No tries in Bledisloe 3, but still a great contest
By Brett McKay, 23 Oct 2012 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Bledisloe Cup, Rugby Union, wallabies
Australia's Mike Harris reacts after their draw against New Zealand. AAP Image/Dan Peled
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- Wallabies v All Blacks news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
I had made the comment late last week in the build-up to the Brisbane Bledisloe that it really didn’t feel like a normal Bledisloe week.
The Rugby Championship had been run and won already, and there was no real cross-ditch sledging as you’d normally expect.
It felt, I suggested, “rather more like an end-of-season jaunt against the BaaBaas.”
And perhaps that reflected in my own ‘approach’ to the game, if I can call it that. Where for most other big games this year I’ve read everything being said, taken note of team selections, even watched previous outings, for this game I did very little of that at all (I certainly wasn’t subjecting myself to either of this year’s trans-Tasman clashes again).
In fact, I didn’t even realise that New Zealand were going into the match with only one Franks until I didn’t see a second brother during the anthem line-up.
Where for all the games previous I would sit through them studiously taking notes, I instead relaxed and watched this game with a couple of mates; the perfect dessert to a sumptuous feast shared with good friends.
Perhaps that relaxed nature could be put down to the bottles of wine consumed during dinner, and the numerous beers downed beforehand, but such was my and our focus on all things other than rugby, we didn’t actually tune into the game properly until the teams were running out.
It wasn’t a lack of interest in this game, either, but perhaps it was one of those end of season games that you’re attracted to only because it’s on, not because it’s likely to bring anything that hasn’t already been seen throughout the season.
The All Blacks were always going to be up for this game, in looking to equal their record number of consecutive wins, and the Wallabies were desperate to finish the domestic international season on some modicum of a high, be that for themselves, their coach, or for their allegedly-retiring third caretaker captain.
And so what did we get?
Well, I realise this might not be even close to the common opinion, but I thought it was among the Wallabies’ best performances of the year, and a completely enthralling game from start until all five minutes after the slated end.
And no, that’s not the wine talking still.
I get that people will look at the 18-all scoreline, the no tries to either side, and six penalty goals each and will conclude that this game was dire. I don’t agree with that point of view, but I do get that it’s out there.
What I saw was two teams that kept a 50,000-plus capacity crowd on the edge of their seats for 80 minutes, plus five minutes and change after that.
I saw two teams that did want to play with space and with ball in hand where possible, but who were thwarted by their own mistakes. And two equally good defensive sides, who probably kept their line in tact as much through good luck as good management.
I saw two teams who made errors at the worst possible times, and whose supposed set-piece strengths were often the chink in their armour.
I saw two teams who did their very best at getting away with what they could wherever the chance arose, but who also earned the ire of the best referee in the game who always keeps a keen eye out for that sort of thing.
It was a compelling, gripping, absorbing, annoyingly defensive, frustratingly poorly executed, niggly, error-prone, brutal, wonderful game of rugby, and I loved every minute. A repeat viewing on Sunday confirmed this complex, but necessary description.
From a local perspective, the Wallabies will be annoyed they couldn’t get the win, given the possession and territory advantages they enjoyed.
They did superbly well to hold possession for the 26 or 28 or however many phases it was to get themselves deep into New Zealand’s half after the siren, but will rue their inexperience for not seeing that the All Blacks were never going to give away a penalty at the breakdown to which they weren’t committing numbers.
In time, this experience will jolt Kurtley Beale and/or Mike Harris into the realisation that in the same situation, they need to take charge and present as a drop goal options when the penalty’s not looking likely. They can’t just sit back and wait for the ball to arrive.
The Wallabies should be rightly be proud of the fact that despite the many chances the All Blacks had to create tries, they couldn’t break the Wallaby line.
But that’s not to say the Wallabies had it all their way. Yet again, their discipline at times was appalling and, yet again, the lineout throwing was as accurate as my ability to pick Lotto numbers. The restarts, the handling under the high ball, the handling in general play for that matter; basic skills of the game went missing so often.
