Who is next in line to replace Ponting?
By Luke Doherty, 30 Nov 2012 Luke Doherty is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australia cricket, Callum Ferguson, Cricket, Phillip Hughes, Ricky Ponting, Rob Quiney, Test cricket, Usman Khawaja
Ricky Ponting's future unclear. AAP Picture
Related coverage
Australia’s selectors won’t know whether to be relieved or concerned following the announcement that everyone expected but, at the same time, few saw coming when it arrived.
The selection panel didn’t want to force Australia’s best batsman since Sir Donald Bradman to retire from Test cricket. They’d much rather he took the road more travelled and realise that his time had come.
While they got the desired outcome, with Ponting boldly declaring the decision was his and his alone, it would’ve come just a little too soon.
Generation next was supposed to earn the call-up on the back of a solid Sheffield Shield season. They were meant to bang the door down through pure weight of runs over a sustained period of time.
They had to prove they were back, prove they had matured and prove they either deserved a baggy green cap or had earned the right to put one back in its exalted position.
We all know that Phil Hughes, Usman Khawaja and Callum Ferguson can score plenty of runs in a short space of time, but what about their mental toughness over a long period?
Hughes and Khawaja have displayed that type of quality before. In the 2009/10 Sheffield Shield season they both averaged over 50. But since then, they’ve been in and out of the Test side, lost form before finding it again and packed up and moved interstate in search of a fresh beginning.
Those beginnings have got off to promising starts and Ponting’s decision to walk away from the Test arena has thrust them both back into contention for national selection.
Hughes moved from New South Wales to South Australia with a seemingly re-jigged technique which looks strangely likely the one that piloted him towards 17 Tests for Australia with three centuries, three half centuries and 1072 runs at an average of 34.58.
Today is his 24th birthday and his celebrations will no doubt be made all the sweeter by the fact that at a time when there is a vacancy in the Test squad, he is the leading run scorer in shield cricket.
The left-hander has one century and three half centuries for the Redbacks from five games and is averaging 51.80.
Is Hughes the man for the impending moment?
The opener could be a square peg in a round hole. Shane Watson, fitness permitting, will be batting at number three, but I don’t see any reason why Hughes couldn’t slot in at number four.
Given Australia’s penchant for top order collapses he might not even have to wait too long to face the new ball.
State teammate Callum Ferguson is also starting to rediscover the touch that, three years ago, had him earmarked as one of Australia’s best young talents.
The then-24 year old was going through the initiation process of international limited overs cricket before he slipped while fielding in the final of the 2009 Champions Trophy against New Zealand. He’d end up having a knee reconstruction and many wondered if he’d ever be the same player.
Now 28, he has started to show his class once again.
Ferguson is second, behind Hughes, on the Sheffield Shield run scorers list with 463 at 42.09. That tally includes one century and one half century. He also has two scores in the 40s that could’ve translated into bigger innings.
In his favour, he is a specialist middle order batsman. Round peg meet round hole.
But his story is the type of premature elevation the selectors were trying to avoid.
Ferguson is batting well and if his form keeps tracking this way he’ll be hard to deny, but for now it would be a gamble.
Usman Khawaja, has amassed a similar tally to Ferguson for his new state. He has one century and three half centuries for Queensland, the same as Hughes.
Khawaja was the heir to the throne not so long ago. The 25 year old has a technique that would make a training manual look sloppy.
He played six Tests and while he looked solid, his average was just 29.22 with one half century. Grass grew quicker than he scored.
He appears to have learnt the same lesson as Ed Cowan.
Cowan recently said that you could get away with not scoring for long periods of time in domestic cricket before eventually breaking out of the slumber, but in Test cricket not scoring creates pressure unlike any a cricketer has felt before. Pressure will generally translate into a contemplative walk back to the pavilion.
Khawaja has been far more aggressive in his stroke play this season and with a new found determination to punish the bad ball his selection wouldn’t be a shock.
