to a front-on action, to the point where he has lost all the zing in his deliveries because his body is not following the ball at the point of release. Because he has an angled arm (exaggerated by a side-cocked wrist), when he bowls front on his body is about 10 inches to the right of the ball and traveling in a diff direction to the ball. Lasith Malinga hasn’t lost his pace, because he maintained his side-on slinging action. Sri Lanka were right not to amend it because, although he can be erratic, he has remained a match winner. Johnson has lost his match winning ways, but remained erratic. Lesson to be learnt Aus…
October 17th 2012 @ 9:24am
josh said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Would be very close to the team. But the bowling line up has a bit of sameness too it. If Pattinson and Cummins haven’t blasted them out , then what? Stick Siddle on to bowl straight, hope Hilfy swings it?
October 17th 2012 @ 11:45am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:45am | Report comment
I think you’ve touched on the limitations of Australia’s bowling attack, regardless of which three or four right-armers they pick. They’ll need to be at their very best and hope South Africa’s equivalents are not in order to successfully compete with them.
October 17th 2012 @ 9:40am
Brett McKay said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
“..insist that he bowls at the stumps and not at 3rd slip”
It really is a simple game, cricket….
October 17th 2012 @ 9:43am
josh said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:43am | Report comment
I remember McGrath bowling a 1st slip line to salvage a draw against New Zealand at the Gabba back in the day.
October 17th 2012 @ 10:23am
JohnB said | October 17th 2012 @ 10:23am | Report comment
After a ridiculous declaration
October 17th 2012 @ 9:45am
Matt F said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
I’d have Siddle in that team in place of either Starc or Cummins, probably Cummins given his lack of first class cricket over his career (he’s only played 5 games including his sole test.) Both have played nothing but ODI & T20 cricket for months and it’s a big adjustment from T20 to first class cricket. Give Cummins a few Shield games and look to the Perth test for him to make his mark.
I’d also still be considering Lyon, despite Inverarity’s comments yesterday, in as I’m hesitant to play 4 quicks plus Watson although that will obviously depend on the pitch. By the sounds of it the pitches this summer will be very green which makes sense given our fast bowling talent (though the SA quicks will be salivating at those pitches as well) but it wouldn’t be the first time a pitch has looked like a bowlers paradise only to end up playing fairly flat. A lack of a spinner could hurt if we don’t bowl first. The Gabba especially has that reputation of looking more lively than what it actually plays. If the pitches are like what we saw in Perth and Hobart last summer then by all means load up with pace, but if they’re not we may regret it come day 5.
I can’t fault your battling line-up. I hope they stick with Wade. Haddin was in awful form before he withdrew from the WIndies tour and it would be very harsh to drop Wade given he made a century in his last Test, though it was a long time ago. We still have an ageing middle order which will need rejuvination soon and it’s better to ease the veterans out graduallyas opposed to throwing
3 players (Ponting, Hussey and Haddin) out at once. The time would seem right to move one of the veterans on and Haddin for Wade is the obvious choice.
October 17th 2012 @ 11:49am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Totally agree on that last point. Bringing Haddin in again would be a major backward step, seeing as, ideally, the top six needs rejuvenating soon. Having the relatively young Wade there is/was a piece of the future puzzle in place.
October 17th 2012 @ 12:09pm
Matt F said | October 17th 2012 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Exactly. It’s the perfect opportunity to rejuvinate and, given that Wade was there in the last series, it doesn’t have the potential drawbacks of potentially disrupting the incumbent XI, rather simply keep as it was. It’s quite a unique position when you can begin to rejuvinate the side without actually having to make a change to the last XI.
October 17th 2012 @ 9:49am
Kersi Meher-Homji said | October 17th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
If you have friends like Bayman and Brett, you don’t need publicity agents!
Took the hint. Won’t mention the book again. Not in capital letters.
Re Johnson. McGrath should take him under his wings to convert him from a wayward genius to Annie get your gun.
