Winners and losers from the AFL meat market
By Vince Rugari, 18 Oct 2012 Vince Rugari is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, AFL draft, Kurt Tippet, Quentin Lynch
Related coverage
It started with a bang. But the AFL Trade Period is quickly running out of steam. Why? Three bloody weeks, that’s why.
As the 18 clubs continue their childish stalemate before activity predictably resumes in a flurry 10 minutes out from the deadline, let’s take a brief look back at what we’ve seen so far. Let’s see which teams have come out on top, and which ones lost out at the trade table.
Winners
Collingwood: With the introduction of free agency and all the concerns about the big clubs eating the little ones whole, they were always going to end up here, weren’t they? But to their credit, they’ve done some terrific business.
In comes the big Q-Tip, key forward Quentin Lynch, who joined the Pies as a free agent at the very opening of the window. He might be 29 but he is a proven goalkicker and a clear upgrade from Chris Dawes.
Plonk the Q-Stick next to the recently-resigned Travis Cloke in the forward 50 and Collingwood will have one of the best forward lines in the competition in 2013. As part of the Dawes trade to Melbourne, they got pick 20 – and for Sharrod Wellingham, they got pick 17 from West Coast. Hard not to see that as a massive net profit.
GWS: The expansion club’s fascination with hoarding draft picks continues. Never mind the fact that they’re using the mini-draft in the exact opposite way it was intended.
As a result of their wheeling and dealing with Melbourne and Gold Coast for talented 17-year-olds, the Giants now have the first three picks in the national draft and a total of five of the first 13.
If that doesn’t confirm their future powerhouse status, then nothing will. They also hung onto ruckman Jonathan Giles, who was being courted by Adelaide before his contract stand-off was settled.
With Leon Cameron signed up as Kevin Sheedy’s successor starting 2014, something will have gone wrong if there’s no silverware in the cabinet by the end of the decade. There’s just too much potential.
Hawthorn: Basically, they’ve swapped Tom Murphy for Brian Lake. The former straddled the fence between solid stopper and depth player, and will find a little more room to grow on the Gold Coast. A shift there did wonders for Matthew Warnock last year.
The latter is a proven defender who wants premiership glory before he retires and knows he wasn’t going to get it at Whitten Oval. He cost the Hawks six spots in the draft order. Worth it, you’d say.
Geelong: There’s a reason Josh Caddy was one of the hottest properties on the market. He’s a gun, already. Effectively, 2012 was his debut season, having spent almost all of Gold Coast’s first season sidelined with injury.
To play every single game this year on the back of that is the mark of a young player who has already found his level. Caddy almost represents where Geelong is at the moment – perhaps not a premiership contender yet, but certainly building in the right direction.
Losers
Port Adelaide: Harsh. They’re only just here, to be fair. And it’s not necessarily because of the losses of free agents Troy Chaplin (Richmond) and Danyle Pearce (Fremantle). Any Port fan will tell you those two needed a fresh start years ago.
The Power are here because of their inactivity up to this point. With the ink still drying on new coach Ken Hinkley’s contract, there wasn’t a whole lot the club could do but sit and watch all the business happen without them.
Angus Monfries is a nice buy, but there’s a whole lot more that needs to be done in a short period of time to give this tired old list a desperately-needed makeover. The fact that everyone else had a head start is no great help.
Adelaide: Not their fault, but this is one of the disappointing things about the AFL player movement system.
Kurt Tippett was two years away from free agency but he’s been acting an awful lot like one, nominating his club of choice (controversially so) and expecting everyone else to do the legwork to get him there.
If it doesn’t happen, he can declare his salary and slip through to Sydney in the pre-season draft anyway. No worries, Kurt. You can just sense that the Crows are going to get badly burnt in this situation.
There is nothing that the Swans are willing to part with that will make up for the loss of a power forward that, on his day, is one of the best in the competition. Adelaide must accept chicken feed for a player that will soon be worth millions, or watch him walk for nothing.
Vince Rugari is an Adelaide-born journalist who cut his teeth on the sporting graveyard that is the Gold Coast. He fancies the round ball and the Sherrin, and used to be a handy leg-spin bowler before injury curtailed a baggy green push. He is a Port Adelaide fan by birth, as painful as that has been recently. He's now sports editor of The Area News in Griffith, NSW.