Tasmania’s Alex Doolan is also one to keep an eye on.
He turned 27 yesterday and while the average cricket fan could trip over him in the street without realising who it was, the selectors have noticed his potential.
He was picked for Australia A against South Africa before the Test series started and made an unbeaten 161.
Add to that one century and two half centuries for a total of 409 runs at an average of 58.42 and you have a contender.
Those runs have also been accumulated from just eight innings, which is three less than Ferguson and Khawaja and two fewer than Hughes.
Then there’s Rob Quiney.
Remember him?
He’s the Victorian who scored the best nine in the history of any sport which uses numbers as a measurement of success.
The excitement around that nine on debut for Australia in Brisbane wasn’t his fault. He looked genuinely comfortable at the crease and bigger things were expected at the next time of asking. The only problem was that a pair in the second Test in Adelaide and a fit again Watson meant he was given his marching orders.
This is one the selectors will agonise over.
Do they shun a man with a Test average of three? Or do they continue to show the belief that was so prominent a month ago?
These aren’t lollies they’re handing out. These are baggy green caps and they should mean something.
His shield form this season has been terrible, but last season he was the leading run scorer and the season before that he was second on the list.
To say the domestic talent pool is dry isn’t fair.
Hughes, Khawaja, Ferguson, Quiney and Doolan are clearly talents.
The only problem is that the selectors have been forced to go to the well a little earlier than expected.
The road back from the well takes in a visit from Sri Lanka, a tour of India and back to back Ashes series.
This selection is crucial.
You can follow Luke Doherty on Twitter @Luke_Doherty and on Sky News Australia.

November 30th 2012 @ 2:39am
Johnno said | November 30th 2012 @ 2:39am | Report comment
Steve Smith also has lots of potential. Remember him?
He has now decided to give up on his leg spin bowling and try to be the next Warne, and is focusing on his batting now. He is a class player and I think we will see him back sooner rather than later. Shaun Marsh has really fallen off the radar after starting so promisingly.
Micheal Klinger was making a stack of runs but has fallen off the radar, and Chris Rogers is making a lot of runs, but the selectors seemed to have marked a never return for Chris Rogers it seems. Henriques still has all rounders potential and him, Andrew Mcdonald, John Hastings, all 3 can bat at 6 and do fine. Cossy Cosgrove still is on the scene and has a heap of talent.
Aoran Finch is not bad, I like Finchy he has some potential.
November 30th 2012 @ 8:13am
DingoGray said | November 30th 2012 @ 8:13am | Report comment
Having posted this at 2:39 am you were clearly under the influence of Alcohol or Drugs or even both!
1st you mention Steve Smith as a likely replacement for Ricky Ponting and then you throw in names like Andrew McDonald & John Hastings! I can see McDonald getting a run under some whacked up theory but to consider Hastings capable of replacing Ponting as a out and out batsmen, you need to be institutionalised
And you mention Aaron Finch. If you look at his one day form then you could be forgiven, but his 4 day form is deplorable!
You Mexicans have always been a whacky lot.
Man get off the gear!!!!!!!!!
November 30th 2012 @ 12:23pm
Johnno said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
DingoGray you really don’t get it do you i’m glad your not a talent scout or on the selection panel.
Steve Smith has been one of our most talented cricketer went to the cricket academy here in OZ. I mentioned him as one of many , Mcdonald is a good all roudner and we need one. He played a big part in tying up an need when we won the series in 2009 in STH Africa not leaking runs. Hastings batting has come on leaps and bounds, and once again we need an all rounding option as watt may assume punter’s role, as his bowling fades with age an injury. And Finch can play and has potential .
November 30th 2012 @ 1:02pm
DingoGray said | November 30th 2012 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Again Johnno,
you want to replace a bloke who has scored 13k in Test runs with a couple of potentially talented all rounders….
Your having a laugh!
Now if Shane Watson was announcing his retirement, all the blokes you have mentioned would be perfect candidates to take Watto’s spot in the team….
