Queensland not blue-ing over Origin games
Related coverage
Mal Meninga’s Maroons would relish going to Sydney next year and giving NSW another State of Origin thumping, according to Queensland rugby league boss John McDonald.
McDonald, Queensland’s inaugural Origin coach in 1980, declared Queensland would “get on with it” after confirmation Sydney’s ANZ Stadium would host games one and three of the 2013 series.
The ARL Commission revealed a new five-year rotation for the best of three-game series on Tuesday.
NSW will host two home matches next season and in 2016, while Queensland will have two games in 2014 and 2017. Victoria Major Events Company are in discussion with the ARLC to host a game in 2015.
Brisbane had been slated to host two matches in 2013, but the ARLC, which took control of the game in April, changed that after the NSW government outbid Queensland to secure games one and game three at ANZ Stadium.
Maroon legends Wally Lewis and Gorden Tallis slammed the Campbell Newman Liberal National Party government – believed to have been in expensive negotiations to bring Manchester United to Brisbane – for handing over an Origin game, but McDonald and Meninga took the news calmly.
“We’ll enjoy the challenge of going to Sydney and giving them a thumping in 2013,” said McDonald, who is stepping down from the top job.
“We’ll just get on with it, win the series again and NSW can please themselves.”
Meninga, who has won every series since taking over in 2006, bristled at the prospect of facing his former Canberra and Australian teammate Laurie Daley with the added motivation of two games in Sydney.
New NSW coach Daley suggested Queensland would be “filthy” at the news.
But Meninga said it would bring the best out in his champion side.
“We were hoping for two games (in Queensland), but it’s not going to be so we’ll just get on with it,” he said.
“The game should always come first.
Daley dismissed statistics showing NSW enjoyed overwhelming success against Queensland at ANZ Stadium.
“We want it (ANZ Stadium) to be a a rotten place for Queensland to come and visit and we need to sell it out,” he said.
“Every little advantage is worth something but it won’t decide the result if we don’t prepare and play well.”
Meninga conceded that his record breaking Maroons faced a challenge with NSW “right on our heels”
“We’ve had a little bit of success in Sydney in 2007, 08 and 09 but the last two years we’ve stumbled a little bit down there.
“We haven’t played to our potential at ANZ Stadium recently so that’s going to be really critical next year.”
Lewis took a swipe at sports minister Steve Dickson for handing over an Origin game to the enemy without a fight.
“Anybody that doesn’t fight hard hard to maintain a bit of loyalty and support for Queensland, I don’t believe they’re real Queenslanders,” said an upset Lewis.
An angry Tallis suggested voters would not be happy.
“I tell you what,” fumed Tallis, “if there was an election right now, I know what would be happening.”
Queensland stalwart and Origin original Chris `Choppy’ Close said it didn’t matter where Origin was played.
“I’ve always said we’d play them in a carpark if they wanted,” Close told AAP after the news broke.
“If they want to play (Origin) at Woolies’ carpark in Broken Hill, then bring it on.
“We’ll turn up with the same attitude, the same team and no doubt there’ll be the same result.”
© AAP 2013![]()
Passionate about your league? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily league email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin


November 21st 2012 @ 5:36am
DJW said | November 21st 2012 @ 5:36am | Report comment
That’s disappointing the Queensland government didn’t try harder to keep the two games.
I suppose they must see more value in other sports.
This is the best outcome for the NSW team, as now they have a better chance of winning the series. It was more than likely another series win for QLD next year if they kept the two games.
Makes all more interesting.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
November 21st 2012 @ 7:23am
Robert said | November 21st 2012 @ 7:23am | Report comment
I can hear it now.if NSW win,QLD will be whinging that they lost their home game and if QLD win,they won against all odds despite everything going against them.QLD=Redneck Wonderland
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
November 21st 2012 @ 12:43pm
Lachlan Simpson said | November 21st 2012 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
well to be fair to us QLDers, it has been a long 7 years since we’ve had anything to whinge about. so it would be about time after giving you NSWelshman so much to whinge about for 7 long years. It is interesting that you should predict such a reaction from the QLD fans though and I dont doubt it for second as I’m quite sure i remember more than a few NSWelshman have something to say about their home game being shifted to melbourne costing them the series… i guess there’s some redneck in all of us. A certain expression relating to pots and kettles comes to mind….
