An Australia A side in name only
By A View From the Top, 28 Oct 2012 A View From the Top is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Andrew McDonald, Australia A, Cricket, Proteas, South Africa, Test matches
The Australia A side to play the Proteas in their only tour match was picked yesterday. In the wake of some head scratching selections, I thought it timely to pose this question to my fellow Roarers – why pick an Australia A side at all?
Traditionally, ‘A’ sides have served as either a second XI or a developmental team, allowing a country’s best young prospects to gain some exposure against international opposition.
This side doesn’t fit either description. It is neither a second XI nor a developmental team.
A number of the selections are more than a little puzzling. Of course, the Chairman of Selectors did attempt to justify his picks, but I’m not going to go near the continued infatuation with a side of all-rounders.
Nor am I willing to debate the much criticised policy of managing fast bowlers: ‘If they don’t play, they won’t get injured’.
With roots in Albury-Wodonga, and as the Chief Selector of rugby league’s Ranga All-Stars (go on, dig it up and have a read), I’m more than happy for Andrew McDonald to be selected as captain of the side.
But, despite McDonald’s strong early season Shield returns, we’ve been there before and it hasn’t really worked out.
He isn’t even knocking on the door of Test selection, let alone barging through it, and at best he has slim prospects of slotting into the Australian middle order when current international players retire. So why pick him?
The selection of Nathan Coulter-Nile is equally baffling. When you consider the fact that he is the only specialist quick chosen, you reach a whole new level of befuddlement.
Australia is blessed with a generation of young fast bowlers who are unable to break into the Gabba attack for the first Test.
Think of Starc, Cummins, Cutting, Bird, Hazlewood and McDermott, and you have to wonder how Coulter-Nile was even considered, let alone picked as the sole fast bowler.
As I said earlier, this is South Africa’s sole tour match before the first Test. The Proteas have planned their tour that way for a reason.
Despite the obvious opportunities for Phillip Hughes to score some runs and build international confidence, and for Tim Paine to get behind the stumps, is it too cynical to suggest a little Mickey Arthur inspired sabotage?
Are we hoping for South Africa to arrive at the crease a little underdone for the first Test? Or am I missing the obvious reasons for selecting this particular Australia A side?
Fellow Roarers, I’m looking to you on this one, because I haven’t stopped scratching my head.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (169)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (74)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (54)
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (48)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- DIZZY: It’s time for the Aussie batsmen to fulfill potential (42)
- I should have called Craddock: Warner (25)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (32)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- Landmark day for women’s sport as cricket cuts a cheque (15)
- Cricket Australia fines Warner (7)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (58)
- Australians off to win back the urn
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (32)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (58)
- Australians off to win back the urn (0)
- Has cricket corruption been filed in the ‘too hard’ basket? (2)
- Cricket’s all-time alphabetical G team (19)
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (173)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Andrew McDonald, Australia A, Cricket, Proteas, South Africa, Test matches


October 28th 2012 @ 4:11am
Johnno said | October 28th 2012 @ 4:11am | Report comment
Shameful this team. Ivers should be sacked. Disgracing the Australia A team like this. A proud team with a proud history Australia A. They should be treated with such contempt again. Back in the 90′s oh how i used to love my Australia A. Id get some lollies from the corner store and watch the young lads, play with fun and freedom vs the senior team in 94-95 ODI finals. Ponting,Martyn, Blewett,Hayden, taking it too Boony, Slats, Warney, and Mcgrath.
I wore my Australia A ODI shirt with pride, and was eagerly looking forwad to this match, my Australia A i love you. And you have been disgraced by Ivers , willing to sacrifice an Australia A loss for the senior team. what a disgrace and contempt and not taking Australia A seriously. Don’t give me bigger picture nonsense Ivers. A loss from Australia is heartbreaking and should never be cheapened and you have cheapened the speical team and special history of Australia A. Sack Ivers, not good at all he has upset a lot of fans in OZ.
October 28th 2012 @ 2:54pm
Don Corleone said | October 28th 2012 @ 2:54pm | Report comment
Wow Johnno, I think you’re actually being serious there. An Australia A fan! Did you travel to England this year for the Australia A matches? I was a hardcore ‘Australian XI’ fan…but they totally lost me when they sold out and called them ‘Australia A’.
October 28th 2012 @ 7:34am
Atawhai Drive said | October 28th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
Johnno, only you could draw a parallel between the Australia A one-day team of the 1990s and the team labelled Australia A that will play the touring South Africans in a three-day match starting next Friday. The wolves must have been howling when you fired up the keyboard at 4.11am today.
As I’ve said elsewhere, the forthcoming South Africa-Australia A match is of only three days duration, and barely rates first-class status. For the Proteas it’s a chance to shake the travel stiffness out of their legs and get some centre-wicket practice. I will not be surprised if their management asks for the rules to be relaxed so that all the touring squad can get on the paddock at some stage over the three days.
The Australian selectors are keeping an eye on Sheffield Shield form. This tour match has contractual obligation stamped all over it and the selection emphasises that.
This is not really a competitive match. It resembles the three-day exercise in centre-wicket practice that England played at the SCG in 2006-07 against NSW. It’s unlikely to achieve a result _ I can’t see sporting declarations.
Such is the way of modern tours. The visiting team is prepared to risk going into the first Test of a series underdone, and the hosts don’t care much one way or the other. But I’ll get along on Friday. The SCG nets allow you to stand quite close behind the batsmen and get a feel for what it’s like to face, in this case, Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel and Vernon Philander.