But no this is the Ricky T Ponting……Bits and pieces cricketers like Steve Smith, Andrew McDonald & John Hastings don’t cut the muster!!!!!!!
November 30th 2012 @ 10:49pm
Bearfax said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:49pm | Report comment
Seem to forget DingoGray that when Ponting first came into test cricket, he, after a promising start was dumped and for a while was averaging in the 30s. But he was young enough to develop just as Smith, Khawaja, Hughes and Burns will. Smith is a good batsman and like Steve Waugh, who also had a very slow start to his test career, and like him he has decided to concentrate on his batting and his recent scores are evidence of an improving first class average. Our trouble with selectors is they pick 30 year old batsmen with 30-40 batting averages and expect miracles. Trouble is by 30 you’ve just about reached your peak.
November 30th 2012 @ 5:12am
AndyMack said | November 30th 2012 @ 5:12am | Report comment
sorry, but the fact everyone is jumping on Doolan as a test prospect (age 27, FC ave under 40) shows how quick we are to jump on the newest thing to roll into town. 1 good innings and he is the saviour. please!!!!
i’m still shaking my head at the fact UTK is not in the side, behind the likes of Cowen and Quiney (seriously??), he needs to be given the spot at #4.
And as much as I like Ferguson, his FC ave of 36 is nowhere near good enough. He prob should be first picked on 20/20 and ODI cricket though. Another year or two on that scene, with some solid FC form and I will reconsider.
November 30th 2012 @ 8:10am
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 8:10am | Report comment
I think it’s Hughes or Khawaja. They should bat at 3, Clarke 4, and Huss/Watto at 5/6.
At least we can put Watto down the order a bit so he can rest after bowling.
November 30th 2012 @ 9:56am
boes said | November 30th 2012 @ 9:56am | Report comment
I agree – its the perfect opportunity to shuffle the order, and move Watson down. Its very likely that he will continue to miss test matches so establishing an alternative to Watson at number 3 could help stabilise the top order.
November 30th 2012 @ 10:23am
Bakkies said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:23am | Report comment
The problem is just not the order. Hussey is late 30s and won’t have much time left, so we have to line up another replacement. Sadly it looks like his kid brother Dave has lost his chance to make the test side.
November 30th 2012 @ 11:48am
Talisman said | November 30th 2012 @ 11:48am | Report comment
All these players mentioned are in mid to late twenties or in their thirties. Where is the next David Hookes? Don’t the various cricket bodies actively seek out talented young players? If they do where are they?
November 30th 2012 @ 12:17pm
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Hughes is about 23, Khawaja maybe 25-26.
Who are you talking about? Nothing wrong with blooding people of that age.
By thet logic, you’d have never debuted Hussey, who played his first test at age 30 and has become one of our best batsmen ever.
November 30th 2012 @ 10:57pm
JVGO said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:57pm | Report comment
Hughes is as good as Hookes at the same age. We are seeing the birth of a very good test team of the future under a very good leader. Enjoy it. I thought they bowled well ioday and am expecting another good effort tomorrow. Honestly the way this team has performed against an experienced number one test team in the world is the stuff of legend and will be talked about for a very long time. This is comparable to Steve Waugh’s efforts to finally conquer the WIndies after a decades domnance.
November 30th 2012 @ 9:08am
josh said | November 30th 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Khawaja.
November 30th 2012 @ 9:37am
Red Kev said | November 30th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
It has to be Hughes or Khawaja, they’re the only two with the class to be genuine long term top order players for Australia.
November 30th 2012 @ 9:42am
The Kebab Connoisseur said | November 30th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Get out of it. Hughes has proven to be a dud at the top level. Khawaja got in for mysterious reasons in the first place and did not grasp his opportunities.
Who else do you have up in NSW?
Actually why doesn’t NSW just enter it’s own test team and let the rest of us play as Australia!
