Wade could be Australia’s finest wicketkeeper/batsmen
By Justin Ware, 24 Oct 2012 Justin Ware is a Roar Rookie
Related coverage
We all loved Adam Gilchrist, the legend of Australia cricket, whose inconsistent but often breathtaking displays with bat and glove dominated highlight reels for over 10 years.
Since then it has been a dramatic withdrawal from our Gilly hit, with Brad Haddin replacing Gilchrist at the beginning of 2009.
It was such a huge burden to be placed on one keeper, as Haddin was taking the mantle of the greatest wicketkeeper batsmen Australia has ever seen. Haddin struggled with consistency early in his career but went on to chalk up three hundreds for the nation.
Whilst Haddin is a pure strokes player, who’s exquisite cover drive became his trademark, he has suffered a serious form decline, not just with the bat but also with the gloves. Enter Matthew Wade, the young strapping Tasmanian who assumed a home with the Bushrangers.
Wade stands at just 1.70m, but while his stature may be small, his on-field presence in the recent Test matches in the West Indies sold me as a sure replacement in the Australian Test team for the next decade.
A blistering 106 runs, which ensured an Australian victory, with an average of 40 in his first three games, should see Wade anointed the successor to Haddin’s declining performance at the top.
Wade, who is 24, has showcased remarkable ability with the gloves, taking some breathtaking catches and performing some solid stumpings in recent ODI’s. However, it is his batting that has captured my attention and imagination.
Wade has showcased his ability to bat in a way that is appropriate to the innings, a trait that David Warner and Haddin seem to lack. Wade showed amazing leadership and grit in the recent Sheffield Shield game, making 89 runs on a green deck at the GABBA, the next best score for the entire match was 53 from paceman Peter Siddle (who’s batting has improved markedly).
Wade has also shown the ability to be able to destroy an attack, which he did against the West Indies, as well in last season’s T201s where he blasted 72 off 45 balls, including a six which sailed 109 metres at the MCG.
Wade must be played; his upside is enormous, and I don’t think Australian selectors, or for that matter supporters, have grasped how much upside he has, if he is given the opportunities. He looks like a player that could take well over 300 Test catches, and make 6000-plus runs at Test level.
His predesscor Haddin scored three centuries in 43 Tests at an average of 36; Wade has played three Tests and already has one century with an average of 40. The left-hander also has an uncanny resemblance to Gilchrist at times, when he slog sweeps or blasts open an attack but has the grit of Mike Hussey to dig in with the tail and make a big score.
Wade, if played this summer, will dominate this Test series, and I whilst others may be surprised that he may score a couple of centuries in the upcoming Test series and net a few brilliant catches, I will not be. This is the man that will be as close to Gilchrist as you can get, and perhaps, he may be even better.
So it is time we moved on from Haddin, and forgot about Paine, because Matthew Wade is the face of the Australian wicketkeeper… and he will be for another 10 years.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- Rogers’ 214 gives Aussies Ashes boost (40)
- Channel Ten fires $500m bid for cricket rights (37)
- Have we been too harsh on Warner? (34)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (39)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (5)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (56)
- IPL saga kick in teeth for cricket: Warne
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (33)
- Cricket’s all-time alphabetical F team (16)
- CA gain Tait’s assurance over IPL scandal
- Warner’s case to bat at six (56)
- Cricket’s all-time alphabetical F team (16)
- Have we been too harsh on Warner? (38)
- Russell Domingo to coach Proteas (17)
- Is Shaun Marsh just a T20 bully? (4)
- Work together, and Australia’s Ashes avengers could triumph (28)
- Confident Mathews leads Sri Lanka in first tournament (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Adam Gilchrist, Australian Cricket, Brad Haddin, Cricket, Matthew Wade, Test cricket

October 24th 2012 @ 7:40am
Matt h said | October 24th 2012 @ 7:40am | Report comment
Settle down. He’s had three tests! I agree he should have first shot this summer, but Tim Paine is class. Lately Wade has struggled to find the right rhythm in the shorter formats, scoring quite slowly and not going on. It will be interesting to see how the summer pans out for Wade and Paine. But I still would not be surprised if Haddin gets in due to being “great for the team”. Age is against him however, even though his form so far this season has been ok.
October 24th 2012 @ 1:39pm
Justin said | October 24th 2012 @ 1:39pm | Report comment
I agree with your point of view, however I think people should be genuinely more keen about Wade than what they already are. Yes he has struggled in the shorter formats of the game lately, (due to being shuffled around the order a lot) but this guy is class act. Paine has one first class century at the age of 27 and Wade has 5 at the age of 24. Haddin I think should be moved on, his glovework however in the current Champions League is world class, and he looks in good shape, but he is 35.
