Haddin should be the Test keeper at the Gabba
By David Lord, 30 Oct 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Brad Haddin, Cricket, Matthew Wade, Test cricket
Brad Haddin is coming under lots of criticism AAP Image/Tony McDonough
Related coverage
Former Test keeper Brad Haddin should be more worried about what the chairman of selectors said yesterday than missing out on the first Test to Matt Wade against the South Africans at the Gabba.
John Inverarity, in his best headmaster manner said “Brad is still a strong contender for the keeping position”.
A sugar-coated kiss of death comment.
That’s like the CEO of a football club telling the media and fans the coach is in no danger of the sack.
Days, or short weeks later, the coach is gone.
Wade took over the gloves in the West Indies seven months ago and played all three Tests, when Haddin had to return home to be with his very sick daughter.
But Haddin is back to his best, and he’s a far better keeper than Wade. Haddin should have been reinstated yesterday.
Wade is too flashy with the gloves, and while there’s not much difference between them with the bat, Haddin is the more reliable proposition overall.
What a lot of cricket fans don’t realise, the Australian Test keeper is more exclusive club than Test captains.
Australia has played 744 Tests since 1877, selecting 428 players. There have been only 43 captains.
But there have been less Australian keepers in those 135 years – just 32.
And among the 32, five Australian keepers played just one Test each:
* Billy Murdoch in 1882 against England.
* Frederick Burton in 1887 against England.
* Hammy Love in 1932 against England in the infamous Bodyline series.
* Phil Emery in 1994 against Pakistan.
* And Graham Manou in 2009 against England.
There’s a good story about Emery and his father Nev, rarely told.
Nev, a first grade cricketer with Sydney University, always wanted to be a Test cricketer, but ended up first choice five-eighth on the 1946-47 Wallaby tour of the UK and France.
Phil, a first grade rugby rep with Gordon, always wanted to be a Wallaby, but ended up a Test cricketer, albeit for the one appearance, and one ODI.
Both were Shore head prefects – Nev in 1942, Phil in 1982 – and both were selected in the Combined GPS first X!, and first XV, in their eras.
Quite a father-son combination.
Amazingly, Jim Burke from Sydney Grammar in the 50s, and Phil Emery, are the only two GPS cricketers to win Test caps since World War two
There have been many fine GPS cricketers over the years, but only two kicked on.
And while I’m on amazing stats, not one country has won half their Test matches.
Australia is the closest with 350 wins from 744 matches – 47%.
England’s next, just pipping South Africa.
England’s played 926 Tests for 329 wins – 35.53%, South Africa 369 Tests for 131 wins – 35.50%.
But I digress, Brad Haddin should be the Test keeper at the Gabba.
![]()
Passionate about your cricket? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily cricket email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Brad Haddin, Cricket, Matthew Wade, Test cricket


October 30th 2012 @ 7:00am
The Bush said | October 30th 2012 @ 7:00am | Report comment
Haddin is 35. I don’t really know why anything more needs to be said, there has to be some fresh blood if we continue to persist with Ricky and Hissey (I’d personally would have dropped Ricky by now). I’d also point out that People forget how inconsistent and unreliable Haddin is – when did he score the runs that won us a test? Rarely.
He had a good run and now it’s someone else’s time – that’s how sport works.
Johnno, I only read the first line of your ramble, but how do you know Clarke didn’t vote for Haddin – he’s one of five, not the only selector.
October 31st 2012 @ 2:23am
Brendon said | October 31st 2012 @ 2:23am | Report comment
Never understood the whole amateurish notice of “fresh blood”. What, is Wade going retire and disappear if Haddin had got selected?
This idea of playing players not up to test standard because they might get good down the track is just one of the many stupid beliefs and ideas I see in sport that people cling to.
October 30th 2012 @ 7:08am
Red Kev said | October 30th 2012 @ 7:08am | Report comment
I don’t understand the article or Johnno’s comment.
I think you’re both bonkers. Wade is the incumbent, Haddin missed the last three tests as well as all the intervening ODI and T20 matches and at 35 deserves a recall at the expense of 24 year old Wade?
What has Wade done to get dropped?
Do you people forget the several chances Haddin dropped last summer? Or his lack of test runs for the last four series?