November 30th 2012 @ 10:11am
Christo the Daddyo said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:11am | Report comment
OK, and with this line up:
Warner
Hughes
Khawaja
Clarke
Henriques
Smith
Haddin/Nevill
Starc
Hazelwood
O’Keefe
Bollinger
…we’d probably win too!
November 30th 2012 @ 10:36am
Disco said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
And throw in Copeland, Cummins, Hastings and Bird too.
Christian or Forrest not so much.
November 30th 2012 @ 10:43am
MrKistic said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:43am | Report comment
You may not be paying quite enough attention to your beloved state Christo, Hughes and Khawaja don’t live there no more.
November 30th 2012 @ 12:04pm
Matt F said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
I’m pretty sure his team is based on their origins rather than current sides, otherwise Watson would be included. Besides if entered our own Test team then Khawaja and Hughes, among many others, wouldn’t be playing for the other states
November 30th 2012 @ 12:11pm
Matt F said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
If we’re basing it on origins then Nevill’s out as he’s a Victorian. We get Cowan, Christian, Cooper, Krejza (actually Tasmania can keep him) Forrest, Hastings and Bird though! We could take back Aaron O’Brien as well if we’re really desperate!
November 30th 2012 @ 12:16pm
Disco said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
And Michael Hogan as well.
Nathon Lyon’s from Canberra. But I reckon O’Keefe’s better anyway.
November 30th 2012 @ 12:25pm
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
So if we include people with NSW origins, it looks like this (without Watto)
Warner
Cowan
Khawaja
Clarke
Hughes (could be the test top 5 within 12-18 months)
Christian/Cooper/PJ Forrest at 6 – if you go with immigrant Watson there’s your test top 6
Haddin/Nevill
Krejza/SOK as spinner. almost Lyon if you include ACT
Starc
Bird
Cummins
Helluva team. The only non-NSW players you must have are Pattinson and Watto, who’s playing for NSW now anyway.
Missing out:
Hastings, about to play a test
Hazlewood, about to play a test
Hogan, good bowler
November 30th 2012 @ 12:54pm
rl said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
you blokes are getting mixed up with the ARU selection policy
November 30th 2012 @ 10:44am
Pope Paul VII said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:44am | Report comment
He averaged 60 for 2 years. Baffling. The real mystery is why he was dropped.
November 30th 2012 @ 12:19pm
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
have a look at his name – Red does not refer to his skin colour you know.
Khawaja got in from being the standout Shield batsman over a 2-year period.
Hughes was a young prodigy, and did well till opponents worked him out and he was listening to too many people.
These two are the best performed over the last 2-3 years, and both are scoring runs this season. Hughes had big technical issues, but he is now still at the crease. If you don’t use Shield form as a guide, then how do you pick the replacement?
November 30th 2012 @ 1:04pm
Red Kev said | November 30th 2012 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
That’s right, Red stands for commie!
November 30th 2012 @ 1:20pm
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Qlders are about as commie as an Afrikaaner farmer.
November 30th 2012 @ 2:20pm
soapit` said | November 30th 2012 @ 2:20pm | Report comment
i never fully understood your name until now.
November 30th 2012 @ 9:37am
Jamie said | November 30th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Burns. Or Mark Cosgrove
November 30th 2012 @ 9:42am
formeropenside said | November 30th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
The sad thing is, in making some good one-day scores last year Peter Forrest looked like a quality Test batsman – and then was discarded and been comparatively out of form so far this summer.
November 30th 2012 @ 9:55am
The Kebab Connoisseur said | November 30th 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Who is making runs at Shield level? That is the first question, forget the marketing from certain states media(yes YOU NSW!) and then let us go from there.
Clarke should be up to number 3. Watson should be down at number 6 or 7 if he intends to eventually bowl again. Who else do we have out there? Cosgrove perhaps. Would be nice to see a rotund sportsman again and not these cookie cutter types. Who cares about the weight, it is about the runs.