October 17th 2012 @ 10:02am
josh said | October 17th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Why? He’s over 30; Starc, Pattinson, Cummins would be worth putting more effort into, plus all the others guys at Shield level, Cutting McDermott etc… I can’t see a reason to persist with Johnson at an international level.
October 17th 2012 @ 10:19am
Christo the Daddyo said | October 17th 2012 @ 10:19am | Report comment
Yes, agree. And fast bowling isn’t really the problem, its the spinning department that looks a little underwhelming at the moment. And then there’s the batting lineup…
Hopefully Hughes and Khawaja can come back into the reckoning over the next 18 months or so as Ponting and Hussey retire at some point.
October 17th 2012 @ 10:33am
Matt F said | October 17th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
I think Lyon has actually done really well for us, especially when you consider that we’ve been producing a lot of green pitches recently so he hasn’t really played too many matches on pitches which suit spin. When he got a go on the slower pitches in the West Indies he picked up a fair few wickets. We clearly have nobody else behind him though. Agree with our batting. It’s all well and good to talk about rejuvinating the middle order and but it would be nice if there was a batsman who was actually making runs at Shield level and winning a spot on merit.
October 17th 2012 @ 11:56am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:56am | Report comment
I know it’s going over old ground, but the one batsman who was making big shield runs was picked, showed promise (without dominating), and was then discarded once the selectors finally felt the need to shake things up after the Hobart debacle, picking a patently out-of-form Western Australian to bat at three.
I just don’t think the selectors have any serious willingness to rejuvenate the middle order yet, which I see as a mistake.
October 17th 2012 @ 12:06pm
Matt F said | October 17th 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
I think most of us agree that dropping Khawaja after very few opportunities was very harsh but as you say, it’s going over old ground. Time to move on from that and look to the upcoming series. Given that the Test team has won their last few series (admittedly it’s been a while since the last one) and the main challengers for spots haven’t been making runs (hopefully this will change as the Shield season develops) it’s difficult to call for changes to the batting line-up for the first test. If SA belt us in this series and some domestic players make Shield runs then that discussion will undoubtedly happen again, as it should.
There’s no doubt that a succession plan is needed but the back to back Ashes series’ make it tough to do unless the team starts to lose
October 17th 2012 @ 1:11pm
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
That all sounds sensible, though don’t forget the Indian hammering was preceded by the Hobart loss to NZ and followed by a pretty average showing in the West Indies. It would be bit of a selection punt to remove one or two of the incumbents, but I just can’t see the current batting line-up causing South Africa too many headaches.
October 17th 2012 @ 2:04pm
Matt F said | October 17th 2012 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
“I just can’t see the current batting line-up causing South Africa too many headaches.”
I have my doubts as well (though I said that when we played them in SA last year and it ended 1-1.) The problem is that the potential challengers aren’t making runs, actually Hughes did well in the county season. Add this to the fact that we’ve won 6 out of our last 7 test matches (one draw) admittedly against fairly mediocre opposition, and it’s hard to make a strong argument to drop a batsman for the first test, or any player for that matter. If our batsmen fail against SA and there are some Shield batsmen making first class runs then an opportunity could very well open up against Sri Lanka
October 17th 2012 @ 3:30pm
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
Worth noting is that South Africa seem to play better away from home, so I wouldn’t read too much into the 1-1 over there last time.
Hughes got good press early in that county season but his form tapered off dramatically. I would have thought the selectors would still be put off by his horror show against NZ last summer.
October 17th 2012 @ 11:52am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:52am | Report comment
And then there’s question marks over Warner and Cowan, and Watson as a No.3…
October 17th 2012 @ 12:20pm
josh said | October 17th 2012 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
I’d bat Watson and Warner together.
October 17th 2012 @ 11:50am
Disco said | October 17th 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
Precisely. Why invest time and effort in Johnson as some sort of special project when he’s nowhere near as good as other alternatives?