If you want the best gloveman you pick Hartley who stands up with the bat under pressure. If you want a keeper-batsmen Wade and Paine and Nevill are all better selections than Haddin. Australian cricket needs to regenerate not become a seniors club. Hopefully SA do us all a favour and shatter Hussey and Ponting’s stumps and season average.
October 30th 2012 @ 11:13am
Rob from Brumby Country said | October 30th 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Agreed on everything until the last sentence. Who are we supposed to replace Hussey or Ponting with? Maddinson? Lynn? Khawaja? The next generation is not Test standard. Yet.
October 30th 2012 @ 12:39pm
Red Kev said | October 30th 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
Do I really need to post the list of batsmen that performed worse than Khawaja and Cowan in their first half-dozen tests?
Test ready does not mean test proven.
Show some nuts and take the punt.
October 31st 2012 @ 2:25am
Brendon said | October 31st 2012 @ 2:25am | Report comment
Do I need to post a list of players that performed worse than Khawaja and Cowan in their first few tests, got dropped and came back better players?
October 30th 2012 @ 8:12pm
Disco said | October 30th 2012 @ 8:12pm | Report comment
“Australian cricket needs to regenerate not become a seniors club.” Bang on.
October 30th 2012 @ 7:19am
Gina ninja said | October 30th 2012 @ 7:19am | Report comment
Are people forgetting ow dreadfully Haddin played in the nz and India tests last year? He demonstrated poor keeping and a lack of test style batting. It became difficult to watch the tests with the thought that he will drop another catch or throw away his wicket with some wild flash at a delivery when we needed stability. Wade should have been the keeper for the last of the Indian series when it was obvious that Haddin was out of form.
October 30th 2012 @ 7:56am
David Lord said | October 30th 2012 @ 7:56am | Report comment
Red Kev and Gina, thanks for bringing me up to date with the new selection formula. I was always under the impression current form was the benchmark, not last year’s form. Learn something new every day.
October 30th 2012 @ 8:16am
The Bush said | October 30th 2012 @ 8:16am | Report comment
When has Australia’s selectors ever picked on current form? They hardly ever do it and you know this David.
October 30th 2012 @ 8:20am
Quality said | October 30th 2012 @ 8:20am | Report comment
David, I’m not sure your attempt at sarcasm is justified. Red Kev and Gina’s points are spot on. If current form was the sole criterion (and it often isn’t the only reason – many players have been picked on potential with an eye to the future) then Wade made a good score against Qld recently and kept well in the T20 WC, so he is in good form. Allied to that is his good performance in the West Indies and that at 24 he represents a potential long-term option. Haddin’s past performances are completely relevant to the selection process. He’s been around for 43 tests, so everyone has had a good look at him over a long period and knows what we get with him – patchy keeping and inconsistent batting. In my opinion it was always a straightforward decision to select Wade.
November 5th 2012 @ 10:16am
Ginja Ninja (damn autocorrect) said | November 5th 2012 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Thanks for the support Quality; explained better than my attempt.
October 30th 2012 @ 8:52am
Scuba said | October 30th 2012 @ 8:52am | Report comment
Surely you jest David. Everyone knows that Shield (or whatever it’s called these days) is irrelevant to Test selection and has been for many years. Cymbals was hopeless with the gloves in the Australian tests last summer, and irrespective of the fact that he got his opportunity due to Haddin’s withdrawal from the Windies tour for personal reasons, Wade is the incumbent.
October 30th 2012 @ 9:50am
David Lord said | October 30th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
Quality and Scuba, Wade is the incumbent by default when Haddin had to return home when his daughter was so sick. As for current form, keeping and fielding are the only two departments of any format that don’t change, whereas batting and bowling can be vastly different. Haddin was brilliant with the gloves in the Champions League, back to his very best, and he wasn’t too shabby with the bat either. In the Sheffield Shield he’s averaging 41 from two matches with a top score of 114.
October 30th 2012 @ 10:21am
Brett McKay said | October 30th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
David, for what it’s worth, Wade is averaging 54 from two Shield matches this season..