The Crowd Says (12) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- AFL, AFL draft, Kurt Tippet, Quentin Lynch

October 18th 2012 @ 9:33am
AndyMack said | October 18th 2012 @ 9:33am | Report comment
I guess the pies in the winners circle will depend on how well picks 17 and 20 turn out.
October 18th 2012 @ 10:58am
andyincanberra said | October 18th 2012 @ 10:58am | Report comment
Carlton’s silence over the trade period has been a little surprising. I would have thought they’d be doing everyting possible to bolster their forward stocks.
October 18th 2012 @ 10:58am
TomC said | October 18th 2012 @ 10:58am | Report comment
If we’re including free agency, then you’d have to include Essendon as a trade week winner. Brendan Goddard is a fantastic pickup for nothing, and exactly what the Bombers need. The little do-si-do they’ve done with Port to get a third round pick for the departing Monfries is also a smart bit of work.
Depending on the compensation they get, even the Saints might end up as trade week winners. They’ve nabbed a good young prospect in Tom Lee, and they obviously see themselves as entering a big rebuilding phase. However, they look like they’ve failed their first goal, which was to get a good young KPP who can play in 2013. Always a tall order, though.
I think one of the quiet achievers out of this trade period has been Richmond. Chaplin and Knights are solid depth players with finals experience that they’ve acquired as free agents, and they should add something to their young list.
October 19th 2012 @ 7:39am
Ian Whitchurch said | October 19th 2012 @ 7:39am | Report comment
Err, Tom Lee is a KPP, he’s 21, and he kicked 59 goals in the WAFL last year.
If that doesnt count as “a good young KPP who can play in 2013″, Im not sure what does.
October 19th 2012 @ 3:18pm
TomC said | October 19th 2012 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
Perhaps I should have said a KPP with AFL experience. I was thinking of the failed effort to lure Mitch Brown.
For what it’s worth, I don’t think there have been too many 21 year old key position players who have come out of a state league to play a full season in the AFL.
October 19th 2012 @ 5:03pm
Ian Whitchurch said | October 19th 2012 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
Given a choice between Lee for a trade-down and – probably, $100k a year and Dawes for pick 20 and half a million a year, I’d be pretty happy with that piece of business as St Kilda.
Ironically, they might at some point have a forward line *entirely* of GWS zone concessions … Lee, Saad and Milera.
October 18th 2012 @ 1:01pm
SurlyPie said | October 18th 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
Vince, while GWS SHOULD do well from their wealth of early picks, it doesn’t necessarily lead to guaranteed success. See Melbourne in recent years…..
October 18th 2012 @ 3:34pm
Willow mused said | October 18th 2012 @ 3:34pm | Report comment
Must have missed the memo on essendon: arguably the best free agent available was Goddard. Clearly the ideal fit for a club with lack of midfield class and requiring leadership support. Surely this is more of a win then Q Lynch and speculative draft picks?
Agree on cats and tigers.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
October 18th 2012 @ 5:30pm
Justin Curran said | October 18th 2012 @ 5:30pm | Report comment
Interesting you haven’t mentioned Melbourne who have been one of the most aggressive teams during this year’s trade period. You clearly rank them as a middling team, neither winning nor losing?
October 22nd 2012 @ 7:51am
Bill Larkin said | October 22nd 2012 @ 7:51am | Report comment
More than interesting, astounding. I know that the club is absolutely delighted with the trade period, and are looking to add Farren Ray this week. With pick 4 to come, I would think Melbourne is a big winner.
October 18th 2012 @ 6:47pm
Nathan of Perth said | October 18th 2012 @ 6:47pm | Report comment
No one who gets the modern day Brian Lake in a trade period can be described as having been a winner
October 19th 2012 @ 10:41pm
Floyd Calhoun said | October 19th 2012 @ 10:41pm | Report comment
Interesting change in recruiting strategy lately. 7-8 years ago, most discarded fringe players tended to hang around at their ‘life-line’ club for a season or two before disappearing off the radar. That still happens, but clubs seem to have developed a more acute sense of list management these days. Of course, when you’re a top four club, these choices tend to appear to work so wonderfully well when they do succeed, but are also hardly noticed when they fail. Middling, and struggling clubs don’t have that luxury.