…7 long years.
November 21st 2012 @ 9:17am
Will Sinclair said | November 21st 2012 @ 9:17am | Report comment
I genuinely don’t understand what the problem is…
2010: Sydney / Brisbane / Sydney
2011: Brisbane / Sydney / Brisbane
2012: Melbourne / Sydney / Brisbane
CLEARLY, the next turn on the rotation is 2013: Sydney / Brisbane / Sydney.
Otherwise, Sydney has a four year wait to get two games.
Honestly, why is there an issue here? I genuinely don’t understand.
November 21st 2012 @ 9:20am
steve b said | November 21st 2012 @ 9:20am | Report comment
Have to agree Will ..
November 21st 2012 @ 9:25am
josh said | November 21st 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Except the NSWRL sold their second home game last year to Melbourne. That’s the issue.
November 21st 2012 @ 4:08pm
formeropenside said | November 21st 2012 @ 4:08pm | Report comment
NSW did it to themself, and now expect Qld to clean up their mess (or at least make us pay for it).
Why Qld and NSW would ever play a game in Melbourne confuses me. If the silly Victorians have not seen the light and given up AFL yet, they never will.
November 21st 2012 @ 10:52am
Renegade said | November 21st 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Will,
I am in the same boat as you…..i can’t seem understand what the fuss is about – it’s just common sense in terms of the rotation that NSW gets 2 home games next year
Queenslander’s are just showing that they really do have lower IQ levels up north……how did this make front page news up there? LOL
November 21st 2012 @ 11:46am
oikee said | November 21st 2012 @ 11:46am | Report comment
This is just typical the way NSW have run the game into the ground. If you sell your origin game because you cant fill your own stadiums, then that is tough luck.
You cant see a issue if Queensland sold it’s game then wanted to have 2 games next year. Come on, we are not that stupid Renegade.
Queenslanders might have been born yesterday, but we are not fools mate. And this is what has happened. The Commission could have started with Queensland having 2 games next year, then the same pattern for the rest of the 5 year shonky deal. But they had to change it around. They could not bare the fact Queensland was going to have 2 games.
Like a big kid with his tonker toy, once he does not get his own way, he grabs his trucks and goes home.
Let us pray that it is not a dead rubber for the third game. God help us, NSW will be trying to sell off that game to PNG to get a crowd.
When you have to start paying for a game that is part of your history, you know that someone has lost the plot.
Good on Can-do Newman. No punch without Judy, like a prize fight and only one person turns up.
NSW needs to be really careful, Queenslanders dont mind travelling across the ditch, we might start up our own origin with them nz. You(nsw) can go play with themselves. Just saying.
November 21st 2012 @ 1:31pm
Renegade said | November 21st 2012 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
Mate, you do realise QLD have had more origin games at home than NSW……so this rubbish about NSW not being able “to bare the fact that QLD have 2 games” is a bit of a myth buddy.
We’ve given you plenty of turns with the tonker toy, to the point where QLD now thinks they own it…..
November 21st 2012 @ 5:21pm
oikee said | November 21st 2012 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
NSW dont own the tonker toy. Dont ever think somehow you can wiggle that one. You bought the NRL grand finals, you wont be buying origin you oxygen thieves.
If it wasn’t for Queensland their would be no origin.
November 22nd 2012 @ 5:08am
ThomasCrown said | November 22nd 2012 @ 5:08am | Report comment
There would be no Origin if not for NSW, dont make out QLD had the bigger hand in creating it. If not for NSW League in Qld would of probably died in the 80′s and no Origin. Dont forget we help create Origin to help Qld and prevent them going broke, and the thanks we get is “rats n scum” grow up.
November 21st 2012 @ 9:37am
ac said | November 21st 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
The idea of a “neutral” ground in Victoria (Melbourne) is appealing. It makes it fairer plus the Victorian Gpvernment was willing to pay
$2.5m for it (including 400,000 to employ development people in that state_> Also record tv ratings are had when the game is played in that City. The ARLC are making some crazy decisions,.
November 21st 2012 @ 9:57am
Australian Rules said | November 21st 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
To be honest, I was a bit surprised that the next neutral game is Melbourne in 2015…and then nothing until 2020.
As you say, ratings are massive when in Melbourne or elsewhere.
Opportunity lost?