Funny thing is, the much lauded cricket academy never gets mentioned anymore. Maybe it is just a waste of time when you do not have the likes of Warne, Gilchrist and Ponting shouldering the whole team.
November 30th 2012 @ 10:15am
Christo the Daddyo said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Forget Clarke at number 3 – ain’t gonna happen. Look at his stats for confirmation. He’s in the right spot, so keep him there.
And to answer your question as to who’s making runs – Khawaja, Hughes and Doolan are all making runs and looking good doing it.
November 30th 2012 @ 12:45pm
The Kebab Connoisseur said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
Hughes made “8″ in his last innings. Who else do you have?
November 30th 2012 @ 11:12pm
Bearfax said | November 30th 2012 @ 11:12pm | Report comment
Kebab that was a pretty lame statement about Hughes. Sure he made 8 in his last innings and 158 in the first innings. He is the top runscorer in the Sheffield Shield and this year is averaging almost 55. Khawaja is not that far behind him averaging in the high 40s this year. Both were dropped from test teams a year ago but like so many champions before them including Ponting and Clarke, our recent best, players do get dropped early on and redeem themselves and come back stronger.
For mine the batting lineup should be
Warner
Hughes
Clarke
Khawaja
Hussey
Watson
and in that order.
Those suggesting Cowen should be there, check out his test averages. Another poor score and he’s averaging 33, which is less than Hughes was averaging when they dropped him. Good shield player but this love affair with Cowen has to end if Australia is to establish a formidable top three. Warner has shown he’s good for it, Watson needs to drop down and get your best batsman in at 3, Clarke and Hughes needs to come back to strengthen the opening partnership. Otherwise the pressure will continue to be on Clarke and Hussey to keep performing while the top order keeps failing to establish a good foundation.
November 30th 2012 @ 2:00pm
ADSA said | November 30th 2012 @ 2:00pm | Report comment
Clarke should stay at5, he has made all his runs at 5 & 6, when he batted at 4 a few years back and Hussey shifted down the order his figures were ordinary. At 5 he is the current worlds most prolific run score so why change him?
November 30th 2012 @ 10:18am
Larry said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Usman’s technique is far from textbook. He is disgustingly bottom handed, for starters. Greater technical minds than myself would no doubt be able to pick him apart to a greater degree but he doesn’t fill me with confidence.
November 30th 2012 @ 10:58am
Ryan O'Connell said | November 30th 2012 @ 10:58am | Report comment
I’ve heard a few whispers that Hughes may open with Cowan, and Warner may drop down the order.
I’m split on this. I’d be loath to move Warner a few innings removed from a hundred. By the same token, Warner coming in at 6 against an old ball and tired bowlers could be a devastating prospect (much like Gilchrist was). You do want a counter attacker at 6, and there is no one in Australian cricket that fits that bill better than Warner.
November 30th 2012 @ 11:23am
MrKistic said | November 30th 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
If that was the thinking, just bung Hughes in down the order. He’s hardly a dour grafter is he? You wouldn’t want to mess with the opening partnership when there are signs of it working.
November 30th 2012 @ 11:56am
Skinnada said | November 30th 2012 @ 11:56am | Report comment
Ryan, Fantastic idea! I know Warner scored a good hundred last start but he is very pronce up the top of the order against a new call to get out early. I would prefer two steady openers to pave the way for Clarke to come out and do his thing. And Warner would be devestating against an older ball and even the second new ball against tired bowlers would work too.
November 30th 2012 @ 12:30pm
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
Yeah ROC but you still need to fit Watto in at 5/6. Once Huss goes, you could go:
4. Clarke, ust move up to 4 now
5. Watto, gives him time to have a rest
6. Warner/Hughes, swashbuckling 6
November 30th 2012 @ 12:40pm
Ryan O'Connell said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
Watson’s fitness is proving an issue, because if you’re going to bat him at 3, every time he gets injured, you have to juggle the entire line-up, or bat a newbie at 3.
