Make-up of the final Aussie XI still unclear
By Henry Arkwright, 30 Oct 2012 Henry Arkwright is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, Test cricket
The Australian Test squad announced today to face South Africa in Brisbane is as predicted. As seemed likely despite recent frailties, Australia’s top six will be the same as which took the field in their last Test against the West Indies back in April.
The obdurate Ed Cowan and dashing David Warner make a nice combination on paper, even if they have only clicked as an opening partnership on fleeting occasions so far.
Captain Michael Clarke and Coach Mickey Arthur see great value in having Cowan at the top of the order as a new ball ‘blunter’, before the ageing, but still dangerous middle order of Ponting, Clarke, and Hussey come to the crease against a tiring attack with an older ball.
Warner is inconsistent, but has the ability to change, or set the tone of a game, in a session.
The number three spot has been an issue for Australia since Ricky Ponting relinquished the role last year. Usman Khawaja, Shaun Marsh, and Shane Watson have all been tried there with minimal success.
Australia might consider promoting either Clarke or Hussey to the role. Both are vastly experienced, and both possess techniques capable of countering a new-ball-barrage from the impressive threesome of Steyn, Morkel , and Philander.
Clarke has been reluctant to bat higher than number five in the past, but as captain he may now feel it’s time to set an example and take on the trickiest spot in the batting order himself.
Shane Watson’s game is better suited to number six a role where he can come to the crease with the freedom to play his natural game from the outset. He has been far from terrible as a top order player, but his inability to convert starts into big scores has gradually become an issue.
Watson’s bowling has also become a huge asset to Australia and batting him at six would allow Michael Clarke to bowl him for sustained periods without worrying about his batting being affected by the workload.
Despite talk of Brad Haddin coming back into the side after a nine month lay-off for family reasons, Matthew Wade has now been backed to be Australia’s long-term wicketkeeper. Therefore, barring injury to Wade, at 35 and with Tim Paine also pushing for another chance at test level, Haddin’s Test career is probably over.
Wade has been impressive since he made his debut against the West Indies earlier in the year, and deserves to be given the entire series against South Africa to establish himself.
Bowling-wise, Peter Siddle and Ben Hilfenhaus are considered the ‘bankers’ – their selection for Brisbane was never in doubt. Both are likely to make the final XI. The third seamer’s spot is something of a revolving door, however.
James Pattinson, Mitchell Starc, and Pat Cummins are three of the most promising young fast bowlers in the world, but at this stage of their careers they have also shown a worrying tendency to pick up injuries on a regular basis.
Realising this, the selectors are considering a rotation policy involving these three, and another injury-prone quick, Ryan Harris. Pattinson and Starc have got the nod for Brisbane, but Cummins and Harris are still very much in the mix.
It is a sensible plan, but a plan that has the potential for backlash. If, say, Starc runs through the South Africans at Brisbane, while the other quicks look less effective, do they persist with the plan to rest Starc for the second Test at Adelaide? It would be a brave selector to rest a bowler in those circumstances.
It would also confuse Starc, and anger fans, who under normal circumstances expect Australia to field their best available Test team at all times, especially against a team as good as South Africa.
Further debate surrounds the spinner’s role. The limited, yet big-hearted Nathan Lyon has performed admirably in his short Test career so far but, on a Brisbane pitch likely to suit the quicks, he will be competing with Pattinson for the final bowling spot.
It is likely that a decision on whether to play Lyon will be made the night before the game, once the conditions have been properly assessed.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (175)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (74)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (58)
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (48)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- DIZZY: It’s time for the Aussie batsmen to fulfill potential (43)
- New Zealand shows fight, and then capitulates, again. (2)
- How can we win the Ashes? (14)
- I should have called Craddock: Warner (31)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (33)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- Landmark day for women’s sport as cricket cuts a cheque (15)
- Cricket Australia fines Warner (7)
- New Zealand shows fight, and then capitulates, again. (2)
- How can we win the Ashes? (14)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (33)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (58)
- Australians off to win back the urn (0)
- Has cricket corruption been filed in the ‘too hard’ basket? (2)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, Test cricket


October 30th 2012 @ 8:17am
PeterK said | October 30th 2012 @ 8:17am | Report comment
Warner gets out to the moving red ball since he is an opener. Watson has not done as well at 3 as when he opened.
Warner is a dashing batsman with all the strokes. To me it seems simple to open with Cowan and Watson and move Warner to 3.
Of course the selectors struggle with even this minor changed so mired are they in their set thinking.
October 30th 2012 @ 12:20pm
Nick said | October 30th 2012 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
Personally i would start Starc over Pattinson because he is a lefty and it is always good to have that variation in your bowling line-up. Also he has the one thing Mitchell Johnson lacked when he was in the team, Starc has the ability to consistently swing the ball back into the right hander and not just move it away. This is a vital component of a left arm quicks bowling repertoire and it causes headaches for all batsmen. The advantage of Pattinson though is that he is aggressive and is probably the consistently quickest out of the four premier fast bowlers. Cummins needs more time to develop, although he is possibly the most talented bowler this country has developed since McGrath, he needs time playing at shield level to really develop and get used to bowling longer spells than in 20/20 and ODI.
I’d leave Lyon in the squad, I think with Watson providing his pace as well having a fourth designated quick bowler is overkill and would become very predictable. Lyon although not overly flashy does a good job and would offer the variation needed. Also he could continue to bowl long spells while using the fast bowlers in short sharp spells down the other end.
The Batting lineup is much more difficult to decide upon. Im not convinced by Watson at number 3 especially if Cowan gets out early I would want another batsmen like Ponting of Hussey to go in who could build an innings slowly and continue to blunt the new ball. I still feel Watson is best at number 6. I’d like to see Clarke go to 3 but i don’t think it will happen unfortunately.
October 30th 2012 @ 12:37pm
TheGenuineTailender said | October 30th 2012 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
Number six takes any freedom to play your natural game away from Watson. If it’s 4-near on nothing, I would certainly prefer Hussey over Watson coming to the crease. Watson’s attack style of play is better suited to the top order where he isn’t confined by finding himself in a tricky situation.
It’s easy to forget that Lyon took seven wickets in the Gabba test last summer when talk of an all pace attack was also rife and his test record is top notch to this point.
Having said that, if Lyon is as ineffective in the first few tests as he has been in the shield, Australia are in the fortunate position to have a barrage of young quicks capable of emulating the 80s Windies awesome foursome. A path we could certainly consider making a permanent move in the near future.
October 30th 2012 @ 11:49pm
Matt h said | October 30th 2012 @ 11:49pm | Report comment
Watson’s record st the top of the order is much better than when batting at 6 or 7. He actually is s top order batsman.
November 1st 2012 @ 11:06am
Frankie Hughes said | November 1st 2012 @ 11:06am | Report comment
I think Lyon should be axed.
Hashim Amla picked apart Graeme Swann in SA’s recent tour of England. And lets be honest Lyon will never be as good as Swann.