November 21st 2012 @ 11:30am
Crosscoder said | November 21st 2012 @ 11:30am | Report comment
Live telecast into Melbourne.Bums on seats opportunity lost,eyeballs affixed to TV in Melbourne gained.
Monetary advanatge gained.Blues fans get a 2nd shot. 52,000 Melbourne,80,000 Sydney.
The ARLC does however need to do more at grassroots level in Vic,that is obvious.
November 21st 2012 @ 12:46pm
Australian Rules said | November 21st 2012 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
There are 21 Origin games in the next 7 years…20 of them are in Queensland or NSW.
You honestly think that putting it into Melb is a “bums on seats” opportunity lost?
Weird logic.
Ratings are the biggest when Origin is in Melb and the reason so many down south tuned in last time was because…wait for it… the event was down there…not rocket science.
November 21st 2012 @ 9:51am
Maximus said | November 21st 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
The point is not to look at the past 3 years but the whole SOO. It was Brisbanes turn to have 2 – there is no denying this and even Roy Masters admits its all about trying to even up the contest (same way last years 2nd game should have been in Brisbane and not Sydney). Its just bizarre and the QRL are playing ball by not bluing (pardon the pun) because I’m sure they will get something in return and in any case its in their interests to have a close contest…Gallop admitted as much the other day by saying that the A-League has a really good competition that is even and the top spot is shared around which is what all sports administrators want…
November 21st 2012 @ 10:50am
Ken said | November 21st 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
It’s not bizarre at all – the rotation had got out of balance and the problem was resolved. Queensland did get something in return anyway, they really didn’t want to give up regular games to Melbourne, which was a genuine consideration.
November 21st 2012 @ 12:56pm
Confucius said | November 21st 2012 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
The RL have said that the 2015 game when Qld should have sent a game to melbourne will be a neutral venue so nothing has changed except NSW manages to rearrange the draw next year to suit itself and even up the series…
November 21st 2012 @ 2:04pm
Ken said | November 21st 2012 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
Your post and the others against this decision are just spin as far as I can see.
Please check the recent past and scheduled future and get back to me with a solid example of how Queensland are being hard-done-by. It makes sense that when a neutral venue is used it doesn’t interfere with the rotation – this is a good policy.
November 21st 2012 @ 11:26am
Crosscoder said | November 21st 2012 @ 11:26am | Report comment
The ARLC made a logical decision ,and did so for 5 years in advance.That is planning ahead,doing the figures ,maximising income.
Business like ,not reaction like(spur of the moment) pre commission decision making.Queensland still get their quota.That mob would boo anything south of the Tweed(unless of course you are from Kempsey).
And the NRL is not an even comp ? Gallop is riding a different pony now,of course he is going to say its got the goods.
One minute Gallop says the West is rl territory and we are comfortable with the fact,the next rl and other codes better look over their shoulders
Roy Masters whining,that”s the only thing that keeps his blood circulating,Too many face slaps in his fibro days, methinks.
November 21st 2012 @ 11:59am
oikee said | November 21st 2012 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Anyhow, the truth is this, Sydney struggled to fill their white elephant. So they desided to sell a game to Melbourne for cash.
Then last year they found their mojo,(queensland always had a mojo,sellout both games in under 2 hours, not 2 months.).
The problem was never anything to do with Queensland, it was sydeenee not getting behind the game.
Now they think they have found their Mojo, they have not thought about what happens if they lose the first 2 games. ?
How are they going to fill a stadium to 80 thousand when nobody cares.
Sydney is a weak shallow spoilt bigmouth and no substance type of place, with too many latte drinkers in tight pants.
I bet even cotton wool is doing a fabulous trade in Sydney, lucky they have a few kiwis and islanders out west or they would be introducing cushions on the trains and buses.
November 21st 2012 @ 12:44pm
Confucius said | November 21st 2012 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Ken,
If it got out of whack it must have been officialdom that let is happen but its a complete untruth. You are defending the indefensible (unless you are an official). In 2006 NSW gave a home game to Melbourne, in 2009 Qld gave a home game to Melbourne, in 2012 NSW gave a home game to Melbourne and if they signed up with Victoria again one assumes that Qld would have given a game to Melbourne in 2015 which still may occur and that evens it up.
Carr said “”If you look at it currently, Queensland under the traditional model would have had two games next year, but we (NSW) wouldn’t have had two games (at home) between 2010 and 2014 (NSW had 2 at home in 2010 and again in 2014). That’s not fair to the people of NSW.”