Yet somehow, they kept their line intact and even managed to force All Black errors, which is something not too many teams have done this year.
Did New Zealand crumble under the pressure of a record? We may never know that in truth, but certainly, they wouldn’t have been happy with their inability to convert those numerous chances into tries.
Their front row had some issues at scrum time, and Dan Carter had something of an off night with the boot, missing two penalties and pulling what would’ve been the match-winning drop goal.
All the errors throughout the game were a direct result of the pressure from both teams, and that’s what made it a great contest. It didn’t produce any tries, but that didn’t make any less enjoyable.
Brett McKay is a former non-tackling scrumhalf and not-quite-1st Grade middle order stalwart. A rugby and cricket expert for The Roar since July 2009 (having joined in Sept 2008), Brett has written for Inside Rugby and Cricket Australia, and is also PLAY Canberra's rugby correspondent. He tweets from @BMcSport
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Bledisloe Cup, Rugby Union, wallabies


October 23rd 2012 @ 3:41am
Mitch in Valencia said | October 23rd 2012 @ 3:41am | Report comment
Here here Ben. I agree whole heartedly. I thought the wallaby forwards did well, competing aggresively at the rucks n the backs at least attempted some first phase moves. even though mcabe had an off night in some areas, I thougt encouraging that he n tapuai were at least passing the ball….! A great game!
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:27am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:27am | Report comment
Ben?!? Good point about McCabe and Tapuai, though, there’s a nice little combination developing there Mitch…
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:38am
Albo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
For fear of repeating myself, the Taps/McCabe combination is strarting to take shape and should be given time to develop more. Both are young, coachable, and offer differing playing styles/strengths.
For those who want JOC in at 12 when he is fit, I say move him to FB where he can inject himself anywhere at varying times a la Jason Robinson (but with a more complete game).
As for the article, Journalist Formerly Known As Ben, thank you for commenting so aptly on what this game truly was – a great contest. Pretty? No. Spectacle? Probably not. Edge of your seat? Yes. Memorable? Definitely. A good old fashioned Bledisloe tussle.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:38am
Albo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
For fear of repeating myself, the Taps/McCabe combination is strarting to take shape and should be given time to develop more. Both are young, coachable, and offer differing playing styles/strengths.
For those who want JOC in at 12 when he is fit, I say move him to FB where he can inject himself anywhere at varying times a la Jason Robinson (but with a more complete game).
As for the article, Journalist Formerly Known As Ben, thank you for commenting so aptly on what this game truly was – a great contest. Pretty? No. Spectacle? Probably not. Edge of your seat? Yes. Memorable? Definitely. A good old fashioned Bledisloe tussle.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:43am
Riccardo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
For fear of repeating myself, repeating myself, repeating myself…
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:48am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Oh the irony, Albo….
Another great point on the centre combo though, and I’d be more than happy to see these two continue on in Europe next month. And recalling Robbie Deans’ importance placed on developing combinations when I spoke to him back in July, perhaps that’s exactly what will happen.
And you blokes are starting to turn me Schizophrenic; I think ‘Ben’ is my third or fourth Roar personality now..
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:54am
Red Kev said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Personally I think it is a bit rich for Deans to talk about “developing combinations” when McCabe-Tapuai is his 21st different starting centre combination in 67 tests (my personal favourite was two tests of Cooper at 12 and Ioane at 13). Even accounting for injuries and retirements that is an absurdly high number.
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:08am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
But why Kev? Regardless of how many centre combinations he’s used (and a good number of them would’ve been injury-enforced), the need to develop a combination is no less important, surely?
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:13am
Red Kev said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:13am | Report comment
Because developing a centre combination means not changing the fkn centres.
Deans doesn’t have a clue who his best centres are. He doesn’t even know who he wants to select in the centres other than Pat McCabe and building a team around McCabe is just not smart selection policy.
Why has it taken injuries to Barnes, Horne, AAC and Cooper (so Beale moved from 15 to 10) to get Tapuai (who has been the best performed centre in Australia for the past two years) a start?