October 24th 2012 @ 6:42pm
geoff said | October 24th 2012 @ 6:42pm | Report comment
It is early in Wade’s career but I agree with Justin that if he is given the opportunities that he could become one of our great wicketkeeper batsmen. Given our aging test side it is amazing that there does not seem to have been a stronger push to keep Wade, who is young and has already produced a couple of eye-catching performances, in the team. (Maybe in the selectors’ book he is already a certainty!) Whilst Haddin has made a valuable contribution since taking over from Gilchrist, he was not in great form before he had to pull out of the Australian team last year. As far as Paine is concerned, hopefully he can have an injury free summer. I agree with Tim H that it will be interesting to see how he goes.
October 24th 2012 @ 8:24pm
Johnno said | October 24th 2012 @ 8:24pm | Report comment
Really don’t be silly this is a poor article in my opinion. It is inconceivable to even imagine there will be an even better wiketkeeper/batsmen than Adam Gilchrist. A man who had a strike rate like the other modern day untouchable Viv Richards. Men like Gilchrists, richards, and shane warne are untouchable, and Bradman is well in another world so don’t even go there. It really is insulting as well to even dare think it is conceivable that future wicketkeeper/batsman will be as good as Gilchrist. This is a man who made from memory 149 in world cup ODI final in 2007, hit a equal fastest century in test cricket or 1 ball short of viv richards record. Incredable to even think someone could imagine a player being better, it will never happen, give up on the romance of the idea, just is not going to ever happen at least not for 50 years or more .
October 24th 2012 @ 9:46pm
Oracle said | October 24th 2012 @ 9:46pm | Report comment
Had to check the date.
Gilchrist, daylight second.
October 25th 2012 @ 11:58am
Justin said | October 25th 2012 @ 11:58am | Report comment
Hey Johnno,
I think you missed the point of the article. I hinted he ‘could’ be better, or ‘may well’ be better. Gilchrist is perhaps the most lethal batsmen known to man, but my point of the article really wasn’t to insult Gilly, I believe Wade is a technically more sound batsmen than Gilchrist, however Gilchrist can do more damage. I believe Wade has the ability to, by the end of his career, to have statistics in the test format that shape on pretty well to Gilchrist. He could play as a batsmen, he is a brilliant keeper and he has leadership. If you don’t agree with me that’s fine, but it to think I was insulting gilly is ludicrous Johnno. I still believe Gilchrist dominating best will never be matched, but if we are talking about statistic’s, I reckon Wade has a good shot if he’s given the opportunities to get as close to him, if not a better career in terms of hundreds etc.
October 25th 2012 @ 11:33pm
Danno1 said | October 25th 2012 @ 11:33pm | Report comment
I appreciate your support for Wade, who certainly looks a talent, but really the first sentence negates a lot of what follows “inconsistent but often breathtaking displays”.
Gilchrist was both consistent and breathtaking. He was technically excellent, that was why he could play as well as he did. That is why he is one of the all time greats full-stop.
Towards the end of his career he went from great to being outstanding, he never fell below that level.
Wade has yet to get to very good with the gloves let alone the bat.
The equivalent would be Steve Smith was a gun young leggie, who could have been as good as Warne because he did better than 1 for 150 upon debut.
Wade doesn’t need the comparison, so give him a chance before even mentioning him in the same breath as Gilly.
October 25th 2012 @ 11:58pm
Jason said | October 25th 2012 @ 11:58pm | Report comment
I reckon Wade’s keeping is average and his batting will be lucky to be of a Haddin standard let alone Gilly.
October 26th 2012 @ 8:17am
Justin said | October 26th 2012 @ 8:17am | Report comment
Appreciate the feedback fellas, all valid points. I see where many of you are coming from, I honestly think that it is a bit too early to call but from what I’ve seen of him he is a very fine player, and I’m not sure how you could say his keeping isn’t that great, as every time I’ve watched him he’s been terrific. As for his batting Jackson, haven’t you seen his maiden test century? I suggest you watch it.
October 26th 2012 @ 9:49am
Jason said | October 26th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Don’t get me wrong, I think he should be the Australian keeper. I just think the jury is still out on how good he will end up being.
October 26th 2012 @ 10:30am
Justin said | October 26th 2012 @ 10:30am | Report comment
Hey Jason,
That’s a fair enough call, and to be honest I think I share the same view, I think it is possible he could chalk up over 10 centuries in his career but time will tell. He was the leading run scorer or there about in the Sheffield shield last year so let us hope he converts that to international form