A settled top 6 could look like this:
Cowan
Hughes
Watson/Khawaja
Clarke
Hussey
Warner
Or if you don’t want to mess with the openers:
Cowan
Warner
Hughes/Khawaja
Clarke
Watson
Hussey
November 30th 2012 @ 12:50pm
The Kebab Connoisseur said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Not sure if you are a close follower of what goes on in the world of cricket, but Hughes has had to go away and rejig his technique. It is too early to warrant another call up for him. 12 months from now.
November 30th 2012 @ 12:58pm
Ryan O'Connell said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
Not sure if you are a close follower of what goes on in the world of The Roar, but if you were, you would know I’m more than just a close follower of cricket. Take your passive aggressive tone and go have a Friday beer to settle you down a bit. Go to your happy place. Find your smile again. Whatever it takes, Grumpy.
Hughes is the leading run scorer in Shield cricket, and has scored centuries at Test level. Considering the fact that there isn’t an abundance of high scoring first class batsmen in Australia, that puts him at the top of the list of players to replace Ponting.
I personally would pick Khawaja, but you would have to have your head in the sand, or not be a close follower of the cricket world, to think that Hughes isn’t a big chance to selected.
November 30th 2012 @ 3:50pm
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 3:50pm | Report comment
Well said ROC, gave me a Fri afternoon chuckle! And I’ll happily go that beer thanks.
Agree, I was as vocal as anyone that Hughes had to be dropped. His head and technique were just all over the place, it was painful to watch.
However now he’s settled his batting down, his head’s still, and he’s the leading run scorer in the Shield. Runs are the main commodity. He has to be first in line.
Khawaja has played 6 tests in the last couple of years and is also scoring. He’d be next in line. Twin failures against NSW in Canberra though.
November 30th 2012 @ 12:57pm
sheek said | November 30th 2012 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
Hi Ryan,
You simply can’t have Watto batting top 3 for several reasons.
1. As a key bowler, he needs to rest down the order.
2. His technique isn’t good enough for top 3.
3. Mentally, he isn’t strong enough to tough out tight bowling.
4. He is injury prone, which would mean constant rejigging of the top order.
November 30th 2012 @ 1:04pm
Ryan O'Connell said | November 30th 2012 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
Hey Sheek, how are you, mate?
Just on your comments:
1. Totally agree. I think he should come in at 5.
2. Not sure I agree there though – I think he has a great technique. (On this, he’s a better player of pace than spin, which is often used as an excuse to bat him higher).
3. Hhhmm…. I know what you’re saying, but I think that is slightly harsh. His issue is more around converting his starts.
4, Yeah, I said the same thing. I totally agree with that, because I don’t like putting new boys in at first drop.
November 30th 2012 @ 2:34pm
sheek said | November 30th 2012 @ 2:34pm | Report comment
Yeah Ryan,
Watto struggles to convert good starts into big scores, which is why I think it might be a combination of technique & mental toughness.
In any case, practical common sense would suggest you play your key all-rounders at 5, 6, 7.
November 30th 2012 @ 3:52pm
jameswm said | November 30th 2012 @ 3:52pm | Report comment
Sheek I don’t agree with 2 either.
I certainly agree with 1 and 4 and they are good enough reasons alone. Nothing wrong with having someone with a solid technique at 6.
Don’t wholly agree with 3, but I would change it to say he relaxes mentally and it’s stopping him converting good starts into big tons. Concentrating for 250-300 balls in a day is no walk in the park. It takes application. It might come, but I’d bat him at 5/6.
November 30th 2012 @ 11:11am
Lancey5times said | November 30th 2012 @ 11:11am | Report comment
James, my phone won’t let me reply directly to your earlier post but I agree with your lineup of Clarke at 4 and Watson down to 5. I’d probably give Hughes the 1st crack at 3 though. If he locks this down it sets up perfectly for Usman to replace Hussey when the time comes. I don’t like Clarke at 3 but 4 seems a perfect fit
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].