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:27am
Albo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
I think the point is that even if you are right RK, if Deans has made selection boo boos in the past, we have to look forward and what we have now is something now tried, tested and worth pursuing.
You are right though. It does need a commitment from RD to not change the centres. But I feel that he is as happy with the success of M&T as any.
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:28am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:28am | Report comment
But again, the reasons for the changes don’t deflect from the need to develop a combination, surely? Surely if you pick a centre pair and you don’t like what you got from them, you try something else – isn’t that part of your reasoning for wanting a new coach? And if changes are forced because of injury, surely it’s still important to want the two new centres to develop a combination together?
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:33am
Red Kev said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:33am | Report comment
No the reasons for the changes do not deflect the need to develop combinations but they do call into question (at the least and in my opinion reveal as myth) the ability and committment of the current coach and selector to developing said combinations.
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:47am
soapit said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
but the fact is tapuai (who is the better member of this particular combo) only got his chance after deans was forced to by injuries to his first 2 picks.
him doing well now he’s there isnt really a positive for deans.
developing combinations is important but making sure you’re developing the right combo is more important. if not for chance injuries deans would still be developing a mccabe horne combo and going nowhere.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:57am
Albo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Oh man. Of all comments to go in twice!
October 24th 2012 @ 2:26am
Mitch (in Valencia) said | October 24th 2012 @ 2:26am | Report comment
Ah! Sorry Ben/Brett. I’ve been reading your articles for years, so I know you are Brett. Lets just say the Mediterranean sun has cooked my scon!
October 23rd 2012 @ 4:58pm
Pot Stirrer said | October 23rd 2012 @ 4:58pm | Report comment
The only reason it was a good contest is becuase it was close. The fact is it was embarrasing that the wallabies only secured a draw
and were lucky to not get beaten. Why the wallabies didnt have a player in place to take a field goal tells me the playmakers in the team jsut cant make the right decisions. They may have even drawn a penalty had they at least got the allblacks worried about the field goal. So whilst the last 10 minutes were good, it was only becuase it was close and the rest of the game was boring imo.
October 23rd 2012 @ 3:59am
Shop said | October 23rd 2012 @ 3:59am | Report comment
My only gripe was with Joubert. I’m yet to see a replay but there seemed to be a lot of pedantic decisions that he could have let go. Saying that though I think the stop start nature of the game favoured the WB’s.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:30am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Shop, Joubert’s always been like that, that he seems to give out theoretically pedantic, but technically correct penalties, especialy early on. Someone made the point yesterday that he seems to want to lay down the law in the first half an hour of the game, so that he doesn’t have to in the last ten. I’d question why the first 30 are refereed differently to the last 10, but I understand the motivation..
October 23rd 2012 @ 4:59pm
Lats said | October 23rd 2012 @ 4:59pm | Report comment
Joubert may be pedantic.. but nowdays they all are. He still is one of the better refs going around.. at least he calls the
“daylight” rule where the tacklers must release the tackled player before playing at the ball.. which is the correct intepretation.
The other guy Rollaind referess it completely the opposite way, ergo, he penalises the tackled player, even when they have had no oppurtunity to present the ball… this is actually wrong, so I am at a loss to know why he has not been dropped from the IRB’s refereeing panel.
So I dont mind Joubert at all. And I agree it was a gripping contest… I thoroughly enjoyed the game.
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:55am
soapit said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
makes for a better game. it shows the players can adapt if theres enough incentive. there were only a few that were genuinely 50/50 calls. dont worry he let olenty go as well (offsides for example).
October 23rd 2012 @ 5:40am
Bazza all black supporter said | October 23rd 2012 @ 5:40am | Report comment
A good positive article on the game!
I nearly had a heart attack in the last 10 mins – very exciting and probably the right result..
Both teams will look to take their frustrations on our northern brethren next…
October 23rd 2012 @ 6:09am
Billy Bob said | October 23rd 2012 @ 6:09am | Report comment
Brett, I agree.