October 30th 2012 @ 3:36pm
Nik F said | October 30th 2012 @ 3:36pm | Report comment
zing
October 30th 2012 @ 10:26am
jameswm said | October 30th 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
So you pick Haddin on his glovework in T20 cricket?
You’re kidding, right?
October 30th 2012 @ 9:50am
Matt F said | October 30th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
So we drop the guy who made a century in his last test match for a guy who has hit a few runs in a T20 tournament? Interesting view there David
edit – It appears I posted this before your most recent comment David
October 30th 2012 @ 10:22am
jameswm said | October 30th 2012 @ 10:22am | Report comment
What current form Lordy? His captaincy in the T20? Or the one Shield score this summer?
I wouldn’t even have him keeping for NSW. Nevill’s a better gloveman and a more reliable bat, currently opening for NSW.
It was very sad how Haddin gaveup hgis spot, but the rule of cricket selection is that you don’t give a sucker an even break. Wade got his chance, scored a match-saving ton, and keeps his spot.
Wade got a century in his last test and 89 and 19 the only times he’s batted this season. Don’t see how you drop the incumbent to bring back a 35yo on those numbers.
October 30th 2012 @ 10:26am
nachos supreme said | October 30th 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
Wade made 106* in one of his last (and first) 3 tests, so while it’s early he’s done nothing to deserve dropping.
Can Haddin say the same? no, you’re going back to 2010 before you see his last tonne and 2009 till his next. Batted in the lower middle order? sure. Lack of opportunity? no.You can’t say Haddin hasn’t thrown plenty of good opportunities to make test match winning contributions away can you?
November 1st 2012 @ 1:15am
TJ said | November 1st 2012 @ 1:15am | Report comment
David, if it was based on form Haddin would have been dropped long ago.
Which Indian player was spot on when he said Haddin was no longer moving his feet? That was clearly obvious in the analysis of his many dropped catches.
Your sheltered NSWism, as evident by your regular anecdotal stories, shines through again.
October 30th 2012 @ 9:19am
Robert said | October 30th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
David you have been on another planet for a while now.The only current form Haddin has has been in T20,and anything he did in shield before he left has been matched by Wade.And im sure you have been complaining about the age of the team for a while so it makes sense ti pick Wade.You obviously have a crush on Haddin
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
October 30th 2012 @ 9:40am
Adam said | October 30th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Excellent article. I couldn’t agree more with what David says.
October 30th 2012 @ 3:53pm
Larry said | October 30th 2012 @ 3:53pm | Report comment
cheers adam lord
October 30th 2012 @ 9:50am
josh said | October 30th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
TWithout reading this article. The headline is incorrect on many levels.
Unfortunate as Brad Haddin’s exit was, you can’t without any bias truly believe he is the best man for the job?
It’s a joke that the captain gets a say in the selection, He and Haddin are mates. It’s a amateur approach to professional sport.
October 30th 2012 @ 9:55am
MrKistic said | October 30th 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Haddin is back to his best you say. Based on what? His recent first class performances?? Give me a break.
October 30th 2012 @ 9:57am
Happy Hooker said | October 30th 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
I see a corollary with Healy’s demise. That was the right decision then, and as much as I have been a Haddin fan, this is the right decision now.
October 31st 2012 @ 8:05am
Matt h said | October 31st 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
X2
October 30th 2012 @ 10:17am
jameswm said | October 30th 2012 @ 10:17am | Report comment
Haddin is more reliable?
Lordy, have you not watched any cricket for the last two years? You haven’t seen Haddin get out with reckless shots and miss easy catches and stumpings? More reliable? And that’s ignoring the age factor.
Crikey I wonder sometimes.
October 30th 2012 @ 10:22am
Greg said | October 30th 2012 @ 10:22am | Report comment
I’m sorry, but what is it with people sticking up for Haddin?
Yes he has gone through a horrible ordeal, but this is the real world where bad stuff happens and unfortunately he has lost his spot to Wade, who mind you, is a gun batsmen, and as far as I can see his keeping is magnificent, anyone who would have watched the recent T20 world cup would know this. I am sick of the fanboys sticking up for Haddin, I really hope Wade comes out and takes 4 catches in the first innings, concedes no byes and blasts a quick fire half century to put Haddin and you fanboys to bed