October 28th 2012 @ 2:09pm
Brett McKay said | October 28th 2012 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Must agree, Atawhai. There has been much hand-wringing about a selection for what is essentially a practice match for the tourists..
October 28th 2012 @ 3:58pm
Atawhai Drive said | October 28th 2012 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
The one touring team in recent years who took their preparation seriously was England in 2010-11. They played no fewer than 10 days of first-class cricket before the first Test _ a three-dayer against Western Australia, another three-day match against South Australia, and then a four-dayer against Australia A in Hobart. That team was properly tuned up for Brisbane.
The South Africans, like the Indians last summer, will gamble on a limited preparation.
October 28th 2012 @ 5:04pm
Brett McKay said | October 28th 2012 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
The Indians certainly turned the Chairmans XI game at Manuka into a farce last summer..
October 28th 2012 @ 8:43am
Disco said | October 28th 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
Another who underrates McDonald. He played in four Tests against South Africa, three of which his side won, and performed pretty well. He then didn’t play a Test in the lost ’09 Ashes and hasn’t been picked since. In the meanwhile, he’s been one of the best players in Shield cricket and as such is one of the only true Second XI picks in this Aus A side.
October 28th 2012 @ 7:45pm
nk7792 said | October 28th 2012 @ 7:45pm | Report comment
We’re not saying he isn’t a good player, it’s more the fact that he’s too old to be a genuine chance of establishing a test career and medium pace isn’t going to take swarms of test wickets…
October 28th 2012 @ 11:59am
Swampy said | October 28th 2012 @ 11:59am | Report comment
McDonald is an interesting cricketer.
He is very fundamentally sound in all aspects of cricket. He probably has a winning record at every level he has ever played at – the consummate team player. Clearly he has cricket smarts and he Is consistent, reliable and cool under pressure.
Problem is, he is the most boring cricketer in Australia, if not the world. Even if he scores a 100 off 20 balls or takes 6 wickets in an over it would seem like watching paint dry.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
October 28th 2012 @ 12:07pm
headlong said | October 28th 2012 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
What else is there to say? Your reaction is exactly the same as mine was when I saw the team. The team you pick when you have to, but don’t want to show your hand. The only problem is, we have to find some players to play test matches against the best in the world!
However, I do agree with Disco’s views on McDonald (and I don’t come from Victoria).
October 28th 2012 @ 12:36pm
Neuen said | October 28th 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
31 year old quickie with a strike rate of 81. You almost made it sound if he was responsible for those 3 out of 4 wins when he only took 9 wickets in 7 innings.
October 28th 2012 @ 1:04pm
Disco said | October 28th 2012 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
Who’s this quickie?
October 28th 2012 @ 5:52pm
Johnno said | October 28th 2012 @ 5:52pm | Report comment
But what Mcdonald did was keep it tight. He was a very accurate bowler who kept an end tight is hard to score off. He frustrated the batsman, keeping it tight. Was nagging bowler who has only got better since 2009 , and is good team man would of made a good Austraian capitain Ronald Mcdonald as he is effecitonalty known. He has been a top class captain for Victoria.
October 28th 2012 @ 7:46pm
nk7792 said | October 28th 2012 @ 7:46pm | Report comment
I have to disagree.
October 29th 2012 @ 4:53pm
Jack said | October 29th 2012 @ 4:53pm | Report comment
You only have to see what happened to Trent Copeland, he too is a similar player to McDonald and even though he has excellent FC stats, he apparently doesn’t even rate a mention nowadays! I’d rather an accurate, smart bowler any day. He started Shield wel too, but everyone’s forgotten his name.
October 28th 2012 @ 7:39pm
paddyeff2 said | October 28th 2012 @ 7:39pm | Report comment
I disagree with your point about Coulter-Nile. There are a lot of good judges who think he is right up there with those young quicks you mentioned. Not quite as young, perhaps, but just as promising.
Otherwise, not giving the Saffas a look at our pace battery is not such a bad thing, although it cheapens the Aus A side. The concept doesn’t quite have the same romance anymore really.
October 28th 2012 @ 7:47pm
nk7792 said | October 28th 2012 @ 7:47pm | Report comment
Its almost unanimously agrred that there are a large stock of younger faster bowlers who should rightly be considered higher in the Australian pecking order than NCN.
October 28th 2012 @ 7:49pm
nk7792 said | October 28th 2012 @ 7:49pm | Report comment
Surely they’re just trying to under-do the Safas by giving their bowlers a dose of over-confidence and leave their batsmen’s reflexes short when they face only medium pacers on a slow SCG wicket.
October 28th 2012 @ 11:45pm
Jamie said | October 28th 2012 @ 11:45pm | Report comment
Seems to me that the main error here has been calling the team ‘Australia A’. If it’d been called the ‘Prime Minister’s XI’ (remember them) no one would have batted an eyelid at the lunacy of picking 5 all-rounders and 1 fast bowler!
On a different note, how long til we see Joe Burns being pushed for selection? He’s been scoring runs for fun on the toughest pitch in the country for a season and a half!
October 29th 2012 @ 10:38am
Matt F said | October 29th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Good point. Change the name and most people wouldn’t care. The fast bowling line-up, and the next 2-3 quicks in the pecking order, pick themselves for the Test side and Lyon is miles ahead of the next spinner (especially with Holland injured) so they probably wanted to try out players for other areas. The plethora of all-rounders are probably because they want to see if anyone is capable of filling Watsons spot if he gets injured again.
October 29th 2012 @ 8:14am
Atawhai Drive said | October 29th 2012 @ 8:14am | Report comment
The Proteas allegedly wanted this match moved away from Sydney.
There is no word on why they wanted a switch, or where they wanted to play.