I was at the Sydney Bledisloe in 2000, That one was a try fest and down to the wire and a NZ victory. And possibly the best game of rugby in history.
And last Saturday’s contest, for all of its faults, revived memories of that game.
I get what all the critics get, but as a drama for children, it was exquisitely enthralling.
I say drama for children, because that’s what a significant game is.
There are good guys and bad guys. Even the good guys have their own borderline villiain (Higgers?) and the arch villain gets ‘his beans’ threatened with yellow for being too sneaky too many times.
And when the show is over, there are tantrums and ‘it’s not fair!’ all over the place.
And refreshingly, this week it’s not us complaining.
Rugby is a kid’s game for adults to enjoy. And regress to childhood.
And I enjoyed it.
October 23rd 2012 @ 6:19am
mania said | October 23rd 2012 @ 6:19am | Report comment
wow higgers only gets a 2 test ban. what a let off. not surprised as this s the same citing commisioner that somehow thought qc was innocent of the knee to richies head.higgers is a coward
richie has to start retaliating by any means possible
October 23rd 2012 @ 7:37am
Olddantucker said | October 23rd 2012 @ 7:37am | Report comment
Nah, don’t retaliate. Just keep on winning all the trophies. Cheap shot merchants like Higginbotham can only dream of half the success or talent Richie has.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:03am
Cruise said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Half of the success. More like 100th. In 50 years we will be remembering the greatness of the king of the darkness, and whats his name, I dont think so.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:50am
formeropenside said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Actually, most non-New Zealanders wont care. And Richie’s just a cheat; if the refs wont sort him out, well then players have to.
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:17am
Olddantucker said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:17am | Report comment
That’s pretty tough talk. I see “the players” have been pretty successful in sorting out Richie, alright. He’s only survived a decade at the top of the tree and is only considered one of the greatest players of all time (greatest AB ever, to me). Remind me, what’s Richie’s win loss record and trophy cabinet look like?
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:49am
mania said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Olddantucker – yeah continued winning would be nice but theres more at stake here than just winning a game now. all these cheap shots at richie are head shots. the greyling and cooper one were pretty big hits. this can lead to permanent damage in the long term. bradThorns not around anymore to be richies body guard and its just going to get worse because perpertrators know that richie isnt the type to get retribution.
for richies longevity he needs to retaliate. i’m sick of these cheap shots and richie must be too. people already whinge that he’s a cheat so why shouldnt richie give them a reason to whinge. i dont mean misdemeanor cheating either. i mean full on bakkieBotha cheating.
this citing commisioner is a joke and the system isnt protecting richie so its time he looked out for himself. richies got too much faith in the system. with richies nous i hope he gets an eye gouge on higgers when he finds at the bottom of the next ruck. if higgers can be a down right lowly coward cheat then its time richie gave an eye for an eye
October 23rd 2012 @ 10:52am
Hoy said | October 23rd 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Cooper’s big hit? It was a whole six inch wind up. I don’t condone thuggery, Cooper’s knee was pathetic, and the attention it got was stupidly out of proportion.
I wrote on the other thread about Richie. Here is a bloke that gets sorted out every game he plays, and yet in his book, he focussed on Coopers pathetic knee as he was pulling himself out of a ruck. Kiwi’s teams and players have given him a few things to think about as well, but for some reason, he took offence at Cooper’s soft knee?
Now looking at Higger’s pathetic knee, it was even less than a 6 inch wind up. Stupid, but hardly going to damage anyone’s body. To me, the headbutt was much more unnaceptabl mainly for intent. He got about the right break I think.
October 23rd 2012 @ 11:03am
mania said | October 23rd 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
coopers hit was with a knee with all the weight and momentum of his thigh and hip. u obviously havent been hit by a good knee to the head but it is a deceptively powerful hit.
if its ok for others to take the law into their own hands then you’ll fully agree to richie being allowed to retaliate.
you are right to, higgers knee was pathetic and cowardly. he should’ve gotten more.
but the only way that these cheap shots are gonna stop is if richie starts handing out his own justice and pay bax. i hope he sheds the goody too shoes image and becomes a colinMeads like enforcer. starting with higgers
October 23rd 2012 @ 7:37am
Riccardo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 7:37am | Report comment
Morning Mania,
Loving the Australian argument that Richie’s a cheat and deserves it; apparently the judiciary are buying into that BS as well.