By that formula, Qld didnt have 3 games at home between 2007 and 2011 (again at home twice in those 2 outlier years).
In other words there is no reason that Sydney gets 2 next year -its a complete furphy. Its all about evening up the series like they tried to do last year by putting the Sydney game second instead of in Brisbane where it should have been…
November 21st 2012 @ 12:52pm
Confucius said | November 21st 2012 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
This para should read
By that formula, Qld didnt have 2 games at home between 2007 and 2011 (again at home twice in those 2 outlier years).
November 21st 2012 @ 2:19pm
Ken said | November 21st 2012 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
I replied to you above asking for a solid reason for your issues with this decision, not seeing that you’d done so here.
I still don’t agree though
You’ve pointed out that it all balances out in the long run as long as both teams give up home games regularly. In the recent past 06/09/12 this has held true but the way these decisions have been made (i.e. seemingly with little forward planning) shows that this is more good luck than good management. The winds of money and politics have seen neutral state of origin games fly in and out of fashion.
Surely you could concede that it’s a defendable policy to not let the rotation get out of sync in the first place? The recent history shows that both sides are ‘even’ based on 06 and 09 series (although I believe NSW lost out from the Melbourne games in the 90′s – old news though) so nobodies nose should be out of joint by changing now.
November 21st 2012 @ 4:29pm
Confucius said | November 21st 2012 @ 4:29pm | Report comment
The arrangement for Melbourne games was signed in 2005 for 3 games (06/09/12) and NSW who were dominant at the time so gave up a game first and because they were struggling to fill Homebush for 2 games a year. The Vic deal ended this year. The deal in the 90s when NSW was dominant involved the Vic govt providing incentives to get southern regional NSW people to come to Melbourne to fill the MCG and spreading the code to Victoria, What is not acknowledged that there is no reason to change the BSB chain to SBS (Sydney /Brisbane/ Sydney) because NSW wont get a 2 home game for 3 years when Qld had the same thing happen to them. It doesnt pass the smell test.
November 21st 2012 @ 1:23pm
Mals said | November 21st 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Stop your whinging Queenslanders. In the history of State of Origin you have had 9 more games played in Brisbane than Sydney so you are still well in front!
November 21st 2012 @ 4:32pm
Confucius said | November 21st 2012 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
This was when the game meant more to Qldrs and NSW people wouldnt go to the game but that was back in the 80s so ancient history. The games are now interesting so validating it from the 80s is ridiculous…
November 21st 2012 @ 4:46pm
Confucius said | November 21st 2012 @ 4:46pm | Report comment
PS
The 9 home game lead emanated in the 1980s when it meant a lot to Qldrs and there were no Qld teams in the NRL. The year the Broncos came in 1988? the SOO was in Sydney twice for the first time and drew 26K and 16K respectively so obviously Sydneyites preferred to watch it on TV then.
November 21st 2012 @ 9:51pm
soapit` said | November 21st 2012 @ 9:51pm | Report comment
judging by the courier mail this guy must be the one guy in queensland not throwing a wobbly over it.
November 22nd 2012 @ 1:52am
stormtrooper4 said | November 22nd 2012 @ 1:52am | Report comment
I DON’T KNOW WHY QUEENDLANDERS ARE SO PROUD OF THE LITTLE SHOW PIECE CALLED ORIGIN? YOUR BEST PLAYERS WERE DEVELOPED IN MELBOURNE BY THE STORM, SO WE SHOULD BE TAKING CREDIT FOR ALL YOU STATE OF ORIGIN WINS AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED. YOU WOULD’NT HAVE HALVE THE WINS IF IT WASN’T FOR COOPER CRONK, BILLY SLATER, CAMERON SMITH AND GREG INGLIS.
THE ONLY OTHER GOOD PLAYER IN THAT TEAM IS JONATHAN THURSTON AND THAT IS THANKS TO THE BULLDOGS
November 22nd 2012 @ 4:34pm
mushi said | November 22nd 2012 @ 4:34pm | Report comment
Yes because they’d never played rugby league prior to heading to Melbourne… or found the caps lock button
November 22nd 2012 @ 4:56pm
Renegade said | November 22nd 2012 @ 4:56pm | Report comment
LOL that’s gold!