An investigation panel examining the International Cycling Union’s links to the Lance Armstrong doping case will include and Australian lawyer and British Paralympic great Tanni Grey-Thompson.
The UCI said on Friday that the three-member independent commission will be chaired by retired British judge Philip Otton.
His sports legal cases include a Premier League relegation dispute centred on Carlos Tevez and Chelsea’s tactics in trying to lure Ashley Cole from Arsenal.
Otton will work alongside Australian lawyer Malcolm Holmes and Grey-Thompson, a 10-time Paralympic gold medallist in wheelchair racing who is now a lawmaker in the upper chamber of Britain’s Parliament.
The panel will meet in London from April 9-26 and report by June 1.
“The appointment of these three eminent figures demonstrates clearly that the UCI wants to get to the bottom of the Lance Armstrong affair and put cycling back on the right track,” UCI President Pat McQuaid said in a statement.
The UCI asked Court of Arbitration for Sport board president John Coates to help create a panel to investigate suspicions raised by the US Anti-Doping Agency’s damning report into widespread doping by Armstrong’s teams during his seven Tour de France victories from 1999-2005.
Armstrong was stripped of seven Tour de France titles and banned for life.
McQuaid said UCI had no part in choosing the three officials, who have drawn up the terms of reference for their work which could be key in rebuilding – or wrecking – the governing body’s damaged credibility.
The commission will closely scrutinise McQuaid, who was elected as UCI president weeks after Armstrong first retired in 2005, and his predecessor, Hein Verbruggen, in their working relations with Armstrong.
The governing body denies claims made by former Armstrong teammates to USADA that it covered up suspicious samples from Armstrong in exchange for cash, or that the American rider enjoyed special protection.
“The Commission’s report and recommendations are critical to restoring confidence in the sport of cycling and in the UCI as its governing body,” McQuaid said. “We will co-operate fully with the Commission and provide them with whatever they need to conduct their inquiry and we urge all other interested stakeholders to do the same.”
The UCI pledged to fund the commission’s work and will be legally represented at the London hearings. It did not specify if the sessions will be held in public or behind closed doors.
“The costs of the Independent Commission will be a significant burden on the UCI,” McQuaid said. “However, it is clear that only such a decisive and transparent examination of the past will answer our critics by thoroughly examining our assertion that the UCI’s anti-doping procedures are and have been among the most innovative and stringent in sport.”
The panel will examine whether the UCI’s doping rules “were inadequate or were not enforced with sufficient rigour”; if the UCI had “any reliable evidence or information” that Armstrong was doping; and if it “adequately co-operated with, assisted in and reacted to the USADA” investigation.
A potential conflict of interest between the UCI’s role promoting the sport and its duty to police anti-doping will also be examined.