It’s even more laughable that this stuff happens directly in front of officials, repeatedly.
Given that in recent times the French, Chiefs, Boks and the Wallabies have employed this tactic it would be prudent to consider that this “niggle”, as it’s uneducated supporters like to refer to it, is being adopted at a tactical level.
What really irks me though is the fact that McCaw appears to be letting it affect him now. I think it threw him off his game and his handling of Joubert
October 23rd 2012 @ 11:22am
rl said | October 23rd 2012 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Geez Riccardo – you’re high in my estimations as a blogger, but I’m getting heartily sick of all Australians being labelled because of the actions of a few. I certainly don’t label all NZers racists or lunatics just because of Winston Peters.
October 23rd 2012 @ 2:51pm
Riccardo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 2:51pm | Report comment
That’s fair rl.
My apologies to you and other Roarers.
I confess to frustration regarding this incident and others like it regarding our Captain. It was particularly cheap and cowardly and to hear others champion this behaviour because they don’t like Richie makes my blood boil.
However, as the day proceeds so does the calm return.
I don’t necessarily care about the initial knee, nor the head butt. These are cursory things, if an advertisment for the perpetrator’s cowardice. However, the sinking knee in his throat could do real damage and it could be argued that these tactical decsions will at some stage result in serious injury.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:37am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Mania, the biggest joke in all that is that the 2 x two match bans get to be served concurrently, in my humble opinion…
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:43am
mania said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
agree brett
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:56am
Red Kev said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Oh wow, I didn’t realise he got 2x 2-match bans. That was what I was expecting but that they would have to be served consecutively not concurrently as you say.
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:06am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:06am | Report comment
Likewise Kev. Paul Cully on Twitter on Sunday came up with the very scientific formula, that Dean Greyling’s 2 weeks + Eben Etzebeth’s 2 weeks should equal 4 weeks for Higginbotham, and that honestly seemed and felt about right.
I can’t think of a precedent where two charges from the same game have had sanctions imposed AND be allowed to be served concurrently??
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:32am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Billy Bob, I like that description, “a drama for children”, that’s a really good way of putting it..
October 23rd 2012 @ 6:41am
moaman said | October 23rd 2012 @ 6:41am | Report comment
Brett—I thought much the same as you except far less positively! It was frustrating as hell. the ABs were stifled in their attempts to gain any momentum for much of the game-either by their own mistakes or the whistle.I was hoping they would go into ‘Pick’n Go’ mode in the 2nd half and wrest some control via holding onto the ball. Glad you enjoyed it though
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:41am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Moa, in those last ten, maybe fifteen minutes, I actually thought there was inevitablitiy about the way the All Blacks were going about their business, and it was only a matter of when, not if they would score and take the lead. Wallaby defence played a part in stopping that momentum, but so did unforced errors and penalties, as you mention. And yes, it was a real stop-start affair – I’ve not seen a ‘time in play’ stat yet – but I think that’s what added to the contest and made it more gripping..
October 23rd 2012 @ 7:14am
Fromthesideline said | October 23rd 2012 @ 7:14am | Report comment
I think we have been dumbed down if that was considered a good game. There has been a long time since I have seen a game worth saying that was a game to remember irrespective if who wins. The last 4 minutes was the only thing worth recording for history books
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:44am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:44am | Report comment
FTS, I know I called it a “..-prone, brutal, wonderful game of rugby” above, among other descriptors, but you’re right, I’m probably talking about the contest more than the game itself. It probably was a horrible game on the surface, and Steve Hanson was probably right to call it ugly in the post-match, but the contest was what kept eyes glued to screens…
October 23rd 2012 @ 7:43am
Dasher said | October 23rd 2012 @ 7:43am | Report comment
The end of the game was the oddest in that the crowd just quietly shuffled out of the stadium and went home – mildly disappointed with no result, but very satisfied at seeing such a tense and thrilling game.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:17am
Riccardo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:17am | Report comment
Morning Brett.
Congratulations to the Wallabies who were visibly more committed in this fixture. I have to eat some humble pie as I thought Palu would be found out and the fact is he was good as were the Wallaby forwards in general.
Like Moa I found the encounter frustrating. A stop/start affair.
Joubert is proving to be every bit as pedantic as his NH counterparts and limited the contest from the outset. His advantage was awful. He missed TPN’s cynical obstruction and then managed to penalise the ABs for a similar infringement that was the result of a badly timed set move. He was inconsistent with his “warnings”, sinbinning Woodcock and then failing to penalise repeated infringements by the Wallabies in the second half.
How the cowardly Higginbottam was not redded for his offending directly in front of Joubert’s “assistant” (I use the term loosely) defied belief. The continuous employment of this tactic by All Black rivals is every bit as much a blight on the sport as the ongoing serial offending at the breakdown by a number of protagonists. 2 weeks is frankly a joke and sends the wrong message.
The All Blacks lost the breakdown battle which is also a credit to the Wallabies. I thought Taps was pretty good too and the fact he has not been a more consistent selection is a quandry considering the injuries the Wallabies have suffered. That young man could have a long career in a gold jersey. The Wallabies have always had pretty sold defensive systems. None moreso than Saturday night. Both teams forced errors off this attribute.
I thought the All Blacks kicking game, an asset this year, was poor. I was particuarly disappointed to not to see Harris taking some aerial enquiry outside the 22, where he has been found wanting in the past, not that it would have mattered I guess as the All Black chasing was not the same level as it has been recently.
I thought the last 10 minutes was pretty nail-biting stuff though; the only real time the All Blacks played enterprising rugby and they almost pulled it off.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:53am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Can’t disagree with that too much, Riccardo, it was one of those funny sort of games, wasn’t it. And it was always going to be a game that divided opinions as to it’s quality. That’s fair enough, we all see things differently.
Just on Higginbotham’s suspension, again, it’s the concurrency that I find most bewildering. If he’s charged with two acts of foul play that would earn a two-match ban on their own, surely they can’t be lumped together just because they happened in the same minute? Wish bank fees worked that way…
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:16am
Riccardo said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
It’s interesting that it was the same Commisioner that made the decision regarding Quade’s citing Brett.
As I said this is sending the wrong message.
October 23rd 2012 @ 9:29am
Brett McKay said | October 23rd 2012 @ 9:29am | Report comment
I didn’t realise that, Riccardo. That is interesting..
October 23rd 2012 @ 11:24am
rl said | October 23rd 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
certainly agree with you on the need to send a message to these blokes about their actions. Unacceptable in our great game.
October 23rd 2012 @ 10:20am
Shop said | October 23rd 2012 @ 10:20am | Report comment
If you are talking about TPN obstruction of Jane he called it as TPN standing his ground. There were some other strange decisions, I thought Woodcock’s yellow was very harsh but he was offside in plenty of incidents before hand so perhaps it evened out. I thought Hooper’s card was a penalty at worst, though I think Phipps should have been carded for intentionally playing the ball when AAC dropped it.
Did anyone see a replay of Tapui (I think) touching down from a kick and then Jane dived on it? I’d like to see it again…
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:37am
Atawhai Drive said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
This was probably a tense and absorbing Test to watch live, not knowing the outcome.
But if you missed it live, as I did, there was little viewing pleasure to be had from the replay.
By contrast, the ITM Cup semi between Canterbury and Taranaki was thrilling to watch yesterday, even though I knew the score.
This year’s three Bledisloe Cup matches produced just three tries, all to the All Blacks.
I first watched Test rugby in the early 1960s, when tries were rare and 6-3 and 3-0 scorelines common. No one wants to revisit those days, surely.
October 23rd 2012 @ 8:56am
krill said | October 23rd 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
I thought it was a great game, nice article brett!!!